The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2022 AFPFIFA looks to 48-team World Cup as eyes turn to 2026
By Jean DECOTTE DOHA©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2022 AFP
20 Comments
Login to comment
Thomas Twatt
It’s too much.
Less is more.
Diluted. Dumbed down. Devalued.
I wish they’d stop this nonsense. Don’t they have enough money already?
TT
wallace
Sounds like more FIFA corruption.
20 teams would be better.
John-San
I was thinking the total opposite. I thinking top 4 team competition with each team playing each other once, the two high points go into the final and after a 100 minute if there is a tie next goal wins no shoot outs.
wallace
Even the best players have physical limits. Many suffer cramps and other problems with extended play.
factchecker
So much for being sustainable. It's not like the USA is a tiny country.
Martimurano
The FIFA pigs with their noses firmly back in the trough, looking to screw another few billion dollars regardless of the impact this will have on the players and hard-pressed fans, especially when it's to be spread over 3 countries - when will they ever learn.
I'd really like to see FIFA disbanded and a more normal, equitable and reasonable organisation in its' place, but very little chance of this happening.
wallace
The 2026 WC will be hosted by USA/Canada/Mexico. The finals will be in the USA.
DudeDeuce
This part always confuses me. So Australia is part of the AFC and New Zealand the OFC though both are in Oceania. So basically New Zealand will get an automatic birth and Australia has to go play a bunch of Asia teams to qualify?
englisc aspyrgend
Oh dear god no, the bloody thing will drag on even longer!
FIFA all about the money/graft as usual.
kaimycahl
Sounds like the Olympics all over again, increase the number of teams FIFA get more money!!!
BurakuminDes
Yep. NZ will essentially be playing against amateur teams in the lead up like Vanuatu, Samoa, Tonga etc and scoring goals for fun - with no challenge. Hard to prepare for a World Cup playing teams like that.
Australia getting to play the likes of South Korea, Japan, Saudi etc over the 4 year cycle definitely raises their standard.
Japantime
This will be great to see more countries get the chance to compete on the international stage in the biggest sporting event. I am looking forward to China qualifying which will take Soccer to a level it has never seen before.
painkiller
wallaceDec. 19 07:37 pm JST
The WC hosted by the US will be the most watched, and the most successful ever.
The increase to 48 teams is a gift to England to make it easier they qualify.
Jimizo
Very good point.
Sadly, FIFA isn’t genuinely interested in points not related to cash.
lostrune2
The US can do it by itself, but be harder for future countries, especially smaller countries
Co-hosting may become the norm
Team depth will become more important, maybe even increase the roster size
Rotate players more; give their players more rest
Australia used to be part of OFC, but the OFC didn't get a guaranteed spot and usually had to play against a good South American side for the play-in
So Australia asked to be part of the AFC, where there are guaranteed spots. Plus, they wanted tougher competition in order to develop their players better
But now, the OFC will get a guaranteed spot, so who knows if Australia wants to go back
Now that everybody has finished criticizing the state of LGBT rights and workers' rights in Qatar, can we now start talking about racism, police brutality, murders against racial or sexual minorities, human rights abuses abroad by American troops, illegal invasions of other countries, and possible boycotts of the next tournament? Perhaps all games can be shifted to Mexico only. Or is it a case of one rule for the garden, and another for the jungle?
The US lets people criticize it
Besides, Mexico has it worse, and Canada doesn't have the stadiums
Yeah, bottom levels, if they can even qualify. They couldn't even make it to the final round (10 teams) of the AFC qualifying
John-San
This is how I would run it. Every 3 years. Held by the cup holder in their country. Top 4 teams. If cup holder is not in top 4 bad luck but they still get to hold it. Each team plays one game every week or seven days. So after week 3 every team has played each other the two highest point go through to the final. No draws No shoots. Golden goal after 100 mins. If all four teams end up with same points then decide by goals for and against for best two . The same goes for three end up on same points best two or best if team already in final. How the top four is decide is same way but without having a host country. They play home and away if a draw then decides by most goals or first goal. No draws no shoot out. After 100 min golden goal.
smithinjapan
China's finally paid FIFA enough money to expand the tournament so much even they will have to get in.
Randy Johnson
Money grab. Which is fine by me because I love capitalism.
However, approximately 40 of the supposed 48 teams aren't worth a damn.
But hey, party on!