world

Former Trump adviser Navarro convicted of contempt of Congress

56 Comments
By Andrew Goudsward and Sarah N Lynch

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Thomson Reuters 2023.

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.


56 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

The more attacks against Trump, the more money and support to Trump's campaign..

-15 ( +2 / -17 )

TokyoLiving

The more attacks against Trump, the more money and support to Trump's campaign..

Did he, or did he not, defy the subpoena?

He did.

Then guilty. Nothing to do with Trump.

13 ( +15 / -2 )

The more attacks against Trump, the more money and support to Trump's campaign..

Well no, this isn't true. Besides that, it's irrelevant. He committed the crime, and now he's been convicted. Simple as.

12 ( +13 / -1 )

Well no, this isn't true.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/29/trump-raises-9-4m-since-georgia-mug-shot-more-than-20m-in-august/

Besides that, it's irrelevant.

Not as long as he’s on the ballot and still breathing.

He committed the crime,

allegedly

-13 ( +1 / -14 )

Not as long as he’s on the ballot and still breathing

No, no. It is irrelevant. Prosecutorial decisions are not and should not be made on the basis of whether it'll hurt or help a politician's campaign

11 ( +11 / -0 )

allegedly

And no, not allegedly. He was convicted.

11 ( +12 / -1 )

No, no. It is irrelevant.

As long as he’s alive and on the ballot it is or are YOU going to change it? YOU are going to stop him from running, he can still run whether he’s convicted or not. How about this for arguments sake, when Trump is locked up (will never happen) then I’ll owe you an apology. Until then and unless you hear big news, breaking news Trump is not on the ballot, nothing changes

-13 ( +1 / -14 )

If Trump was already elected twice he can't run for a third time.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

If Trump was already elected twice he can't run for a third time.

Wrong.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-elected-president-indicted-convicted-experts/story?id=97688250

"Because of the 22nd Amendment, the individual can't have been twice elected president previously," Shaw said. "But there's nothing in the Constitution disqualifying individuals convicted of crimes from running for or serving as president."

-11 ( +1 / -12 )

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis could sue Donald Trump for copyright infringement for the commercialization of his mugshot.

"Donald Trump’s campaign may have violated United States copyright law by selling merchandise featuring the former president’s mugshot, legal experts have warned."

https://nypost.com/2023/09/05/trump-may-have-violated-copyright-law-by-selling-mugshot-merch/

6 ( +7 / -1 )

As long as he’s alive and on the ballot it is or are YOU going to change it?

That wasn't my point, Bass. My point was very clear:

No, no. It is irrelevant. Prosecutorial decisions are not and should not be made on the basis of whether it'll hurt or help a politician's campaign

That's what I'm talking about. Not whatever inane, nonsensical point you think you're making.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Wrong

Thanks for the admission that Trump did indeed lose the 2020 elections. Bravo

10 ( +11 / -1 )

bass4funk

He committed the crime,

allegedly

Allegedly is used when he is indicted. He has now been convicted, so it isn't allegedly. It is definitely. He definitely committed the crime.

12 ( +13 / -1 )

So in fact Trump wasn't elected twice then.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

That wasn't my point, Bass. My point was very clear: 

As was mine

That's what I'm talking about. Not whatever inane, nonsensical point you think you're making.

Calm down, relax, don’t like Trump, want him gone, assassin is the only way, other than that, the Dems will not stop this guy.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis could sue Donald Trump for copyright infringement for the commercialization of his mugshot.

Good! Do it and take it to the Supreme Court, that is definitely what Trump is begging for.

-12 ( +1 / -13 )

What I recall of Peter Navarro are his many losing attempts at being elected to San Diego City Council, San Diego Mayor, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, the state Assembly and again to the San Diego City Council. He ran for office variously as a Republican, an Independent and as a Democrat. I also recall that as an Economics professor his research was not well regarded by his peers and he never got anything published in a major economics journal. His research was always in second tier journals and poorly reviewed. Some of us in economics considered him to be a little bit of a crackpot. It strikes me that perhaps Trumpworld was the only place he felt any degree of respect so he went all in. Considering some of his out there economic theories I am not surprised he fell for the voter fraud and fake electors scams.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

Calm down, relax, don’t like Trump, want him gone, assassin is the only way, other than that, the Dems will not stop this guy.

I'm not talking about Trump, my guy. I'm talking about TokyoLiving's mistaken assertion that prosecutorial decisions should be made based upon the impact they might on have on a candidate's popularity. I don't think it should have any baring on the decision to charge a suspect.

If you want to have a discussion on Trump here on this article, that won't be with me.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

Copyrights Supreme Court Cases

https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/copyrights/

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Desantis has lost his top 50 financial supporters. Maybe he needs a mugshot.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

Thanks for the admission that Trump did indeed lose the 2020 elections. Bravo

Uhh, try not to put words in my mouth or think for me please. 

If you want to have a discussion on Trump here on this article, that won't be with me

Thank the lord….

-13 ( +1 / -14 )

Uhh, try not to put words in my mouth or think for me please

I didn't. That is a logical conclusion to your response. See below:

If Trump was already elected twice he can't run for a third time.

Bass: "Because of the 22nd Amendment, the individual can't have been twice elected president previously

An admission that Trump didn't win. Well done.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

I didn't. That is a logical conclusion to your response.

Ok, so we both made our points, fair enough.

An admission that Trump didn't win.

In the lefts mind, ok…

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

Ok, so we both made our points, fair enough.

No. I made mine, and then you tried to thread jack.

In the lefts mind, ok…

Not just in the "lefts mind," but anyone with a bit of intellect.

If Trump won in 2020, then how can he run a third time? He can't.

10 ( +11 / -1 )

""But U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Navarro could not use this as a defense, finding that the defendant had not put forward evidence that Trump formally invoked executive privilege in response to the subpoena. Defense lawyer Stanley Woodward was left to argue that Navarro's failure to comply may have been an accident or a mistake.""

An Accident or a Mistake? how convenient, he probably thought Trump will stand behind him or even come to his aid!!! little he knew that Trump will throw anyone under the bus.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Voters want a President who could run for two terms. 45 would be a lame duck way before the midterms.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Trump was elected twice or not. Which is it? By his own admission, Trump has said he was elected twice.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

No. I made mine, and then you tried to thread jack.

We both made ours, it’s an open forum, relax.

Not just in the "lefts mind," but anyone with a bit of intellect. 

Now you are the sole purveyor of knowledge wisdom, and expertise as to who is intelligent and who is not? Now this is interesting…

If Trump won in 2020, then how can he run a third time? He can't.

Soooo then why are the Dems trying to stop him if that were remotely true? If Trump is guilty of all of these so called 3000 or so indictments, they feel they have a solid case particularly in GA and J6 why wait and hold the trials next year during the start of the Iowa Caucuses? Dunno, if I were a betting man, I would say the Dems have deliberately daisy-chained these trial dates to keep Trump from running, so that would conclude that either the Dems are lying through their teeth and know they can’t legally stop Trump from running or they’re lying through their teeth to the public and giving the impression that he can’t run gain support for their fledgling cause.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

Trump was elected twice or not. Which is it? By his own admission, Trump has said he was elected twice.

Don’t worry, you can’t vote so him running won’t affect you either way. Relax.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

The collateral damage from Trump goes on and on. Navarro is finding the advice from Trump at the time a ticking time bomb to prison, as have the Proud Boys and others who foolishly believed Trump's intent was honorable. It never was and never will be.

Jump ship MAGA. That's better advice than any you'd get from Trump.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Now you are the sole purveyor of knowledge wisdom, and expertise as to who is intelligent and who is not? Now this is interesting…

That's not what I said. Nice try.

Soooo then why are the Dems trying to stop him if that were remotely true? 

No, no. If he won in 2020, then he can't run a third time. You know he lost, and that's why he can run a 3rd time. Let's not be silly now.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

bass4funk

   Trump was elected twice or not. Which is it? By his own admission, Trump has said he was elected twice.

> Don’t worry, you can’t vote so him running won’t affect you either way. Relax.

That is a cop-out. Has Trump been elected twice or not? Trump says yes.

YES/NO

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Franks: Trump and Biden too old for the presidential game

https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/06/24/franks-trump-and-biden-too-old-for-presidential-game/

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Navarro, wearing a dark suit and red tie, showed no visible reaction when the verdict was read aloud

Well that would be a first - this guy is a walking time bomb that goes off randomly...he rants and raves like a lunatic...they better give him a padded cell....

The panel sought to interview Navarro about a plan devised by him and other Trump allies, dubbed the "Green Bay Sweep," to delay Congress from certifying Democratic President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The committee concluded its work last year without interviewing Navarro.

Ah yes, the "Green Bay Sweep" - otherwise know by its author John Eastman as a VIOLATION OF FEDERAL STATUTE...

*Eastman admitted to Greg Jacob, Vice President Mike Pence’s counsel, who recounted a White House meeting on Jan. 4, 2021, in which Eastman said *he told Trump that his plan to thwart the counting of the Electoral College violated federal statute.

The more attacks against Trump, the more money and support to Trump's campaign..

True, a better scam and con-job than any Nigerian Prince inheritance...and in MAGA-world they boast about being hustled....ROFL...

6 ( +6 / -0 )

That's not what I said. Nice try. 

Ok, so you did what most hot-headed Trump hating libs do, you speculated

No, no. If he won in 2020, then he can't run a third time. You know he lost, and that's why he can run a 3rd time. Let's not be silly now.

Ok, tear up the constitution and give the Supreme Court the middle finger, gotcha…

That is a cop-out.

Not at all

Has Trump been elected twice or not? Trump says yes.

According to the left, No.

So it’s game on now.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

bass4funk

I was asking you not the "left" You have claimed numerous times Trump was elected twice. How does a twice-elected president stand for a third time?

7 ( +8 / -1 )

No, no. If he won in 2020, then he can't run a third time. You know he lost, and that's why he can run a 3rd time. Let's not be silly now.

Ok, tear up the constitution and give the Supreme Court the middle finger, gotcha…

What? He lost in 2020. If you believe he won in 2020 you disqualify him from running again in 2024. It’s really simple.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Lock him up.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Ok, tear up the constitution and give the Supreme Court the middle finger, gotcha…

lol Again. Not what I said. If Trump won in 2020 as you claim he did, then he couldn't run in 2024, which you've already acknowledged here:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-elected-president-indicted-convicted-experts/story?id=97688250

"Because of the 22nd Amendment, the individual can't have been twice elected president previously,"

6 ( +7 / -1 )

What? He lost in 2020. If you believe he won in 2020 you disqualify him from running again in 2024. It’s really simple.

So why are Dems unsuccessfully trying to stop this man "IF" they are so sure he can't run again? I mean, if they were that convinced and the law was 100% on their side they wouldn't have the subject the country through this. Again, I would have a lot more respect for the Dems if they just said, "I hate this guy and I want my party to stop at nothing and do anything and everything within their power, legal or not to stop this guy", I can respect that, I like honest people, but this lib circus, come on now no one believes this charade that the Dems are on some sort of democracy crusade. ROFL

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

So why are Dems unsuccessfully trying to stop this man "IF" they are so sure he can't run again?

Because they know he lost in 2020. Again, it’s really simple.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

If Trump is elected president in 2024 then he clearly lost the 2020 election contrary to what Trump has stated since then, and his MAGA supporters.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

lol Again. Not what I said. If Trump won in 2020 as you claim he did, then he couldn't run in 2024, which you've already acknowledged here:

https://www.axios.com/2023/06/09/trump-president-run-criminal-charges-indictment

Indictments, and even potential convictions, do not legally disqualify Trump from running for president in 2024 or from serving if elected, said Chris Edelson, an assistant professor at American University who specializes in presidential power.

"The clearest path to disqualifying Donald Trump running for office would have been if the Senate had convicted him in one or both of the impeachments," Edelson said.

Context: The Senate acquitted Trump in both of his impeachment trials in 2020 for abuse of power and 2021 for incitement of insurrection, respectively. 

Between the lines: The Civil War-era 14th Amendment has a clause that bans anyone who "engaged in insurrection" against the U.S. from holding elected office without the approval of two-thirds of the House and Senate.

(But he was never charged with Insurrection)

After the Jan. 6 insurrection, Democrats accused Trump of engaging in "insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. as defined in the 14th Amendment, which would prohibit any such person from "holding any office" if the Senate had convicted him.

Lawmakers also floated using the 25th Amendment to remove him from office at the time, which like impeachment didn't bar him from future office. 

Reality check: Beyond impeachment and the 14th Amendment, the only other barrier to the presidency is the two-term limit. Trump is one of nearly two dozen U.S. presidents who have served one term.

But, but, but: Trump is also being investigated over efforts to subvert the 2020 election by special counsel Jack Smith, who was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to oversee both federal probes on Trump. 

In a separate probe out of Atlanta on his efforts to subvert the 2020 election, a charging decision is expected this summer.

Experts, including Edelson, still expect him to be able to run.

Libs, strap in, it's going to be fun, and a lot of hair-pulling for y'all

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Reality check: Beyond impeachment and the 14th Amendment, the only other barrier to the presidency is the two-term limit. Trump is one of nearly two dozen U.S. presidents who have served one term.

Reality check. He lost in 2020.

Yes or no ?

9 ( +10 / -1 )

The panel sought to interview Navarro about a plan devised by him and other Trump allies, dubbed the "Green Bay Sweep," to delay Congress from certifying Democratic President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The committee concluded its work last year without interviewing Navarro.

And we learned something new this week about the "Green Bay Sweep"....the one its author confessed to being a violation of federal law....

"During Eastman's testimony on the stand as part of his disbarment trial he dodged a question on whether he and Trump had planned to replace VP Pence with Sen Charles Grassley when counting the electoral votes in Congress. "Grassley has consistently denied being part of any such discussions. However, it remains unclear how seriously anyone in Trump’s orbit considered using Grassley — or attempting to use him — to grant Trump a second term in office. Eastman was reportedly asked about the alleged plot during testimony he was forced to give this week as part of his disbarment trial in California. He cited attorney-client privilege as he declined to provide an answer. Asked which client he was referring to, he said, “President Trump,” according to Politico."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-trump-lawyer-keeps-mum-224737337.html

So this unlawful scheme was even going to prevent Pence from doing his Constitutional duty and instead bring in a "fake" replacement....

And it will all come out during the trials as all the MAGA-rats turn on one another...

Trump should start to measure the curtains for his cell at Leavenworth now....

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Reality check. He lost in 2020. 

Indictments, and even potential convictions, do not legally disqualify Trump from running for president in 2024 or from serving if elected, said Chris Edelson, an assistant professor at American University who specializes in presidential power.

Chris Edelson is by no means a conservative

https://journalnow.com/opinion/column/chris-edelson-the-surreal-possibility-of-another-trump-term/article_f1fdff0a-25a0-11ee-aa7d-3fa1fe148b80.html

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

why are Dems unsuccessfully trying to stop this man

Peter Navarro is the subject of this story. He's not running for public office.

Is this thread going to get run into the ditch again by you-know-who?

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Libs, strap in, it's going to be fun, and a lot of hair-pulling for y'all

This is the infantile heart and soul of MAGA.

9 ( +10 / -1 )

Then guilty. Nothing to do with Trump.

The decision may or may not have anything to do with Trump. I think the decision is correct.

But the result of the decision is going to have a LOT to do with Trump, like it or not.

I HATE Trump. But even I am starting to view him as the lesser evil.

This case aside, the U.S. government and court system has gone hog wild and stomped all over America values in this desperate bid to take Trump down and paint Jan. 6 as the second coming of the American Civil War.

Fact is Jan. 6 was already based on that sort of corruption. Its so bad that even I am hoping Trump wins the next election, even as I marvel that the country survived 4 years of his presidency. But the country has not yet survived 4 years of Biden.

-11 ( +0 / -11 )

Keepyer Internetpoints

This case aside, the U.S. government and court system has gone hog wild and stomped all over America values in this desperate bid to take Trump down and paint Jan. 6 as the second coming of the American Civil War.

What? Since when has prosecuting crimes been described as "gone hog wild and stomped all over America values"?

Trump's indictments are the direct result of him allegedly committing crimes. They have been brought by grand juries of peers. There is nothing political in this process.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Believe me, I get it. You’re trapped.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

People like Trump and this guy right here don’t think any laws apply to them.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

Bass: Indictments, and even potential convictions, do not legally disqualify Trump from running for president in 2024

Has anyone here said a conviction bars him from running? If so, I haven't seen it.

You doin' OK? Your attention seeking shiposting seems to be on steroids tonight, just lashing out at anything and everything with more nonsense than usual.

Bad day at work or something? Maybe you should sign off for a bit.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Bass: Nope, wrong again as usual.

OK, well just checking in. You seem to need more attention tonight than usual. I wish you luck.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Guessing again,

Why? Because you say so? ROFL

lost

Trump?

and definitely No cigar for you.

Ditto. Scroll up. Not my style. I already answered that.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

The conclusion from the MAGA supporters and registered conservatives is that Trump didn't win the 2020 election so he can stand for reelection in 2024 even with a criminal record. Would Americans want a President with a criminal record? Would that prevent him from traveling outside the US?

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Trump did not win 2 elections as he claims, he won NONE. He was beaten by Clinton in 2016 by over 3 million votes, but put in the WH by a dubious and unelected Electorial College, which is not a bi-partisan thing. As for this idiot, Navarro, I watched a short video of him yesterday, on the streets begging for money to pay his lawyers fees. He has a a small fortune of $5 million so why is he not using that? ...Oh, I know, he thinks the magats will pay for it.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites