Facebook's news blackout in Australia is the latest turn in a long-troubled relationship between the social platform and media industry Photo: AFP/File

Shockwaves worldwide after Facebook turns off the news for Australia

By Rob Lever

Facebook's stunning decision to turn off the news for Australia highlights a long-troubled role for the U.S. tech giant which stumbled into the news business and has grown into one of its most powerful forces.

The announcement by Facebook, defying Australia's efforts to impose a payment scheme for media featured on the platform, raises fresh questions about the future of the platform used by some two billion people and its relationship with the news media.

Analysts pointed out that Facebook, even though it was not created as a news organization, has become a critical source of information for many people around the world, especially younger internet users, with traditional media on the decline.

"This is a very stark reminder of the power of Facebook," said Kjerstin Thorson, a Michigan State University professor specializing in social media.

"The idea that with a flick of a switch you could shut down a civic infrastructure -- that's a wake-up call."

Thorson noted that Facebook's action may deprive users of "high quality information" but "doesn't remove people's desire to know what's happening. That's an opportunity for noxious information and rumors to circulate."

Ken Paulson, a former USA Today chief editor who is now on the faculty at Middle Tennessee State University, said the social media giant risks eroding trust in global information if the blackout becomes widespread: "Facebook without real news would be a conspiracist’s fantasy."

Facebook made the announcement Wednesday as Australia put the finishing touches on legislation that would force digital platforms to pay for news and links under a threat of government-imposed arbitration.

The Australian measure "fails to recognize... the fundamental nature of the relationship between our platform and publishers," said Campbell Brown, Facebook's head of global news partnerships in a blog post.

"Contrary to what some have suggested, Facebook does not steal news content. Publishers choose to share their stories on Facebook. From finding new readers to getting new subscribers and driving revenue, news organizations wouldn't use Facebook if it didn't help their bottom lines."

The California tech giant has been investing in news through its Facebook Journalism Project in a number of countries but has sought to avoid a mandatory scheme of paying for sharing links, saying it would set a bad precedent for the internet.

Still, the news media industry has seen its woes deepen as digital giants such as Facebook and Google dominate the market for online advertising in much of the world.

And the imbalance appears to have grown as news organizations struggle in the an economy roiled by the global pandemic.

"Most news media don’t benefit appreciably from links in Facebook," said Paulson.

This underscores a need for a new system that would support news media whose information is critical to the long-term success of the digital giants, according to analysts.

Facebook's move contrasted with Google, which in recent days has brokered deals with media groups, including Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., in response to the Australian regulatory push.

Facebook maintains that news content makes up only four percent of people's feeds. But Thorson said that despite the small percentage, "for many people Facebook is their main source of information," making it a critical part of civic discourse.

"I don't think this problem will be solved without some form of government regulation," she said.

The standoff in Australia "is about the renegotiation of a relationship that has been strained for years," said Chris Moos, a researcher and lecturer with Oxford University's Said Business School.

While it appears that Facebook has the upper hand, Moos maintains that the social media leader would lose its appeal if it moves away from professional news content.

"It would be impossible to imagine Facebook (and WhatsApp) to maintain cross-demographic popularity without media content of at least the big media organizations," Moos said.

"Media organizations and Facebook need each other. Both parties have every incentive to collaborate to come to agreements."

Paulson said it remains unclear whether Facebook would suffer from a disengagement with news, with Australia becoming a test case.

"If people only come to Facebook for social experiences and cat photos, it will face no economic pressure," he said.

© 2021 AFP

©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

Use MeWe instead of Facebook. It doesn’t steal your data and sell it.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

People are still using Facebook for things beyond finding dates? Crazy people.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

"The idea that with a flick of a switch you could shut down a civic infrastructure -- that's a wake-up call."

Oh please! Since when was Facebook civic infrastructure?!

I strongly get the sense that FB has employed a PR firm to drive this nonsense narrative.

If you want news - go to a news website. Facebook is a place where people post pictures of their dinner.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Still can’t believe that people are so lazy to not to use other websites for news apart from Facebook

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Still can’t believe that people are so lazy to not to use other websites for news apart from Facebook

Neither can I. I live in Australia and get precisely 0% of my news from Facebook. And I read a lot of news, including, believe it or not, actual newspapers.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

It started off as a kind of "BonkBook" - a free rating page of students' photos at Harvard; morphed to a 'family and friends' picture sharing website, and has now ended up like the ubiquitous 'Borg' sucking the life and information out of people for sale to anyone.

Just use it for sharing pictures, if you like, though there are other platforms for that.

Get the news direct from news site, the weather direct from a weather site, Covid info from a Covid site, etc..

1 ( +2 / -1 )

What's even funnier about this is that FB... blocked itself in the process!

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Facebook fear the implications to its future business of/to the News media bargaining code.


The effect these tentative first steps to full or partial regulation and the inevitability that EU/UK Government will soon follow suit has Facebook rattled to such an extent Facebook blacked out the reading and sharing local news.

Also, an alleged failure to fully carry out algorithm tests prior to the mass-blocking, meant a whole host of vital pages for Health and Emergency services, Charities, Sports, Weather services, Trade Union to name but a few were ‘inadvertently' blocked in the ban.

Within the News media bargaining code, is the legislation to formally bring into creation arbitration panels to set a binding price for news in such events that social media giants fail to reach agreements with news media broadcasters for original content.

This is a new level of arrogance, that Facebook feel the necessity to act the playground bully.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Seems fb is all ok about making $$$ off the net but doesnt want to pay some of the costs to do so!!!

fb & goggle need to be reigned in for a lot of things

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites