The boss of OpenAI, Sam Altman, has been on a global tour to charm national leaders and powerbrokers Photo: GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File
tech

OpenAI chief seeks to calm fears on job losses

8 Comments
By Joseph Boyle and Laurence Benhamou

The boss of OpenAI, the firm behind the massively popular ChatGPT bot, said on Friday that his firm's technology would not destroy the job market as he sought to calm fears about the march of artificial intelligence (AI).

Sam Altman, on a global tour to charm national leaders and powerbrokers, said in Paris that AI would not -- as some have warned -- wipe out whole sectors of the workforce through automation.

"This idea that AI is going to progress to a point where humans don't have any work to do or don't have any purpose has never resonated with me," he said.

Asked about the media industry, where several outlets already use AI to generate stories, Altman said ChatGPT should instead be like giving a journalist 100 assistants to help them research and come up with ideas.

ChatGPT burst into the spotlight late last year, demonstrating an ability to generate essays, poems and conversations from the briefest of prompts.

Microsoft later laid out billions of dollars to support OpenAI and now uses the firm's technology in several of its products -- sparking a race with Google, which has made a slew of similar announcements.

Altman, a 38-year-old emerging star of Silicon Valley, has received rapturous welcomes from leaders everywhere from Lagos to London.

Though earlier this week, he seemed to annoy the European Union by hinting that his firm could leave the bloc if they regulate too severely.

He insisted to a group of journalists on the sidelines of the Paris event that the headlines were not fair and he had no intention of leaving the bloc -- rather, OpenAI was likely to open an office in Europe in the future.

The success of ChatGPT -- which has been used by politicians to write speeches and proved itself capable of passing tough exams -- has thrust Altman into a global spotlight.

"Years from now, reflecting on this will feel very special... but it is also quite exhausting and I hope life calms down," he said.

OpenAI was formed in 2015 with investors including Altman and billionaire Twitter owner Elon Musk, who left the firm in 2018 and has repeatedly bashed it in recent months.

Musk, who has his own AI ambitions, said he came up with the name OpenAI, invested $100 million in it, was betrayed when the company turned itself from non-profit to profit-making in 2018, and has said Microsoft now effectively runs the company.

"I disagree with almost all of that, but I will try to avoid a food fight here," said Altman. "There's got to be more important things than whatever he's going on about."

Instead, he wanted to focus on the mission of OpenAI, which he said was to "maximise the benefits" to society of AI and particularly Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) -- the much-vaunted future where machines will master all sorts of tasks, not just one.

He conceded that definitions of AGI were "fuzzy" and there was no agreement, but said his definition was when machines could make major scientific breakthroughs.

"For me, if you can go figure out the fundamental theory of physics and answer it all, I'll call you AGI," he said.

A major criticism of his products is that the firm does not publish the sources it uses to train its models.

As well as copyright issues, critics argue that users should know who is responsible for answering their questions, and if those replies used material from offensive or racist web pages.

But Altman argued the bottom line was that critics wanted to know whether the models themselves were racist.

"How it does on a racial bias test is what matters there," he said, deflecting the idea that he should publish the sources.

He said the latest model, GPT-4, was "surprisingly non-biased".

© 2023 AFP

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.

8 Comments
Login to comment

Asked about the media industry, where several outlets already use AI to generate stories, Altman said ChatGPT should instead be like giving a journalist 100 assistants to help them research and come up with ideas.

He is trying to spin in positively here but there have already been mass layoffs at many media outlets like Vice and Buzzfeed.

The sad truth is to generate much of the newswire copy and sponsored content and listicles current GPT 4 is more than sufficient to replace humans.

If a Hunter Thompson or Chris Hedges is assisted by AGI that is a different story.

Altman is thinking about ideas that could return more of the wealth generated from productivity gains to people.

https://moores.samaltman.com/

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Shows us how ridiculously obsessed with race we are if that’s the main focus of concern. AI doesn’t know race, nor will it care.

There’s only one anyway!

The human one.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

No one seems interested in the environmental impact, or lack of one. How much extraction of raw materials is required for the increase in AI? What raw materials? Is an increase in energy demand foreseen and, if so, how much?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Why is it 'surprisingly' unbiased, did they make it the other way but then it change its own mind to be unbiased? Thousands of jobs will be lost because of AI, but you know who will not lose out, the bosses.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Model is obviously unbiased, but the data that it trained on can be easily skewed. Train it on Nazi's values, you will have a Nazi AI.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I think lots of people are full of themselves,their will always be manual labor

0 ( +0 / -0 )

OpenAI, Sam Altman, agenda is to smother competition at birth.

OpenAI has avoided any regulatory drawback to steal a lead in this exciting field to develop there AI product.

So Altman is cynically calling/lobbying for regulation on his companies terms to hobble, increase cost on his competitors

The EU commission has had its fingers burnt to a crisp with Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon.

So Altman resorted to veiled threats ....

When it started to dawn on him, the European Parliament when having none of it.

Though earlier this week, he seemed to annoy the European Union by hinting that his firm could leave the bloc if they regulate too severely.

I am surprised that Altman never considered to employ the skills and experience of independent lobbyists.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

If it ever got to the point where AI and robotics could take over the dangerous and physically taxing jobs then I am all for it, especially in third world countries, although I don't see that happening in my life time. This AI stuff is only going to grow from here so we as a species better buckle up because it's gonna be a wild ride.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites