Two federal judges will consider on Friday whether Elon Musk's government cost-cutting team known as DOGE will have access to Treasury Department payment systems and potentially sensitive data at U.S. health, consumer protection and labor agencies.
Musk's team has swept through government agencies since Republican Donald Trump became president last month and put the chief executive of carmaker Tesla in charge of rooting out wasteful spending as part of Trump's dramatic overhaul of government.
In Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer will consider a request by Democratic state attorneys general to extend a temporary block on DOGE that he put in place on Saturday, which prevented Musk's team from accessing Treasury systems responsible for trillions of dollars of payments.
The states allege that Musk's team has no legal power to access the payment systems that contain sensitive personal information on millions of Americans.
The lawsuit also argued Musk and his team could disrupt federal funding for health clinics, preschools, climate initiatives and other programs, and that Trump could use the information to further his political agenda.
In Washington, U,S, District Judge John Bates will consider a request by unions to prevent the DOGE team from accessing sensitive records at the Departments of Health and Human Services, the Labor Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Bates denied a similar request last week, delivering a rare ruling in the Trump Administration's favor. The unions have renewed that request after they amended their lawsuit.
Most of Trump's initiatives that have been legally challenged have been blocked by the courts, which has prompted Musk and other Trump allies to call for judges to be impeached, although the president said he would obey court orders.
Despite some initiatives being blocked in court, Trump's administration has pushed ahead with mass firings of government workers and has sharply curtailed America's foreign aid program, although the cost-cutting appears to be focused on programs opposed by political conservatives.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
38 Comments
The Avenger
DOGE is now auditing the IRS.
President Donald Trump on Thursday threw his support behind the Department of Government Efficiency investigation into alleged fraud and waste at the Internal Revenue Service.
Trump has long railed against the IRS, repeatedly claiming on the 2024 campaign trail that the office improperly targets conservatives for political reasons. After entering office in January, the president proposed closing down the IRS and replacing it with a new External Revenue Office. The president and his allies claim that revenue coming in from new Trump-era tariffs would sufficiently offset the loss of federal income taxes.
https://gazette.com/news/wex/trump-signs-off-on-doge-audit-of-irs/article_71b454df-bb78-5f85-bed1-1045169cc65d.html
bass4funk
Arizona congressman Eli Crane announced that he’s filing articles of impeachment against Manhattan-based Judge Paul A. Engelmayer (a Obama appointed judge) for blocking Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing Treasury Department payment systems. Judge Paul Engelmayer, is married to Emily Mandestam, who works for "The New York Association For New Americans" - an NGO that's swimming in USAID cash! Hmmm, Pam Bondi should immediately gather a grand jury and seek an indictment against Judge Paul Engelmayer, and al the Dem attorneys who brought forth the blatant unconstitutional case for the sole purpose of a presidential coup. Article III, Sec 3 now.
Underworld
bass4funk
What a loser.
Underworld
Yeah, keep the unelected South African out of the US's Treasury systems. He has no right to see that data and / or access those systems.
If you want to audit US government spending, payment systems are useless. They pay what Congress has voted to spend. Altering what is being paid is highly illegal.
Congress controls the budget. Not Trump. And certainly not Musk.
bass4funk
Well, that’s why I said what I said.
I'veSeenFootage
This is your brain on drugs.
Underworld
bass4funk
What a loser.
Yup, Arizona congressman Eli Crane is a loser.
lincolnman
DOGE - Dimwits, Oafs, Grifters, and Egomaniacs...
bass4funk
That is not what I said, don’t distort my words, don’t be dishonest. I was very clear and was talking about the judge.
Underworld
bass4funk
Yup, Arizona congressman Eli Crane is a loser
I didn't say it was what you said.
But you distorted my words, so I had the need to clarify.
Blacklabel
Both of these judges have been found to be biased with conflicts of interest. What is it with liberal judges and how their daughters make money?
sooner or later they will have to reverse course just like the federal employee buyout judge did, (no article about that huge win?)
Underworld
Blacklabel
No, they don't. Their daughters jobs are irrelevant.
But if you are worried about conflicts of interest, Musk is a walking conflict of interest.
patkim
No, not the IRS. That, along with my passport, are the only connections I have left with being an expat American citizen. I've filed every year since I've been in Japan and there is all my personal information on the 1040 and 2555 forms I fill in. If DOGE investigates the IRS, a bunch of teens will have access to my personal information.
Blacklabel
not when they get paid by an organization that Daddy is ruling to keep spending money on his daughter.
against the will of the people and our President:
I'veSeenFootage
Oh, you care about conflicts of interest? OK, how about a guy who get dozens of billions in government contracts now working inside the government without any accountability? Or an anti-vaccine cook who get money from people suing vaccine companies working as health secretary? I have a lot more if you want. It's pretty egregious!
Blacklabel
Are any of them judges, ruling by partisan politics and against the Constitution?
and against the agenda of a duly elected President in our democracy?
if so, go ahead!
patkim
Excellent point. Why is Musk allowed access to sensitive material and information even though his company SpaceX gets funding from the government, Tesla also gets help from the government, and he hasn't cleared any security protocols, background checks, and proper vetting. There is a definite conflict of interest there, as well as lack of following the rules.
patkim
Let's not forget that Musk himself said that the country doesn't want "an unelected bureaucracy " running the country. Gee, Musk is correct. Americans don't want unelected officials running government. Is he implying that he was elected by Americans?
Also, can we actually believe what Musk says? He stated on X that an example of the fraud he mentioned was that 50 million dollars worth of condoms were sent to Gaza. He said this without providing any evidence for this. Can we really believe that is true? Really?
iknowall
Musk is doing a great job.
Even Democrats are advising that their party go along with what Musk is trying to do instead of complaining, whining, screaming.
patkim
I still am a bit baffled though, why Trump let DOGE attack organizations like USAID, which only spends a mere fraction of a percentage point in money spent, but Republicans released their budget plan which calls for a 4.5 trillion increase in the debt limit which would offset the 4.5 trillions of dollars in tax cuts.
He wants to cut spending for Americans' healthcare, social services, and the flow of energy. Of course, the amount of money he tries to save, he wants to use to increase on defense spending and fund his military to carry out more deportations. In the meantime, DOGE is his hounds who he has made to carry out some of his orders to physically move their agenda forward.
Organizations like USAID actually did a lot of good. By providing healthcare, food, and other essential products to poor nations, it helped build America's "soft power" around the world. It helps in diplomacy when other nations look at you as doing good around the world.
patkim
By the way, DOGE and Musk have not provided a shred of evidence of fraud within any of the agencies and organizations they have been investigating. They claimed that a woman (who they did not and could not name) suddenly made 30 million dollars and questioned how she could've done it on a Federal salary. Gee, anybody could make up a story like that without any documents, facts, witness accounts, or actual names. Yet, they expect the American public to buy it.
Also, if you watched the video of the interview of Trump and Elon (with his kid), Elon clearly admits that he made up that whole story about 50 million dollars worth of condoms to Gaza. Yeah, he admits it on camera that he made it all up. I'm sure it's not the only thing he made up.
Blacklabel
Receipts:
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6368719165112
Blacklabel
In case you want to see and read:
this “there isn’t a shred of evidence!” narrative is misinformation.
patkim
This just in, Trump and the government is set to buy 400 million dollars worth of armored Teslas.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/musk-slammed-state-department-reveals-053821508.html
If that is not an example of a conflict of interest, then I don't know what is.
HopeSpringsEternal
DOGE has TONS of evidence, though they're not tipping off fraudsters in the media. So many politicians, who've worked with DOGE are speaking out about tremendous amount of waste, fraud and abuse being uncovered.
Blacklabel
20 billion.
HopeSpringsEternal
DOGE will result in far greater US Govt. downsizing and efficiencies gained than anyone thought possible, bringing down the US Govt. deficit by an expected 'whisper' number 1TRILLION dollars for FY 2026.
Nobody can believe how inept and corrupt the US Treasury Dept. Payment systems are being run, scary.
Blacklabel
Isn’t it a legitimate question for let’s say the IRS to investigate?
a person whose only employer has ever been the US government at $170,000 per year, how can they have 30 million dollars in assets?
let’s see some tax returns.
I'veSeenFootage
Ah yes, nothing more credible in this world than links to... Fox News articles. The TV channel that had to pay close to 800 million dollars in a settlement for knowingly lying to its viewers.
patkim
They should ask that of Melania. Also, that fake person they made up has not been proven yet. There is no name, and no information about such a person. Musk has already proven that he makes stuff up on X, so why should we believe in him on this one?
In any case, I have a question. Isn't it illegal to buy votes for an election? If so, then why was Musk allowed to give out million dollar checks to potential voters when he was campaigning for Trump? Why is Musk allowed to benefit from a 400 million contract for Tesla trucks from the Department of State, while he is serving in a position of power within the government? It's just too convenient that Trump and DOGE goes after any entity, person, or competitor who could stand in Musk's way to receive such a contract.
Blacklabel
It’s super transparent with documents, updated several time a day :
that’s a lot of “shreds (of evidence)” huh?
Blacklabel
its a video. Of the Press Secretary speaking.
and just for you, I posted documents for you to see and read for yourself. The ones that she had in her hand.
I'veSeenFootage
Ah yes, nothing more credible in this world than links to... the twitter account of DOGE itself. Why shouldn't we believe everything they post? I mean sure, there's no third party checking anything, they could be completely making everything up, no way of knowing or verifying anything, but hey, the important thing is: liberal tears. Nothing else.
Desert Tortoise
Only an act of Congress can legally create a department in the executive branch and The Appointments Clause of the Constitution provides that those principal “officers” not expressly mentioned in the Constitution (i.e., individuals who exercise significant authority and report directly to the President), but “established by law,” must be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Congress has not even proposed legislation to create a Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk has never been confirmed by the Senate as it's head. It would be very hard, almost laughable, to argue he does not exercise significant authority within the Executive Branch.
I recall what happened the last time Jupiter was Pres and he tried to circumvent the Senate with a recess appointment. The courts ruled that everything his recess appointee did was illegal and void. I don't remember the department involved but I do remember the outcome.
I suspect one or more judges are going to rule that DOGE as currently organized is not a legal entity since Congress did not create it as the Constitution requires and because their leading members were not vetted and confirmed by the Senate.
Blacklabel
who did they “go after” so that Elon could get a Cybertruck contract?
somebody else makes those?
patkim
Isn't it also convenient that Trump fired the USDA inspector general, whose agency had investigated Elon Musk's start-up company Neuralink back in 2022, because there were accusations that they had mistreated test monkeys?
And of course, the list of people and organizations who've done Trump and Musk wrong are targeted for their excuse that they are saving lots of money, even though they themselves plan to increase the national debt by trillions of dollars.
Well, as long as you are a billionaire, then you may not have to worry, but the middle and lower classes will have to worry.
Blacklabel
maybe they plan to take all the money they save and apply it to the national debt?
then it won’t increase as much as expected, or at all.
Desert Tortoise
Way ahead of you. Musk responded to a post on X claiming former USAID chief Samantha Power earned $23 million between 2020 and 2024. Power received a salary of $183,100 while working as administrator of USAID, according to federal records, and there’s no evidence suggesting she benefitted from her position to the tune of millions of dollars. In 2020, Power disclosed royalties and sales from her books, none of which exceeded $1,000, in addition to positions in several exchange-traded funds and mutual funds, including some holdings with Vanguard valued up to $1 million. In 2024, Power disclosed a retirement fund valued at up to $1 million and other assets held in ETFs and mutual funds. Over four years, some of Power’s assets rose in value, but many of them were mutual funds that track broad stock market indexes and there isn’t any evidence that growth had anything to do with her job at USAID.
A career civil servant ought to be able to save a lot more than $1 million in the Thrift Savings Plan, which works like a 401k. She probably, like me had a home and some money she inherited from her parents that she invested. I bought rental properties with my inheritance to supplement my retirement income. That doesn't make me corrupt. Elon Musk is just lying about things, as increasingly seems to be his habit.