Japan Today
Image: iStock/metamorworks
tech

How to archive your photos in the digital age

15 Comments
By Wasim Ahmad

Taking photographs used to be a careful, conscious act. Photos were selective, frozen moments in time carefully archived in albums and frames. Now, taking a photograph is almost as effortless and common as breathing – it’s something that people do all the time in the age of smartphone cameras with seemingly endless digital film.

But the downside to capturing every moment is that it creates a mountain of those moments to save for the future. Those photos can be easily lost if they’re not archived properly. All it can take is one accidental dip in the toilet for your phone, and all that data is lost forever.

So what’s a practical backup strategy for the average person? Here are a few ways to make sure memories are never lost:

Cloud storage

The simplest way to archive your photos is cloud storage. For Apple users, there’s iCloud, which starts at $0.99 per month for 50 gigabytes all the way to $59.99 per month for 12 terabytes with various tiers in between. With an average iPhone photo clocking in at 3 megabytes, that’s a little over 16,000 photos for the cheap plan and 4 million or so for the largest plan. Google’s Google One cloud storage is most cost effective for yearly plans, with 2TB going for $99.99 per year and 5TB going for $249.99 per year.

The actual amount you can store in that space does vary greatly with how a file is shot. Video has larger file sizes than photos. HEIF files, a newer format on Apple phones, compresses files into smaller packages, but long-term compatibility is unknown since the format hasn’t been in use for as long as the standard JPG file, which has been around since 1992.

While cloud services from big providers generally provide the easiest way for most average folks to back up their photos, and operate with little to no intervention via apps that are already on the phone constantly uploading every photo taken, there are risks involved.

Big companies often change their policies about how photos are saved. For instance, depending on what phone and when it was bought, Google’s cloud storage may have saved photos in a “storage saver” format that lowers the quality of images by sizing them down or compressing them differently. This affects your ability to make high-quality prints or view the photos on high-resolution screens down the road. Unless someone is astute enough to notice small text here and there that mentions it, most users won’t even realize it’s happening.

And what happens to cloud services when things go badly wrong? Users of photo backup service Digital Railroad found out the hard way. In 2008, the company abruptly shut down and gave its users 24 hours to download everything before the servers were shut down. Photographers rushed for the exits, trying to grab their photos on the way out, only to strain the servers to the point where few were able to recover anything at all. If this was the only way photos were backed up, it’s a lost cause.

So while the cloud is easy, costs can add up and terms of service can change at a moment’s notice. What are some ways for photographers to control their own fate?

Hard drives and network-attached storage

Manually taking photos off a phone may take some extra time, but the approach offers peace of mind that cloud services can’t necessarily match.

Almost all phones can plug into a computer’s USB port and use the built-in photos app on both Windows or MacOS to download photos to a computer. Apple users can use a method called AirDrop to send photos wirelessly to other Apple devices as well, including laptop and desktop computers.

Now loading photos onto a local hard drive built into the machine can fill it up quickly, but there is a cost-effective way to get around that – namely, external hard drives. Theses are storage devices that you can plug into your computer as needed. They can be of the older and less expensive type with spinning platters or more modern solid-state drives that can survive a drop and greater temperature changes than the older drives can.

These are different than flash drives, more commonly known as thumb drives because of their small size, that are designed as temporary storage to shuffle photos from one place to another.

It’s easy to buy more than one hard drive to have duplicate backups in case of failure or catastrophe, but the downside is that there’s no easy access from the internet to your photos, and backup is generally a process that users must remember to do.

Network-attached storage is one way to solve the cloud storage problem while retaining the ability to access photos from the internet. These are essentially hard drives – sometimes multiple hard drives linked together for even greater or faster storage – that are connected to a router that allows for access to the internet through specialized software.

While not as easy as most third-party cloud storage services, once it’s set up, a network-attached storage unit is a flexible way to store your photos safely and accessibly. There are even companies that specialize in fireproof and waterproof units for extra insurance in case of disaster.

Printing photos

If cloud storage and hard drives seem too complicated, there’s always the old-fashioned approach of printing. There’s still something magical about seeing a photo on a wall or in an album, and thankfully there are ways to print professional-quality archival prints without having to go to a drugstore.

The easiest and most cost-efficient types of printers are dedicated 4x6 printers using a technology similar to professional labs called dye-sublimation. These yield high-quality, waterproof prints that cost about the same as what one would pay for drugstore developing. HP makes its popular Sprocket line of printers, though those require a phone and an app to print from, which makes plugging in a memory card from a professional camera out of the question. However, Canon’s Selphy lineup includes many models with screens and a card slot to make that possible.

The rabbit hole goes very deep, and there are many professional printers that can print even larger sizes. Canon and Epson dominate this space, marketing a range of pigment- and dye-based printers that can emphasize archival needs or color saturation, respectively.

Another option is ordering a photo book, which, as the name suggests, is a physical bound book of your photos. However, photo books are probably more appropriate for memorializing an event – trip, wedding, project – than general archiving, given the typical costs and number of photos involved.

There’s little reason to not make some sort of backups of photos in 2024, whether that’s on printed media, hard drives or in the cloud. The important thing is not which method to use, but to do it at all.

Wasim Ahmad is Assistant Teaching Professor of Journalism, Quinnipiac University.

The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

© The Conversation

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

15 Comments
Login to comment

Flickr offers unlimited full resolution image storage for US$72.99 for a year which includes video files up to 10 minutes long. Why would anyone pay Google or Apple to back up their photos?

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Google Photo is free for the first 15GB. Apple Cloud stores files and documents. I had a Flicker account until they started charging for it.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

@wallace

I understand but I would never trust my images to the google resolution downgrade.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

proxy

I also keep my photos on my computer and backed up. Cloud is just for convenience.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Does anyone else remember when Google photos offered unlimted free storage?

Does anyone else remember when Google soon after admitted the unlimited storage was at reduced resolotuion?

Then it became 15GB limited, pay for more.

Now the free GB is not for just photos but for everything you save in a Google cloud account such as Gmail, and if you have an Android phone, that includes the phone backup.

Apple's HEIF files are not a unversal standard so not good for archiving. In fact they are not even good for sending in an email or message to non-Apple users.

Google's TB plans cost more per year than equivalent hard disks, so what kind of great deal is that.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Why would anyone pay Google or Apple to back up their photos?

I agree. Moreover, why would anyone use cloud for photos? One of the main challenges of cloud is data security and privacy. Cloud users entrust their pics to third-party providers, who may not have adequate measures to protect it from unauthorized access, breaches, or leaks. Who can forget Celebgate 2014?

So we print and delete the pics we like and keep them in albums like the good ole days, and leave the rest to be deleted as they lose their intrinsic value, or kiss them goodbye when the device they are on dies. The effect of choosing pics carefully and binning the rest is difficult but in the long run, very therapeutic and has a certain Zen-like cleansing feel to it.

No third party clutter for me thank you very much

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Apple's HEIF files are not a unversal standard so not good for archiving. In fact they are not even good for sending in an email or message to non-Apple users.

You can download a photo from Apple Photo with jpg, tiff, or png file. I usually use png.

A copy of all photos should be on your computer and backed up.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Free photo or video storage space is not god-given. Of course all those companies finally want and need to make some money for their owners or shareholders. It's primarily to catch customers and a friendly company image , but later to cash in biggest possible. We will surely see it soon in other fields to, for example usage of AI. As usage is extremely costly, soon the end consumers will have to buy model storage, AI chips , new capable high-end devices and to pay themselves the high operational and energy costs.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

I have about 150GB of free Cloud space. Microsoft Drive gives 40GB. I also use Box.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Google pictures compress pictures even if you select original size.

Most online storage do the same and secondly I would never trust a 3rd party for storage.

Just have two NAS one at home and another at another location for redundancy.

Works fine and have access to my files and pictures where ever I am.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

I have a personal storage device at home and an app on my phone automatically downloads new media to it when connected to my home wifi.

It costs me only the electricity to operate it, and a backup to another device once a year has served me fine so far. The device hasn’t failed in its several years of use, but I guess I will buy a replacement in a few more.

if my house is destroyed I’ll have more to worry about than old reams of data that I probably will never review in future anyway - much like the old printed photos in the attic!

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

If a photo op is really important to why not trust the grey matter you were born with, to me cloud, google sony stuff (showing my age there) are just a possible exposure in the future, I went through multiple volumes of albums a few years ago, threw the lot, I could remember every occasion, shot setting etc. I realised that the prints had no meaning apart from a few historic ego boosts. In today's world digital is mentally expired within 5yrs?

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Don't trust cloud storage (if you pass away, your subscription will lapse and your stuff may be deleted). Buy a couple of external drives. Regularly back up incrementally (you don't need to keep replacing the same files, just tick the option boxes). Give your photos sensible file names (with dates) and organise them into folders, so you can search for them more easily. For holiday photos, include a .txt file in the folder describing the photo and its origin. Always use .jpg/.jpeg for images, .mp3 for music and .mp4 for video, unless you a operating professionally. These are the most widely used file formats. Don't save images in WEBP format - Copy them, paste into an image editor to save as .jpg files. Proprietary formats, encryption and password protection should always be avoided for archiving. Consider that you may be archiving these not just for yourself but for your children.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

@wallace

I am with you. I don't consider things backed up unless I have 3 copies, a local drive, I drive updated regularly and stored at a family's home and a copy on flickr, which also allows me to retain the copyright.

If I'm not mistaken, if one posts an image on some popular social media sites the TOS gives copyright to the SM media company.

But if I just post a link to my image on flickr, I retain the copyright.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Google Photo is free for the first 15GB.

Yes and no. Google gives you 15GB free but that's shared across your Google account. That is photos, Gmail and Google Drive.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites