The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2018 AFPPentagon successfully tests U.S.-Japan missile interceptor
By Latonja MARTIN WASHINGTON©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2018 AFP
11 Comments
Login to comment
socrateos
It's not an accident that this show of Japan-US military cooperation was carried out on the very day when Japan and China announced a "historical" agreement of mutual economic cooperation.
Meiyouwenti
The successful test firing doesn’t guarantee that the new missile defense system will work in real war. It’s easy to shoot down a missile if you know where it’s coming from.
Seth M
good news. this missile had failed in last two tests, a success was badly needed to boost the confidence in the project.
Triring
Well land based ballistic missiles site locations are known as well so what is your point?
nandakandamanda
33.3% success rate against a single missile, then.
Kenji Fujimori
YET Abe is opening up free Trade ro China.. Stock up on those missiles for the future
Serrano
"It’s easy to shoot down a missile if you know where it’s coming from."
No, it's extremely difficult to shoot down a missile whether you know where it's coming from or not. Those things travel at very high speeds and don't have a whole lotta surface area to hit.
Putin and Xi aren't going to like this.
gaihonjin
-Triring
Not so. Potential adversaries use mobile launchers.
Triring
You don't need exact coordinates you just need a general area to point the radar 5~1000Km away since the radar is going to be below the horizon for the first 10~30Km during accent anyways.
That is what I mean when I said land based ballistic site locations are known. These missiles are not for preemptive strikes, they are to shoot down the missiles that had already been launched.
lostrune2
50% - Test #1 (Feb 2017) success, Test #2-3 (June 2017, Jan 2018) fail, Test #4 (Oct 2018) success
Baby steps - can't shoot down more advanced missiles if they can't shoot down the easier ones
Once they learn as much as they could from this, only then can they move on to the next level
Nobody could do the next level without doing these tests first
englisc aspyrgend
The fact that it failed twice is irrelevant, that is what testing is all about, you learn far more from the failures than the successes. You fail now so you don’t fail when you need it.