Japan Today Get your ticket to GaijinPot Expo 2024
world

Colorado Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, bans Trump from state’s ballot under insurrection clause

102 Comments
By NICHOLAS RICCARDI

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


102 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Trump.need to be deemed clinical insane by a court,then he would go absolutely crazy

4 ( +15 / -11 )

The 14th amendment to the constitution is clear … the former Insurrectionist-in-Chief is disqualified to seek the Office of the President of the United States of America (POTUS) … period!

18 ( +29 / -11 )

And it will be overturned on appeal of this kangaroo court ruling.

-25 ( +16 / -41 )

JUSTICE!

9 ( +20 / -11 )

Turns out actions really do have consequences in American law.

The reckoning is neigh.

8 ( +21 / -13 )

Nice to start the day looking at a win. But to be honest I wish there were better candidates to chose from.

6 ( +17 / -11 )

Of course it will be overturned, but it sends a good message that no one should be above the law.

-2 ( +11 / -13 )

If he is not an "officer of the United States" then by what law does he become "Commander in Chief" of the armed Forces, which is by law an officer!

17 ( +22 / -5 )

Herve,you do.not know what court ,it will be overturned,not the 9th US circuit court of appeals,the most liberal appeal court,I am an American,only an educated American, would know the circuit court of appeals

-16 ( +4 / -20 )

Conservative judge and Federalist society member in good standing Micheal Luttig says the ruling is correct and the law is clear.

And SCOTUS has already shown multiple times that not only doesn’t it belong to “Less intelligent Voldemort” (all of the evil with none of the brains), it clearly has had enough of his “I’m above the law” behavior.

as Luttig is not only a conservative legal scholar but also a former federal judge, I’ll take his considered opinion over that of the cultist rubes.

3 ( +14 / -11 )

Colorado electors are give not by the popular state results,but by who win national vote

-16 ( +2 / -18 )

Another farce.

Like Russian collusion.

-22 ( +11 / -33 )

Excellent news!!!

20 ( +29 / -9 )

Another farce.

Like Russian collusion.

That all 5 intelligence agencies and the GOO-chairs Senate Intelligence Committee said absolutely happened.

Yes, another “farce” that was aired live on tv.

14 ( +21 / -7 )

There are consequences for engaging in insurrection.

12 ( +22 / -10 )

45 making history again, for all the wrong reasons.

11 ( +21 / -10 )

45 making history again, for all the wrong reasons.

No, just the radical left and its continued witch hunts.

-22 ( +10 / -32 )

Excellent news of the day and for 2024! Nice. Apparently, just about anyone who is or who was associated with this guy has been screwed one way or another.

4 ( +12 / -8 )

Wouldn’t it be a shame if he threw such a fit that he blew a vein?

4 ( +12 / -8 )

JUSTICE!

That will happen when he is in prison, like his conspirators.

6 ( +16 / -10 )

Trump meets his Waterloo.

6 ( +17 / -11 )

45 making history again, for all the wrong reasons.

No, just the radical left and its continued witch hunts.

This suit was brought by a group of registered Republicans and declared Independents.

You didn’t know that little rid-bit?

How utterly unsurprising.

14 ( +21 / -7 )

JUSTICE!

No, after the SC rules the constitution, then we can say, JUSTICE.

-21 ( +7 / -28 )

Trump meets his Waterloo.

For a month or 2 according to the Dems.

-17 ( +6 / -23 )

Americans want these courts to run the country, or do you want legislators to run the country?

You want a court to interfere in the election by not letting the people vote for who they want?

What a bunch of looneys on that court.

Trump has never been charged or convicted with insurrection.

These "judges" should all step down.

-16 ( +9 / -25 )

JUSTICE!

That will happen when he is in prison, like his conspirators.

coming as surely as dawn follows the darkness.

I should revise my remarks to say “This is the beginning of the reckoning.”

6 ( +14 / -8 )

JUSTICE!

No, after the SC rules the constitution, then we can say, JUSTICE.

(Channeling Dr. Phil) How’s that been working out for you so far? Lol.

4 ( +10 / -6 )

coming as surely as dawn follows the darkness. 

Seems like it's coming Joe's way.

I should revise my remarks to say “This is the beginning of the reckoning.”

So that's the reason and desperation for trying to get Trump? Kind of a pathetic tactic.

-18 ( +8 / -26 )

Just one of many to follow - especially after the mountains of evidence from Powell, Cheseboro, Ellis, and Meadows comes out...

As I've said all along, better dump those Trump 2024 banners and print out some "Haley 2024" ones ASAP...

4 ( +10 / -6 )

I can almost hear the MAGA criers.

12 ( +19 / -7 )

Trump voters aren't scared of Biden being on the ballot.

How come Biden supporters are scared of Trump being on the ballot?

-10 ( +9 / -19 )

I can almost hear the MAGA criers.

More like laughing actually. The left is trying sooo hard, funny.

-18 ( +8 / -26 )

More like laughing actually. The left is trying sooo hard, funny.

I actually feel bad that they think this is a victory of some sort.

-15 ( +7 / -22 )

bass4funk

I can almost hear the MAGA criers.

More like laughing actually. The left is trying sooo hard, funny.

My comments are my own. Nothing to do with the "left".

13 ( +20 / -7 )

Beautiful. Now let’s have a few more.

suit brought by republicans who don’t see open fascism as preferable to libs

And it will be overturned on appeal of this kangaroo court ruling.

Funny how the former GOP used to champion States Rights

9 ( +15 / -6 )

Hey, it’s the law.

3 ( +10 / -7 )

45 making history again, for all the wrong reasons.

No, just the radical left and its continued witch hunts.

No. The US constitution and the SC of Colorado.

Why are you against the constitution?

8 ( +11 / -3 )

Zibala name one case Trump has won ,he should be declared psychological unfit, Bass4 with his Maga delusional state of mind is just as insane

2 ( +10 / -8 )

No, after the SC rules the constitution, then we can say, JUSTICE.

The Colorado SC did rule the constitution. It’s even in the very first sentence of the article.

Why are you against the constitution?

9 ( +13 / -4 )

Funny how the extrene Right is always defending the Constitution until it works against them.

7 ( +13 / -6 )

the extrene Right is always defending the Constitution

What material have YOU been reading? The "Extreme Right" wants the Constitution destroyed because, according to their philosophy, "This 'never' would have happened had the Constitution 'worked' in the first place".

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

Not always.

98%

The Colorado SC did rule the constitution. It’s even in the very first sentence of the article. 

Seems like these 4 unelected judges are trying to do just that.

Why are you against the constitution?

Hmm, you should be asking the left that very question.

Funny how the extrene Right is always defending the Constitution until it works against them

Interestingly, the left doesn't even know what the Constitution is.

-14 ( +6 / -20 )

Isn't it amazing that even with mounds of evidence any investigation into trump is a witch hunt and yet with no evidence at all, an impeachment inquiry in to Biden is absolutely justified.

8 ( +12 / -4 )

Why are you against the constitution?

Hmm, you should be asking the left that very question.

Funny how the extrene Right is always defending the Constitution until it works against them

Interestingly, the left doesn't even know what the Constitution is.

That’s what you call an answer is it?

”ditto” next?

The state SC ruled in line with the constitution. You don’t like it but that’s what happened. For the first time in US history. 45 making records again.

6 ( +11 / -5 )

What book would you recommend? It isn’t a trick question.

I have to know what it is that you're looking for if you want my recs. Outside of that, all I can do is list some of my favorite books: A Night to Remember (Walter Lord) BattleTech: Decision at Thunder Rift (William Keith Jr.), Red Harvest (Dashiell Hammett), The Hustler (Walter Travis).

what are people to think of the Republicans who brought this suit?

Cowards afraid that they're losing their power over the party. As I said in another comment section, the Republican party's biggest weakness is how petty and fractured it can become.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

what are people to think of the Republicans who brought this suit?

Cowards afraid that they're losing their power over the party. As I said in another comment section, the Republican party's biggest weakness is how petty and fractured it can become

Sounds like you have little time for disagreement. There are lifelong Republicans who despise Trump and what he’s done to the party. They’d include people like fiscal conservatives who saw his out of control spending as unforgivable. There are others who saw his behaviour regarding the January 6th events as spitting in the face of what a peaceful transition of power should be. Plenty of other objections from Republicans we can talk about here.

Defensible objections.

Should they just line up behind Trump?

8 ( +11 / -3 )

Only the Supremes can now save Trump's desperate bid to regain the Oval Office and keep out of a prison cell. Clarence has surely heard the call, but will the 3 Trump appointees go there? To save their tainted reputations they will probably rather not.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

Trump’s trying to figure out what Hitler would do, since he studied his speeches so much.

Be frightened of people who rise to power with lies.

10 ( +13 / -3 )

I actually feel bad that they think this is a victory of some sort.

Because they're stepping over the Constitution again, they just don't learn.

That’s what you call an answer is it? 

Yup.

”ditto” next?

Depends on the statement.

The state SC ruled in line with the constitution.

A bunch of liberals over-stepping their constitutional authority again.

You don’t like it but that’s what happened. For the first time in US history. 45 making records again.

I don't have to like and neither with the left once the SC rules in Trump's favor.

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

There are lifelong Republicans who despise Trump and what he’s done to the party.

Like John McCain, Mitt Romney, and the dynasty of Bush? Yeah, I know.

They’d include people like fiscal conservatives who saw his out of control spending as unforgivable

Hey, that's something I agree on. Trump never should have printed those trillions of dollars during the lockdowns. However, I also believe that there should never have been a lockdown in the first place.

There are others who saw his behaviour regarding the January 6th events as spitting in the face of what a peaceful transition of power should be.

Telling people to not be violent and to go home?

Plenty of other objections from Republicans we can talk about here.

I have my objections with Trump, too, but I feel like that isn't the point you're trying to make.

Should they just line up behind Trump?

Isn't there some pledge in the Republican primaries that demands that, regardless of whoever wins, all the members of the party are required to support them? The same pledge that new sites made a stink about several months ago when Trump refuse to sign it after everything that happened?

-7 ( +5 / -12 )

Still a long way to go as the US Supreme Court is heavily lined Conservate 6-3 and could overturn the ruling.

One thing that the Supremes may have to juggle with is if the person has to be CONVICTED for insurrection before being removed from the ballots.

That also may happen next year.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Trump’s a traitor and should be banned in every state.

Having said that, he may be more popular than before, just as Hitler became more popular when people tried to silence him. Don’t underestimate the radical fringe.

2 ( +8 / -6 )

This decision is an attack on democracy.

It denies the people their right to vote for a candidate of their choice, over an alleged crime (a) for which Trump hasn't been convicted, and (b) for which he is actually facing trumped-up, politically motivated charges.

The Supreme Court should, and I predict will, strike this decision down.

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

The Supreme Court should, and I predict will, strike this decision down.

The U.S. Supreme Court, I should clarify.

-5 ( +4 / -9 )

Funny how the extrene Right is always defending the Constitution until it works against them

Interestingly, the left doesn't even know what the Constitution is.

Horrifying, that someone brags about suspending it...

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social".

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

6 ( +9 / -3 )

This decision is an attack on democracy

On the contrary; it’s a plain text reading (that so-called “textualists” love to blather about) of the law.

On the other hand, inciting a mob to commit insurrection to overthrow the legally elected government in order to overturn a free and fair election that Trump clearly lost…

That IS the definition of an attack in Democracy.

12 ( +15 / -3 )

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution

You DO remember that Time magazine bragged about rigging everything, right: https://archive.ph/xR6pV

-9 ( +3 / -12 )

‘Overstepping’ the constitution. lol you know more about the constitution than Supreme Court judges. I see

5 ( +9 / -4 )

Trump voters aren't scared of Biden being on the ballot.

How come Biden supporters are scared of Trump being on the ballot?

Trump voters see a possibly corrupt and ineffective politician.

we see a fascist surrounding himself with fascists loyal to him not America and leading a fascist movement wholly dedicated to making their fascist all powerful.

that answer your question, Zibala?

7 ( +11 / -4 )

we see a fascist surrounding himself with fascists loyal to him not America and leading a fascist movement wholly dedicated to making their fascist all powerful.

You seem to be using the word "Fascist" a lot. Do you even know what a "Fascist" is? Can you explain what makes someone a "Fascist"?

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

I'm torn: Trump doesn't deserve to be on the ballot nationwide but at the same time we have to have an end to MAGA losers and their fantasies. Not having Trump go down in defeat with receipts is not helping achieve that.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

@bass: More like laughing actually. The left is trying sooo hard, funny.

Trump cultists laugh as x-45, his media and fellow Republicans try to further divide and weaken the US; which is not surprising when so many of those just mentioned want dictators like Putin appeased, and actually think it's OK for Russia/Iran and China to take over larger parts of the world.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

when so many of those just mentioned want dictators like Putin appeased, and actually think it's OK for Russia/Iran and China to take over larger parts of the world.

Who are you quoting? Seriously, could you link which people are saying this?

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

This will backfire big time, and will likely be struck down in any case. The Democrats and their fellow travellers are absolutely petrified of trump, and will use any means fair and foul to prevent him from running.

Sad little people.

-14 ( +3 / -17 )

There is a determination, desperation to remove Donald Trump from a democratic ballot, to make the former President ineligible for the White House.

The 2024 US Presidential election, for the sake of the very constitution, elements within the government are tainting abusing, to wilfully besmirch US judiciary to exclude Trump for a cynical political agenda.

This is a blatant example of political bias to leverage weaponize partisan Justices in an attempt to remove a candidate from the democratic process

The promise that those wish to run for office is equally protected by law undermines democracy and weakens fundamental rights.

-5 ( +4 / -9 )

I'd say it's a pretty apt description for a man who wants to be dictator.

Well, yeah, that definition is basically a dictatorship. So could you explain what Trump has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make him qualify as a Fascist?

-9 ( +4 / -13 )

Trump must be afforded the democratic right to run in the 2024 US Presidential elections, the US people will decide at the ballot box if Donald Trump is eligible or not.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

Well, yeah, that definition is basically a dictatorship. So could you explain what Trump has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make him qualify as a Fascist?

How does the definition of fascist not describe the Republican party? I've already given my definition and it fits the GOP to a T.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

I'm torn: Trump doesn't deserve to be on the ballot nationwide but at the same time we have to have an end to MAGA losers and their fantasies. Not having Trump go down in defeat with receipts is not helping achieve that

If Trump is the candidate and loses, put your money on unfounded gibberish about stolen elections.

I think Trump has claimed large scale fraud in 3 separate elections involving him ( I may have missed some here - corrections welcomed ).

I’d add it’s unusual to find Trump supporters on board with all this peevish, unfounded crackpottery - it’s more a la carte.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

I'd say it's a pretty apt description for a man who wants to be dictator.

So, Cards fan, demonstrate with concrete proof that Trump wants to be a dictator.

This should be funny.

-6 ( +5 / -11 )

So, Cards fan, demonstrate with concrete proof that Trump wants to be a dictator.

He's already said it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/11/donald-trump-dictator-one-day-reelected/71880010007/

This should be funny.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Trump must be afforded the democratic right to run in the 2024 US Presidential elections

No. Anyone who commits insurrection and incitement to overthrow the government is disqualified as a plain-text reading of the law clearly says.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

How does the definition of fascist not describe the Republican party? 

Same question, could you explain what the Republican Party has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make it qualify as a Fascist?

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

The Left The Left The Left

The metastasis of MAGA non sequitur is a preview of 2024.

There are a few on the right, RINOs as it were like Mitt Romney, an uber Private Equity capitalist head of Bain, who somehow fall under that label.

No appreciation for them but maybe there are a small subsection of the GOP who are suffering some performance anxiety before going full MAGA fascist.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

On the contrary; it’s a plain text reading (that so-called “textualists” love to blather about) of the law. 

Uhhh, it seems to me that the Dems don’t know the law, that’s a reason why ninth circuit appeals court is always the most overturned court in the country

On the other hand, inciting a mob to commit insurrection to overthrow the legally elected government in order to overturn a free and fair election that Trump clearly lost…

It wasn’t insurrection, if it were, then they would’ve been charged with an insurrection, show me 1 document that says they were charged with an insurrection

That IS the definition of an attack in Democracy.

It actually seems that it’s what the Democrats are trying to do right now, trying to deny the voter right to choose candidate of their choice. If the tables were returned, would the Democrats be silent?

-7 ( +5 / -12 )

Donald Trumps protestations of wide spread electoral fraud are misguided, unproven, flawed.

However, this is a matter to be debated and presented to the US electorate to only be decided at the ballot box.

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

Same question, could you explain what the Republican Party has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make it qualify as a Fascist

Again, how does the definition of fascism not describe Trump/ the GOP? Happy to answer you question once you've answered mine.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

The metastasis of MAGA non sequitur is a preview of 2024. 

Is that bad?

There are a few on the right, RINOs as it were like Mitt Romney, an uber Private Equity capitalist head of Bain, who somehow fall under that label. 

They are non-irrelevant.

No appreciation for them

None.

but maybe there are a small subsection of the GOP who are suffering some performance anxiety before going full MAGA fascist

I like how the left use fascist in the context as if Democracy was something they strictly uphold. ROFL.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Cards fanToday  12:07 pm JST

So, Cards fan, demonstrate with concrete proof that Trump wants to be a dictator.

He's already said it. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/11/donald-trump-dictator-one-day-reelected/71880010007/

This should be funny.

It was - clearly said in jest. But trust the haters to run with it as if it were his MO.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Donald Trumps protestations of wide spread electoral fraud are misguided, unproven, flawed

They are absolute trash. No need to be diplomatic about it.

However, this is a matter to be debated and presented to the US electorate to only be decided at the ballot box

Fair point but again, you can pretty much guarantee that Trump will not accept the results at the ballot box.

Even after he won in 2016, he claimed enormous election fraud which deprived him of winning the popular vote.

No need to elaborate too much on what was found to back this claim up.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

The metastasis of MAGA non sequitur is a preview of 2024. 

Is that bad?

There are a few on the right, RINOs as it were like Mitt Romney, an uber Private Equity capitalist head of Bain, who somehow fall under that label. 

They are non-irrelevant.

English, do you speak it?

The GOP debates, and the duopoly ones have descended into farce for this reason.

'

That being said the Colorado decision will not factor much into the 2024 election, IMHO.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Trump cultists laugh as x-45, his media and fellow Republicans try to further divide and weaken the US;

This administration has already done that and his falling and failing poll numbers are showing that. He’s pretty much on life support at this point.

which is not surprising when so many of those just mentioned want dictators like Putin appeased,

He did that already. Afghanistan, the Mullahs, Maduro, the Saudis? Trump was in office, nobody left him, sitting and waiting for eight hours. They all met with him all of our adversaries, this time they just ignore him.

and actually think it's OK for Russia/Iran and China to take over larger parts of the world.

Which is exactly what Biden allowed to happen, you’re making my point for me.

-7 ( +4 / -11 )

Hilarious watching our MAGA-friends spin new conspiracy theories and gut-busting lies...

Just face reality - your guy is going to jail for attempting to stage a coup - one that it's author John Eastman admitted violated federal statute...and that four of his inner-circle have flipped and will testified he led...and just wait until Pence gets on the stand...

Then there is the classified stash and steal where he violated a subpoena even after his lawyer told him that was illegal, having another lawyer lie in writing, then obstructed justice by re-hiding his stolen classified and telling his aides to destroy the tapes showing that...

Trump is jail-bound, and you can rant all you want that "it won't happen"...it will, and you should save yourself from the meltdown when it happens and just accept it now...

5 ( +9 / -4 )

It was - clearly said in jest. But trust the haters to run with it as if it were his MO.

Was it? Were his comments about suspending the constitution, and immigrants poisoning the blood of our country also said in jest? Very weird how the comments made in "jest" sound eerily similar to the comments made fascists who weren't speaking in jest.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

how does the definition of fascism not....

No one can prove a negative: https://infogalactic.com/info/Evidence_of_absence

So, again, can you explain what the Republican Party or Trump has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make either qualify as Fascistic?

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

It was - clearly said in jest

Hard to know with Trump.

It became clear that building a wall, getting rid of the debt, draining the swamp and throwing all illegals out was said in jest but that only became apparent to all later.

He also has a predisposition to telling lies so that has to be factored in.

6 ( +10 / -4 )

No one can prove a negative:

I'm not asking you to prove a negative. I'm asking you which part of the definition of fascism doesn't sound like Trump/GOP?

4 ( +8 / -4 )

It was - clearly said in jest. But trust the haters to run with it as if it were his MO.

Just locker room fascism then? Oh that’s alright then. We’d all like a leader who doesn’t mean what he says. That’s ideal.

7 ( +11 / -4 )

*So, again, *can you explain what the Republican Party or Trump has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make either qualify as Fascistic?

Merger of state and corporate power. It has been there since the beginning with Mussolini.

https://politicalresearch.org/2005/01/12/mussolini-corporate-state

And a non sequitur: Who? What? And? Then? thread of logical failure.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

Trump 2024!!

In ADX Florence with a sentence not running less that that of those convicted of seditious conspiracy. So 19 years.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

So, again, ****can you explain what the Republican Party or Trump has done (Specifically, as in provide links to events) that would make either qualify as Fascistic?

Are we limited to things that happened this week? If so, my entry is the thing about immigrants poisoning the blood of our nation.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

I'm not asking you to prove a negative.

That's exactly what you're doing. Asking "...which part of the definition of fascism doesn't...", is asking for a proof of a negative. Absolutely NO ONE can argue what something "is not" another thing as there's ALWAYS an "exception". All that can be proven is what is. So, again, what have they done that would qualify, specifically and with sources, as Fascistic?

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

That's exactly what you're doing. Asking "...which part of the definition of fascism doesn't...", is asking for a proof of a negative. Absolutely NO ONE can argue what something "is not" another thing as there's ALWAYS an "exception".

Lol no, that is incorrect. proving a negative would be like me saying, "Prove Trump is not a fascist." That would be asking you to prove a negative, but that's not what I'm asking.

1.) I gave you my definition of fascist:

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

2.) I then stated that I think this sounds like a pretty apt description of Trump/the GOP.

Now I assume you disagree with my assertion of the definition of fascism is an apt description of Trump/the GOP. So again, I'll ask, which part do you disagree with?

Do you disagree that they put the nation above individuals?

Do you disagree that the GOP doesn't believe in a centralized autocratic government?

Do you disagree they want severe economic and social regimentation?

Do you disagree that they support the forcible suppression of opposition?

6 ( +10 / -4 )

Absolutely NO ONE can argue what something "is not" another thing as there's ALWAYS an "exception".

Huh? Are you sure about that?

6 ( +10 / -4 )

Why are you writing in such an obtuse way? It's simple yes or no questions, so let me make it easier to read.

Do you agree that they put the nation above individuals?

Is it the job of EVERY government to put the nation's survival above an individual? Needs of the many above the needs of the few and all that?

Do you agree that the GOP does believe in a centralized autocratic government?

Fixed your double negative, I think you may have goofed asking this one. No.

Do you agree they want severe economic and social regimentation?

No

Do you agree that they support the forcible suppression of opposition?

No

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

So they found 4 of 7 Democrat judges stupid enough to do this? That’s fun

-14 ( +5 / -19 )

This court really thinks if the Supreme Court doesn’t rule by Jan 4th that they can just go ahead and legally proceed with this nonsense?

spoiler alert: no they can’t

-12 ( +5 / -17 )

Why are you writing in such an obtuse way? It's simple yes or no questions, so let me make it easier to read

Lol good of you to concede I'm not asking you to prove a negative.

No

Really? Have you not heard of project 2025?

No

Again, really? The GOP doesn't want to force women to give birth? They don't want to strip healthcare away from massive swaths of the country?

No

Lol you have presidential candidates saying they want to end leftism in the US. They openly chant about locking up opponents They tried to overturn the elections when they lost.

4 ( +11 / -7 )

Commies always have a general problem with democratic elections and free speech. That's obvious and of course not limited to China, North Korea and such. As we learn here, also the motherland of modern capitalism is already severely infected and drifting away, although it still seems to start small with one state of many more. May US quickly find a fitting and healing cure. The countdown is ticking quickly.

-4 ( +6 / -10 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites