FILE - This file photo released April 19, 2013, by the Federal Bureau of Investigation shows Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, convicted and sentenced to death for carrying out the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon bombing attack that killed three people and injured more than 260. On Friday, July 31, 2020, a federal appeals court overturned the Boston Marathon bomber's death sentence. (FBI via AP, File)
world

Court overturns Boston Marathon bomber's death sentence

3 Comments
By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER

A federal appeals court Friday threw out Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s death sentence in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, saying the judge who oversaw the case did not adequately screen jurors for potential biases.

A three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a new penalty-phase trial on whether the 27-year-old Tsarnaev should be executed for the attack that killed three people and wounded more than 260 others.

“But make no mistake: Dzhokhar will spend his remaining days locked up in prison, with the only matter remaining being whether he will die by execution,” the judges said, more than six month after arguments were heard in the case.

Tsarnaev's lawyers acknowledged at the beginning of his trial that he and his older brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, set off the two bombs at the marathon finish line. But they argued that Dzhokar Tsarnaev is less culpable than his brother, who they said was the mastermind behind the attack.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a gunbattle with police a few days after the April 15, 2013, bombing. Dzhokar Tsarnaev is now behind bars at a high-security supermax prison in Florence, Colorado.

Tsarnaev’s attorneys identified a slew of issues with his trial, but said in a brief filed with the court that the “first fundamental error” was the judge’s refusal to move the case out of Boston. They also pointed to social media posts from two jurors suggesting they harbored strong opinions even before the 2015 trial started.

The appeals judges, in a hearing on the case in early December, devoted a significant number of questions to the juror bias argument.

They asked why the two jurors had not been dismissed, or at least why the trial judge had not asked them follow-up questions after the posts came to light on the eve of the trial.

The judges noted that the Boston court has a longstanding rule obligating such an inquiry.

Tsarnaev’s lawyers say one of the jurors — who would go one to become the jury’s foreperson, or chief spokesperson — published two dozen tweets in the wake of the bombings. One post after Tsarnaev’s capture called him a “piece of garbage.”

Tsarnaev was convicted on 30 charges, including conspiracy and use of a weapon of mass destruction. An email was sent to his lawyer seeking comment.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s office in Bostonsaid they are currently reviewing the opinion and declined further comment at this time.

© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

3 Comments
Login to comment

Life imprisonment with no chance of parole is a far worse punishment than death.

Anyway, judicial executions are expensive (more expensive than life imprisonment), demonstrably ineffective, and barbaric.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

But... this is American Justice... trial by Media before Trial by a Jury given the facts.

The North American way of Justice has it's problems in modern day Society... prone to Social Media Manipulation by unknown parties for whatever purposes. Those involved are sadly thrown to the Wolves.

I have no support for people who wish to inflict harm upon others - regardless whether they consider those people innocent or not - such Terrorists are spineless, lower than humanity, even animals treat their own better. Though, Justice in our more intellectual evolution needs to be carried out better, than simply over a series of scandalous articles in Tabloids, or over Social Media groups where anything can be said by anyone.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

But... this is American Justice... trial by Media before Trial by a Jury given the facts.

What? This was literally a court decision. And he had a trial by jury.

Seems like you've got the same itchy trigger finger as the cancel culuturists that so many complain about on this site.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites