The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2017. Click For Restrictions - http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.aspApple reports surprise dip in iPhone sales
SAN FRANCISCO©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
7 Comments
Login to comment
gogogo
Apple had it and lost it
Strangerland
Yeah they only sold 50 million iPhones and had a revenue increase. Failures.
Lost-in-Nagoya
strangerland:
Apple goes down every year, don't you know that? Haters just can't explain how it gets richer everytime it goes down LOL
lostrune2
Don't expect it anytime soon - Apple erred by running themselves into the computer-equivalent of an architectural dead-end with the Mac Pro
Apple: "We're sorry for what happened with Mac Pro", but new version isn't coming this year
https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-we039re-sorry-for-what-happened-with-mac-pro-but-new-version-isn039t-coming-this-year
Many Apple users and fans have been hoping that the company would finally release a new version of its Mac Pro desktop PCs this year. The most recent Mac Pro was introduced in December 2013, featuring a distinctive cylindrical design, but while Apple has since introduced several new generations of its iPhones, iPads and Mac notebooks, the Mac Pro line has stagnated over the last few years.
The frustration over Apple's apparent lack of commitment to its pro-users intensified last year, when Microsoft unveiled its Surface Studio all-in-one PC, targeting creative professionals, which led some to declare that Microsoft had "out-Apple'd Apple".
*Today, Apple clarified its position on the Mac Pro, reaffirming its commitment to the machine, and promising great things to come - *but they won't be coming anytime soon.
Significantly, though, Apple also admitted that the current design of the Mac Pro is no longer suitable for customers' needs. Apple's Craig Federighi explained:
*I think we designed ourselves into a bit of a thermal corner, if you will. We designed a system with the kind of GPUs that at the time we thought we needed, and that we thought we could well serve with a two GPU architecture. That that was the thermal limit we needed, or the thermal capacity we needed. But workloads didn’t materialize to fit that as broadly as we hoped.*
*Being able to put larger single GPUs required a different system architecture and more thermal capacity than that system was designed to accommodate. So it became fairly difficult to adjust.** At the same time, so many of our customers were moving to iMac that we saw a path to address many, many more of those that were finding themselves limited by a Mac Pro through next generation iMac. And really put a lot of our energy behind that.*
*As we’ve said, we made something bold that we thought would be great for the majority of our Mac Pro users. And what we discovered was that it was great for some and not others. Enough so that we need to take another path. *One of the good things, hopefully, with Apple through the years has been a willingness to say when something isn’t quite what we wanted it do be, didn’t live up to expectations, to not be afraid to admit it and look for the next answer.
2020hindsights
Yep. Keep repeating this year, after year, after year...
Good news! It's in the pipeline!
However, it's at least a year away, so a modicum of patience is required.
In the meantime, the new iMacs will include a pro level machine.
lostrune2
It's the talk of the tech last month - there's an internal conflict inside Apple about which direction to take the company - niche high-end vs. mainstream:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/is-it-time-for-high-end-pros-to-dump-the-mac/
http://www.zdnet.com/article/apples-desperate-mac-damage-limitation-message-hints-at-a-divided-company/