tech

US company sues Nintendo in Wii wand patent case

9 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2008/9 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

9 Comments
Login to comment

lol once again another US company thinks it can cash-in on a Japanese original creation. or it could be that again we did something better than they could, and they got butt-hurt about it.

Hellcrest rep: waaaaaa! Japan (this time Nintendo) once again did something better than us! its no fair that everything we rip off of them never seems to work. Whats there secret?

this case will be dismissed.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

So they wait 2 years before filing the suit. Sounds more like lets see how well it sells then get as much cash as we can because we clearly didn't think of that.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Identifying true violations of these complex technology patents is going to be a long, lawyer-filled process, which Nintendo can certainly better afford than relative newcomer Hillcrest Labs. Given that prospect, a settlement is more likely, unless Nintendo truly believes their technology is original (or appropriately licensed, where applicable).

Looking at the Hillcrest technology, there do seem to be areas of overlap in at least the concepts behind their products (though they are being implemented for very different purposes), and at least Hillcrest is not simply another patent troll, looking to make a buck off of technology it has no intention of developing itself.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Are they envious about the success of this japanese creation. how they also wish they could beat nintendo..

0 ( +0 / -0 )

oopppsss with a question mark! ?????

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I gave their patent a glance (really long to read without falling asleep). Patent seem to have been filed in 2005, and there seem to be some similiarities. If the Wii somehow has "patent pending" on it, they may be in for a fight. Maybe they're late in suing because the patent was only approved last year.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Is the patent recognized internationally? You can file a patent with a US office but that doesn't mean it will be qualified for international copyrights. It sounds kinda odd.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

uhuh, too bad ThinkOptics WavIt have the patents filed before Hillcrests crappy inertial (accelerometers) pointer. www.thinkoptics.com

Electronic Vision Based Remote Control System: US Provisional Patent Application (PPA) # 60/593,413 (January 12, 2005)

Electronic Equipment For Handheld Vision Based Absolute Pointing System: US Application # 11/187,405 (July 21, 2005)

Handheld Vision Based Absolute Pointing System: US Application # 11/187,435 (July 21, 2005)

Handheld Vision Based Absolute Pointing System: International Application (PCT) # US2006/001198 (January 11, 2006), Foreign filings in Europe, Japan, and China (July 10, 2007)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

uhuh, too bad ThinkOptics WavIt have the patents filed before Hillcrests inertial (accelerometers) pointer - www.thinkoptics.com

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites