The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.U.S. faces new outbreaks as coronavirus infections worldwide top 575,000
By MATT SEDENSKY, KEVIN McGILL and DAVID RISING NEW ORLEANS©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
23 Comments
PTownsend
One of the many positives of a free, for-profit press is being able to choose from dozens of sources offering an array of perspectives on the virus. Here's an interview with Bill Gates providing his perspective.
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/health/2020/03/27/entire-march-26-coronavirus-town-hall-part-4-sot-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/entire-cnn-facebook-march-26-coronavirus-town-hall/
Chip Star
So, you think there is a link between being a great businessperson and not knowingness what you’re talking about? You must really love Donny.
Back to downplaying the seriousness, I see.
PTownsend
The Gates Foundation has been world leaders in doing research and implementing programs re 'medical situations' for decades. I'll trust Gate's knowledge over Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bannon etal. I've heard people question Gate's business tactics, but never his intelligence. Isn't it nice to have a variety of perspectives to inform our perspectives.
Fuzzy
Actually, Gates knows a lot about pandemics. It's been a big part of his philanthropic efforts for many years. Check out his 2015 TED talk where he warns of exactly what we are going through now.
Chottobaka
In the midst of taking a trade and economic beatdown by the US, social unrest in Hong Kong and recent protest in Wuhan over environmental issues, China unleashes an engineered bioweapon that crashes the world economy, silences their own people and gets them back to pretty much even footing with the rest of the world. Trifecta from their point of view.
Ah_so
Yet.
Now is the opportunity to keep the numbers below 500,000.
But increase that number by 20% for every day's delay.
CrazyJoe
Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted
Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.,
H. Clifford Lane, M.D.,
and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.
The New England Journal of Medicine
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387
Strangerland
There is a problem here. They are using the Case Fatality Rate of SARS and MERS, but then they don't compare it to the Case Fatality Rate of Covid19. The CFR is the number of people who die in related to diagnosed cases.
So the comparisons are apples and oranges. Any comparison needs to against the equivalent metric. If they want to compare the number of deaths to an assumed number of cases for Covid, then that is the comparison that needs to be made with SARS and MERS, not against their CFR.
Fuzzy
CFR is only part of the picture. You also need to factor in the transmissibility. Given there is no existing immunity to this virus (or vaccine) and the rate of spread observed around the world, a large percentage of the population will be infected. Experts are saying 40-70% of the population will be infected. So, even with a CFR similar to the seasonal flu, the total deaths will be higher. With a CFR of 0.1%, the fatalities could be between 50,000 to 90,000 in Japan. And, as has been pointed out many times before, it's not only fatalities that are a concern. The serious complication rate is very high and the potential to push health systems well beyond their capacity is proven in several countries already. Relying on reputable sources like Fauci and NEJM is the right thing to do. But, you need to look at what is being said on balance as a whole, not just cherry pick parts to suit your narrative. Just look at Fauci as an example. He's co-author of the NEJM editorial, but he's also the one telling how serious we need to take this and calling for the lockdowns.
Busby
Trump's outright lies and falsehoods - in his own words;
“Anybody that needs a test gets a test.”
“Within a couple of days [the number of positive cases is] going to be down to close to zero.”
“This is their new hoax.”
“Nobody could have ever seen something like this coming.”
"We’re very close to a vaccine."
“The cure can’t be worse than the problem.”
“I don’t take any responsibility at all.”
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-coronavirus-lies-covid19_n_5e7b7d1ac5b6b7d80959966f
Just absolutely disgraceful...
Remember these lies, and the people that have died as a result, when you vote in Nov...
Strangerland
I listened to a plea from a doctor in Madrid today for ventilators, because they are having to take anyone over 65 years old off of them, to give them to younger people. And the old people have to die without their families, because they are quarantined.
This is no joke, it's important we do what we can to keep as much burden as possible off our medical systems, so that the resources we do have can cover as many people as possible.
kwatt
America is almost under martial law. Curfew will be 24 hrs. Other countries are already under the law.
rainyday
Including you. You’ve been doing nothing but spread disinformation about this since day one. Everything you have said about it has been proven wrong by experience, its pathetic how glib you remain about being so wrong.
Every infectious disease expert in the world: “This is extremely dangerous and will kill huge numbers without drastic action”
Your message in almost every post: “Its just like the common cold, nothing to worry about, hardly anybody has it anyway.”
Numan
It isn't looking good. In addition to the idiot-in-chief disbanding the global pandemic unit and firing the official to watch pandemics in China, he and the WH also refused extra funding in February when the idiot was still calling it a "Democratic hoax".
Senator says White House turned down emergency coronavirus funding in early February
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senator-says-white-house-turned-down-emergency-coronavirus-funding-in-early-february-003319950.html
Oh, my......!
WilliB
strangerland:
Don´t you think you should argue that with the authors of the article? Let me, in case of disagreement about a medical study between Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D. and Strangerland, who I give more credibility? Decisions, decisions...
Strangerland
Well no, because I can't be bothered, and you posted that here, where I can.
It's not an issue of credibility. I pointed out how that bit of text posted was making a comparison of different things. That's fact, not an opinion, on which my credibility would have any bearing. I didn't even draw a conclusion, the validity of which could be subject to my credibility.
Chip Star
Democrats talking and Donny having the final say are completely irrelevant to Donny’s Fans expecting the rational adults to think Donny’s words don’t mean what words mean. Smh.
Fuzzy
@WilliB
The key point is, don't cherry pick the data. Here's what else Fauci is saying...
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200124/coronavirus-2020-outbreak-latest-updates?ecd=wnl_spr_032720&ctr=wnl-spr-032720_nsl-LeadModule_cta&mb=t68V0O9BA5imHI%2fwnEcOpChonS%2fH3cwyOWuPXlytnj8%3d