Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
world

AP Fact Check: Trump's epic speech laced with false statements

75 Comments
By Kevin Freking, Hope Yen and Calvin Woodward

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


75 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Let me guess. This article is not credible because it’s “bias”. Or what about Dems? Or what’s wrong with lying? Or libs try so very hard . . .

17 ( +21 / -4 )

Basically, it was a 2 hour, 27 minute rant of falsehoods, bloviating, self puffery, lies, deceit, and fear mongering.

20 ( +24 / -4 )

Why waste time fact-checking Dimwit Donny? The real news is when he doesn't lie.

It's safest to assume everything falling from his lips is inaccurate.

21 ( +25 / -4 )

This was great:

The team is not known to be particularly or historically angry.

16 ( +19 / -3 )

Dumpster Fire can't even be honest about this:

Trump actually left the White House plenty of times during the "months and months" surrounding the partial government shutdown that began Dec. 22.

How could anyone with a measurable intelligence believe anything this guy says?

Master negotiators/8-D chess players don't forget things this quickly or fabricate their moves.

12 ( +16 / -4 )

Trump's most fervent supporters prove that you actually can fool some of the people all of the time.

14 ( +18 / -4 )

What a horse's ass.

And talking about the war on Socialism, these are the same people who are against providing free school lunches and milk to poor kids.

What the hell's wrong with these people?

14 ( +17 / -3 )

People with NPD like Donnie fiasco don't live in the real world, they twist reality to suit themselves and their mouths are full of verbal diarrhoea.

13 ( +15 / -2 )

pathetic and petty fact check.

Unemployment is “down to” can in fact mean the lowest point. Which it was at 3.7 percent.

I stopped reading after the “angry” fact check. How can you face check an emotion?

-20 ( +3 / -23 )

pathetic and petty fact check.

But are they accurate? And if not, which ones are incorrect?

Unemployment is “down to” can in fact mean the lowest point. Which it was at 3.7 percent.

No, the word 'is' is the present tense of the verb 'to be'. It refers to the current state of events. If they were referring to the lowest point, it would be 'has gone down to [as much as] 3.7 percent'.

14 ( +15 / -1 )

Despite the grammar police the unemployment rate was in fact 3.7 percent. Also it’s petty to say he didn’t get 306! He only got 304! I’m not wasting my time past that because these 2 show it’s just a biased fact check.

Did Trump also visit 57 states? That one seemed to be ok to say without a “fact check”

-16 ( +4 / -20 )

Despite the grammar police the unemployment rate was in fact 3.7 percent.

You're right, it was. But you were whining that they claimed it's at 4.0%, which it is. So you were whining about them saying the truth. Why do you hate the truth?

13 ( +14 / -1 )

When people have a spew at the media for inaccuracies, however small they may be, then said people need to speak the truth in its entirety. Trump... As one of said people... Doesn't.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

57 states agree with you.

57, clearly incorrect, does not need to be fact-checked as people already know the fact. But if you Republicans want to do it then by all means go ahead.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

I said they were petty actually. And misleading. And you can’t fact check opinion.

If im not angry how can I manufacture outrage? You need a new catch phrase.

Well ok you put a FAQ on your website. You get ridiculed and take it down. Is it a fact they when someone mentions whet you said the things in the FAQ, it is a lie. Cause it was obviously erroneously posted. Nope. Or the liberal world technically, you didn’t say it you wrote it.

-10 ( +2 / -12 )

Trump is in a great situation with his base. He can lie non-stop and they do not care.

I just think they should be honest about his lying and expect better.

13 ( +15 / -2 )

Honest eye? With your honest eye It’s a”lie” when you say 306 instead of 304? That’s so important to call out? Or when you get fact checked when indicating that people are angry (an emotion)? Can this fact checker really prove this is a lie? Nope.

-9 ( +4 / -13 )

So what else is new? The man has been lying about everything and anything from the get go. You can pretty much assume half of what comes out of his mouth is a lie.

7 ( +9 / -2 )

You are just lame by now with your manufactured outrage nonsense. We aren’t mad, you are.

that’s why you gotta have your biased articles trying to fact check emotions and opinions and arguing that you lost by 2 less votes than you did and that unemployment was 3.7 percent but it’s not right now. 57 states agree with you.

The delution of the Trumpers - the crazy is strong with them.

The Great Orange Idiot goes on stage and does what he always does, engage in a unhinged lunatic-like rant, that even a "fifth or sixth grader" would know contains mostly bald-faced lies.

And yet his supporters, who evidently operate on an academic level below that, just enjoy the ride.

Trumpers fail to undestand the difference between governing and entertaining (if that's what you call what Donnie does). Third-rate lounge acts belong in Las Vegas, not the White House...

But life for the Dimwit is going to get much more difficult - all the names that Cohen dropped in his testimony will soon or have already been interviewed by Mueller and the NY SD Attorney.

The Trump Crime family will be dissected and dismantled piece by piece, and none too soon...

11 ( +14 / -3 )

Interesting that the Republican response to Trump's lie riddled speech being fact-checked amounts to "How dare you!"

12 ( +13 / -1 )

Honest eye? With your honest eye It’s a”lie” when you say 306 instead of 304?

Did you not read the article? Where does it call it a lie? The word use is 'falsehood' and as it is inaccurate, it most definitely is a falsehood. A lie would require intent to deceive, and as often as not, Trump just doesn't know what he is talking about.

That’s so important to call out?

Showing the president to be to incompetent to even know what he is talking about is quite important.

Or when you get fact checked when indicating that people are angry (an emotion)? Can this fact checker really prove this is a lie? Nope.

Again you are the one using the term 'lie'. That said, once again you haven't bothered to reference what you are talking about.

12 ( +12 / -0 )

Interesting that the Republican response to Trump's lie riddled speech being fact-checked amounts to "How dare you!"

That's all they have left. Then they get annoyed when you point out how they dared to for eight straight years, and have no standing to whine about it being done to them.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

The farcial Donald J. Trump does not know what the truth is ... period.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

blacklabel

Why are you so opposed to media fact checks? They are just doing what Trump wants them to, to tell the truth. If Trump wants to lie about his un-accomplishments, then its his fault for looking like a lying chump.

Trump supporters are more and more embarrassed by the day. Its never too late to change your minds and grow up.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

By the conduct of the Marxists...very!

So now Republicans are Marxist. Cheers.

12 ( +12 / -0 )

Its petty and biased. Im done with it.

The fact check of Obama 57 states comment was called a "mixture" of fact and truth because he obviously misspoke and was "dog tired". Ok, I know the President of the USA knows how many states there are. So I dont run around trying to claim he lied or is stupid or something. Thats the opposite thing of what you do with Trump though. I have never seen the liberal media make an excuse for him like they do with Dem politicians.

The FAQ was on the persons official website, but it was obviously incorrect and was removed and disavowed and .....so Trump lied when he said she said it!

Again you are the one using the term 'lie'

As are all your liberal buddies, its the point of the article to infer this.

All done here.

-12 ( +2 / -14 )

I wonder the mentality of the American people that they vote for a deranged reality TV actor. More alarming is the fact that they cannot get rid of him.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

So we know Trump lies a lot. His fans don't care and they never will.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

Dem politicians get called out by liberal media as well. For example, Northam was smeared all over the liberal msm, including farther left reaching sites like CNN.

Gee, that’s one, I have about 30 more the media missed.

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

Its petty and biased. Im done with it.

That pretty much encapsulates how Trumpers interact with facts and reality - "don't want to hear it, done with it"...

And that's exactly what the right wing media empire wants them to think - come back to your safe far-right bubble where the whole word can be viewed thru the simple lens of Lib and Con, where Trump is a faithful husband, doesn't lie, has never had any dealings with Russia, and has the world's most attractive hair....

They con them into buying their books and clicking on their sites - bilking and scamming them out of money they probably don't have. And what's really both funny and tragic, is that they're not conservative or believe in any of this far-right conspiracy BS - they just make it up and publish it because it makes them money.

And these right wing media and pundit top one-percenters laugh all the way to the bank at the blind sheep that follow them...

9 ( +10 / -1 )

Despite the grammar police the unemployment rate was in fact 3.7 percent. Also it’s petty to say he didn’t get 306! He only got 304! I’m not wasting my time past that because these 2 show it’s just a biased fact check.

Facts are facts, there is no bias involved. If Trump weren't an incompetent pathological liar, this fact check wouldn't exist at all. Accept that Trump is incompetent and a pathological liar instead of constantly trying to find bias in every article about him.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

I get it, it’s politics, i won’t quibble so much, but to cherry pick every single comment and then give their own a pass is just so hilariously dishonest.

You literally do this with everything a democrat says.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

The Great Orange Idiot goes on stage and does what he always does, engage in a unhinged lunatic-like rant, that even a "fifth or sixth grader" would know contains mostly bald-faced lies.

For liberals it would appear that way, I get it.

And yet his supporters, who evidently operate on an academic level below that, just enjoy the ride.

Trumpers fail to undestand the difference between governing and entertaining (if that's what you call what Donnie does). Third-rate lounge acts belong in Las Vegas, not the White House...

Funny, the so called educated elite alumni liberal crowds think that their Washington socialist counterparts have the facts straight and the only thing they have are politicians that have some of the longest noses and their millennial followers swallow it seeds and all. AOC, Bernie are great examples of this, but the comedy doesn’t stop there, now you have liberal socialists that will lie, bend the facts and take on positions they previously would have never touched with a 10 foot poll.

But life for the Dimwit is going to get much more difficult - all the names that Cohen dropped in his testimony will soon or have already been interviewed by Mueller and the NY SD Attorney. 

Life may be more difficult, but not unbearable because the Dems are already showing signs of rapidly becoming damaged goods and now that Mueller’s report is looking more and more like it’s not going to be politically devastating to the President weasel Spliff is now putting the Russian hoax aside and moving the goalpost and saying, we have to look into his previous business dealings....well, if that’s the case and that’s all they have, Trump should be floating on thin air, so at the very best they get an indictment on some business deal. The GOP will laugh these people out of the room.

The Trump Crime family will be dissected and dismantled piece by piece, and none too soon.

And in the meantime while they again waste time and squander another opportunity to do something for the people instead of themselves they have this to worry about:

In SC there was a random poll taken of 5000 people conducted by an Emerson poll and the results are for the 2020 predictions so far are:

SOUTH CAROLINA

2020 GE:

Trump 52% (+4)

Biden 48%

.

Trump 54% (+8)

Warren 46%

.

Trump 54% (+8)

Sanders 46%

.

Trump 54% (+8)

Booker 46%

But yeah, let the Democrats go chasing after more rabbits, fine with me. Lol

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

@bass

SC voted 54.9% for Trump in 2016. And Trump barely won the election. What's your point here? That he has become slightly less popular in a Conservative state?

11 ( +12 / -1 )

OK, I'll bite. SOUTH CAROLINA!? The last Democrat to win a presidential election in SC was Jimmy-Georgia-Peanut-Farming-Carter. Before him it was JFK. That's twice in nearly 60 years. I could choose from a number of states to reverse your amazing poll numbers. Would California be to your liking--would that indicate anything about Trump's national appeal?

11 ( +11 / -0 )

Defending Trump the man takes a special kind of compartmentalism in the brain.

I can kind of understand the idea that people are willing to accept his vulgarity, ignorance, childishness, trash and constant stream of falsehoods as long as he gets the things they want done.

Defending the man just makes the people who do it look dishonest.

9 ( +11 / -2 )

@ Chip Star

Fact checking is not a new phenomenon and it doesn't have anything to do with Trump. Fact checking Politicians and Presidents began in 2004. Bush and Obama's speeches were always fact checked. The reason why it is becoming more known is simply because of the rise of social media which has increased the rate and speed at which information on the internet spreads.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

2.6% growth rate with more slowing expected. Probably because all of that investment and new jobs created by the corporate tax cuts.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

The Trump administration has been quite good for America. I hope it continues for another six years.

-13 ( +0 / -13 )

Fact checking is not a new phenomenon and it doesn't have anything to do with Trump. Fact checking Politicians and Presidents began in 2004. Bush and Obama's speeches were always fact checked. The reason why it is becoming more known is simply because of the rise of social media which has increased the rate and speed at which information on the internet spreads.

I'm well aware of the history of fact-checking. My post was very clear that it's a waste of time with Dimwit Donny because he's incorrect so often.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

The founders of democracy, the ancient Greeks are rolling in their graves looking at the Democratic Party of today.

Um, it was the Republicans who crashed the economy. And started two wars, one based on lies.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

The house judiciary committee is about to fact check Donald's kids. Which probably means at least 1 of them is going to screw up and omit the wrong document and get them all charged for obstruction of justice. All for daddy. Trump supporters should be more concerned about fact checks that really matter, not an AP article that confirms once again that Trump is a pathological liar.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

OK, I'll bite. SOUTH CAROLINA!? The last Democrat to win a presidential election in SC was Jimmy-Georgia-Peanut-Farming-Carter. Before him it was JFK.

That’s just one State. At this point and the way Democrats are going and with more and more

Blacks waking up and finally realizing that States like Illinois will never lower the crime rate if they continue the elect Democrats.

Would California be to your liking--would that indicate anything about Trump's national appeal?

California is thankfully not the entire country. Keep it

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

The house judiciary committee is about to fact check Donald's kids. Which probably means at least 1 of them is going to screw up and omit the wrong document and get them all charged for obstruction of justice.

Ok and then?

All for daddy. Trump supporters should be more concerned about fact checks that really matter, not an AP article that confirms once again that Trump is a pathological liar.

I really think Democrats are fishing for....God knows what and then nothing will come of it or if it does then Trump will pardon them, life will go on or if Weissmann tries to do something shady (he always does) they can appeal it and like with so many of his mafia like scare tactics to find anything to lock people up, it will be appealed overturned, either way, the Dems never learn, they didn’t learn in 2010 and they really didn’t learn in 2014.

-11 ( +0 / -11 )

Trump lied? Why, I am shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Trump will pardon them, life will go on or if Weissmann tries to do something shady (he always does) they can appeal it and like with so many of his mafia like scare tactics to find anything to lock people up, it will be appealed overturned, either way, the Dems never learn, they didn’t learn in 2010 and they really didn’t learn in 2014

Brilliant, not only have you admitted that Trump will pardon anybody convicted of collusion with russia, you've also admitted that Trump's money man is a shady character who always does shady things (with trump's money, under trump's order).

I think you are fishing pretty hard for hope, Trumps approval is worse than 2016. GOP is now voting against him. His entire 2016 campaign team is starting to be indicted, prosecuted, and sentenced. Almost every country is laughing at him. Good luck bass, hope you know how to swim.

Blacks waking up and finally realizing that States like Illinois will never lower the crime rate if they continue the elect Democrats.

You can't keep making stuff up and expect us to believe you.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Blacks waking up and finally realizing that States like Illinois will never lower the crime rate if they continue the elect Democrats.

Wait...Chicago is not the state?

You are aware that black people only account for 15% of the population in Illinois? That 15% is comprised of those that can vote and cannot vote.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

Brilliant, not only have you admitted that Trump will pardon anybody convicted of collusion with russia,

There won’t be a Russian collusion with ?Trump, even Cohen, a convicted felon, liar and closest to Trump doesn’t think so and he threw everything at the President, so that theory is gone.

you've also admitted that Trump's money man is a shady character who always does shady things (with trump's money, under trump's order).

Cohen is going to prison, I don’t think he’ll get 3 years, I’m sure Clinton acolyte Lanny Davis will do whatever he can to reduce his sentence.

I think you are fishing pretty hard for hope,

I don’t think so

Trumps approval is worse than 2016. GOP is now voting against him. His entire 2016 campaign team is starting to be indicted, prosecuted, and sentenced. Almost every country is laughing at him. Good luck bass, hope you know how to swim.

Actually, Trump’s approval is a bit higher, not great, but given the circumstances and being a bit over 40%, that’s not great news for the Democrats, this is why they are going through great lengths to do maximum damage to his character as long as they can to drive hopefully his poll numbers down.

Good luck.....no planes, no meat, 70% tax hike...ROFL!

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

There won’t be a Russian collusion with ?Trump, even Cohen, a convicted felon, liar and closest to Trump doesn’t think so and he threw everything at the President, so that theory is gone.

Look at the logic failure here! Cohen is a liar so can't be believed except when he is saying there was no collusion. Uh . . . That's not what Cohen said, he said he wasn't aware of any. Keep thrashing around, grasping at straws.

Cohen is going to prison, I don’t think he’ll get 3 years, I’m sure Clinton acolyte Lanny Davis will do whatever he can to reduce his sentence.

That's what lawyers are paid to do. You simply can't resist throwing in irrelevant references to Clinton, Obama, or Dems. It's an unhealthy compulsion with you.

Good luck.....no planes, no meat, 70% tax hike...ROFL!

None of this is accurate, which isn't a surprise given the source. ROFL! Smh. Lol! Kudos! I have a personal anecdote for every situation!

6 ( +6 / -0 )

There won’t be a Russian collusion with ?Trump, even Cohen, a convicted felon, liar and closest to Trump doesn’t think so and he threw everything at the President, so that theory is gone.

What are you talking about? The investigation is still on, Meuller's report has yet to be released, and 60 more people are now being investigated.

Cohen is going to prison, I don’t think he’ll get 3 years, I’m sure Clinton acolyte Lanny Davis will do whatever he can to reduce his sentence.

This is random. The original post was about Trump's money man, the shady guy, as you put it. Not Trump's fixer. You really need to learn how to defend an argument.

Actually, Trump’s approval is a bit higher, not great, but given the circumstances and being a bit over 40%, that’s not great news for the Democrats, this is why they are going through great lengths to do maximum damage to his character as long as they can to drive hopefully his poll numbers down.

The only poll that puts his approval rate higher than his 47% at the time of elections is rassmussen. It's dropped. Don't trust me, trust the poll average. Believe in your made up percent all you want though.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Regardless of whether we like Trump or not, we need to be honest about a few things. Trump is not an idiot. Trump has consistently been suspected of breaking numerous laws especially during his early business days. He is good at not leaving direct connections.

As for the Russia collusion case, most of what they seem to have against him is circumstantial evidence. You can’t build a federal case on circumstances. Circumstances can be considered an impeachable offense, but not enough to make a judge want to bring an indictment down on a president.

The nature of his position, as the president, affords him some protection as it can be considered complete career suicide for a judge to indict a President on circumstance.

That is why they are looking for a “smoking gun.”

1 ( +2 / -1 )

When a politician who you like says something inaccurate, he or she "misspeaks."

When one you don't like does the same thing, he or she "lies."

Human nature at work again.

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

Boring.

He lies, his fanbase lap it up. Reality doesn't get a look in.

Facts are presented, checked and still the truth is a bitter pill for some.

No need to read the comments from the faithful, it will be the usual diatribes about liberals.

Ugh.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

When a politician who you like says something inaccurate, he or she "misspeaks."

If a politician lies as often as Trump does, most of us tend not to like them in the first place. Since you've bought all his lies so far, it must be hard be bothered about any new ones.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

When a politician who you like says something inaccurate, he or she "misspeaks."

When one you don't like does the same thing, he or she "lies."

Human nature at work again.

Do you think it's fair on the American people to have a leader who lies to them on a daily basis?

Does it not sicken you, the sheer contempt he has for the electorate?

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Having checked previous "fact checks" from AP, NYT and other fake media, I am not even bothering with these one. Not in the mood to digest more fake concocted partisan misrepresentations.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Having checked previous "fact checks" from AP, NYT and other fake media, I am not even bothering with these one. Not in the mood to digest more fake concocted partisan misrepresentations.

Isn't that a bit, well, partisan of you?

Where do you get your facts from, regarding this speech?

6 ( +6 / -0 )

Defending Trump the man takes a special kind of compartmentalism in the brain.

Trashing Trump for virtually everything he says or does, no matter if it's clearly good/the right thing to do ( meeting and talking with Kim Jong Un / not agreeing to a bad deal ) indicates Trump Derangement Syndrome.

The only poll that puts his approval rate higher than his 47% at the time of elections is rassmussen

No polls said he would win the 2016 election. heh

The only poll that really counts of course is the one on election day and it's going to be sweet.

Trump 2020

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Look at the logic failure here! Cohen is a liar so can't be believed except when he is saying there was no collusion.

Do you know why? Think! Mueller and his merrily posse of Democrat Clinton supporter lawyers and not to mention her best buddy Lanny Davis, they would do anything to get to Trump and Cohen for Spliff and Cummings is the key, so if he didn’t even have the very thing that Democrats planted in the minds of DTS haters then one might say with the greatest of certainty Cohen really couldn’t definitively say. So on that one, I believe him.

That's what lawyers are paid to do.

Ok, you can believe that, I’m not stupid, Lanny Davis being Cohen’s lawyer, we all know what’s up. Sneaky, but not at all surprising, NYC has over 3,000 lawyers and Cohen happens to get the lawyer of the woman that he beat, the closest person in her life besides her daughter and grandkids....lol....yeah sure...

None of this is accurate,

Yes, it is, unless AOC has a twin.

https://youtu.be/D4-kd1o8ptU

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

What are you talking about? The investigation is still on,

But it’s going to wrap up soon. Don’t worry. And fear not, weasel shifty Spliff and Nadler will find other extra curricular activities for the Dems work with in trying to snare Trump.

This is random. The original post was about Trump's money man, the shady guy, as you put it. Not Trump's fixer. You really need to learn how to defend an argument.

I’m doing that, please keep up. What I’m wondering is, now that Cohen lied once again will he be given extra prison time? Oh, one could only hope.

The only poll that puts his approval rate higher than his 47% at the time of elections is rassmussen. It's dropped.

Not that much and by the way, it’s not in the 30’s so that’s a thallium great news.

Don't trust me, trust the poll average. Believe in your made up percent all you want though.

You are right, I don’t trust the majority of the liberal polls since they all got it wrong last time, even with the Senate....

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Toast Heretic:

Isn't that a bit, well, partisan of you?

Where do you get your facts from, regarding this speech?

I did not see this speech. I was just responding in general to these polemical "fact checks" by the fake media of which I have seen too many:

Try original sources. Like watching the source video instead of CNNs selected snipped. (Famous recent example: The Covington highschool thing). And try to make a distinction between what is meant and ridiculous nitpicking about words. (Random example: No, Obama did not write a formal founding certificate, but his policies did create ISIS, so yes, he is the founder). I could go on for ages, but all these so-called "fact checks" (often with the help of a party political hacks like the couple of activists who run "Snopes") fall into these main categories of misrepresentation and sophistry.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Do you know why? Think! Mueller and his merrily posse of Democrat Clinton supporter lawyers and not to mention her best buddy Lanny Davis, they would do anything to get to Trump and Cohen for Spliff and Cummings is the key, so if he didn’t even have the very thing that Democrats planted in the minds of DTS haters then one might say with the greatest of certainty Cohen really couldn’t definitively say. So on that one, I believe him.

Whatever this means, it does nothing to explain how Trumpophiles can say with a straight face that Cohen can't be trusted about anything unless it's something that supports Trump.

Ok, you can believe that, I’m not stupid, Lanny Davis being Cohen’s lawyer, we all know what’s up. Sneaky, but not at all surprising, NYC has over 3,000 lawyers and Cohen happens to get the lawyer of the woman that he beat, the closest person in her life besides her daughter and grandkids....lol....yeah sure.

Cohen was free to hire any lawyer he so chose. Instead of accepting it at face value, you feel the urge to push another conspiracy theory. ROFLMA!

Yes, it is, unless AOC has a twin.

AOC isn't going to take away planes and meat. Only utterly ignorant people that haven't bothered to do their own research believe that nonsense.

To what does the 70% tax apply? You probably don't even know this.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Whatever this means,

It really means, Dems better think of something and fast, when the witch hunt is over what next? Financial crimes? Will it work? Stormy? Didn’t work, allegations of a love child, crushed..hmmm....what else can we get on him....

Cohen was free to hire any lawyer he so chose.

Of course he can do that and we all know why. Lanny’s pretense means one thing, use Cohen to get to Trump and throw him away like a used toy.

AOC isn't going to take away planes and meat.

No, she won’t because she’s a loose canon! California and their version of a Bullet train just went bankrupt? Gee, imagine that. Like I’m going to take a boat from California to Japan. Lol

Only utterly ignorant people that haven't bothered to do their own research believe that nonsense.

We have and she and Bernie are the biggest gift to Trump and ever private business entrepreneurs. AOC won’t get my money. Trump was definitely right, keep the hammer and sickle out.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Just catching up here. Trump fans seem upset. Are you all saying he didn't lie through his teeth during his speech or something?

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Do you think it's fair on the American people to have a leader who lies to them on a daily basis?

They all lie, the Democrats lie all day, the media lies all day, the FBI lies all day, so what do you suggest? I’m not happy with these people and they all lie on a daily basis, so now what?

Does it not sicken you, the sheer contempt he has for the electorate?

You are now a clairvoyant?

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Ah, so there's no debate that he lied, it's just that he's a politician and they all do it.

Drain the swamp!!!!

6 ( +6 / -0 )

They all lie

Follow your own logic. If they all lie, why do you support the one that has been proven to lie the most? Shouldn't you throw your unquestioning support behind the person that lies the least? And please let's not pretend that that person is Trump, that would be truly ROFL and you know it.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Trump lies about so many things, and so often that he’s in a class of his own.

A Trump supporter’s only recourse is to object to the grade of the lie he’s being called on (306 vs 304) completely ignoring (or more likely deflecting) from the breathtaking scope of this mans mendacity, his penchant to lie about everything and anything big or small. Petty and pathetic? An apt description of the liar-in-chief.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Just to set the record straight; As Trump has lied, he is a liar by definition.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

TRUMP, on his Electoral College win: "We didn't get to 270. We got 306."

Also it’s petty to say he didn’t get 306! He only got 304! I’m not wasting my time past that because these 2 show it’s just a biased fact check.

Actually it's one of the more telling fact checks. Good revealer of Trump's lack of character; what he's lying about. He's made the claim more than once before and been called on it. Isn't it petty and pathetic to repeat a lie because you just can't accept you lost 2 faithless voters?

He also claimed to have had “the biggest Electoral College win since Ronald Reagan.” Another lie. Called on it he then claimed "that he meant he achieved a bigger Electoral College victory than any Republican since Reagan". Another lie. And then, as is his habit he blamed someone else for giving him the information.

It's the petty lies that are revealing... and he makes so, so, so many of them.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

It really means, Dems better think of something and fast, when the witch hunt is over what next? Financial crimes? Will it work? Stormy? Didn’t work, allegations of a love child, crushed..hmmm....what else can we get on him....

And this also doesn't explain how Trumpophiles can say Cohen can't be trusted except when he supports their opinions.

Of course he can do that and we all know why. Lanny’s pretense means one thing, use Cohen to get to Trump and throw him away like a used toy.

Another conspiracy theory.

No, she won’t because she’s a loose canon! California and their version of a Bullet train just went bankrupt? Gee, imagine that. Like I’m going to take a boat from California to Japan. Lol

AOC isn't even proposing taking away planes or hamburgers. Only people too lazy to do cursory research continue to push this falsehood.

We have 

Your inaccurate posts demonstrate otherwise.

Here's your boy acting like a stable genius:

https://youtu.be/g5HHZI_pe3w

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites