Japan Today
world

GOP Convention security will allow guns within outer perimeter, sets parade route for demonstrators

74 Comments
By TODD RICHMOND

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


74 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

They demand total unrestricted gun ownership but can't quite seem to allow it when it might effect them.

9 ( +12 / -3 )

Oh, I’m SURE we won’t see a bunch of out of state, beer gutted militia goobers in dirty fatigues waving around their “freedom genitalia” (AR-15s) to harass the locals, er…”exercise their 2nd amendment rights”…

10 ( +13 / -3 )

They demand total unrestricted gun ownership but can't quite seem to allow it when it might affect them.

Yes, just as it would be the case for any Presidential candidate or the President himself.

Oh, I’m SURE we won’t see a bunch of out of state, beer gutted militia goobers in dirty fatigues waving around their “freedom genitalia” (AR-15s) to harass the locals, er…”exercise their 2nd amendment rights”…

Turn off the TV, I’m fit and have a sizable gun collection, love beer and Freedom, liberals do like to harass and intimidate people, Supreme Court justices or send the Feds in, funny how they stay clear from most gun owners, wonder why that is.

-14 ( +3 / -17 )

Yes, just as it would be the case for any Presidential candidate or the President himself.

Oh, but I thought having guns makes everyone safer. Don't the gun lovers want the President to be safe?

11 ( +14 / -3 )

Oh, but I thought having guns makes everyone safer. Don't the gun lovers want the President to be safe?

It does, but that doesn’t mean that everyone that has a gun has “good intentions” especially in a heated political climate as this current one, that goes for both sides.

-11 ( +4 / -15 )

And of course, as a convicted felon, Don the con is forbidden to carry or in fact even to own a gun.

So the zone of allowance doesn’t apply to him.

9 ( +12 / -3 )

And of course, as a convicted felon, Don the con is forbidden to carry or in fact even to own a gun. 

Yup; but his Secret Service can as well as his private security, as well as the rest of his family, so that’s not even close to a problem for him.

So the zone of allowance doesn’t apply to him.

Not even an issue

-14 ( +2 / -16 )

And of course, as a convicted felon, Don the con is forbidden to carry or in fact even to own a gun. 

Yup; but his Secret Service can as well as his private security, as well as the rest of his family, so that’s not even close to a problem for him.

Whew, what a relief! For a moment I thought his lack of access to firearms owing to the fact that he’s a convicted felon would have rendered him defenseless in Milwaukee, a city that he says at once is “horrible”, but claims to have chosen for the convention (he didn’t).

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Trump hates Milwaukee. They’re forcing him to go for the convention.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Yes, just as it would be the case for any Presidential candidate or the President himself.

I’m glad you agree that there are limits to the second amendment.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

He was going to stay in Chicago till it got out and the optics looked atrocious.

Nothing says “I love Milwaukee” like commuting from Chicago, eh?

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Whew, what a relief! For a moment I thought his lack of access to firearms owing to the fact that he’s a convicted felon would have rendered him defenseless in Milwaukee, a city that he says at once is “horrible”, but claims to have chosen for the convention (he didn’t).

Milwaukee is horrible, not the city, but the crime, absolutely! Lower the crime rate, it can be a good city, but not a lot of hope for Dem controlled cities.

-9 ( +3 / -12 )

No weapons of any kind will be allowed within the inner perimeter but people will be able to carry guns openly or concealed elsewhere as allowed under state law.

Even in the outer perimeter if you are not the right skin color or with the right gear you might find your gun rights being abridged.

Like when the NRA supported gun control against leftist POC carrying.

https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

3 ( +5 / -2 )

We all already know why guns are not allowed in some places and at some times. It’s not some big mystery.

no different than no smoking areas or places you can’t drink alcohol.

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

I thought you guys hated gun regulations.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

none is this a “regulation”.

Just a limited time common sense “restriction” based on a very limited time in a very specific area.

Because armed security is being provided for us inside that area.

your team?? Hate guns but in favor of crackheads being able to purchase guns unless they are specifically using crack at the exact moment of purchase.

-11 ( +1 / -12 )

We all already know why guns are not allowed in some places and at some times. It’s not some big mystery.

Do we? Is that why Republicans repeatedly push for easier access to guns virtually anywhere and at all time? Is that why they blame gun free zones for mass shootings?

5 ( +7 / -2 )

your team?? Hate guns but in favor of crackheads being able to purchase guns unless they are specifically using crack at the exact moment of purchase.

Amen brother, that's something us leftists are saying. reeee

6 ( +7 / -1 )

I thought you guys hated gun regulations

Within Reason. Being a gun owner doesn’t mean, zero restrictions whatsoever. I love beer, but my kids can’t drink it nor should they yet, but once of age, I’ll drink one gladly with them.

Even in the outer perimeter if you are not the right skin color or with the right gear you might find your gun rights being abridged. 

Huh?

https://naaga.co/

Not sure what you’re seeing, lol.

Like when the NRA supported gun control against leftist POC carrying.

At the time when white liberal polices were decimating black communities and then the same people started panicking about black backlash?

Do we?

Yes

Is that why Republicans repeatedly push for easier access to guns virtually anywhere and at all time?

They should be within reason, especially with the war on police and the limitations imposed on them by liberal politicians restricting many from doing their jobs, absolutely the people have the right to defend themselves if the cops are not allowed to do their jobs

Is that why they blame gun free zones for mass shootings?

Worse.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/michigan-cops-endorse-trump-salutes-230603240.html

-11 ( +2 / -13 )

No weapons of any kind will be allowed within the inner perimeter but people will be able to carry guns openly or concealed elsewhere as allowed under state law. Wisconsin statutes outlaw only machine guns, short-barreled shotguns and silencers.

Well, this is outrageous, as a die-hard Trump supporter and MAGA-cult member, we should be allowed to carry our guns everywhere - more guns means more safety - just look at Afghanistan, Lebanon, and the Congo. I never go to the bathroom without my Glock. And what's with this prohibition of machine guns - nothing better to protect against home invasions by Bigfoot...

Next they'll be telling me I can't carry my Bible within the inner perimeter...

The Repub Party has gone woke!

3 ( +5 / -2 )

You do.

And if you don’t it’s irrelevant and/or disingenuous feigned obtuseness anyway.

People who support guns understand and can comply for these specific case where armed security is provided. Who cares anti gun people think, you wouldn’t be bringing a gun there anyway.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

Are they worried Trump would be assassinated?

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Is that why they blame gun free zones for mass shootings?

yes it is.

However, this event has armed security provided for all our safety. They even provided all you crazed leftists some stages and speakers and a marching route.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

none is this a “regulation”.

Hypocrisy exposed.

Let the twister begin.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Do you support guns? No

do you own a gun? No

are you going to this event? No

are you even American? Most of you, no

si spare us the manufactured ignorance and go push the Democrat event why they don’t allow guns either.

Their explanation is quite acceptable to you I’m sure. (But a Hint: it’s the same exact one as republicans are using that you can’t seem to comprehend)

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

are you even American? Most of you, no

Or maybe we are.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

si spare us the manufactured ignorance and go push the Democrat event why they don’t allow guns either.

Yeah, they're also for gun control. Great point as per usual. reeeee

5 ( +6 / -1 )

si spare us the manufactured ignorance and go push the Democrat event why they don’t allow guns either.

One of these parties is for gun control and one isn't, which is one why of these groups is extremely hypocritical for banning guns.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Oh, but I thought having guns makes everyone safer. Don't the gun lovers want the President to be safe?

It does, but that doesn’t mean that everyone that has a gun has “good intentions” especially in a heated political climate as this current one, that goes for both sides.

You just invalidated your own far-right argument that "the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun."

Even including armed police, the far-right believe that even more "good guys" should be armed just in case those "bad guys" get in...

More guns carried by "good guys" is always better...but you're arguing the opposite...

And reading the other comments from our far-right friends, it's clear they support gun control measures also...

Maybe tomorrow they'll be for more LBGTQ rights and racial history courses in schools...

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Well, this is outrageous, as a die-hard Trump supporter and MAGA-cult member, we should be allowed to carry our guns everywhere - more guns means more safety -

Yes, that’s one reason why my neighborhood in Texas is safe, not to mention all the crazy vermin we have that could kill our livestock.

just look at Afghanistan, Lebanon, and the Congo.

We don’t want to think about Biden’s disastrous withdrawal, no need to bring that up.

I never go to the bathroom without my Glock. And what's with this prohibition of machine guns - nothing better to protect against home invasions by Bigfoot...

Or a the radical left.

Next they'll be telling me I can't carry my Bible within the inner perimeter...

Download it, then, no problems.

The Repub Party has gone woke!

To the liberal madness engulfing the nation

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

It’s strange how ‘second/first amendment absolutists’ misunderstand the words ‘amendment’ or ‘absolute’.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun.

The problem is that the inverse is also true.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

its hilarious all the feigned ignorance and refusal to accept an offered explanation. of something that is obvious even without explanation.

guess some of you just gonna have to walk around all day as dumbfounded, just not understanding. But that’s a perpetual state for most of the left.

if an event has armed security inside a perimeter- I don’t need my guns. The restaurant cooks my steak, I don’t need to bring one from home for them to cook. These are obvious things.

And the left thinks WE are stupid? Lol

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

its hilarious all the feigned ignorance and refusal to accept an offered explanation. of something that is obvious even without explanation.

Because you're trying to explain how you're both for and against gun control, and trying to convince us that doesn't make one look like an idiot.

You can be as angry as you want about us pointing out the discrepancy here. Doesn't change the fact of the matter.

6 ( +8 / -2 )

It’s strange how ‘second/first amendment absolutists’ misunderstand the words ‘amendment’ or ‘absolute’.

Nice try, the left try this every single time and they fail every single time with that.

One of these parties is for gun control

The Dems, they could have done something in 2010 and 2020 when they had majorities but didn’t, so yeah, they’re full of…

and one isn't,

We want empowerment because we don’t trust the government and the left continue to prove us right with each passing day.

Are they worried Trump would be assassinated?

Not just Trump, Biden as well.

Thank you for the update. I didn't know Biden would be attending the GOP convention.

No, but he attends his own…not rallies, not a lot of people come, but other events where you would have to give up your firearm. Think Biden can walk through Milwaukee without gun packing secret service protection? Yes, No?

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

I have a right to have a firearm. Shall not be infringed.

I am also aware that guns are not allowed within the security perimeter of an event only at a certain place and time.

this is my event with my people and armed security is there to protect from the crazed left. I feel comfortable to choose to leave my gun safely in the car.

no issue here. My choice. Still have all my rights. Nothing was infringed.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

its hilarious all the feigned ignorance and refusal to accept an offered explanation. of something that is obvious even without explanation.

Because you're trying to explain how you're both for and against gun control, and trying to convince us that doesn't make one look like an idiot.

+1

It's a daily occurrence...

They're against gun control but for it at this convention...

They believe life begins at conception but it's OK to kill babies until the 15th week...

And who can forget Trump's "medical miracle" vaccine - that they also think is poison...

It's all comedy gold for us - and mental breakdowns for them...

3 ( +6 / -3 )

The Dems, they could have done something in 2010 and 2020 when they had majorities but didn’t, so yeah, they’re full of…

Donald Trump has vowed to roll back ALL gun legislation and regulations enacted by the Biden administration, putting the gun lobby over American lives. 

https://democrats.org/news/dnc-statement-on-united-states-v-rahimi/

5 ( +6 / -1 )

I have a right to have a firearm. Shall not be infringed.

Try exercising that right at the GOP convention.

Where they've banned guns. Which you support. While claiming that guns must not be banned.

A binary option, and you're on both sides!

7 ( +8 / -1 )

But what if I need to defend myself against the power-tripping, goonish, gun-toting rent-a-cops? How can I do that without my constitutionally protected AR-15? This is tyranny.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

I have a right to have a firearm. Shall not be infringed.

The leaders of your team are infringing upon that right.

By the way, how are your Truth Social stocks doing? I recall you said you were going to dump large quantities of money in it after that last fall. Are you doubling down again?

5 ( +8 / -3 )

I love it when the left gets so disingenuously concerned about my rights at my event that I choose to attend under the requested guidelines my team has set.

mayhe worry about your own rights and your own events? Yeah, that would be great.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

Blacklabel

I have a right to have a firearm. Shall not be infringed.

> I am also aware that guns are not allowed within the security perimeter of an event only at a certain place and time.

> this is my event with my people and armed security is there to protect from the crazed left. I feel comfortable to choose to leave my gun safely in the car.

> no issue here. My choice. Still have all my rights. Nothing was infringed.

You will be visiting Stateside to attend the GOP Convention with your guns?

6 ( +8 / -2 )

Donald Trump has vowed to roll back ALL gun legislation and regulations enacted by the Biden administration, putting the gun lobby over American lives. 

With what Biden and Myorkas have done with our Southern border, putting American lives at risk, I don’t blame Trump, makes perfect sense.

Try exercising that right at the GOP convention.

You have the absolute right. Freedom doesn’t mean that you can yell fire in a crowded room, certain events we have certain leaders and dignitaries, you should not have a firearm unless you are part of security that is in charge with the safety well-being of the people that are at the event that includes the president or any other candidate.

Where they've banned guns. Which you support. While claiming that guns must not be banned.

They aren’t. I own a lot of guns, but my kids can’t have them, now do they have the right, once they’re adults, they do, but as of now they don’t.

A binary option, and you're on both sides!

Huh? Anyway, the Dems are losing on this, just more political banter. lol

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

someone is using words they don’t know the meaning of again.

Hypocrisy: the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform

my behavior confirms to my moral standards and beliefs. Always. I can morally accept the reason why I am asked to not bring a gun certain places that have armed security already. No armed security? Then I don’t accept.

like hopefully you can accept you can’t bring your own steak to the bar or can accept why you have to wear pants to church, while maintains the right to not wear them at home.

i make total sense here. You like it and I know it.

So 5 minute countdown to: buuuuut Truuuuump, Hannibal Lector, batteries and sharks scary!

i think some of you will need to be institutionalized after Trump wins this election.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

Ok, so you’re just here to troll and not have any meaningful discussion. 

Kind of hard to have a meaningful discussion with rightists who refuse to deal with facts, logic, or reason.

Look, at least your honest, I’ll give you that much.

Which is certainly more than we can say for rightists.

You do.

Yeah man, totally. As a progressive, I am always talking about how everyone deserves a gun. Even crackheads. lmao Seriously, who here has said that? Nonsense as per usual.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

someone is using words they don’t know the meaning of again.

Hah, nice attempt at gaslighting to detract from the fact that you're trying to explain how gun rights must not be infringed, except that you're ok with it happening this time.

5 ( +7 / -2 )

my behavior confirms to my moral standards and beliefs. Always.

He says, while concurrently accepting an infringement of the gun rights he supposedly absolutely believes must not be infringed upon.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

You will be visiting Stateside to attend the GOP Convention with your guns?

I might go. never been to one. But as requested my gun will stay in the car. It’s a reasonable request of anyone.

im perfectly safe around my people and the armed security will keep the crazed left away.

But soon as I get outside security perimeter it’s still left run crime ridden Milwaukee, I need my gun.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

as requested my gun will stay in the car.

Better hope someone doesn't break into your car, steal your gun, and shoot a child in the face with it. Unless you think being so careless as to leave a gun lying around when cars get broken into all the time, absolves you of any responsibility for that child.

Remember, illegal guns started out as legal guns.

7 ( +10 / -3 )

Kind of hard to have a meaningful discussion with rightists who refuse to deal with facts, logic, or reason.

I am, we are, but the usual liberal banshee banning guns lame argument won’t work, because neither party will infringe on the 2nd amendment rights, so that’s not even up for discussion.

Which is certainly more than we can say for rightists.

The left has zero room to talk in that regard

Yeah man, totally. As a progressive, I am always talking about how everyone deserves a gun.

Many, many do

Even crackheads. lmao Seriously, who here has said that? Nonsense as per usual.

You don’t have to, they do though. Their polices definitely do

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

I think I've found the reason the Repub Party is prohibiting guns at their convention....

"A 62-year-old Republican Michigan state representative named Neil Friske delivered what may go down as the signature political arrest of the year, getting collared at 2:45 a.m. Thursday by Lansing PD because, according to an initial report by the MIRS news service, he had “chased an adult dancer after a disagreement” and “had a gun in his possession at the time.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-lawmaker-arrested-chasing-stripper-180031643.html

GOP Representatives chasing strippers while waving a gun is probably not a good look at their national convention...

On the other hand, given their nominee., it would certainly be in character...and consistent with those MAGA "family values"....

ROFL..

4 ( +5 / -1 )

infringed: actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).

man, you really need to understand the meaning of words you use.

Nothing is infringed when I agree with something and choose to comply.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

Hypocrisy: Justifying an infringement upon your rights that you claim absolutely must not be infringed upon.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

infringed: actively break the terms of

Yeah, the terms of absolute rights to guns are that they are always allowed everywhere.

The GOP says you're not allowed.

An infringement.

But you're ok with it.... this time right?

7 ( +8 / -1 )

I am, we are, but the usual liberal banshee banning guns lame argument won’t work, because neither party will infringe on the 2nd amendment rights, so that’s not even up for discussion.

nah. No you aren't. You never are. It's pathetic really.

Democrats? That's liberals. hurrrr That's a typical "meaningful discussion.

The left has zero room to talk in that regard

See, there it is. Rightists have nothing. Just this braindead copy paste, hurrr the left. Thanks for proving my point.

You don’t have to, they do though. Their polices definitely do

Name one policy aimed at giving crackheads guns. Oh you can't? Don't be absurd.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

GOP Representatives chasing strippers while waving a gun is probably not a good look at their national convention...

On the other hand, given their nominee., it would certainly be in character...and consistent with those MAGA "family values"....

ROFL..

Far from it, but knowing the conspiracy theories that libs love about guns, not surprised

-11 ( +1 / -12 )

But you'd be ok with leaving it unattended in your car? In that place Trump has assured us has out of control crime levels?

NYC

Would you feel bad if your gun got stolen and a kid got shot in the face? Or is that just an acceptable cost of business... er, gun rights?

With a lot of crimes being committed by illegals recently, watch the gun sale rate go up.

-10 ( +1 / -11 )

I might go. never been to one. But as requested my gun will stay in the car. It’s a reasonable request of anyone. 

It’s not a “request”. It’s an order

im perfectly safe around my people and the armed security will keep the crazed left away. 

It’s not the crazy leftists you need to watch out for it’s the goobers with guns trying to start a race war by going on mass shooting sprees. Those are almost exclusively your tribe.

But soon as I get outside security perimeter it’s still left run crime ridden Milwaukee, I need my gun.

Biggest fall off in violent crime since the 70s. Murder down 27%, I guess they don’t mention that on Putin TV.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Due to incidents of gun theft from cars, it should be illegal to leave a gun in a vehicle unless in a properly locked box.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

Due to incidents of gun theft from cars, it should be illegal to leave a gun in a vehicle unless in a properly locked box.

The 'pubs would find someway that they figure this would infringe upon their rights.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

GOP Representatives chasing strippers while waving a gun is probably not a good look at their national convention...

On the other hand, given their nominee., it would certainly be in character...and consistent with those MAGA "family values"....

ROFL..

Far from it,

Far from what? This is your Team Red guy arrested for chasing a stripper with a gun...

He should have learned from the Repub nominee and paid her off then fraudulently hide the payment...

Well, given 34 felony convictions, maybe not...

5 ( +6 / -1 )

I remember when white people weren’t so terrified of the “other”. We didn’t need to go full-Rambo to get a bottle of milk from the market.

in fact the idea of concealed or open carry by non-law enforcement was deemed a flag for psychosis.

And crime of all kinds was a lot higher then.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Due to incidents of gun theft from cars, it should be illegal to leave a gun in a vehicle unless in a properly locked box.

I can agree to that

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

I remember when white people weren’t so terrified of the “other”. We didn’t need to go full-Rambo to get a bottle of milk from the market. 

Well, that script flipped

in fact the idea of concealed or open carry by non-law enforcement was deemed a flag for psychosis. 

Nowadays, that’s changed a lot with the growing crime and physical assaults up by almost double digits expect concealed licenses to skyrocket.

And crime of all kinds was a lot higher then.

Not like today

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Real firearms enthusiasts are firmly supportive of common sense gun laws...myself included...

Lockable gun cabinets and trigger locks should be mandatory. If you carry a firearm outside your home then a certified lockable gun storage container must be used.

More importantly are mandatory background checks and red lag laws that keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable and people that clearly aren't mature enough to handle them...

Gun nutters, those that only have their guns because they lack self-esteem and self-confidence, don't want any of those things.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Let's hope and pray that the security measures will be enough against the "progressive" agitators who will undoubtedly show up.

Many of these "progressive" agitators are just bratty and immature.

But more than a few of them are unstable and dangerous.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

More importantly are mandatory background checks and red lag laws that keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable and people that clearly aren't mature enough to handle them...

In related news, the Supreme Court just voted 8-1 to uphold a federal ban on people under domestic violence restraining orders from owning guns. U.S. v. Rahimi.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Real firearms enthusiasts are firmly supportive of common sense gun laws...myself included...

Don’t think you can definitively say who has common sense and who doesn’t.

More importantly are mandatory background checks

Sorry, the way the government has been abusing its powers over the last 4 years, not going to happen.

and red lag laws that keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable and people that clearly aren't mature enough to handle them...

Then there should be a bipartisan effort to try and build mental health asylums to curb a lot of unnecessary violence

Gun nutters, those that only have their guns because they lack self-esteem and self-confidence, don't want any of those things.

I don’t think you’re in the field to determine who has a low self-esteem problem and who doesn’t.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Real firearms enthusiasts are firmly supportive of common sense gun laws...myself included...

Don’t think you can definitively say who has common sense and who doesn’t.

Lifelong firearms enthusiast...27 year military vet...yeah, I think so...

More importantly are mandatory background checks

Sorry, the way the government has been abusing its powers over the last 4 years, not going to happen.

Gun nutter nonsense...

and red lag laws that keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable and people that clearly aren't mature enough to handle them...

Then there should be a bipartisan effort to try and build mental health asylums to curb a lot of unnecessary violence

More gun nutter nonsense...

Gun nutters, those that only have their guns because they lack self-esteem and self-confidence, don't want any of those things.

I don’t think you’re in the field to determine who has a low self-esteem problem and who doesn’t.

Sure I am - I've watched a Trump rally....

4 ( +4 / -0 )

"A 62-year-old Republican Michigan state representative named Neil Friske delivered what may go down as the signature political arrest of the year, getting collared at 2:45 a.m. Thursday by Lansing PD because, according to an initial report by the MIRS news service, he had “chased an adult dancer after a disagreement” and “had a gun in his possession at the time.”

I would say a state representative who is instead of being at home with his wife and family at 02:45 in the morning...is out chasing a stripper down the street while waving a handgun....is probably not mature enough to own a firearm...

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Lifelong firearms enthusiast...27 year military vet...yeah, I think so...

32 years, licensed, concealed to carry 32 years

Gun nutter nonsense...

Sticks and stones

More gun nutter nonsense...

More name calling?

Sure I am - I've watched a Trump rally....

Getting larger each time.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

I would say a state representative who is instead of being at home with his wife and family at 02:45 in the morning...is out chasing a stripper down the street while waving a handgun....is probably not mature enough to own a firearm...

Speculation?

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona posted to Twitter anime that portrayed him killing Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and swinging a sword at President Joe Biden.

Marje Greene repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent Democratic politicians in 2018 and 2019.

“It’s time to do it,” Roger Stone told Sal Greco, then a member of the NYPD who was working as Stone’s security. “Let’s go find Swalwell. It’s time to do it. Then we’ll see how brave the rest of them are. It’s time to do it. It’s either Nadler or Swalwell has to die before the election.

Boebert pointed a loaded gun at a cook in her restaurant.

Trump admitted to keeping a gun during his probation meeting. It is a federal crime for a convicted felon to possess a gun or ammunition.

Republicans have repeatedly shown they are not the right people to be making laws about firearms.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites