Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
tech

Panasonic to stop LCD panel production

11 Comments
By ODD ANDERSEN

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2019 AFP

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

11 Comments
Login to comment

@Hillclimber

This is a misleading comment as people who buy TVs/displays largely view them as disposable compared to 20 years ago.

Maybe in Japan, but if you walk into American Costco prominently displaying $2,000 LG and Samsung TV sets, they aren't.

The TV sets that people want to buy always cost $2,000, and these aren't disposable.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Just a personal impression, but Panasonic were big on plasma and it wasn't a winning technology. By that, I mean the power consumption is about three times that of an LCD. If you have kids and your tv is on a lot, it could cost you 20,000 yen extra a year. That's a lot to pay for a better picture, "deeper blacks" or whatever.

Fridges that are twenty or thirty years old have similarly excessive energy bills. It's worth checking before receiving one off someone.

We just replaced an 11 year old 37 inch Pana Viera LCD tv with 50 inch Hisense that is 4k, has a built-in 4k tuner, and Toshiba innards. It was 55,000 yen, less than half the Pana tv was.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Panasonic - Stop making cheep LCD and start making this instead!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BCjMLU5v9bs

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Out of all TVs I used throughout my life, both in my home country and in Japan, most were Panasonic's. It's a shame to see such a giant and reputable name in TV's move on to other things, but at least they make incredible cameras, home appliances, personal care products, etc. Heck, their headphones are great too.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

@kohakuebisu

That's a lot to pay for a better picture, "deeper blacks" or whatever.

No offence but that's just wrong. Disrespecting someone's tech expertise and their superior product just because you didn't want to pay the extra bill. Plenty of competitors in the market back then too, didn't have to go for Panny necessarily.

We just replaced an 11 year old 37 inch Pana Viera LCD tv with 50 inch Hisense that is 4k, has a built-in 4k tuner, and Toshiba innards. It was 55,000 yen, less than half the Pana tv was.

The tech world nowadays is much different compared to 20 years ago. It's like comparing a flagship phone of today, say the iPhone, with the equivalent flagship of 2001, from, like, Sony or Motorola. With TVs, people simply don't buy them to keep them for a very long time. A Sony Trinitron that was bought just before I was born STILL, somehow, works perfectly. Can't say the same for today's models.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Like what happened in America when they gave up TV manufacturing to the Japanese

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Only ever owned Japanese brands here in Japan and my current Sony bravia android is the best by the proverbial. Had 2 Sharp and both were way expensive and frankly 2nd grade.

As others said LG & Samsung are the ubiquitous choices in many countries and are known for their low(er) prices / hi-quality balance. Not too many duds in their better range.

And companies like Hisense and Vizio (esp US) are up there too.

Panasonics future is probably more likely to be in the smart-interface-tech world with e-homes, e-cars and e-e.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

They could use the technology to make solar panels. Than we'd be less reliant on nuclear energy.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites