The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2021.White House working with Facebook and Twitter to tackle anti-vaxxers
By Nandita Bose WASHINGTON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
50 Comments
PTownsend
I'll use my 80/20 reasoning. If 80% of medical scientists say the vaccine is needed, I'll believe them. I'll also look at sources. I generally trust information from The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, leading medical schools, but distrust that coming from 8chan and random internet posters.
And distrust information from nations that use media of all forms to further rile the easily riled in nations with bits of democracy remaining in those troll nation's ongoing attempts to further weaken democracy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6137759/
Caveat:. the above link came from the US government during the Trump era.
ulysses
donald’s idiots doing what their master did well, spewing lies!!!!
bass4funk
You can believe them, I don’t and won’t. People should have a choice whether they want to get the vaccine or not and should never be pressured by the media or public to get something they don’t want. I’ll wait a few years first before I take the plunge.
PTownsend
And they do have a choice.
Pressured by the media? Media-phobia is strong among the alt right. Except when it's their alt right media, then they believe what's reported.
bass4funk
We know that and no amount of vaccine shaming is going to change that.
Yup, with good and valid reasons.
Because it’s not the conservative media that is canceling, blocking, deleting and censoring liberals. So....
virusrex
The "pressure" consist on saying that an irrational choice is irrational, but if people willingly choose to have it then this is part of the consequences they should be able to assume.
If you want to believe in fantasy based conspiracies about scientists, doctors and nurses sacrifice their own health and of their friends and family just so some company president can get more money, you have that right, but so are other people to consider that completely out of reality. If you consider that to be pressured then it would be much more productive to re-evaluate your beliefs than expecting everybody else to sympathize with the fantasy.
Bob Fosse
So you’ve nothing to complain about then. The media clearly has no effect on you ( and whoever ‘we’ means) You needn’t worry about it.
theFu
Facts should always win over "opinion."
Social media platforms should post factual information "bubbles" on any posts that contain non-factual information and remove any linking to those posts and not allow any advertising on those non-factual posts. If 5 people see them, fine. It is when there are 500+ people seeing factually incorrect words that the problem happens.
Don't let them make any money.
Don't let them spread.
Pay attention to posts that have the most followers.
Remove accounts that constantly post non-factual claims.If you want to post garbage, you are free to use other platforms.
Jsapc
It's amazing to me that when people are offered the choice of being pro-science or pro-ignorance, they actively choose being pro-ignorance. And choosing to believe facebook posts, youtube videos and fox news pundits over scientists and doctors is just mind-numbingly pro-ignorant.
bass4funk
Exactly!
Not and Late term has nothing to do with getting vaccinated. Different topic altogether.
Jsapc
Monumental false equivalency. What you're criticizing here is mostly marketing and lobbies, not scientists.
kurisupisu
I have a statistical mortality rate of 0.3% if infected with the Corona virus.
Have I had an asymptomatic infection?
Why have a vaccine before knowing this?
I like choices in my life, not having to follow the crowds and it has served me a lot better than my peers!
bass4funk
I agree.
virusrex
Because statistically speaking is hugely more likely for you not to have been infected, the vaccine have negligible risks (specially compared with the COVID infection) and it is cheaper than getting even a single antibody test with sensitivity enough to eliminate the possibility of a false negative.
If your choices are irrational then it is as much your right to take it as is it the right of other people to say the are irrational, if you want to go against the scientific consensus you should be aware of this consequence and not give it importance.
Strangerland
Science makes a mistake so you decide it can never be trusted. I hope you never ride bicycles, or get in cars or airplanes. And how are you using a computer when it has radiation coming from it and may give you cancer?! That's crazy!
bass4funk
Well, mine and others that have a strong intuition have served us quite well. You guys can sell it to the people that are more susceptible to your debates and point of view.
Jsapc
You mean like when your parents chose to vaccinate you when you were a baby and then you didn't get diphtheria, tetanus or polio and now you're alive and well enough to post anti-vaccine opinions on internet forums?
virusrex
Not points of view, evidence and data. Irrational intuition is still irrational, specially when it can be proved to be much less likely to be right, if you can accept it to be irrational why complain so much when being told it is so?
Lazarus Knows
Tell us again how Qanon is very sensible, Trump would be re-elected for a second term, and the GOP would keep the Senate.
bass4funk
How does this in any way relate to having the right and choice when it comes to NOT wanting taking the vaccine? Lol, you guys.
Bob Fosse
Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
Will get the vaccine and definitely wears a mask.
Goodlucktoyou
No long term proof that vaccines are ready yet, side effects and ability against mutations.
obvious somethings are being hidden from people, otherwise information wouldn’t be censored
virusrex
Either you make no sense, or you believe time travel is possible. How long time do you think vaccines have been used for humans to be able to have long term proof of safety, a decade?
Side effects and neutralization ability against mutations are being constantly reported, so there is no censoring at all. Science is not instantaneous, trials on cells are quick and have been already finished, animals take longer so they will probably be ready in a few weeks and be reported, and epidemiological studies on humans are expensive and complicated, but not having reports on clusters of reinfections is a very good thing.
bass4funk
Bingo. Like I said, I’ll wait. Others want to take it, go for it.
plasticmonkey
I recall that when Trump was still president, you were applauding his supposedly swift action on getting vaccines developed. I also recall that you had faith that the Coronavirus would go away once people got vaccinated.
Why the change of heart?
NOMINATION
Fauci, though I don't care for him, should be the one in charge in trying to persuade the public to be pro-vaccine since he seems to know what is going on. Secondly, Zuckerburg and Dorsey need to take it with proof.
bass4funk
Yes, I did. And for the people that want, that need to take it they should, but I won’t, don’t need or want to.
No, that was Biden and the other liberals and now they want you to wear 2-3 masks on top of the one we already wear even after you get vaccinated? Lol....uh-huh....
bass4funk
Late Term has nothing to do with the topic. If that comes up, gladly, for now stay on the vaccine topic.
No, not at all, I just don’t want to get off on a tangent
Jimizo
Bass and others complimented Trump for his part in getting vaccines out that they do not trust.
It’s one of the strangest compliments I’ve ever read.
The partisan mind works in mysterious ways.
plasticmonkey
I suppose you also refuse to buy liability insurance for your car.
No, that was Trump. Biden has consistently said that it's going to take a long time, and that there isn't a silver bullet to stop Covid. Which means cooperation is essential. Which you don't agree with because it somehow goes against your rugged American individualism.
You don't wear a mask. I'm sure the people in Fukuoka think you're a real hero.
lincolnman
Well, it's clearly understandable why the Trump supporters won't get the vaccine....
They already took the Trump Clorox cure - they've inoculated...
And from their viewpoint, why chance getting some Alien-DNA...it's in all our drugs...
Lastly, tin foil-lined MAGA hats work a whole lot better when going by those dangerous 5G network towers...
bass4funk
I can always buy a new car.
And Trump got it down within a year, even Joe and Mika had to give Trump some palm. I applauded it, but I don’t and won’t take it, don’t need it. I’ll wait. That’s my choice as an American individual.
Perhaps, I tend not to worry what others think. Besides, when I’m in Japan I’m in the countryside so.....
PTownsend
Were you in Texas where the oil/gas industry and its Republican Party failed y'all? Or back in Germany.
Toasted Heretic
Anti-vaxxers are irresponsible and delusional.
No platform for them needed.
Toasted Heretic
And yet, the far right get their say each and every day.
Strangerland
Trump let 400,000 people die within a year.
And in spite of anything Trump did, the vaccine makers came up with vaccines through their own efforts and funding, through no assistance or motivation from Trump.
lincolnman
Wanna know why Trump supporters don't get the vaccine? Here's a good example...
They don't even understand how personal liability insurance works...
DudeDeuce
I also recall you saying that you wouldn't touch the vaccine with a 10 foot pole since it was developed under Trump's administration. Was there some tweaking by Pfizer over the past few months to make it Democrat-safe to make you want to be first in line?
ArtistAtLarge
This is excellent news.
stormcrow
Thank goodness Trump, a big time anti-vaxxer himself, is finally out of the picture. He left office without any foundation at all for the incoming Biden administration to work with in terms of helping the American people combat this killer pandemic. It goes without saying that the election of Pres. Biden has undoubtedly saved countless American lives.
plasticmonkey
Trump can still:
--get an interview on Fox, Newsmax, OANN, Mark Levin, Infowars, etc. anytime he wants.
--hold a MAGA rally for his zealous cult followers.
--start up his own social media platform.
--stand on a street corner in an old trench coat and spew his nonsense.
He hasn't been silenced.
plasticmonkey
Then your recollection skills are pretty poor. I never said such a thing.
There was concern among some posters about Trump pressuring the FDA to cut corners to release the vaccine before the election. That strikes me as a reasonable concern.
Strangerland
I was one of those posters. I am not against vaccines whatsoever. I'm against vaccines that are forced through approvals due to a president desperate gain a win so as not to lose due to his poor pandemic response.
commanteer
That's an odd argument to bring in, as anybody pushing vaccination or requiring it for certain jobs or travel - but who also is "pro-choice" - is the one being contradictory. The crux of the argument against abortion is that there are two bodies involved, and the smaller one has no voice.
If you assume the position that abortion only involves one body (the woman), and support "my body, my choice" - then it would be inconsistent to criticize people who choose not to be vaccinated. Their body, their choice. If you whine "but, but... their choice will affect others - then welcome to society.
Smoking, drinking, bad driving, drug use.... many of our actions affect others in far more dangerous ways than lack of a Covid vaccination will.