The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2013.No evidence Dreamliner fire linked to batteries
LONDON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2013.
5 Comments
Login to comment
some14some
ok, GS Yuasa shares will go up although Boeing share closed down 4.7% on Friday !
warnerbro
As smithinjapan indicates, this means there is more than one potential cause of fire in this aircraft. And eight hours after it was parked. Unless it was arson or the cleaning crew was smoking at work, this sounds quite serious for the operation of the 787.
smithinjapan
Great! So it's not the batteries, supposedly, it's just another problem.
"Thomson said the aircraft had been fully tested and was being taken back into service at once. The airline declined to specify which components had been replaced."
Only one reason I can think of not to name which parts.
SuperLib
Wait, what?
SimondB
A fire at 30,000 feet would not be "a minor technical problem". I won't be boarding these planes anytime soon.