Judge in Trump subversion case won't be swayed by election schedule

Election subversive applies DIRECTLY to any politician no matter who they are.

It's the whole point of the law.

Golly, what a shame that his trial for coup incitement might interfere with his budding fascist dreams…

Well, that’s done with. Time to move on, the Dems to their failed credit gave it their all, committed, lots of tenacity and determination on their part.

45 will take a hard fall this fall. Then blow away with the other dead leaves.

Well, that’s done with. 

The entire point of the article is that the case is not ‘done with’ and is just starting.

Have you read it yet?

45 will take a hard fall this fall. Then blow away with the other dead leaves.

Like how? Wait, I think I can imagine how...but the right won't make that same mistake again as they did 4 years ago.

The entire point of the article is that the case is not ‘done with’ and is just starting. 

Have you read it yet?

Yes, it is done for this year, pheew! And yes, I read the article.

Like how? Wait, I think I can imagine how...but the right won't make that same mistake again as they did 4 years ago.

Losing? Sure they will. It’s his forte. Even he admits he lost now. Keep up.

Bass4, this case is being guided by judicial administration, Biden or Harris has no say in the administration of Justice,but the judge,the judge see all kind of evidence that the defendant is guilty,she probably issued the warrant

Losing? Sure they will. It’s his forte.

Clinging to hope, at least libs are finally keeping an open mind and dealing with honesty and reality, I like that.

Even he admits he lost now. Keep up.

Just like Kamala said, she wants to lower taxes. ROFL!

Yeah, I am most definitely keeping up. Lol

Even he admits he lost now. Keep up.

Just like Kamala said, she wants to lower taxes. ROFL!

Huh?

Well, that’s done with. Time to move on, the Dems to their failed credit gave it their all, committed, lots of tenacity and determination on their part.

Eh? Your post is a massive non sequitur.

this case is being guided by judicial administration, Biden or Harris has no say in the administration of Justice,but the judge,the judge see all kind of evidence that the defendant is guilty,she probably issued the warrant

What? Anyway, this is over for THIS election calendar year. They didn't even set a trial date yet.

Eh? Your post is a massive non sequitur.

Hey, just keeping it real, hate the game, don't hate the player.

In summary, potential Trump voters need to be shielded from facts about Trump in case it makes them less likely to vote Trump.

Not sure why Trump is worried, he can just say, "fake nooze"

In summary, potential Trump voters need to be shielded from facts about Trump in case it makes them less likely to vote Trump. 

Or be aware of what this admin is trying to do. 

Not sure why Trump is worried, he can just say, "fake nooze"

He's not worried, No reason to be. None.

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1831715250250694940

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1831295199185662460

Trump’s goobers’ “defense” of him is as patchy as his combover, lol.

bass4funk

In summary, potential Trump voters need to be shielded from facts about Trump in case it makes them less likely to vote Trump. 

Or be aware of what this admin is trying to do. 

Which is nothing.

Not sure why Trump is worried, he can just say, "fake nooze"

He's not worried, No reason to be. None.

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1831715250250694940

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1831295199185662460

Are you sure:

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-harris

Which is nothing.

To you, not half of the country.

Not sure why Trump is worried, he can just say, "fake nooze"

Huh? Oh, Lol!

Are you sure:

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-harris

Yes.

https://youtu.be/Vw4Qxft8VB8?si=NOs4UmGh8-N_uN7q

https://youtu.be/uijz_93G7cM?si=pd_Ri8JU-Vfn1CQB

The Hill ....

U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama-nominated judge with a history of ruling on former President Trump and Jan. 6-related cases, has been initially assigned to Trump’s criminal case in Washington, D.C.

It is remarkable how Biden/Harris administration has politically weaponized the US judicial system to smear, potentially imprison, to blatantly interfere with US democratic election process in a attempt to remove a candidate., a republican nominee.

To deny US electorate to make a informed choice at the ballot box.

itsonlyrocknroll

It is remarkable how Biden/Harris administration has politically weaponized the US judicial system to smear, potentially imprison, to blatantly interfere with US democratic election process in a attempt to remove a candidate., a republican nominee.

Actually, it hasn't. There is absolutely no involvement from the Biden/Harris administration in Trump's court cases.

That's on Trump trying to steal the last presidential election.

The courts are trying the case. Not the White House.

To deny US electorate to make a informed choice at the ballot box.

And yet the US electorate is not denied to make a informed choice at the ballot box.

To deny US electorate to make a informed choice at the ballot box.

How?

You frequently claim people don’t know all the facts which conveniently you somehow know all about.

Seems elitist.

People commentators, its an humble opinion, not an elitists proclamation.

I am suggesting, every effort, some clandestine are being deployed in an attempt to remove a candidate, to interfere with US democratic process, to skew US 2024 election.

To potentially criminalize a leading opposition candidate.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is politically bias, evidence that the US justice system is not immune from political interference.

Evidence this travesty of justice has been orchestrated to divert attention away from weak, unqualified, Kamal Harris candidacy nomination. Harris/Bidens failures in office.

The fact that Harris campaigns refusal to allow any media process, combative interviews, press conferences, policies are undefined, Harris an enigma, a political flip flopping paradox.

Evidence this travesty of justice has been orchestrated to divert attention away from weak, unqualified, Kamal Harris candidacy nomination. Harris/Bidens failures in office.

The fact that Harris campaigns refusal to allow any media process, combative interviews, press conferences, policies are undefined, Harris an enigma, a political flip flopping paradox.

Again, if you claim to know this why do you believe others don’t know this? Who made you the font of all knowledge that the average voter can’t see for themselves?

How do you know this ‘evidence’? Where is it?

Why is Harris leading in the polls despite your claims of ‘travesty’?

In 2025, we'll have President Harris and Vice President Walz, along with Dem majorities in the House and Senate...

Trump will be either already in jail or sitting in multiple courtrooms being either convicted or sentenced...

Repubs will start picking up the pieces of what's left of their party - which will either reject MAGAism or split in two with MAGA departing forming their own party...

And our MAGA-fans posting here will disappear as their far-right fairy tale bubble collapses under the weight of reality once again....

itsonlyrocknroll

People commentators, its an humble opinion, not an elitists proclamation.

I am suggesting, every effort, some clandestine are being deployed in an attempt to remove a candidate, to interfere with US democratic process, to skew US 2024 election.

To potentially criminalize a leading opposition candidate.

Can you please show how you formed your opinion and what evidence it is based on. Because if it isn't based on any evidence, it is made up. And we get tired of made up stuff.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is politically bias,

Proof?

evidence that the US justice system is not immune from political interference.

It is no such evidence. First you haven't established that she is biased. Secondly, even if you had established that she is biased, it doesn't follow that that is proof that the US justice system is not immune from political interference.

Evidence this travesty of justice has been orchestrated to divert attention away from weak, unqualified, Kamal Harris candidacy nomination. Harris/Bidens failures in office.

That isn't evidence.

The fact that Harris campaigns refusal to allow any media process, combative interviews, press conferences, policies are undefined, Harris an enigma,

Harris will campaign how she sees fit.

a political flip flopping paradox.

She doesn't flip-flop as much as Mr Trump. Does anyone know what his stand on abortion is? I doubt it because it changes daily.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is politically bias, evidence that the US justice system is not immune from political interference. 

Evidence this travesty of justice has been orchestrated to divert attention away from weak, unqualified, Kamal Harris candidacy nomination. Harris/Bidens failures in office.

The fact that Harris campaigns refusal to allow any media process, combative interviews, press conferences, policies are undefined, Harris an enigma, a political flip flopping paradox.

Exactly.

The chaos in the legal proceedings aiming to extract accountability for felon 45 and bring justice for Americans deprived of a fair presidential election has been sown by the extreme right-wing Trump Republican SC. After the election the priority must be to reform and cleanse the SC of its corrupt interpretations of the Constitution and legislating from its crooked bench. Then rid the country of its major obstacle to the further democratization of elections: the ludicrously named Electoral "College".

u_s__reamer

The chaos in the legal proceedings aiming to extract accountability for felon 45 and bring justice for Americans deprived of a fair presidential election has been sown by the extreme right-wing Trump Republican SC. After the election the priority must be to reform and cleanse the SC of its corrupt interpretations of the Constitution and legislating from its crooked bench. Then rid the country of its major obstacle to the further democratization of elections: the ludicrously named Electoral "College".

Exactly.

the right won't make that same mistake again as they did 4 years ago.

What's that mean?

Bob FosseToday  07:08 am JST “ 45 will take a hard fall this fall. Then blow away with the other dead leaves. “

Bob FosseToday  07:25 am JST

Like how? Wait, I think I can imagine how...but the right won't make that same mistake again as they did 4 years ago.

“ Losing? Sure they will. It’s his forte. Even he admits he lost now. Keep up. “

—

Well, according to the polls, it all comes down to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada—Trump knows it would be a disaster if Kamala wins Pennsylvania along with Wisconsin and Michigan. If Kamala loses Pennsylvania, she would have to win Georgia and Arizona or Nevada (Arizona + Nevada would not be enough).

But when compared to Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020, Kamala’s lead (in some polls) and favoritism is minuscule—combine that with the fact that Trump always underpolls and Kamala is in big trouble; he could very well win Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and NC and win a landslide victory.

—

( Note: The microphones will be muted at the next debate, Kamala won’t be able to say “I’m speaking” 500 times (like she did to Pence), in other words, she won’t be able to distract the voters from her horrible debating skills and nonexistent policies—she has everything to lose. Trump, on the other hand, was hit with everything and is still standing. )

If he hadn’t been president, he’d be dressed in orange and living in a federal prison for what he’s done.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is politically bias,

When is this judge going to realize that she serves at the pleasure of President Trump?

She is very “bias”.

the American Capitalist dream

i learned about this capitalist dream at Trump University.

Now I are an genius!

i learned about this capitalist dream at Trump University. 

Now I are an genius!

There is hope for the left.

When is this judge going to realize that she serves at the pleasure of President Trump?

Like Merchan, Willis, Bragg and Smith for Biden?

She is very “bias”.

So were the failed lawyers trying to nail Trump

—Now I are an genius!

There is hope for the left.

That would be MAGA.

That would be MAGA.

No hope needed judging by the Battleground state polls according to Nate Silver, can’t get more left than that guy.

If he loses and the case goes forward, he is royally screwed because he is guilty AF.

the Battleground state polls

Sorry, but I only trust polls that show my candidate winning.

All the others are “bias”.

Sorry, but I only trust polls that show my candidate winning. 

No, but I do love accuracy, the truth and changing the dates of the polls to recent do make a difference, I mean, you wouldn’t eat a week old stale loaf of bread, right?

All the others are “bias”.

True.

If he loses and the case goes forward, he is royally screwed because he is guilty AF

Doubt he will lose, so Dems need to get the Kleenex ready just in case.

changing the dates of the polls to recent

I’m intrigued. So “the left” has been changing dates of the pollls?

I’d like to see more info about this dastardly conspiracy.

If he loses and the case goes forward, he is royally screwed because he is guilty AF

Doubt he will lose, so Dems need to get the Kleenex ready just in case.

Given your history of inaccuracy, you might need them yourself.

I dare not guess how you’ll use them…

I’m intrigued. So “the left” has been changing dates of the pollls?

Not updating them as frequently.

I’d like to see more info about this dastardly conspiracy.

Dastardly, yes.

Given your history of inaccuracy,

Wrong again.

you might need them yourself. 

I doubt it. Unless the left....well, anyway....Nope, won't need them.

I dare not guess how you’ll use them…

Wiping the eyes of heartbroken liberals, one at a time.

Not updating them as frequently.

Is an hour ago recent enough?

Harris 48%

Trump 44.9

Average of polls

https://www.economist.com/interactive/us-2024-election/trump-harris-polls

Is an hour ago recent enough?

More Leftist bias polls

Harris 48%

Trump 44.9

Average of polls

Silver, Halperin, and Rassmussen are pretty much the gold standard and are fair, down the middle.

https://x.com/TJVNEWS/status/1831073475785892182

Speaking of polls…: The polls conducted by left-wing universities and the press managed a levitation of the Harris candidacy to the point of equality in the popular vote with Trump though still a narrow Trump margin in the electoral college. The only polls that have a record of impartial accuracy, Trafalgar and Rasmussen, continue to predict a clear Trump victory. So, at this point, does Nate Silver, though he’s no supporter of Trump.

bass4funk

Is an hour ago recent enough?

More Leftist bias polls

The Economist isn't a leftist organization.

Harris 48%

Trump 44.9

Average of polls

Silver, Halperin, and Rassmussen are pretty much the gold standard and are fair, down the middle.

I haven't heard of the other two, but Rasmussen isn't a gold standard pollster. Also, you are better of with an average of polls. You used to quote Real Clear Polls, but ever since they don't show Trump in a good light, you have stopped quoting them.

rcch

The only polls that have a record of impartial accuracy, Trafalgar and Rasmussen

Are you kidding. 538 rates Trafalgar as almost 1 star out of 3 and Rasmussen as no stars out of 3.

I haven't heard of the other two,

I would suggest for you to start learning about them.

but Rasmussen isn't a gold standard pollster.

Yes, it has been for years, funny the left didn’t have a problem with them when they showed Obama beating McCain and Romney

Also, you are better of with an average of polls.

You can do whatever you want, I’ll stick to the more accurate ones

You used to quote Real Clear Polls,

I still do

but ever since they don't show Trump in a good light, you have stopped quoting them.

Then you’re not paying attention

bass4funk

I haven't heard of the other two,

I would suggest for you to start learning about them.

No point, they don't appear in 538’s Pollster Ratings.

but Rasmussen isn't a gold standard pollster.

Yes, it has been for years, funny the left didn’t have a problem with them when they showed Obama beating McCain and Romney

Nope. It's a Republican biased poll.

You used to quote Real Clear Polls,

I still do

Haven't seen it for ages.