Australia to continue review of COVID vaccinations

https://www.citizensjournal.us/18-reasons-i-wont-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine/

https://www.citizensjournal.us/18-reasons-i-wont-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine/

Once someone is using Mercola as a if it were a good reference it kinda lost the argument.

Most of the arguments contained have already been demonstrated false or are completely irrelevant.

Animal experiments for COVID were done, they did not give problems, so why mention other coronaviruses? and more importantly why don't mention successful experiments done for vaccine candidates on other coronaviruses?

Companies are liable about many kinds of responsabilities, the article makes it seem as if lawsuits from particulars were the only kind, that is false.

The myth of antibody dependent enhancement makes no sense, this would be something terribly easy to detect in the phase III, but more importantly in the natural infections, obviously it has not been found, so why mention it as if it was a real possibility.

I mean, openly lying about the people being vaccinated being part of ongoing clinical trials should be a huge hint that something is not right with this list.

What I always laugh about is that when people are skeptical about vaccines, and yet they're not skeptical about their anti-vaccine sources. It's like a double-standard, and logical reasoning flies out the window

Don't get me wrong - I actually support skepticism. Everyone trained in the sciences are trained to be skeptical. They're trained to follow where the evidence goes, and only when the facts and evidence goes to support the original assertion, then ya gotta accept it no matter what ya feel about it

So gotta apply the same skepticism on both vaccine and anti-vaccine sources, and follow where the facts and evidence goes. Yet when it comes to anti-vaccine sources, they easily accept them with no skepticism at all. That's just weird that they don't use logical reasoning on all sides