The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2012 AFPSoni sets 200m breaststroke record; Phelps gets another gold; Irie, Suzuki earn silver
LONDON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2012 AFP
18 Comments
Login to comment
whiskeysour
Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!!! Go for the Gold !!!!!!
my2sense
Good stuff... just get ahead of China in medals quick.
Daijoboots
Yes very good and congratulations cuteypie. I'm glad to see that you are doing your best. It's important to do your best in each and every event at the Olympics.
USA_gold
"Michael Phelps delivered one more history-making Olympic performance Thursday, winning the 200m medley to become the first man to win the same individual swimming event at three straight Games."
Simply.
Amazing.
Pukey2
my2sense:
Don't worry, if China gets more gold, you can follow the American way of ranking countries (which everyone else and the IOC does NOT follow).
Wow, your countrywomen broke 2 records in the same event! And not a single accusation of doping - oh, that's right, she doesn't have a Chinese name!
Daijoboots
Haha I just checked the New York Times and sure enough they have them ordered by total medals, as if they were worth the same!!
my2sense
I will dude.
my2sense
http://www.london2012.com/medals/medal-count/
Daijoboots
Congrats must also go out to this fellow. Good to see Japanese adhering to the Olympic spirit and doing their best.
Pukey2
Yes, I know, they rank in order of gold.
smithinjapan
The Americans are really dominating in swimming, not that that's unusual. Good to see a lot of young blood out there scooping in the medals (both Americans and Japanese), though I was glad Phelps could squeeze one more gold in there.
As for ranking by medal tally or 'value', the proper way is definitely the latter -- gold is worth more than silver or bronze -- though a lot of countries who look better by tally will count it using the former. Japan, for example, ranks 3rd in terms of total number of medals, but 12 in terms order of gold. Not that the need to, but if they wanted to look better the media here could easily just talk about how Japan is third.
Pukey2
Especially this year. I hear gold is worth 400 pounds, silver 200 pounds and bronze......a whopping 3 pounds (about 400 yen!!!!!). I know the UK economy isn't doing so well, but 3 pounds!
If the table were ranked by bronze, Japan would be number one! Followed closely by USA. China is useless when it comes to getting bronzes. Absolutely useless.
Richard7481
I guess every country skews the medals table to fit its agenda.
Richard7481
Japan is third in total medals but most are bronze. That won't stop the media here declaring it though.
Daijoboots
They mostly show the table as it should be i.e. by number of gold medals won, then silver medals won, then bronze medals won. Everybody knows the score. Nothing wrong with illustrating total medals won as each is an achievement, but they should not show (and Japan doesn't) just this total medal count, as that would imply an equal significance for each of the medals. Why don't we just level out the medal podium while we are at it?
China is the world's sporting power. I also find it entertaining that Japan's other neighours South Korea, Russia and even North Korea are outperforming them.
Having said that I support most Japanese athletes above anyone else. I do not support unrealistic self back-patting, poor sportsmanship, nor obviously hypocritic criticism of other nations' strategy.
Daijoboots
I'll add that the back-patting and hypocrisy is the work of time-filling daytime variety shows, and not that of the Japanese athletes themselves.
MrsT1
^ totally agree that the back patting is the media not the athletes! I've been impressed with Japan's swimmers and their reaction to medals. There's another way of measuring medals (which NZ ran an article on) - by medals per population. If you do that China is nowhere near the top. Top 3 were like NZ, Slovenia and some other obscure country haha
lostrune2
Gold = 3 points, Silver = 2 points, Bronze = 1 point.
It gives higher value to the champions, but it also gives value to those who come close.
But China only cares for gold. That has been their sports strategy for the last couple decades. Take their state-owned media for example:
http://www.china.org.cn/sports/2012londonolympics/2012-07/31/content_26072232.htm
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/olympics--family-kept-grandparents--deaths-secret-from-chinese-diver-until-she-won-gold-medal.html
China's strategy is mainly to pour resources in sports where:
1.) they have a very good chance of winning gold
2.) sports where there are multiple golds available, like gymnastics (team, all-around, and 1 per each apparatus)
3.) female sports because many are relatively new so they're not so far behind in development, and many female sports are underdeveloped in many nations relative to men's, so they can exploit and dominate in that vacuum arena.
And so:
a.) Unless it's a sport where they actually have a good chance of winning, they won't care too much about it - they're not looking for silvers and bronzes. They don't value silver- or bronze-capable athletes - unless you're a gold-capable athlete, they won't pour resources towards you.
b.) Team sports are lower priority. Why invest so much resources on, say, an 18-member soccer team just for 1 gold? That's why China rarely is competitive in big teams sports. Plus, it's much harder to develop a whole team than just separate individuals. And as the 2004 US men's basketball team found out, team sports takes more than excellent individual pieces - it also takes developing teamwork and tactics.
(On that note, because of that greater difficulty, there are some proponents for giving worth more medals proportional to the team sport size. For example, a 5-starting-players team sport like basketball would be worth 5 medals, while an 11-starting-players team sport like soccer be awarded 11 medals. But limited to "true" team sports with minimum, say, 5 or more starting players. So doubles tennis or 4-member relays still count just 1 medal.)
c.) Chinese women's athletes are pretty good and tend to be better than their men's. The majority of their medals are earned by their women.