Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
The IPK is protected in layers upon layers of glass.If you’ve failed physics before, you should blame this thing. Image: Twitter/@spacemanslog
tech

Japanese research team set to redefine the kilogram for first time in 130 years

10 Comments
By Koh Ruide, SoraNews24

Whether it’s losing weight for cosplay or gaining muscle to impress that special someone, our lives sometimes revolve around mass. To the most of us, the humble kilogram is nothing more than a unit of measurement, but a recent scientific breakthrough may change its very definition.

Let’s take a step back into the 1875, when scientists were working fastidiously to better understand our world. In order to establish a standard of measuring weight with high precision, they created a cylindrical piece of metal made of platinum and iridium alloy, weighing exactly one kilogram. This was called the International Prototype Kilogram (IPK) and has become the definition of the kilogram we’ve all come to know.

The IPK has been faithfully replicated and distributed to numerous countries so that their kilogram can be based off of those, but the original is housed in the International Bureau of Weights and Measurements in France. Dust, contaminants, and countless other factors can change the IPK’s weight, causing each kilogram in the world to be off by a different amount. This may not matter much to the average person, but this inaccuracy can be a huge problem in sensitive research such as those involving radioactive materials.

In an effort to move away from defining the kilogram using an outdated chunk of metal and the inaccuracies that come with it, the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) in Japan has developed an ultra high-precision silicon ball that is currently the most spherical sphere on Earth. Crafted using lasers and some fancy formulae, this new IPK has been tested to be twice as accurate as the cylindrical one, which would contribute tremendously to fields requiring precise measurements like drug development.

AIST hopes to present this new standard to an international conference next year, which would change the way the kilogram is defined for the first time in 130 years. While its benefits might not be apparent to most of us immediately, rest assured that our way of life involving kilograms would become… more accurate, which might help some Japanese women trying to achieve the weight of a fairytale princess.

Source: NHK via My Game News Flash

Read more stories from SoraNews24.

-- Japanese women setting a tough goal for themselves as they try to reach their “Cinderella weight”

-- How hung up on a woman’s weight are Japanese men, really? Poll attempts to find out

-- Does Japan’s “body fat-burning” bottled tea really work? Our 30-day investigation 【RocketScience】

© SoraNews24

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

10 Comments
Login to comment

No matter how much you try to improve it, 1 Kg is still 1 Kg!!

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

By how much will it affect calculations of the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

If this is how we define a kilo how did they know that it weighed exactly a kilo in the first place?  what was the previous definition of a kilo?

also I love the ridiculous ending to the story.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

If this is how we define a kilo how did they know that it weighed exactly a kilo in the first place? what was the previous definition of a kilo?

If I remember correctly a kilo is a unit of theoretical weight of 1 liter of theoretical pure water at 4℃ under 1G.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

actually the most accurate calculation of the kilogram can be seen here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo0jm1PPRuo

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Actually 1 kg is the sum of one thousand grams.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

So, the solution to the problem of the standard for weighing mass being only around 1kg was to make the standard a round 1kg.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Although it can be an astounding achievement ro make the most round ball on Earth, purpose for scientists is to avoid any material reference.

Scientists will try to use Watt balance based on electromechanical effects and Planck number value.

PS: mass is not connect to gravity for its definition.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Validity of this Silicon ball?!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites