Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
world

Biden impeachment inquiry authorized by House Republicans, despite lack of evidence

96 Comments
By Moira Warburton and Katharine Jackson

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Thomson Reuters 2023.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

96 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Contempt of congress = prison time.

Another thing: if Trump was acquitted at both of his impeachment trials, then how was he "impeached"?

-21 ( +8 / -29 )

Another thing: if Trump was acquitted at both of his impeachment trials, then how was he "impeached"?

Look up the word “impeach” in a dictionary and get back to us.

27 ( +32 / -5 )

they have not provided evidence that Biden took any official actions to help those businesses or benefited financially from them.

Because the GOP's Lord 'n' Savior demands retribution. He is a vengeful God.

Pure and simple.

12 ( +21 / -9 )

The utter height of Repub incompetence and irresponsibility...

You've got one of Biden's worst enemies, Repub Sen Chuck Grassley, openly admit this is all political;

"Senator Chuck Grassley admitted on Wednesday that House Republicans’ impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden hasn’t produced any facts pointing to wrongdoing on the president’s part.

“I have no evidence of it,” Grassley told CNN, just hours before House Republicans were set to vote to formalize the Biden impeachment inquiry. “I’m just going to follow the facts where they are, and the facts haven’t taken me to that point where I can say the president is guilty of anything.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/177539/chuck-grassley-no-evidence-biden-impeachment

But go for it Repubs - just ask Gingrich how that last Repub impeachment worked out...

10 ( +18 / -8 )

The corruption attached to this administration is enormous, and has its roots in the Obama administration.

It's not surprising a drug and prostitute addicted son would try and say his father "was not financially involved".

Even Hunter's associates say that is not so. Hunter put his father in speakerphone and these associates heard everything.

There is evidence everywhere. Courts have said payments to family members does constitute evidence.

Misleading headline.

-16 ( +6 / -22 )

Despite lack of evidence.

that says everything.

BTW, JJE, ever heard of Jim Jordan? Scott Perry? Guess what they did? They blew off congressional subpoenas. Lock em’ up, yo!

19 ( +23 / -4 )

Hang on - two Trump guys received prison time for contempt of congress, Bannon and Navarro. Those sentences are under appeal.

-15 ( +4 / -19 )

Another thing: if Trump was acquitted at both of his impeachment trials, then how was he "impeached"?

because the House impeaches and the Senate convicts or acquits.

good to see you’re so up to speed on these things…

21 ( +22 / -1 )

Because the GOP's Lord 'n' Savior demands retribution.

No, but the House Republicans did. I mean, that is their job, it's in the word "oversight"

He is a vengeful God.

So are the Democrats.

Pure and simple.

-14 ( +7 / -21 )

The republicans and their MAGA supporters aren’t playing with a full deck.

9 ( +17 / -8 )

Oh yeah and Peter Navarro. Wasn’t Don Jr deposed twice in private by Dems under threat of prison if he didn’t?

-14 ( +5 / -19 )

Typical GOP (at least recently). No need of facts to make bogus claims.

8 ( +13 / -5 )

What a waste of time. I point my finger at Reps for starting this whole crap with B Clinton. Aside from that, just ignore most of the posters of here as they just wanna whine and cry about the right or left to make themselves feel something, like they doing the right. Again, waste of time.

-2 ( +6 / -8 )

Your House will not remove Biden from office. You understand that don’t you, JJE? There is zero chance of Senate conviction. Zero. With your two seat majority, you might not even score an impeachment in the House.

9 ( +12 / -3 )

Precisely. Steve Bannon and Pete Navarro didn't get to decide how their congressional hearing should be conducted and Bannon got a four-month prison term (under appeal) with Navarro being sentenced soon.

One rule for them and another for Hunter... fraid not.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/stephen-k-bannon-sentenced-four-months-prison-two-counts-contempt-congress

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/former-white-house-advisor-co

-10 ( +5 / -15 )

The republicans and their MAGA supporters aren’t playing with a full deck.

Let me guess, but the Democrats are? Seriously?

Typical GOP (at least recently). No need for facts to make bogus claims.

Says the people cheering on a bogus witch hunt against a former President 91 counts? You would think he committed crimes against humanity. Give me a break. I give the Dems credit for being creative though.

-10 ( +7 / -17 )

The United States of America is afflicted by a paralyzing disease called trumpitis.

The Trump Party (the Republican Party is no longer a a viable political force) has massive internal problems. Hence, to internal problems external solutions.

8 ( +13 / -5 )

Another thing: if Trump was acquitted at both of his impeachment trials, then how was he "impeached"?

Because he was impeached twice then later was acquitted. Impeachment happens first, it’s a permanent stain.

12 ( +14 / -2 )

JJE

Precisely. Steve Bannon and Pete Navarro didn't get to decide how their congressional hearing should be conducted and Bannon got a four-month prison term (under appeal) with Navarro being sentenced soon.

Umm, they didn't request to have a public congressional hearing, they just refused to have any hearing at all.

So quite different. Hunter wants to speak, Bannon and Navarro wanted to stay silent.

11 ( +13 / -2 )

The corruption attached to this administration is enormous,

lol No it's not. It's so "enormous" they're going to impeach him for what? Car payments? A loan they even achknowledged there is paperwork for?

I've said it before and I say it again: Go ahead folks, give Biden the Clinton treatment. Impeach him and get him reelected. :)

14 ( +16 / -2 )

zibala

There is evidence everywhere. Courts have said payments to family members does constitute evidence.

Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.

13 ( +15 / -2 )

The following statement would be more accurate: "Trump was twice acquitted after impeachment".

We don't say people are guilty when acquitted or a higher court strikes down a conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct or malfeasance.

-14 ( +1 / -15 )

Hunter is going to jail regardless of any of this. He has zero incentive to play ball with these jerk-offs. Troll away, Hunter! Screw em’!

11 ( +13 / -2 )

Impeach him and get him reelected. :)

the Trump magic like that doesn’t work when you are actually….guilty.

where did Hunter and Jim get the money to “pay back the loans” to Joe?

What was the source of that money? And what did they do to get it? And Joe knew where it came from and what they did and was ok with it, cause he wanted his 10% cut.

-13 ( +4 / -17 )

Umm, they didn't request to have a public congressional hearing

You guys just say anything, don’t you?

“Bannon willing to testify at public Jan. 6 hearing as contempt trial looms”

-14 ( +3 / -17 )

It’s projection and distraction. To quote @Bass4funk, pure and simple.

-13 ( +2 / -15 )

he wanted his 10% cut.

So the MAGA conspiracy story goes.

Totally baseless nonsense.

9 ( +14 / -5 )

2020hindsights implied that Bannon refused to appear outright - FALSE - he asked for a public hearing after Trump waived his executive privilege. The committee demanded a deposition.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/10/politics/steve-bannon-trump-january-6-executive-privilege/index.html

*“While Mr. Bannon has been steadfast in his convictions, circumstances have now changed,” Costello wrote. “Mr. Bannon is willing to, and indeed prefers, to testify at your public hearing.”*

*(Democrat Joe) Lofgren, however, said that public testimony from Bannon was unlikely, noting that the committee typically does depositions.*

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

Hunter should play this like 45 and Roger Stone did. Take the 5th on every question other than his name. Screw these people.

10 ( +13 / -3 )

Because he was impeached twice then later was acquitted. Impeachment happens first, it’s a permanent stain.

Not to the people who voted and will vote for him.

-11 ( +5 / -16 )

GOP Oversight - what an embarrassment!

Disgusting to say the least!

But like their great leader so good at instigating and dividing!

If you want to have a hearing make it public!

Of course you won't, because you would only twist Hunter Biden's words and never show what was really said!

All they, MAGA and others like them want to do is hurt the Biden family, promote Trump, and keep the swamp they're stuck in!

9 ( +11 / -2 )

Not to the people who voted and will vote for him.

yes Bass, we know he could shoot people on 5th Ave and you wouldn’t give two hoots. Something something establishment

11 ( +13 / -2 )

Blacklabel

Umm, they didn't request to have a public congressional hearing

You guys just say anything, don’t you?

“Bannon willing to testify at public Jan. 6 hearing as contempt trial looms”

But only after disobeying the subpoena.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

The US is fast sliding into one hot mess and it isn't suddenly going to get better.

Be prepared for the worst but hope for the best.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.

Joe's brother sent him a check. To repay a family loan.

Joe was invited onto a call with Hunter and one of his business associates. And nothing of substance was discussed.

Joe insisted that Ukraine fire a prosecutor who wasn't investigating Burisma.

This impeachment inquiry will turn up nothing. The only reason cynical nihilistic cultists like Jim Jordan want to do this is 1) because Trump demands it in retribution, and 2) because they think it'll sully Biden's reputation for feeble-minded, low-information voters. As Steve Bannon has said, "flood the zone with sh&%". Throw crap at the wall and see what sticks.

11 ( +14 / -3 )

But only after disobeying the subpoena.

no, before.

”as trial looms”. You might want to look up the word “looms” to see what that means.

so has Hunter disobeyed the subpoena now too? So he can’t go back later and is subject to the same rules/punishment as Bannon now?

-13 ( +4 / -17 )

Hunter should play this like 45 and Roger Stone did. Take the 5th on every question other than his name. Screw these people.

Well, I agree and that is why and how we think Trump should feel and say to these people. But Hunter will be held in contempt, he can't run from this and this will not go away, this is not even close to being over, so buckle up.

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

We don't say people are guilty when acquitted or a higher court strikes down a conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct or malfeasance.

Again, you are barking up the wrong tree. You really need to read up on things before you post your misguided version of them. 3rd time just this morning.

8 ( +12 / -4 )

yes Bass, we know he could shoot people on 5th Ave and you wouldn’t give two hoots. Something something establishment

As if the left cared about people, if they did, they would have secured the border already

-13 ( +6 / -19 )

*Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.*

There is none. Nada. Nil. Zero. Zip. Zilch.

The whistle blowers don’t blow.

The “blow the doors” “evidence” backfired every single time. The ONE hearing devolved into farce when the GQP’s own witness said there was no evidence to justify impeachment.

The GQP promised their cult leader and their goober base impeachment.

That is literally the only reason.

Like everything else these clowns do, it’s going to blow up in their faces.

12 ( +14 / -2 )

the Trump magic like that doesn’t work when you are actually….guilty.

Sometimes you pretend to believe in innocent until proven guilty, sometimes you don’t. It’s a strange double standard. Speculation even, and I know you don’t like speculation. Except when you do it.

9 ( +12 / -3 )

Hunter will be held in contempt, he can't run from this and this will not go away

whatcha gonna do? Throw him in jail? DOJ beat you to that one.

10 ( +12 / -2 )

Hunter Biden is in contempt of Congress because the GQP is so objectively contemptible.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

bass4funk

Hunter should play this like 45 and Roger Stone did. Take the 5th on every question other than his name. Screw these people.

Well, I agree and that is why and how we think Trump should feel and say to these people. But Hunter will be held in contempt, he can't run from this and this will not go away, this is not even close to being over, so buckle up.

If they hold him in contempt after he has agreed to testify in public, then the GOP have just naded Hunter Biden a big win politically.

Blacklabel

*But only after disobeying the subpoena.*

no, before.

Nope. He had already been held in contempt quite a bit before and he was about to go to trial for it.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

My favorite part of this is Gym Jordan whining about Hunter demanding a public hearing because the GQP has cherry picked transcripts before WHEN HE HIMSELF, ignored a lawful Congressional Subpoena.

That’s some world class hypocrisy.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

the Trump magic like that doesn’t work when you are actually….guilty.

lol The Trump magic? What magic? Trump got impeached and then lost.

I said the Clinton treatment, because this impeachment will be just as silly and counterproductive as the Clinton one. :)

7 ( +9 / -2 )

Reap what you sow.

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

There are two separate issues here- Hunter's taxes and Joe's impeachment.

As for the business dealings, the goalposts have been moving steadily. From the 2020 Presidential debates when Joe said "my son made no money from China" and "we never talked about his business". That changed to "we weren't in business together" and now finally "not financially involved in business". Which means of course that Joe WAS involved in Hunter's business dealings, just not financially.

The impeachment is another matter. There doesn't need to be a direct pipeline to Joe Biden for his conduct to be illegal. If any of his family benefits directly from Joe's actions, he is also guilty on bribery or influence peddling charges.

-5 ( +4 / -9 )

The impeachment is another matter. There doesn't need to be a direct pipeline to Joe Biden for his conduct to be illegal. If any of his family benefits directly from Joe's actions, he is also guilty on bribery or influence peddling charges.

Lol what? If someone in Biden's family benefits it means it is corruption? What a vague and absurd claim.

6 ( +8 / -2 )

They cannot even name the so-called impeachment offense that they want to investigate, nor have they a single piece of supporting evidence.

When James Commer (“I think the DOJ indicted Hunter to save him from our committee!”) is your chairman, you are really scraping the bottom of the cognitive barrel.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

 If any of his family benefits directly from Joe's actions, he is also guilty on bribery or influence peddling charges.

heard of a guy named Jared Kushner, Attila? Of course you haven’t…

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Impeachment is political and not based on any evidence. But Trump (as a non-president) is in criminal jeopardy due to criminal evidence and the courts don't care about politics.

they would have secured the border already

Fact: The left deport more. Look at the numbers Trump vs the recent two Dems.

 But Hunter...

...is not running for President. Why cares about Hunter?

7 ( +8 / -1 )

There doesn't need to be a direct pipeline to Joe Biden for his conduct to be illegal.

your’re serious about this? Anyone trading on the Biden name makes Joe Biden criminally liable? Covering BS in reasonable sounding vocabulary does not make it any less BS.

screw these people

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Question: how did Hunter and the wider Biden family make tens of millions of dollars all of a sudden after someone became VP?

Was it legit? Where did the cash come from and why?

It's these wider questions the inquiry shall establish answers for.

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

JJE

Question: how did Hunter and the wider Biden family make tens of millions of dollars all of a sudden after someone became VP?

Was it legit? Where did the cash come from and why?

It's these wider questions the inquiry shall establish answers for.

Question: did Joe Biden do anything illegal? If so, what was it and where is the evidence? If not, why are they having an impeachment investigation?

3 ( +7 / -4 )

Hunter is free to come in anytime, give a deposition and clear this all up.

It will be like any deposition - videoed and transcribed.

Maybe it's all a mix up, but who is "the big guy" and "Celtic" referred to in his emails from that notorious laptop...

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Question: did Joe Biden do anything illegal? If so, what was it and where is the evidence? If not, why are they having an impeachment investigation?

According to Attila, Hunter trading on the family name makes Joe a criminal whether Joe was involved or not. I’d add it doesn’t matter if Joe was a civilian at the time. Any trading on the Biden name by anyone named Biden is Joe’s personal responsibility and illegal.

screw these people

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Walk it back, White House ?

“Do you have a message to people who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6 Committee?" a reporter asked Biden. "I hope that the committee goes after them and holds them accountable criminally," the president responded at the time.”

family interviews are next.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Blacklabel

Walk it back, White House ?

“Do you have a message to people who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6 Committee?"

And yet Hunter presented himself freely. Good luck getting a contempt of congress that doesn't make Hunter more popular because of it.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Hunter is free to come in anytime, give a deposition and clear this all up.

guess you missed the news. He did show up. He will testify under oath, so long as it’s public. Maybe Jim Jordan can give us all a lecture on the importance of honoring congressional subpoenas

4 ( +8 / -4 )

We’ve come all the way from Hunter or no one in the family has made one penny from China! to:

Hunter: “Let me state as clearly as I can: My father was not financially involved in my business.”

oops. What’s that mean, exactly? Sounds like some kind of legal sounding minor difference that can be used as an excuse.

he didn’t invest in the initial business only gets profits= not financially involved?

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

He will testify under oath, so long as it’s public.

nope, he doesn’t get to choose.

No one else got to choose.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

This evasiveness, chicanery and demanding yet another sweetheart deal is going to backfire on the Biden/s. Voters don't like these double standards.

-7 ( +2 / -9 )

that doesn't make Hunter more popular because of it.

Hunters behavior is/was disgusting, clearly. No one supports that kind of depravity, drug usage and mistreatment of women shown in his pictures/videos/documents.

Do you support his actual behavior? He’s a cool dude for ya?

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

He will testify under oath, so long as it’s public.

nope, he doesn’t get to choose. 

No one else got to choose.

Did that include Gym Jordan?

6 ( +9 / -3 )

What is Commer scared of with a public hearing?

Is it that he won’t get to doctor the transcripts like he did Im with the so-called whistleblowers who weren’t?

Or is he scared of being made to look like the buffoon he so clearly is last time there was a public hearing and his own witness said there was no evidence to justify impeachment?

To be fair, could be both.

It’s probably both.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

nope, he doesn’t get to choose. 

No one else got to choose.

Jim Jordan got to choose. Anytime it’s brought up in committee he just gets up and leaves. So sorry, cry me a river. Hunter is already going to jail. That pressure ain’t gonna work. He gets another 2 months. Big deal. You don’t have squat for evidence and you don’t have squat for leverage. Sit and spin.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Who cares if the GQP trolls in House can’t even name a crime. As long as Orange Jesus is mollified.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

Voters don't like these double standards.

scroll up to Wallace mentioning JaVanka…

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Blacklabel

He will testify under oath, so long as it’s public.

nope, he doesn’t get to choose.

Yes, he does. He has already chosen.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

JJE

This evasiveness, chicanery and demanding yet another sweetheart deal is going to backfire on the Biden/s. Voters don't like these double standards.

Why are we talking about Hunter? He's not the target of this investigation. Where's the smoking gun to Joe?

Hint: there is none.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

I will repeat my question:

Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.

The supposed “loan repayment” check that had no loan agreement and consists of CCP money given to Hunter as part of bribery/influence peddling.

the “loan repayment” check from his brother, also CCP funded money for influence peddling.

heard of registering for FARA? Bidens haven’t.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Blacklabel

*Name one piece of evidence that shows Joe Biden's wrongdoing.*

The supposed “loan repayment” check that had no loan agreement and consists of

Repaying loans is not against the law.

CCP money given to Hunter as part of bribery/influence peddling.

Where is the evidence that it was bribery/influence peddling?

6 ( +8 / -2 )

Blacklabel

heard of registering for FARA? Bidens haven’t.

You don't need to register for FARA for repaying loans.

6 ( +8 / -2 )

It will all come out clearly once all the subpoenas are complied with, all depositions given and all pseudonym business mails received and viewed.

“Ongoing” and “not yet“ come to mind from previous times when the shoe was on the other foot.

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

Blacklabel

It will all come out clearly once all the subpoenas are complied with, all depositions given and all pseudonym business mails received and viewed.

So the GOP have nothing and are going on a fishing trip. They don't even expect to find anything, because if they did, they would let Hunter be questioned in public.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Good point. Jordan is an elected member of congress and standing rules is committees cannot investigate other members. That is precisely why there is a separate ethics committee.

This does not apply to Hunter, but hey, you all overlooked his illegal gun purchase that carries 10 years on a law championed by his dad, while never missing a chance to slam lawful gun owners - so that doesn't surprise anyone.

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

Where is the evidence that it was bribery/influence peddling?

The source of the money and the lack of any work or services done to receive it to the grandchild bank account level.

-7 ( +4 / -11 )

You do know Hunter was indicted for claiming his work salary was also “loans” don’t you?

this family sure gets and receives a lot of “loans” that have no paperwork and that are sourced/repaid with incoming overseas business money from our enemies.

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

Blacklabel

Where is the evidence that it was bribery/influence peddling?

The source of the money and the lack of any work or services done to receive it to the grandchild bank account level.

The source of the money isn't evidence of bribery/influence peddling. Hunter was working in China at the time, so a lot of his money would come from China. That's completely normal.

1 ( +6 / -5 )

Blacklabel

this family sure gets and receives a lot of “loans” that have no paperwork and that are sourced/repaid with incoming overseas business money from our enemies.

Taking out and paying off loans isn't illegal.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

Repeat: Bannon has been sentenced to 4 months in prison (he is free while under appeal). Navarro same thing basically.

Certain quarters thought it was funny then... not so much now with roles reversed.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

Yet Ivanka receiving $100 million from China while her dad was president and she was working in the White House does not count as CCP influence peddling.

you are bad faith actors

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Good point. Jordan is an elected member of congress and standing rules is committees cannot investigate other members. 

It wasn’t a standing Committee. It was a select committee and Gymmy didn’t want to answer questions under oath about his role in the attempted coup. He got away with it. For now anyway.

There is nothing whatsoever tying Hunter Biden’s dodgy behavior to his father and claims otherwise have been disproved with great relish.

This is a fishing expedition in a bath tub to mollify Orange Jesus and nothing more.

2 ( +8 / -6 )

JJE

Repeat: Bannon has been sentenced to 4 months in prison (he is free while under appeal). Navarro same thing basically.

Certain quarters thought it was funny then... not so much now with roles reversed.

I look forward for them finally being behind bars. Let's see if the GOP dare file contempt of congress charges...

5 ( +7 / -2 )

you are bad faith actors

And the public will recognize it as such.

1 ( +6 / -5 )

So still no evidence.... Ho hum, big nothing-burger.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

All of you seem to have all the answers.

wonder why Hunter won’t repeat what you say under oath?

was an odd turn when he made the clarifying addition of financially involved.

joe lied then to the American people when he said he wasn’t involved at all.

-5 ( +4 / -9 )

Repeat: Bannon has been sentenced to 4 months in prison (he is free while under appeal). Navarro same thing basically.

This Is Stevie 3-Chins chance to dry out and finally bathe!

2 ( +6 / -4 )

…despite lack of evidence

The same claim made by some Democrats and Democrat shills. Also, a false claim. There is evidence. To theses Democrats the evidence might not be compelling, but this does not negate that the evidence exists.

-6 ( +3 / -9 )

Yet Ivanka receiving $100 million from China while her dad was president

He wasn’t president in 2015.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2016/07/21/inside-ivanka-inc-100m-apparel-sales-and-a-bid-to-move-some-manufacturing-back-from-china/amp/

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

Just another embarrassing sideshow from a party that continues to eat itself, and that offers nothing but hate and revenge fantasies.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Yet Ivanka receiving $100 million from China while her dad was president

He wasn’t president in 2015.

She received 30 something patents within months from China just as her father was visiting. She got another 100 million In benefits while working in the White House.

Her man-wife screech became the manager of a 2 billion dollar wealth fund OVER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE SAYDI wealth fund within months of leaving in spite of having zero Wealth management experience.

He also got M. East funding to bail out his disastrous 666 Building purchase.

THIS was actual adult children of a sitting President cashing in on their family connections.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

Even in a criminal investigation, police need a hint that a crime has even been committed to investigate.

Here the GQP has nothing. MAGA Mike couldn’t/wouldn’t elaborate about what they are even going to investigate.

That’s some weak sauce.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

The year is 2017, Blacklabel. 2017.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites