The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.China's ban on key high-tech materials could have broad impact on industries, economy
By ELAINE KURTENBACH BANGKOK©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
22 Comments
Login to comment
TaiwanIsNotChina
There are always other sources and alternatives.
deanzaZZR
China on a precious metal roll.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a63072483/china-supergiant-gold-deposit/
TaiwanIsNotChina
They need it if they are going to escape the middle income trap. Or it will be used for weapons.
Sven Asai
We shouldn't care so much about their usual diplomatic rivaling and irrelevant show fighting. That's only in theory a problem, conflict or whatever negative impact. In fact, cars can drive very well also without any chips, maybe even a lot better, that has been shown in practice for many decades and doesn't need discussion or proving again. Also the new overestimated hype AI isn't affected at all as it intrinsically cannot and will not work as widely expected or intended , neither without chips nor with full availability of all and best ever chips. It's only a little political clash, dit-for-dat sabre rattling, and has not a really significant impact on economies.
TokyoLiving
Well done China, put the rules..
Pukey2
This is what happens when you sanction countries just because you don't like them. Sanctions are no longer the weapon USA think they are. Being sanctioned by USA is now a badge of honour. Good luck in finding enough germanium and gallium.
Notice how the Wolf Amendment has banned working with China in the field of space. And twice, USA has had to beg China for their moon samples. Bans and sanctions are now backfiring, as we've seen in the case of Russia where fuel prices are dirt cheap and the economy is growing at a greater pace than Europe.
Clayton K. Char
Not good in the short term, but good for the long term.
The U.S. and its allies should not rely on China to provide strategic materials for their high-tech and defense industries.
deanzaZZR
@Clayton K. Char Just a friendly reminder that this whole thing began with Trump banning Huawei from the USA market and the USA has continued to racket up trade tensions ever since.
TaiwanIsNotChina
For once, something to applaud Trump over.
KnightsOfCydonia
USA wants only one country to install backdoors into networking devices.
GBR48
Tribalisation, tariffs and sanctions will end global growth and ramp up inflation. Everyone gets poorer and elected regimes will get kicked out by unhappy voters.
quercetum
Exactly. The ban on chips to China will just be sourced domestically.
quercetum
There are always other sources and alternatives.
Exactly. Many nations in the world go to the moon and collect lunar samples.
lostrune2
That's one less country. Dunno anyone who'd want more
This'll just further accelerate the worldwide push to source from domestic and all around the world. The world is a big place. Those worldwide businesses will finally get the attention and investments they need
socrateos
The only thing the world was interested in about China was its cheap labor. Goodbye, China.
deanzaZZR
How to say you know nothing about the Chinese economy in the year 2024 in a dozen words or so.
nishikat
Japan doesn't have to worry. Japan has no trade war with China
Pukey2
socrateos:
Wake up. It's 2024 now.
TaiwanIsNotChina
And Chinese companies are still avoided in my house wherever possible.
TaiwanIsNotChina
I'm sure they will be available again when the US has manned missions and a space station for the moon.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Much harder to build your own manufacturing devices for chips than to change the shipping source address on an invoice.
nishikat
....in the year 2100
In Japan? DAISO?