The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.Kyiv says too soon to talk foreign troop numbers in Ukraine
By Dan Peleschuk KYIV©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
55 Comments
JJE
Translation: while there's been some thought-bubble-talk about 'peacekeeping' forces, no EU countries have made a firm commitment and are very reluctant to do so. Despite the previous bluster of Macron and even Keir, this is for a number of reasons: chiefly amongst these is Moscow will not permit it. Secondly is these actors know it will entail biting off more than they can chew and will be get it handed to them. European armies are quite small and not up to the challenge of a confrontation with the Russian armed forces.
Any contingent of foreign forces entering the steppes of the invasion routes into European Russia better stock up on a good supply of body bags. Moscow won't sit on its hands.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Trump is reduced to begging Saudi Arabia to lower oil prices to try to bring russia to the table. Not going to work and he should accept his only path to redeeming his reputation is to continue the Biden policy.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Given how pathetic russia performed against #30 on the military expenditure list, I would expect many European countries could send the russians back where they came from.
bass4funk
True and the Saudis are begging us to protect them, a win, win.
The Saudis want to do business with us, it absolutely will work.
That won’t happen.
Underworld
JJE
Ease up on the drama. The peacekeeping forces will be in Ukraine, not Russia.
RichardPearce
Problem Zelensky is facing is how to require the EU troops to protect HIM from the Ukrainian population while preserving the illusion that the population that put him in power to restore good relationships with Russia is united behind him, even those who have chosen to reject his government and flee to Europe or Russia.
JJE
That's the problem - it's conjecture exactly where a land formerly known as Ukraine's borders actually are since their loss of sovereignty in 2014.
Russia has signalled that it would immediately declare a ceasefire once Kyiv begins withdrawing from what Moscow views as Russian territory, including the Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. This would allow negotiations to begin on the other regions which haven't decided their status, leading to a demarcated, observed border and an eventual peace.
Having a foreign army on any of the above territory would hinder that natural process in the short term but not the long term, not to mention be very detrimental for that hypothetical force/s.
Underworld
Burgerland
he should accept his only path to redeeming his reputation is to continue the Biden policy.
Whoops:
US President-elect Donald Trump intends to push Ukraine to lower its age of conscription to 18 in an effort to stabilise the country’s front lines ahead of direct negotiations with Russia.
https://www.afr.com/world/europe/trump-to-urge-zelensky-to-lower-ukraine-s-conscription-age-to-18-20250113-p5l3yc
Underworld
JJE
The peacekeeping forces will be in Ukraine, not Russia.
There is no conjecture. There was no loss of sovereignty in 2014.
Yes. A non-starter. Which goes to show that Putin isn't serious about peace.
JJE
If there was no conjecture, there would be a consensus on the former-Ukraine border question but there simply isn't.
Realistically moving forward, Moscow won't allow the rump state of Ukraine to be anything but strictly neutral, which means zero NATO. And it won't allow it to be snuck in the backdoor under the guise of a foreign 'peacekeeping force', particularly on its front porch.
Indeed, such a proposition will inevitably lead to a wider conflict, possibly between Russia and NATO directly. That is why it is not just a hindrance to peace, but a graver threat that could suck in the wider region.
Underworld
Burgerland
US President-elect Donald Trump intends to push Ukraine to lower its age of conscription to 18 in an effort to stabilise the country’s front lines ahead of direct negotiations with Russia.
How is this a negotiating technique? That doesn't make sense. If he asks Ukraine to send 18 year olds, how does that have anything to do with peace talks?
He hasn't done that either.
And so did Trump.
And BTW
Do you know what the mobilization age is in Russia? 18.
Do you know what the requirement age to join the military in the US? 17.
It's not controversial, and nobody is saying that they should be sent to the front line.
Even though they both have the same policy for 18 year conscription in Ukraine. You can't make this up.
Underworld
Burgerland
"A non-starter. Which goes to show that Putin isn't serious about peace."
Putin had it as a requirement for peace talks to start. And Ukraine will not renounce their sovereignty to that territory. Ever.
Underworld
JJE
There is.
Well then Putin won't get peace. Simple as that. We can eat popcorn while his country implodes.
Nonsense. NATO is a defensive alliance. They pose no threat.
Blacklabel
And what of beloved Ukraine during that time?
Underworld
Blacklabel
We can eat popcorn while his country implodes.
They can let Russia gain 0.7% of their country per year, for the cost of 430,000 Russian troops. Which is Russia's result for 2024.
Blacklabel
That result was with foreign money and weapons.
especially from Biden who gave billions every time they met even when it was only a few days before.
how about without any of that? Total collapse.
Underworld
Blacklabel
Oh, they will still have foreign money and weapons.
Trump will just call it a loan.
Blacklabel
I see? So your entire premise is now based on Donald Trump giving money to Ukraine.
uh oh.
Underworld
Burgerland
" Ukraine will not renounce their sovereignty to that territory. Ever."
I didn't say that they would get it back. I said that they will not renounce their sovereignty to that territory.
Underworld
Burgerland
"NATO is a defensive alliance. They pose no threat."
We aren't in the cold war. NATO = Defensive alliance.
Underworld
Burgerland
Biden is anti-war. His record speaks for itself.
We don't know Trump's policy.
ClippetyClop
You claimed Putin was ‘lured’ into invading by people that you have never been able to identify.
You also believe that people defending Ukraine are ‘warmongers’ but the people who are actually invading aren’t.
This isn’t the logic of a serious person.
Underworld
Burgerland
And what of beloved Ukraine during that time?......They can let Russia gain 0.7% of their country per year, for the cost of 430,000 Russian troops. Which is Russia's result for 2024.
Don't be ridiculous. We all want peace. It's Putin who doesn't want peace.
We aren't in the cold war. NATO = Defensive alliance."
No, they aren't. They are invading Ukraine. NATO is not fighting in Ukraine.
No, they don't.
Putin even said that he didn't care that Finlan joined NATO, even though they share a long border.
dobre vam zajebava
wait
Ukraine prevails aka winning in conflict and Russia is not prevailing aka loosing in conflict.
sow ahet for some peacekeepers are needed.
heroi will march soon on RedSquare as Vovka just ran out of stock with shovels.
Underworld
Burgerland
And yet you fail to condemn Putin for starting the war.
wallace
Trump is preparing a new weapons shipment for Ukraine.
dobre vam zajebava
2020hindsights
time to pack and go to UA,experts of your level are desperately needed there mate.
udachi.
Underworld
Blacklabel
No.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Trump says Zelenskyy is ready to negotiate but Putin cannot be found. Apologists must trust what their hero Trump says.
dobre vam zajebava
Putin did start the war indeed. After numerous warnings to the West to de-escalate the Ukraine situation and not push Ukraine into NATO. His warnings were purposely ignored by NATO.
its FACT many wont talk about.
ClippetyClop
Lol, Kremlin logic. Deescalate the situation by invading Ukraine again.
It’s certainly something you shouldn’t say to people you know. They’ll think you are insane.
Underworld
Burgerland
That's not a condemnation
There wasn't a Ukraine situation. Ukraine was not a member of NATO and they weren't talking about joining NATO.
No they weren't as stated above. Putin came up with some pretexts, like de-Nazifying Ukraine, which was ridiculous.
But it seems like you are OK with Putin invading a sovereign nation because they decalred a wish to join a defensive alliance. That is pro-war.
For Ukraine to defend itself. If we didn't send weapons more Ukrainians will die.
Same as Russia.
I am for peace talks.
I would sue for peace tomorrow. But you have to get Putin to agree. So while Putin isn't interested, we have to supply weapons so that there are less Ukrainian deaths.
It is.
ClippetyClop
What Russian battalion are you serving in?
Underworld
dobre vam zajebava
Putin did start the war indeed. After numerous warnings to the West to de-escalate the Ukraine situation and not push Ukraine into NATO. His warnings were purposely ignored by NATO.
It's not a fact at all. But even if it was, it doesn't warrant a war of aggression against Ukraine.
Putin didn't invade Ukraine in 2022 because he feared NATO. He invaded because he believed that NATO was weak, that his efforts to regain control of Ukraine by other means had failed, and that installing a pro-Russian government in Kyiv would be safe and easy. His aim was not to defend Russia against some non-existent threat but rather to expand Russia's power, eradicate Ukraine's statehood, and destroy NATO, goals he still pursues.
wallace
Nuclear-armed Putin has never feared NATO. He invaded Ukraine because he believed it belonged to Russia.
Underworld
Burgerland
What Russian battalion are you serving in?"
Because we are calling for peace too.
But, unlike you, we acknowledge that Putin to blame for this war. He should be condemned. All the death and destruction is the fault of Putin.
Underworld
wallace
Exactly! He has written about this.
Blacklabel
but under unrealistic terms and conditions that don’t support any ability to create any actual peace agreement.
Primusinter
What kind of sovereignty of Ukraine are you talking about??? At least since 2014, Ukraine has not been a sovereign state (and maybe even earlier). This is no longer a state, but a project! How can any territory be sovereign if none of the decisions are made independently by the head of the project. For any movement or activity, he has to call Washington or London! All military activities are paid for from abroad, the project has no money or they are simply stolen as they arrive. There is no history, culture, or language in your supposedly sovereign state. Everything is destroyed! They abandoned everything! The lands, resources and all remnants of industry are sold to the owners from over the "puddle". And the rest of the territory itself is being called and considered just a military training ground.
Underworld
Burgerland
If we didn't send weapons more Ukrainians will die."
Yes, because the Russian deal was not a serious deal:
According to Zelensky, the ultimatum also demanded Ukraine recognize Russian occupation authorities in Donbas, change its constitution to commit to "neutrality," shrink its army to 50,000 troops, give up much of its weapon arsenal, and recognize Russian as an official language of Ukraine.
Russia wanted to install pro-Kremlin oligarch Viktor Medvedchuk as Ukraine's president after forcing President Volodymyr Zelensky to step down, the Ukrainian head of state said on Jan. 22, citing a Kremlin ultimatum he received in the early days of the full-scale war.
Putin is not serious about peace. So while he isn't, we send weapons.
Underworld
Primusinter
invading a sovereign nation
It most certainly is a state.
Wow, what a wild conspiracy theory. Wild.