The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2019.Safety of Boeing's MAX 8 in question after Ethiopian Airlines plane crashes, killing 157
By Duncan Miriri, Maggie Fick and Aaron Maasho NAIROBI/ADDIS ABABA©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
17 Comments
Login to comment
Goodlucktoyou
China bans, America allows. Next flight I take, airplane type will be most important. I flew a tiger air flight recently on this jet, it was very nice. But, you never know.
1glenn
The world wants answers, quickly.
Alex80
The dead included 8 Italians, one of them worked for an Onu program.
nandakandamanda
China have grounded their 737 Max 8s.
It will be interesting to see where we go from here, especially as this Max 8 aircraft is certified with these newly-positioned engines, MCAS controlling the subsequent aerodynamics.
On such things hinge the rise and fall of empires.
ZvonkoJonathan
for now it looks as the plane programing fault. If this pilot and co pilot had several takeoffs and landings of the same model it is unlikely they caused the crash. If the pilots are not properly informed of the possible surprise malfunction of the robotics on the plane there is very little they can be expected to do to bypass the faulty system.
nandakandamanda
Chip Star got it in one word.
Let us hope that for lessons to be learned (of benefit to us all) 1. there will be a dispassionate inquiry, and 2. that the resulting directive will go as far back as necessary 3. to present a solid plan 4. that will bring all concerned parties back on board.
If for example the MCAS is at fault, and the decision is 'enough of the endless software fixes', then make the right decision: rip it out for goodness sake and start again.
CrazyJoe
I will not set foot on the 737 Max 8 until Boeing does the right thing: recalls all of their (likely) fatally flawed planes, figures out what the h--- is going on, and then fixes the problem. They require major oversight right now.
jcapan
Wikipedia on reaction to the Lion Air crash:
zones2surf
The default assumption by airline makers is that the cause is pilot error. Without exception, that is their starting point.
Airlines, of course, tend to want to believe that perhaps it is mechanical in nature, rather than it being something their staff caused.
The regulators responsible for investigating crashes tend to be conflicted. And that includes the NTSB.
I will say this. If history is any indication, Boeing will bend over backwards to find anything other than the aircraft to blame. Anything. So, hopefully the investigators let the investigation take its natural course, rather than succumbing to the tremendous pressure Boeing can bring to bear on things.
Toasted Heretic
And Irishman Michael Ryan of Country Clare. Rip to all the victims of this tragedy.
yamada1043
Data and voice recovers must be recovered and analyzed before any factual information is available. Meanwhile, it’s strictly speculation.
gokai_wo_maneku
I'm also wondering about the quality and training of pilots.
Chip Star
Good questions.
ArtistAtLarge
I wonder if this was another case of lack of adequate training on the new flight system that was the cause of the Java crash?
Yubaru
So...it's true, the writers of this article are the one's "calling" this airplanes safety into question. Are they professionals? Do they have the expertise and knowledge to make a call like this?
Or is it they are just trying to stir the pot and look for someone to point fingers at? yellow journalism anyone?
Chip Star
Tragic.