world

Obama gives final approval to let gays serve in military

13 Comments

President Barack Obama certified Friday that the U.S. military was ready to accept openly gay troops after a lengthy battle to lift a ban that had forced them to hide their sexuality.

"Today, we have taken the final major step toward ending the discriminatory 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' law that undermines our military readiness and violates American principles of fairness and equality," Obama said in a statement.

He was speaking after signing a certification with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the top U.S. military officer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, that the U.S. military was ready to accept gay troops.

The repeal of the ban, dubbed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," will now come into force in 60 days' time, on Sept 20.

The ban was overturned in a law adopted in December that first required the top military officer, the defense secretary and the president to certify that the change would not harm military readiness and that the armed forces were ready to carry it out.

In the interim, the Pentagon has drawn up new manuals and prepared the entire armed forces, some 2.3 million people who serve as both active troops and reservists, for the new policy.

"As of Sept 20, service members will no longer be forced to hide who they are in order to serve our country," Obama said.

"Our military will no longer be deprived of the talents and skills of patriotic Americans just because they happen to be gay or lesbian."

Former soldiers and gay rights groups have fought for years to overturn the ban, introduced in 1993 as a compromise after military chiefs rejected a bid by former president Bill Clinton to open the doors to gay soldiers.

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" required gay troops to keep quiet about their sexual orientation or face expulsion from the forces, and an estimated 14,000 service members have been kicked out of the military under the rule.

The issue stirred a passionate debate in the United States, with some U.S. lawmakers, mostly Republicans, as well as high-ranking officers such as Marines Corps Commandant General James Amos fearing it would harm efficiency on the battlefield.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon said that Obama had not taken seriously concerns "that the combat readiness of our force could be placed at risk, particularly those serving on the front lines in Afghanistan and Iraq."

He called for the administration to release the assessments done on the impact of the repeal of the ban."

Most of Washington's NATO allies have already lifted bans on openly gay troops and experienced no serious problems as a result.

A review carried out by the Pentagon showed that 70% of 115,000 soldiers and 44,000 military spouses were in favor of repealing the ban.

But among Marines and certain battle units the figures were reversed with 40 to 60% of those surveyed being against an end to the ban.

Come Sept 20, those people who have been kicked out of the military for being gay can rejoin the ranks if they wish.

© 2011 Agence France-Presse

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

13 Comments
Login to comment

Seems more like a last ditch effort to get re-elected than a sincere action on behalf of Gay Americans.

Do you complain about your ice cream being cold, too?

DADT wasn't a White House policy that could have been magically waved away nor is this "last ditch" by any stretch.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

heterosexuals should likewise not be forced to co-habitat with homosexuals.

Heterosexuals have always been cohabitating with homosexuals in the military.

If we are going to be "fair" then we should be fair to everyone.

On September 20th, we will finally start being fair to all of those people who didn't have to hide their sexuality from bigots.

I guess heterosexuals don't get rights.

The only "right" you're looking for is to be free to discriminate. Do you pine for the days of Jim Crow, too?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Next stop: DoMA!!!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

With one fewer institutionalized taboo and common justification for hate left, I wonder if the human pack will a) hang on to the existing taboos and sub groups even harder b) expand the hate on the current taboos and subgroups or c) find new taboos and subgroups to hate? Who knows? Maybe that anti-witch movement will be resurrected? Or even the satanic ritual panic of the 1980s? Go get those Wiccans! But leave the gays alone! They done their time as whipping boy!

0 ( +1 / -1 )

chewitup

With one fewer institutionalized taboo and common justification for hate left, I wonder if the human pack will a) hang on to the existing taboos and sub groups even harder b) expand the hate on the current taboos and subgroups or c) find new taboos and subgroups to hate? Who knows? Maybe that anti-witch movement will be resurrected?

Maybe they will go after ordinary patriotic citizens when they sing national anthems, or demonize those fortunate enough to break into the category of the 'super rich,' tho in America few stay there for long.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

This was inevitable. American society has changed since the years of Clinton. A majority of Americans now support the DADT repeal.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Maybe they will go after ordinary patriotic citizens when they sing national anthems

Or maybe just those who make it the law to stand and sing?

or demonize those fortunate enough to break into the category of the 'super rich,'

Or maybe just those who got there and stay there by siphoning off government funds (tax money) via cronyism, graft, no-bid contracts and very immoral forms of lobbying?

So, you got anything to say about gays serving openly in the armed forces?

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Was he an American president?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"an estimated 14,000 service members have been kicked out of the military under the Don't Ask Don't Tell rule"

Who can we sue for this collossal waste of time and money?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Mr. president ... What about the lesbians...? are we gonna forget them ? They too need the equal rights as men .

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Seems more like a last ditch effort to get re-elected than a sincere action on behalf of Gay Americans.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

I I paid U.S. taxes, ( I pay Japanese taxes ) I'd be pissed at having my tax money go to keep alive that U.S. airman who beat that gay U.S. sailor until the sailor was an unrecognizable corpse.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

I guess heterosexuals don't get rights. Women are not forced to co-habitat with men in the military and heterosexuals should likewise not be forced to co-habitat with homosexuals. If we are going to be "fair" then we should be fair to everyone.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites