A sign with coming changes to kids' comment on YouTube is displayed as Federal Trade Commission Chairman Joe Simons speaks at a news conference at the Federal Trade Commission in Washington Photo: AP

How YouTube is changing what it shows kids


YouTube is changing what it shows kids.

The new business practices, along with $170 million in fines , settle allegations by the Federal Trade Commission and New York state that YouTube owner Google violated children's online privacy by collecting personal data without parents' permission.

Some of the new responsibilities will be on video creators themselves, as they will have to label videos that are geared toward kids under 13.

Here's a look at what's behind the dispute and what's changing.


The FTC's complaint is based on a 1998 federal law called the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA. It bans websites from collecting personal information from children under 13 without their parents' consent.

Tech companies, however, have long skirted this by saying they officially exclude kids from their services, even though they don't really check. A group of privacy advocates asked the FTC in April 2018 to investigate YouTube's compliance.


YouTube has long said its service is intended for people ages 13 and older, a message that theoretically kept it in line with that law.

Ask any kid or parent, however, and the reality was far different. Younger kids commonly watch videos on YouTube, and many popular YouTube channels feature cartoons or sing-a-longs made for children. YouTube acknowledged Wednesday that "the likelihood of children watching without supervision has increased" since its founding because there are more shared devices and a "boom in family content."

The FTC's complaint details how Google boasted about its youthful audience when talking to major advertisers. The FTC includes as evidence Google's visual presentations made to toy companies Mattel and Hasbro where YouTube is described as the "new Saturday Morning Cartoons" and the "#1 website regularly visited by kids."


Starting early next year, anyone who uploads a video to YouTube will have to designate whether or not that video is directed at children.

If a video is identified as child-focused, such as a cartoon or the "unboxing" of a new toy, Google has agreed not to put up "behavioral" ads — those that cater to specific viewers based on their age and other social characteristics. Google also won't track the viewers' online identities. Google says these restrictions will be in place even if the viewer is an adult.

But Google will still show generic ads, as well as "contextual" ads — those that cater to the type of content rather than the specific viewer. These typically don't bring in as much money as viewer-specific ads.

And Google is stopping short of seeking parental consent on its main service, even for kids-focused video. The law doesn't require it to, as long as there's no data collection.


Google already gets parental consent for its kids-focused service, YouTube Kids. But the service has traditionally been used far less frequently — after all, the main service had all the same videos and more.

YouTube said it will start promoting the kids service more aggressively. On Wednesday, kids-focused pages on YouTube's main service had pop-ups suggesting YouTube Kids.

YouTube Kids similarly does not offer behavioral ads targeted at individuals, but it does collect some basic viewer information to recommend videos. It also collects the device's numeric IP address.

YouTube said it will dole out $100 million over three years to encourage more videos for children.


Google says the changes to the main service will happen in four months to give video creators a chance to adjust. In taking this approach, Google is putting much of the responsibility on video creators themselves, though the company says it will also use artificial intelligence to flag content that targets children but wasn't properly identified as such.

Those who consider the settlement too weak are already concerned about what happens when video creators try to cheat the new system.

Democratic FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, in a dissenting opinion, said high-profile companies like Hasbro and Mattel will likely comply, as they won't want to run afoul of federal rules even it means fewer kids seeing their toy promotions.

But she said it's less clear how it will curb abuses by the millions of others who post videos on YouTube — especially those outside the United States who are beyond the FTC's "practical reach."

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

trojan horse. It's just an excuse for google, facebook etc to actually collect even more personally identifiable info of consumers.

Duck, duck, go searches for me, try it, you'll see your accommodation, flights etc will be substantially cheaper. IMHO, the entire system is now geared to extract as much money out of consumers as possible and presenting a facade of you are getting the best deal already.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Youtube is a place for practically anyone to post up any crap at all. Thankfully they're starting to screen out the stupid xenophobic crap and suicides online. Things are tough enough for kids today with so much abuse, glorification of violence, hatred and a 'President' less mature than they are.

0 ( +0 / -0 )


Sorry for the language. In practise, Kids will use their Parent devices (usually the older models) to watch/listen to YouTube Videos - since in Apple's case Screentime doesn't apply upon those.

Furthermore, I agree with "Sh1mon M4sada" - which could be taken to court under the premise that ...if a Kid cant get married because they're too young, how can they possibly understand the consequences of giving away their Personal Identity for Life to a 3rd party ?

Internet Companies need to stop Asking for Credit Card details in order to approve certain features - they cant even keep those Credit Card Details Safe for starters! And particularly ... Apple who won't allow you to sue them for any breach of Security resulting in financial loss over 50 US$.... it's in the Contract you signed with them... so good luck with Apple Pay hacks. (PS. See the Apple Safari Hacks that havent been addressed for many years..... as raised by the Google Researchers, etc.)

My advice, Physically monitor your devices, and remove from your iPhones things that are suspect.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

It's too late. The damage has already done.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites