The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.ABC suspends reporter caught in Project Veritas 'sting'
By DAVID BAUDER NEW YORK©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
20 Comments
Login to comment
SuperLib
How?
PTownsend
Worrying that a dirtbag like Epstein was being protected. Worrying that media moguls would restrict information on him and the global ruling class dirtbags associated with him.
Project Veritas sounds like it's well intended, a group purported to keep media honest. Unfortunately it's been just the opposite, a group pushing rightwing propaganda while constantly attacking the free, for-profit press, especially outlets that reports issues from perspectives different from theirs and their wealthy backers.
Blacklabel
It was videos of biased reporters in their own words telling us what they did. But please do continue to try to tell us this is a misleading report, not a video.
Chip Star
Project Veritas is a group of conservatives that publish misleading reports, which is par for the course for conservatives.
Alfie Noakes
https://www.rt.com/usa/481751-project-veritas-abc-news-trump/
Mickey Mouse media, Donald in the White House, fraudulent elections, banana republic...
SuperLib
Veritas are a bunch of losers.
PTownsend
Did they report Trump's father was born in Germany? Say no Americans were 'harmed' in Iraq by Iran's shelling? Re nasty, are they calling Trump's opponents schoolyard names? Making up stories about his opponent's fathers and wives? Are they pushing stories like pizzagate? Saying Russian 'meddling' was a hoax?
SuperLib
Right. The issue is when that bias crosses a line and gets in the way of professional conduct. For that, you need evidence. Just having an opinion doesn't mean you're corrupt or else everyone on both sides is corrupt.
Which is silly.
Chip Star
Given conservatives inability to be accurate and this cool thing called editing; yes, that is what I’m asking when a video comes from a group of known scammers. Oh, wait, you support Donny, who has been a documented scammer since at least the 70’s.
Your choice.
Correct.
Times infinity.
Chip Star
See my post immediately above. ROFL!
Hahaha! Of course, it’s no surprise Trump sycophants believe Project Veritas despite its horrible track record for accuracy. Smh.
lostrune2
Heck, people are free to secretly record Trump's campaign too (remember those leaked recordings)
cla68
There’s a reason liberals don’t like Project Veritas, and that’s because they keep catching the mainstream media and Democrats revealing dishonest agendas. Keep it up, James!
Chip Star
This is hilarious, untethered from reality, but hilarious. You write your own material?
bass4funk
Ahhh, now they’re misleading because they were caught saying things with their own mouths? Lol
Project Veritas has been instrumental in getting down to the nitty gritty of the nastiness and the sneakiness of what liberals are doing to undermine the President as well as conservatives.
Blacklabel
Funny, that’s not what the guy in the video said. He kinda said the exact opposite. But what would he know, being an ”award winning” journalist and all?
FizzBit
Full David Wright quote
“So you're asking us to not believe our eyes and ears when we see and hear the videos? We should just believe your narrative?”
That about sums it up. The down votes prove it.
theFu
Depending on the state, recording someone else without their knowledge may be perfectly illegal. There are many single-party recording states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#One-party_consent_states Only 12 states require 2-party consent. NH is one of those, so this appears to be illegal. However, D.C. is a single-party jurisdiction.
Everyone has a bias. Get over it.