COVID-19 INFORMATION What you need to know about the coronavirus if you are living in Japan or planning a visit.
world

Bill Clinton vouches for Hillary's health

11 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

11 Comments
Login to comment

And Bill is completely trustworthy as his past has shown.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

Indeed, a man we can trust and believe in. Wionder what he was getting up to while she was indisposed.

-3 ( +4 / -7 )

You know what? If Bill Clinton could run for president again he would win by a landslide.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

Hillary should release her medical report months ago, or neurologist must certify her health if she is running. The WH and Hillary's state dept. dragged the Benghazi story into a false blaming on the video instead of acknowledging the attacked by Al Qaeda's affiliated on 9/11 anniversary just before the election. She even said of her regret on Benghazi. Like Kofi Annan appointed his friend to investigated his trouble at the U.N., the accountability board failed to interview most key peoples as same. Who is dumbfounded? An impeached president who can't keep his pants in place with many women and lied to the world on his own shame? Hillary knows all, but using Bill for her own presidential ambition.

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

I don't give a hoot about her health. I hope she is well. But, it's her socialist policies that are of concern.

-5 ( +5 / -10 )

Bill vouches for Hillary's health. Really? how would he know?

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

This is just another waste of time by impotent Republicans. If they can't win fair by debating policy, then they try to attack credibility with the flimsiest and most trivial things, which the tea party and right wingers eat up.

As if Karl Rove knows anything about her condition at that time. She was treated and left the hospital.

Just more smoke and no substance from the good old Republicans.

The other smoke and no substance question is Benghazi. A respected group has already investigated, but that apparently wasn't enough for the Republicans because it didn't implicate Clinton. So, they keep squeaking like hungry birds for a worm knowing there isn't one.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Her Karma's coming yet...

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

'You know what? If Bill Clinton could run for president again he would win by a landslide.'

Undoubtedly. One of the most gifted politicians of our age. It's no surprise that his talents have been used since his presidency, unlike others who have sloped off to nothingness.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

I watched CNN discussion moderated by one left lady and on right man, Gingrich. G was supposed to talk on GOP side on this show, When asked about Hilary talk, G said H hasn't declared DEM candidacy. Just R is concentrating on attacking H instead of talking what he will do if he is elected. R has to stop personal attack to be elected to GOP candidate. G said that if asked, I can suggest how to become GOP candidate. One person said, "You are an expert in being attacked for your personal life. Thank you." .

BTW, Obama's first election, he never bragged he would be the first black president. Just ignored birth certificate talks and anything about him and concentrated on agendas so popular Hilary was not elected at Dem convention. R can claim he would be first Latinos but that might backfire him when he concentrates on degrading Hilary who have been popular with other Latinos. ''

R needs G's guidance. Jeb Bush gained more point against R.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@viking

This is just another waste of time by impotent Republicans. If they can't win fair by debating policy, then they try to attack credibility with the flimsiest and most trivial things, which the tea party and right wingers eat up.

Ok, now let's be truthful and decipher through the liberal muck of delusion. As I recall if you take your partisan hats off, I can give you litany of debates where Obama lied...Obamacare, IRS scandal, and countless more fibs and just blatant boldfaced lies. Both sides do it, but this time around, the Dems are running with it to the bank.

As if Karl Rove knows anything about her condition at that time. She was treated and left the hospital.

So you are saying the public doesn't and shouldn't know the potential physical health of presidential candidate. Funny, but the time Hilary runs, she will be 69 around the same when Reagan ran for the presidency. Remember McCain, Dems were shouting through the rooftops that McCain was too old as well as Reagan. It's a fact that Hilary had a serious head injury, if I'm going to vote for a potential candidate, I want them to be in good health. Do you ever think JFK would have been president if the would knew then about his health condition now? You guys are so hypocritical, if a liberal complains about a Republican being too old that is so bad, not to mention despicable, but if a Republican makes a comment about a liberal then he is hung drawn and quartered.

Just more smoke and no substance from the good old Republicans.

So what do you call Benghazi? If you like your doctor, you can keep him, the IRS scandal? Smoke and mirrors? What still NO answer?? No substance, Yeah from the fragmented liberal brain

The other smoke and no substance question is Benghazi. A respected group has already investigated,

Ok, so now let's make it a bipartisan group and have Rice and Hilary testify under oath, THEN you can there was really a true investigation going on.

Again, you libs are a crack up. You guys were on Bush, Rumsfeld about the war and 4500 men and women lost their lives, you guys want their head of a silver platter, because that is so important, but if 4 Americans die, just blow it off. There is NO justification for this lame rationalization. 4500 dead Americans are way more important than 4 dead Americans. And why do you libs not care about these 4 Americans? Because they know, if Hilary has to go for a committee and she was found to be derelict in her duties, she would be in serious trouble which could derail her chances and who else do the libs have? Biden, Warren? Where is the liberal outrage? 4 dead Americans, the libs are quiet, but want to forget about Benghazi, who cares, it's just 4 Americans. It is about as you put it "smoke and mirrors" If the libs lose Hilary either by the Benghazi or possibly her health is the entire egg basket for the Dems. It's all politics. Discredit the Republicans as much as possible, but this time, it might be a whole lot different than before because Hilary can't escape this. The harder she dodges, the more it makes her look guilty after all, she thinks she is entitled to the presidency, if so, then she needs to answer in all honesty the truth about what happened and if she has nothing to hide, the same goes for her health, disclose the information wit the public, pure and simple.

but that apparently wasn't enough for the Republicans because it didn't implicate Clinton.

Not yet, but the Repubs have time and Hilary doesn't, that's the main difference. If she decides to throw her hat in the race, she will most definitely be scrutinized a lot harder.

So, they keep squeaking like hungry birds for a worm knowing there isn't one.

Because they want that giant bug their parents are about to serve up to them.

@Jim

Undoubtedly. One of the most gifted politicians of our age. It's no surprise that his talents have been used since his presidency, unlike others who have sloped off to nothingness.

If you want to call his infidelities talents, be my guest.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites