Voices
in
Japan

quote of the day

I'll do my best to achieve the goal of decommissioning all nuclear reactors in the prefecture.

19 Comments

Masako Mori, the LDP's candidate for Fukushima, campaigning for the July 21 upper house election, even though her stance is in conflict with the national energy policy of the LDP.

© Jiji Press

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

19 Comments
Login to comment

As much as I hate to take LDP's stance on anything, for the moment nuclear energy is the only viable choice considering the current level of energy consumption of Japan and by extension the world.

We must strive to make nuclear energy as safe as possible so that catastrophies like Fukushima and Chernobyl can be avoided in the future.

When green energy produces enough to sustain our needs it stands to reason we can phase out nuclear energy but unfortunately we are not there yet.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Great idea Mr. Mori. I'm sure we can find all our energy needs thru national prayer or perhaps cozying up to Iran.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

As for now there are no guarantees for safe nuclear energy.

That's true but therefore we must invest in further research to make it safer.

There are alternatives!

To provide for our current level of energy consumption no there is not.

For the alternatives to supply us with enough energy we have to drastically lower our energy consumption and although that sounds good in theory it will be very hard to sell to the industrail branch and the general public.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

And you may as well accept the fact that Japan will never again reach the 35% level it once had with nuclear power.

I don't want nuclear energy to reach tot level but the reality is that Japan now in addition to nuclear energy needs to rely on natural gas (33%) coal (8%) and oil (8%) for its energy supply and you can't tell me those energy sources and their extracting process are better for the environment and they are far less efficient.

If am am not mistaken the Japanese government are now aiming for a 20% nuclear energy output by 2030 in alignment with the Paris climate treaty.

If that 20% can be provided by green energy that would be fantastic but for the moment that's not he case so let's think about making nuclear energy safer.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

then it can't be called "the only viable option".

So you would rather have that 20% of energy output to be delivered by natural gas, coal and oil ?

And like I told you people sure as hell are not going to consume 20% less energy in the future demand will only increase.

By the way even with all the suspended reactors nuclear energy today still makes up for 2% of Japan's total energy output and while that may not seem like a lot it might cause serious problems if you would take that out of the equation.

Back to the drawing board with that concept.

I don't see why, my points are valid.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Nuclear energy is basically done in this country

Let's hope very soon this will be a reality but that's not the case today.

The remaining 20 reactors if allowed to operate, would only generate about 15% of power.

I don't want to contest your figures but what I gathered is there are still 42 operable reactors in Japan today, even if you take Fukushima Daichi out of the equation they will still produce more than 15% seeing as prior to the disaster they were over 30%.

The claim was nuclear energy was clean and cheap. No longer longer cheap. The disaster will cost more than ¥100 trillion. And certainly not clean. Ask Fukushima.

Yearly multiple planes fall out of the sky however it still remains the safest form of transportation and nuclear energy is still clean and cheap compared to many other energy sources.

By the way although I vastly prefer green energy (solar, wind,water,...) in favor of nuclear energy even that is still not 100% green because the manufacturing and demanufacturing process of the infrastructure needed to generate the power is anything but green.  

There remains the massive problem of the storage of all the nuclear waste.

That is most certainly a problem but new Thorium-based nuclear power plants might get rid of that problem.

Since 3/11 nuclear energy has only generates about 5% of power.

It is even less than that, about 2% today, but like I said if you take it out of the equation it might cause serious problems.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I need to understand, do you live in Japan.

No I don't, why do you ask ?

Following the new regulations there are not 42 operable reactors

Nuclear power prior to the disaster was about 27% not over 30%.

Like I said I am am not going to contest your numbers, I had gathered different information but what you are saying sounds credible so I have no reason to doubt you.

maybe even 20% but not more.

That is wat the Japanese government is saying so I assume they can reach that level.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

And how exactly will Japan produce electricity without nuclear power? Importing more coal? I can't see how that is a better option. If and when Japan has better option for energy, then of course stop using nuclear power, but this is a long way off.

A couple of days without lights, telly and air conditioning would make Ms Mori and others change their minds, not to mention the much bigger bills.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

It isn't going to be filled by nuclear

Then why is the Japanese government saying that their goal is to provide 20% of the energy output by means of nuclear power in 2030 ?

I mean sure they could be lying through their teeth but that would make absolutely zero sense.

Reactors are closed, some forever, and new ones aren't going to be built.

Yes some are closed but still plenty of the suspended reactors can be reactivated if necessary and some are slowly being restarted as we speak.

How do you know they won't build new Thorium-based nuclear power plants which produce zero waste in the future ?

What you've been looking at for the last 8 years is reality, and reality has been calling the shots.

Yes there is the reality that due to the loss of temporarily output of nuclear energy this needed to be replaced by extracting natural gas, coal and oil.

That's not the reality that I want to be calling the shots.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

because unless you actually lived here and experienced the terrible disasters of 2011 you probably can not understand the current sentiments of the people on nuclear energy

I understand where you are coming from and I do feel for all the people like yourself who had to experience that horrible ordeal.

I was not there at that time but I do have family and friends in Japan who luckily were not in the affected area and I know for sure some of them are completely against using nuclear energy ever again.

And like I said I really wished nuclear energy would become a thing of the past and someday it will but I do think for the moment we should still at least partially rely on it.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites