Instgram-parent Meta says it will respond by mid-March to a call by an independent oversight board to modify its rules about nudity to equally treat people of all genders and sexualities Photo: AFP

Meta says it is reviewing call to make adult nudity policies more inclusive


Meta is reviewing a call by its oversight board to make its policies on adult nudity more inclusive, a spokesperson said, after the tech giant removed two Instagram posts showing transgender and non-binary people with their chests bared.

Neither post violated Meta's policies on adult nudity, and in a statement released earlier this week, the board said it had overturned the company's decision to remove them.

A Meta spokesperson told AFP Thursday that the company welcomed the board's move and had already restored the images, agreeing they should not have been taken down.

But the board also seized the opportunity to call on Meta, which also owns Facebook, to make its broader policies on adult nudity more inclusive.

The current policy "prohibits images containing female nipples other than in specified circumstances, such as breastfeeding and gender confirmation surgery," the oversight board wrote in its decision.

That policy, it continued, "is based on a binary view of gender and a distinction between male and female bodies," and results in "greater barriers to expression for women, trans and gender non-binary people on its platforms."

It called for Meta to evaluate its policies "so that all people are treated in a manner consistent with international human rights standards, without discrimination on the basis of sex or gender."

The Meta spokesperson said the company was reviewing that request, which echoes calls made by activists for years.

"We are constantly evaluating our policies to help make our platforms safer for everyone," the spokesperson said. "We know more can be done to support the LGBTQ+ community, and that means working with experts and LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations on a range of issues and product improvements."

"We have given Meta food for thought," oversight board member Helle Thorning-Schmidt, a former prime minister of Denmark, said Thursday in a forum at Instagram. "It's interesting to note that the only nipples not sexualized are those of men or those who have been operated on."

"Over-policing of LGBTQ content, and especially trans and nonbinary content, is a serious problem on social media platforms," a spokesperson for advocacy group GLAAD told AFP.

"The fact that Instagram's AI system and human moderators repeatedly identified these posts as pornographic and as sexual solicitation indicates serious failures with regard to both their machine learning systems and moderator training."

Meta said it will publicly respond to each of the board's recommendations on the matter by mid-March.

© 2023 AFP

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

Hello world, this is a typical American problem.. you can show the most despicable ways of killing someone on TV, body parts, blood, etc. but as soon as as much as a nipple is visible, all hell gets loose... Just for them, repeat after me (and after the entirety of Europe: human bodies in the nude are NOT indecent, showing someone tortured and murdered IS INDECENT.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

The problem with nudity in America is that any profits can seldom be harvested in the benefits of the war profiteers who promote violence

1 ( +3 / -2 )

@Hercolobus, America's military-industrial complex doesn't need to harvest profits from nudity.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

We maybe need to rewrite that John Cooper Clarke poem to refer to Instagram.

I've seen the poison letters of the horrible hacks

About the yellow peril and the reds and the blacks

And the TUC and its treacherous acts

Kremlin money, all right Jack

I've seen how democracy is under duress

But I've never seen a nipple in the Daily Express

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Thank God I don't give a rat's spleen about who can and can't show their chests. So backward and unimportant.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

UK free-to-air TV often has completely naked people on it - nude dating programmes and the like. Most UK kids have TVs in their bedrooms. Amusing that social media is more restrictive, censorious and Victorian than the telly.

Facebook should simply fork their app into two - one for users below the age of majority with parental control and strict content limits, one for adults without censorship, but permitting individual users to self-censor what they see, according to their individual wishes. Parents could easily check their kid's device to see which was on it. It's not rocket science. Get on with it.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites