Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
world

U.S. judge blocks extension of fast-track deportations nationwide

13 Comments
By ELLIOT SPAGAT

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

13 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

So, once again the Trump administration has lost. NOT because there is anything wrong with rapid deportation of people who have no legal right to be here (a policy that no one would argue with), but because they tried to sneak in language which would have given them power to deport people who do have a legal right to be here.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

So, once again the Trump administration has lost.

No biggie, wait until the SC overturns that ruling and then the deportations will resume.

NOT because there is anything wrong with rapid deportation of people who have no legal right to be here

We also have the legal right NOT to allow illegals to stay in the country and can deport them if necessary.

(a policy that no one would argue with), but because they tried to sneak in language which would have given them power to deport people who do have a legal right to be here.*

As a sovereign nation, if you are illegal, you actually don’t have the right to be in any foreign country, you can ask or apply for asylum, but it doesn’t have to be granted.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

So, once again the Trump administration has lost.

No biggie, wait until the SC overturns that ruling and then the deportations will resume.

Nah, we'll wait for impeachment, that will be quicker...

See-ya Donnie - the NYSD Prosecutor is waiting for you...

Just a suggestion, but I'd pick a different lawyer than Rudy - unless you want double the sentence...

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Didn’t lose anything. Just delayed until it gets out of the lower courts where liberal judges have agendas.

Not only an Obama judge but he wanted this judge on the Supreme Court, so one of his favorites.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Makes sense.

Trump's hateful authoritarianism won't wash with true defenders of liberty and democracy, as we can see.

The rancid administration and its followers are corrupt to the core.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

“Trump's hateful authoritarianism won't wash with true defenders of liberty and democracy....”

Don’t fool yourself. The blowback we’re seeing now is a rejection of hypocrite liberalism and its insanely optimistic confidence in Pol Pot style remaking of society solutions. Their increasingly brazen Utopianism correlates with an accelerating debasement of liberty and democracy and is precisely what brought us to this impasse. Importing the endemic poverty and corruption of failed multi ethnic states is guaranteed to make things worse.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Didn’t lose anything. Just delayed until it gets out of the lower courts where liberal judges have agendas.

This shows how the Right has radicalized their base. No thought required in this opinion and it gets rolled out every time Trump loses in the courts.

Add in the training they've received to distrust academics and science and it goes a long way to an entirely thoughtless process when presented with evidence.

It works well with non-college educated white males who flock to the GOP.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

I’m educated enough to see that all these things that are blocked at low level courts by Obama appointees get overturned at the higher levels.

did the law change as the cases progress? No it’s just stall tactics by liberal activist judges. We’ve seen it so many times that their decisions don’t hold up.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has blocked the Trump administration's move to vastly extend authority of immigration officers to deport people without allowing them to appear before judges

Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama,

The liberals and their games, this ruling will get appealed to the US Supreme Court who going on recent past rulings will over rule the lower courts decision and things will return to normal.

The money that must get wasted by liberals and their constant games to impede at all cost must be a massive waste to the US taxpayer.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

its insanely optimistic confidence in Pol Pot style remaking of society solutions. 

Dishonest and insulting to the victims of that regime.

Importing the endemic poverty and corruption of failed multi ethnic states 

Whereas that white supremacism is really working out for the US, eh?

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Nah, we'll wait for impeachment, that will be quicker...

He won’t be removed, so then what? Lol

See-ya Donnie - the NYSD Prosecutor is waiting for you...

Just a suggestion, but I'd pick a different lawyer than Rudy - unless you want double the sentence...

If anyone will face the prosecutor it’ll be the previous VP and his son.

The liberals and their games, this ruling will get appealed to the US Supreme Court who going on recent past rulings will over rule the lower courts decision and things will return to normal.

The money that must get wasted by liberals and their constant games to impede at all cost must be a massive waste to the US taxpayer.

Bingo.

SxThe administration's setbacks followed two recent victories for its immigration policies at the Supreme Court, one allowing diversion of Defense Department money to build a border wall and another denying asylum to anyone who enters the country at the Mexican border after passing through another country and not applying there.

Spot on. But as usual, this ruling will be overturned then Trump can proceed.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Nah, we'll wait for impeachment, that will be quicker...

He won’t be removed, so then what? Lol

Keep saying that while clicking your Ruby Slippers three times - maybe you'll be brought back to reality....where Trump's confession is already in writing...

See-ya Donnie - the NYSD Prosecutor is waiting for you...

Just a suggestion, but I'd pick a different lawyer than Rudy - unless you want double the sentence...

If anyone will face the prosecutor it’ll be the previous VP and his son.

Hey Rudy, is your client guilty? No!....He Rudy, is your client guilty? Of Course!

The liberals and their games, this ruling will get appealed to the US Supreme Court who going on recent past rulings will over rule the lower courts decision and things will return to normal.

The money that must get wasted by liberals and their constant games to impede at all cost must be a massive waste to the US taxpayer.

Bingo.

Like socialist subsidies to farmers?

SxThe administration's setbacks followed two recent victories for its immigration policies at the Supreme Court, one allowing diversion of Defense Department money to build a border wall and another denying asylum to anyone who enters the country at the Mexican border after passing through another country and not applying there.

Spot on. But as usual, this ruling will be overturned then Trump can proceed.

Proceed from where - Rikers to Leavenworth?

3 ( +3 / -0 )

But they're both socialist policies - Donnie the Socialist....

Temporary is different than 70-80 years of it for each person in this country.

When are you going to say enough is enough with Trump’s out of control socialist spending?

This doesn’t seem temporary. He’s piling that debt on.

>

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites