Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
world

GOP considers holding formal vote to authorize Biden impeachment as White House questions legitimacy

55 Comments
By FARNOUSH AMIRI

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

55 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Blacklabel

Hmmm looks like….. “evidence”

Unfortunately for you, it isn't.

“Money laundering investigator warned of Hunter Biden's 'unusual,' 'erratic' payments from China in 2018

The bank investigator raised concerns about money that ultimately funded the $40,000 payment to Joe Biden, Comer says”

Having working in an investment bank on anti-money laundering, there is a difference between a red flag, which means you investigate, and actual money laundering, which is a crime.

Considering Hunter hasn't been indicted on money laundering, this was the former. Not a crime.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

“Furthermore, there has been negative news regarding the beneficial owner of Owasco PC, Robert Hunter Biden (son of former U.S. Vice President- Joe Biden) regarding allegations by his ex-wife that there were financial concerns about his extravagant spending on his own interests (drugs, strip clubs, prostitutes, etc.) which may put his family in a deep financial hole," the investigator wrote”

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Where? I haven't seen one piece of evidence.

Because YOU personally haven’t seen it doesn’t mean they don’t have any. Again, if you work in Congress show us what you know..

The same isn't true for Biden.

Not according to what the Republicans have on him

No they don't,

Yes, they do show me a pole where it says that Biden is ahead of Trump 10 points

They aren't getting anywhere.

Neither are the Trump hunters.

That doesn't make sense.

A lot in politics, don’t make sense, I say, the same thing about the Dems obsession with Trump, but they want to go that route, let them. lol

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

Blacklabel

But they are a year away

quite different from yours pals falsely claiming Trump is losing in the polls right now.

Well they aren't wrong. E.g., the latest (Nov. 25-27) YouGov / The Economist poll has Biden 44% Trump 42%,

I.e.,  Biden+2

i notice you didn’t correct them, why?

Because, I'm not interested in the polls a year out.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Hmmm looks like….. “evidence”

“Money laundering investigator warned of Hunter Biden's 'unusual,' 'erratic' payments from China in 2018

The bank investigator raised concerns about money that ultimately funded the $40,000 payment to Joe Biden, Comer says”

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

But they are a year away

quite different from yours pals falsely claiming Trump is losing in the polls right now.

i notice you didn’t correct them, why?

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Blacklabel

There will be a closed door deposition under subpoena.

Why? Surely James Comer wants Hunter to admit to all his crimes in front of the world. Unless, there were no crimes.

then a public hearing where any lying can be compared to answers given under oath in the deposition.

Oh, there won't be a public hearing if they come up empty handed. There will only be spin pretending that they got something.

This is an investigation.

No it isn't, it's a fishing expedition.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

let him drop out of the race in exchange for 5 years in prison for his boy instead of 10 and let’s move on to Trump 2024.

Lol, this is not how the US works.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Biden was losing in 12 polls in a row. A couple of +1 polls form left leaning orgs that only add up to 85% of the vote doesn’t change anything.

32% on the economy?

-10 ( +0 / -10 )

bass4funk

*The prosecutors in Georgia, New York, and Florida, however, do have evidence on Trump and much of it is public.*

As the Republicans do have on Biden.

Where? I haven't seen one piece of evidence.

The same isn't true for Biden.

The polls look disastrous for Biden

No they don't, but I don't see how it's relevant one year from the election.

They aren't getting anywhere.

If that were true we wouldn’t even have the closed door hearings.

That doesn't make sense. Hearings are to find out things. If they had any evidence at all, they wouldn't keep it secret.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

There will be a closed door deposition under subpoena.

then a public hearing where any lying can be compared to answers given under oath in the deposition.

adam Schiff was all for closed door depositions in investigations.

This is an investigation.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

That’s exactly why you can’t go after Hunter. 

Or Trump

Because at some point in the past incorrect verdicts have been made.

I agree

We just can’t take the risk of investigating any crimes in the future because this happened in the past. 

Yes, yes!

Case dismissed.

Well, you and I can’t make that determination, but I agree otherwise on both men.

*The prosecutors in Georgia, New York, and Florida, however, do have evidence on Trump and much of it is public.**

As the Republicans do have on Biden.

Trump will have his day in court and we will see what they have.

Hmmmm.

I'm pretty confident that if Mark Meadows testifies against Trump, it will be pretty convincing.

We don’t know, but since the left are after him and will use any method, I’m not surprised. Meadows is 100% a Trump backer and if he testifies against him means one thing, what did the Feds tell him to turn?

Well, we have seen much of the evidence against Trump,

As well as Biden

The Dems are doing nothing to stop Trump from running.

Running and going after him are two entirely different things

The same isn't true for Biden.

The polls look disastrous for Biden

They aren't getting anywhere.

If that were true we wouldn’t even have the closed door hearings.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Steve Bannon just said that Hunter is calling Comer’s bluff and that the House committee is clearly afraid of Hunter. Steve is all for the public hearing, but clearly thinks Comer isn’t up to the task.

say what you will about Bannon, he’s a hell of a lot smarter than Jim Comer.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

More egg on MAGA mugs. This right-wing bunch of traitors are unredeemable (as future polls will prove).

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Impeach Biden . . . Isn’t that asinine?!

Today’s Republican Party is so ridiculous.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

bass4funk

*The prosecutors in Georgia, New York, and Florida, however, do have evidence on Trump and much of it is public.*

Do you know how many blacks were executed in the U.S. based on faulty evidence we know the government lied about just because they wanted to uphold the white status quo. Sorry, if I’m skeptical after all these years and that sentiment is growing nation

Trump will have his day in court and we will see what they have. I'm pretty confident that if Mark Meadows testifies against Trump, it will be pretty convincing.

Well, we have seen much of the evidence against Trump,

And much of it failing, now the Dems are getting ridiculously erratic and going to great lengths to stop this guy from running, it’s looking sad, pathetic and just plain stupid.

The Dems are doing nothing to stop Trump from running. If you disagree, let me know what you think they are doing.

The same isn't true for Biden.

Getting their slowly.

They aren't getting anywhere. They don't have one piece of evidence of any wrongdoing.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Do you know how many blacks were executed in the U.S. based on faulty evidence we know the government lied about just because they wanted to uphold the white status quo. Sorry, if I’m skeptical after all these years and that sentiment is growing nation

That’s exactly why you can’t go after Hunter.

Because at some point in the past incorrect verdicts have been made. We just can’t take the risk of investigating any crimes in the future because this happened in the past.

Case dismissed.

/s

7 ( +8 / -1 )

No they don't.

They do.

They demanded Hunter Biden testify, but won't let him testify publicly. They know they've got nothing, and making it publicly will prove this. 

There has to be a reason why? You and I don’t know what that reason is. Must be a calculated one.

Why have a private testimony?

I don’t know, but there has to be a valid reason as to what that reason is, time will tell. 

Sure they would. They are going on a fishing expedition. Because they have nothing.

Like with Trump, I see.

They've got 0 proof of nefarious dealings.

Like with Trump.

If they had evidence they wouldn't keep it secret.

When you become a congressman, please tell us about the rules and protocol please until then, we all can throw guesses

They would use it to impeach Joe Biden.

That’s coming it seems.

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

You’re a member of Congress and oversight committee? You never told us this. Huh…

The Dems don't have anything on Trump 

True

Oh the sad irony.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

The problem with that, is that they have absolutely no evidence that Joe Biden had any nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan at all. No evidence. None. Zilch.

You’re a member of Congress and oversight committee? You never told us this. Huh…

The Dems don't have anything on Trump

True

and they aren't going after him.

Where have you been for the last 8 years????

*The prosecutors in Georgia, New York, and Florida, however, do have evidence on Trump and much of it is public.*

Do you know how many blacks were executed in the U.S. based on faulty evidence we know the government lied about just because they wanted to uphold the white status quo. Sorry, if I’m skeptical after all these years and that sentiment is growing nation

No they don't.

Yes, they absolutely do.

Well, we have seen much of the evidence against Trump,

And much of it failing, now the Dems are getting ridiculously erratic and going to great lengths to stop this guy from running, it’s looking sad, pathetic and just plain stupid.

and there was obviously enough to indict him 4 times.

That is their hope, and his poll numbers still climb, damn!

The same isn't true for Biden.

Getting their slowly.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

bass4funk

No they don't. They demanded Hunter Biden testify, but won't let him testify publicly. They know they've got nothing, and making it publicly will prove this. 

The public testimony is coming later, no rush

Why have a private testimony? If they had something on Hunter isn't it better that it come out for all to see? What are they trying to hide?

and if they didn’t have anything, he wouldn’t even give private testimony.

Sure they would. They are going on a fishing expedition. Because they have nothing.

Let’s see where this goes, didn’t go with Trump and you might be right, might not go with Biden, who knows.

They've got 0 proof of nefarious dealings. See the article: 

You don’t know what they have, if you do, show us, prove it,

If they had evidence they wouldn't keep it secret. They would use it to impeach Joe Biden.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

I wonder whether Johnson's comments were meant to distract the media about George Santos's impending expulsion from the House.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Hunter offered to testify as long as the hearing was public. Comer said hell no.

wonder why?

9 ( +10 / -1 )

bass4funk

The problem with that, is that they have absolutely no evidence that Joe Biden had any nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan at all. No evidence. None. Zilch.

You guys can say that all day, I feel the same about what the Dems have on Trump

The Dems don't have anything on Trump and they aren't going after him. The prosecutors in Georgia, New York, and Florida, however, do have evidence on Trump and much of it is public.

and the Dems say they do,

No they don't.

I can’t stop the Dems and you can’t stop the Republicans, so let’s see who has what and who doesn’t.

Well, we have seen much of the evidence against Trump, and there was obviously enough to indict him 4 times. The same isn't true for Biden.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

You would want this, technically, because if there’s nothing, then you can rest, assured that this guy is not compromised, so these hearings are a good thing to clear the air of corruption, possibly.

Pull the other one. You’ll have excuses and conspiracies aplenty when nothing comes of this.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

bass4funkToday  09:18 am JST

Trump did the things he was accused of. There were witnesses. 

As in Biden’s not just that, there’s audio and video of him boasting about it.

In no way shape or form I are the statements taken out of context Impeachable Offenses.

And no, Biden isn’t going to lose to a sex-offending soon to be convicted felon.

Reality, he already is, every single poll says it, every single one, left or right or independent.

Just like Romney a year out, eh? How’d that go?

And Mitt wasn’t a proven sex-offender and likely convicted felon.

Thought you didn’t believe in polls?

Biden isn’t losing to Cheeto-Jesus.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Trump did the things he was accused of. There were witnesses. 

As in Biden’s not just that, there’s audio and video of him boasting about it.

GQP Toadies just didn’t care.

And the Dems care? That would be a first.

Buden isn’t even accused of a specific offense yet and there is F-All for evidence. 

And we shall see, no one knows yet, that’s what we are trying to find out. You would want this, technically, because if there’s nothing, then you can rest, assured that this guy is not compromised, so these hearings are a good thing to clear the air of corruption, possibly.

The whistleblowers aren’t. The one is actually a fugitive from justice. 

Yeah, the Dems don’t get to determine who is a whistleblower and who isn’t, they can scream that, but they can’t legally determine that on their end, especially if the person is registered as one and is classified as one.

So just like Clinton, let’s watch this crash and burn, it won’t even get 1/2 the votes in the Senate.

You are probably right, I’m not a big fan of impeachment, I didn’t like when the Republicans impeached Bill Clinton, I thought it was a waste of time that the Democrats went after Trump and impeached him twice, but if these people think they have something, go for it.

And it’s going to show those not in the cult just how concerned the GQP really is in solving actual problems. 

They won’t be able to solve any problems as long as they’re the minority, and as long as we have a democrat president, that won’t happen, the only thing that they can do is make sure that this doesn’t go off of spending spree, and I’m happy for that, and good for the house and doing their job limiting administrations open checkbook.

And no, Biden isn’t going to lose to a sex-offending soon to be convicted felon.

Reality, he already is, every single poll says it, every single one, left or right or independent.

-7 ( +2 / -9 )

“While we take no pleasure in the proceedings here, we have a responsibility to do it,

I don't believe that, I bet they get all giddy thinking about it while swinging their little feet around at their desks.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Trump did the things he was accused of. There were witnesses.

GQP Toadies just didn’t care.

Buden isn’t even accused of a specific offense yet and there is F-All for evidence.

The whistleblowers aren’t. The one is actually a fugitive from justice.

So just like Clinton, let’s watch this crash and burn, it won’t even get 1/2 the votes in the Senate.

And it’s going to show those not in the cult just how concerned the GQP really is in solving actual problems.

And no, Biden isn’t going to lose to a sex-offending soon to be convicted felon.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Disagree all you want.

Yes.

The fact still remains that Biden is beating Trump in the latest polls. 

Uh-huh…lol

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/11/28/no_really_biden_is_in_trouble_against_trump.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/bidens-polling-dangerous-territory-obamas-2011-rcna126759

Is that why he lost his reelection bid? Is that why he's losing to Biden in the latest polls as well? 

What?

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/25/biden-polls-worse-trump-00128536

And now you're backtracking. Come on friend, what about those claims of nefarious business dealings in Ukraine? Complete nonsense. 

Not backtracking, I don’t need to, I’m not the one in the hot seat and I’m not the one being subpoenaed or the one working in congress. I I don’t know what the Republicans have, or what they don’t have, they feel they have a good case, well, then, let’s see it I am open for it, just like you would be if the Dems have something on Trump, I don’t think they have anything on Trump, you don’t think they have anything on Biden. OK let’s just see how this thing plays out.

His former boss? Lol right, Obama is the real kingmaker of the DNC.

Pretty much.

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

I disagree, same political playbook.

Disagree all you want. The fact still remains that Biden is beating Trump in the latest polls.

Trump is getting that and he was impeached twice, and Biden’s number is going down and fast.

Is that why he lost his reelection bid? Is that why he's losing to Biden in the latest polls as well?

No one knows, we will have to wait and see.

And now you're backtracking. Come on friend, what about those claims of nefarious business dealings in Ukraine? Complete nonsense.

His former boss.

His former boss? Lol right, Obama is the real kingmaker of the DNC. DNC members are constantly seen going in and out of his house. Totally. :)

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Actually, that's not true. Try again.

I disagree, same political playbook.

Also, when I talk about the Clinton treatment, I'm talking about the bump in polling he got after being impeached.

Trump is getting that and he was impeached twice, and Biden’s number is going down and fast.

That's what they claim, but the GOP also lies a lot.

The Dems even more, not sure where to even begin.

I suspect there won't be a public hearing after he testifies. 

No one knows, we will have to wait and see.

Back at you friend.

To you as well.

Lol Okay, then who is the DNC cult of personality centered around?

His former boss.

-10 ( +2 / -12 )

Yes, Trump treatment, the Dems went after Trump twice, impeached him and he was acquitted twice and now surpassing Biden in the polls.

Actually, that's not true. Try again. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/

Also, when I talk about the Clinton treatment, I'm talking about the bump in polling he got after being impeached. Impeach away. I wang Biden to run up his polling numbers even more.

The public testimony is coming later, no rush and if they didn’t have anything, he wouldn’t even give private testimony. Let’s see where this goes, didn’t go with Trump and you might be right, might not go with Biden, who knows.

That's what they claim, but the GOP also lies a lot. I suspect there won't be a public hearing after he testifies.

You don’t know what they have, if you do, show us, prove it, you screaming on JT they have nothing means nothing to the people up in DC, but you are allowed to have an opinion, we all do

Back at you friend. You don't know what they've got either, but you sure seem confident they got dirt on Biden. Which is funny because they don't want Hunter to testify in public. :)

Ok, that’s what you think, millions of us have a different opinion on that.

Lol Okay, then who is the DNC cult of personality centered around?

7 ( +9 / -2 )

The problem with that, is that they have absolutely no evidence that Joe Biden had any nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan at all. No evidence. None. Zilch.

You guys can say that all day, I feel the same about what the Dems have on Trump and the Dems say they do, I can’t stop the Dems and you can’t stop the Republicans, so let’s see who has what and who doesn’t.

And the funny thing is that James Comer subpoenaed Hunter Biden to testify and he agreed as long as it is public. Now James wants it secret!

Hunter also said the laptop wasn’t his despite every bit of information was Hunter’s, go figure.

If they have explosive evidence, let's expose it!

So let’s see, we have time, calm down.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

No, not the Trump treatment. Trump went on to lose. Clinton got impeached and the reelected. 

Yes, Trump treatment, the Dems went after Trump twice, impeached him and he was acquitted twice and now surpassing Biden in the polls.

No they don't. They demanded Hunter Biden testify, but won't let him testify publicly. They know they've got nothing, and making it publicly will prove this. 

The public testimony is coming later, no rush and if they didn’t have anything, he wouldn’t even give private testimony. Let’s see where this goes, didn’t go with Trump and you might be right, might not go with Biden, who knows.

They've got 0 proof of nefarious dealings. See the article: 

You don’t know what they have, if you do, show us, prove it, you screaming on JT they have nothing means nothing to the people up in DC, but you are allowed to have an opinion, we all do.

No they wouldn't. The Democrat party isn't a cult of personality.

Ok, that’s what you think, millions of us have a different opinion on that.

-9 ( +3 / -12 )

Go for it. If you have evidence let’s all see it.

If Biden is guilty lock him up. Investigate all serious crime allegations.

What will actually happen however is nothing. A case of put up or shut up, then make up a cover up to explain why nothing happened.

Go for it, apparently impeachments just make the impeached stronger, right?

8 ( +11 / -3 )

bass4funk

responsibility = worshipping at the feet of their Lord 'n' Savior Donald Trump

No, it’s about Biden and his nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan.

The problem with that, is that they have absolutely no evidence that Joe Biden had any nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan at all. No evidence. None. Zilch.

And the funny thing is that James Comer subpoenaed Hunter Biden to testify and he agreed as long as it is public. Now James wants it secret! If they have explosive evidence, let's expose it!

7 ( +9 / -2 )

Hrm. It certainly stinks but it doesn't appear from the article that Biden's been involved in anything actually illegal. If the GOP had a more viable candidate for 2024 they could maybe use this stuff against him and get some Democrat-leaning swing voters, but I think a lot of them might rally round Biden to keep Trump out.

There's the rub and the Hobson's choice.

I didn't even get into Biden's making it more difficult for poor people to have bankruptcy protection.

It just shows how useless the GOP is for the people and the area left for a real populist candidate on the left.

Trump gave up his pledge to take on Wall Street in 2016 after beating Hilary.

Still talks about taking on those 'elites' though.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Too late. Biden will be thrown out in the election anyway if he even makes it that far.

Not according to the latest polls. :)

Or the Trump treatment…twice.

No, not the Trump treatment. Trump went on to lose. Clinton got impeached and the reelected.

Well, I kind of agree with you, but as in the Dems case they think they have good reason then go for it.

No they don't. They demanded Hunter Biden testify, but won't let him testify publicly. They know they've got nothing, and making it publicly will prove this.

No, it’s about Biden and his nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan.

They've got 0 proof of nefarious dealings. See the article:

the party looks to formalize a process that has yet to yield any direct evidence of wrongdoing by the president."

.

it doesn’t matter, the Dems do the same thing, so this is the world of politics.

No they wouldn't. The Democrat party isn't a cult of personality.

7 ( +9 / -2 )

a process that has yet to yield any direct evidence of wrongdoing by the president.

The GOP has long been a party for which 'evidence' has not mattered, and lately it's more Qanon-ish, believing in all sorts of wack further spread by the former guy, aka Fraudmeister-in chief, whose conspiracy theories and outright lies are spread by his own blog, and by Murdoch and Musk's media empires, aided greatly by Putin and Xi and their media and social media warriors. The GOP want to undermine the republic and replace it with pure corporatocracy, with a system where the greediest and wealthiest can have no laws nor regulations to slow their quests for even more wealth for them, while saying screw the country and those that are not already wealthy, i.e. the majority of the nation..

5 ( +7 / -2 )

Blacklabel

Today 07:49 am JST

Too late. Biden will be thrown out in the election anyway if he even makes it that far.

Should have done this 2 years ago if they were going to impeach.

Then they shouldn't be bothering with it now, should they.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

Please go for it. Give him the Bill Clinton treatment. 

Or the Trump treatment…twice.

Pretty pathetic that the house wastes time on this nonsense.

Well, I kind of agree with you, but as in the Dems case they think they have good reason then go for it. Our objections didn’t stop the Dems and now their objections won’t stop the GOP.

responsibility = worshipping at the feet of their Lord 'n' Savior Donald Trump

No, it’s about Biden and his nefarious business dealings with Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan.

There you have it. Doing the golden calf's bidding

Even if that is the case, it doesn’t matter, the Dems do the same thing, so this is the world of politics. When the Dems went after Trump in the manner they did, what did they expect? Anyway, the left can’t say anything, they just need to deal with it. Just remember, when the left went after and impeached him, every conservative complained and it didn’t stop the left and now that pendulum swung back. The Dems have to deal with it.

-11 ( +4 / -15 )

Too late. Biden will be thrown out in the election anyway if he even makes it that far.

Should have done this 2 years ago if they were going to impeach.

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

Biggest circUS on earth...

-5 ( +5 / -10 )

dagon

Today 07:13 am JST

Biden should have been investigated for turning Delaware into an American Cayman Islands while posing as wanting to raise wealth taxes.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/whats-matter-delaware-joe-bidens-194150855.html

In that sense Trump and Biden are complicit in financial fraud.

Hrm. It certainly stinks but it doesn't appear from the article that Biden's been involved in anything actually illegal. If the GOP had a more viable candidate for 2024 they could maybe use this stuff against him and get some Democrat-leaning swing voters, but I think a lot of them might rally round Biden to keep Trump out.

7 ( +9 / -2 )

doesn't matter, Biden is history.

And there you have it. The right is very concerned about corruption.

7 ( +11 / -4 )

Whether by impeachment or gentle push into retirement, Joe Biden should no longer be President. It's borderline cruel to force our senior citizens to do things they're clearly incapable of doing in their advanced elderly years.

Joe should be more concerned with winning the jackpot at Monday night bingo than calling the shots on matters of massive global importance.

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

plasticmonkey

Today 07:03 am JST

"Johnson's comments came just over a week after he traveled to Mar-a-Lago to meet with former President Donald Trump..."

There you have it. Doing the golden calf's bidding.

Well it does sound a bit like a pilgrimage, doesn't it.

7 ( +10 / -3 )

It doesn't matter, Biden is history.

-10 ( +5 / -15 )

digging deeper into the family finances, particularly payments that Hunter Biden received from Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company that became tangled in the first impeachment of former President Donald Trump.

Repubs always never doing any good for the people amd just engaging in power plays to appeal to their maroon base.

Biden should have been investigated for turning Delaware into an American Cayman Islands while posing as wanting to raise wealth taxes.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/whats-matter-delaware-joe-bidens-194150855.html

In that sense Trump and Biden are complicit in financial fraud.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

Cards fan

Today 06:56 am JST

Please go for it. Give him the Bill Clinton treatment.

Pretty pathetic that the house wastes time on this nonsense.

They don't seem to have much of a clue what to do about anything else. Going after Biden to keep Trump supporters sweet is pretty much all the can agree on, although I suspect many of them know it's a waste of time.

4 ( +10 / -6 )

“While we take no pleasure in the proceedings here, we have a responsibility to do it,” Johnson said

responsibility = worshipping at the feet of their Lord 'n' Savior Donald Trump

Johnson's comments came just over a week after he traveled to Mar-a-Lago to meet with former President Donald Trump, who has been publicly pushing his Republican allies in Congress for months to impeach Biden in retribution for Democrats’ two impeachments of him.

There you have it. Doing the golden calf's bidding.

10 ( +16 / -6 )

"...the party looks to formalize a process that has yet to yield any direct evidence of wrongdoing by the president."

As if that matters in the MAGAverse. Winning the 2020 election was the major crime as far as Donald Trump is concerned and there's plenty of evidence of that.

10 ( +15 / -5 )

Please go for it. Give him the Bill Clinton treatment.

Pretty pathetic that the house wastes time on this nonsense.

13 ( +18 / -5 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites