The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2024 AFPMeta 'supreme court' takes on cases of deepfake porn
SAN FRANCISCO©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2024 AFP
3 Comments
Login to comment
Logical_Fallacy_Killer
Meta is tryi g to censor free speech and art. If a famous person's image is being use without permission, then that is a copyright issue. If Jane Public wants to put her photo out there for everyo e to enjoy and discuss, that is art. It is about freedom of speech.
virusrex
This is completely unrelated to the examples included in the article, which are about fake pornographic images made based on public figures, there is no "free speech" nor "art" argument that could justify people sharing fake nudes of anybody else.
owzer
Seems like a simple fix. Is it nudity? (real or AI generated) If yes, then it's not allowed.
Problem solved.