The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.Putin ally Lukashenko declared winner of Belarus vote that West calls a charade
By Mark Trevelyan MINSK©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
31 Comments
TaiwanIsNotChina
What a shocker!
theFu
There's no point in having elections when the winner is pre-decided by Moscow.
elephant200
Congratulations Mr.Lukashenko you are the right one. Russia loves you, China sees you are a good friend !
wallace
30 years as president is too long for any country or any leader. Terms need to be limited to two or three. This was a rigged election. The result was known before a single ballot was cast.
factchecker
Gee what a shocking result. Who could have predicted that!
JJE
Belarus does not want to be run by the loyal western-appointed 'opposition' and become the next victim like their neighbour.
TaiwanIsNotChina
The only reason they would become a victim is because of the animals next door.
JJE
The only reason they will become a victim is because they became collaborators like the animals next doors.
JJE
In photo 2 at the bottom, one can observe Lukashenko's pet dog, Umka, following him. Goes many places with him.
Mr Kipling
The part that many don't understand is that Lukashenko is genuinely extremely popular in Belarus. I was there about 15 years ago, he had super star status. Of course there is little or no negative press and a weak opposition but the idea that the election is rigged is false. They didn't need to stuff the ballet boxes.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Yes, everyone is a collaborator except the saintly russian. No one believes this, not even the russian.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Are you also under the impression that Kim Jong Un is the most popular world leader?
JJE
This follows a familiar pattern of western-anointed 'opposition leaders' who call for sanctions and even intervention in their alleged country. They live in luxury abroad and have no domestic support or even a shred of credibility. They are funded by the usual three-lettered suspects and are more marketed towards the west.
Belarusians don't like collaborators; they have been ruthlessly assaulted by them. They also know Alexander Grigoryevich is a decent patriot who once was in the border guards and patrolled the frontiers of his land. He also understands a patient next door is chronically sick and needs forced intervention and some tough medicine to cure them of nasty concepts.
Sven Asai
Whatever criticism, much of it is right and much is wrong, but this guy finally seems to have strong support from population. They are more skilled there on average than in Russia and are the technological and sophisticated military workbench for Putin. Btw, Lukashenko even managed complete security for his country by always getting the newest arms, including nuclear ones, for nearly FREE from his much bigger neighbor and ally. Which other smaller countries' leader can show up such a success? Not even any of the strongest US allies would get such confidential and nuclear warfare things nearly unasked and free into their own hands. And in the other bloc, not even Kim Jong-Un, too, who has to deliver something in return or gets only second class support and more outdated technologies.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Because that violates the NPT and also NATO has been far too generous keeping equipment from russia's borders.
TaiwanIsNotChina
russia is in need of a lobotomy. This much is true.
GuruMick
30 plus years as top leader !!
This is either a miracle ordained by God himself, or a dictatorship and rigged elections.
FizzBit
Kinda like the World section on JT. All we get is NATO, US, EU,UK warmongering while everyone else is bad bad bad.
Funniest part is folks buy into this crap, proof is above this.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Still Putin's War.
FizzBit
Putin and Biden to be fair
ClippetyClop
Not fair, just a laughable coping method for Putin fanboys.
It's Trump's war now, and he's still supplying weapons. Proxy warmonger etc.
ClippetyClop
Hehe! America forced Putin to invade Ukraine, and he doesn't even know it. All Wall Street had to was order Biden to tell Zel that Putin was going to invade and bingo, Putin had to invade. Couldn't not invade. Not invading wasn't an option.
Team Putin feeble coping method no. 128.
Blacklabel
im gonna need a source for that one.
ClippetyClop
Man who doesn't supply sources for his conspiracies now wants one.
Google it.
Trumps XO suspending foreign aid for 90 days doesn't apply to weapons.
If Trump stops supplying weapons before the peace talks (in the next 24 hours?), he won't have any leverage. No skin in the game. He'll be irrelevant, and he will fail to end the war.
You are so deperate for Trump to do what the Russian army can't that you aren't thinking straight.
ClippetyClop
I'm not a Biden fan. Nor a Trump fan, or a Putin, or a fan of any politician.
Nobody ever said that the Russians 'were down to their last shovel', or 'were out of missiles' or whatever strawman nonsense you need to cope with supporting Putin's million-man-murder invasion. Pure dishonest rubbish.
Blacklabel
Didn’t sound good for your claim:
The United States will provide nearly $1 billion more in longer-term weapons support to Ukraine, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said Saturday as the Biden administration rushes to spend all the congressionally approved money it has left to bolster Kyiv before President-elect Donald Trump takes office next month.
ClippetyClop
First hit on your quote.
"Trump’s aid freeze leaves weapons flowing to Ukraine"
Yet to be 'suspended'. He's taking his time, isn't he? Probably busy renaming bodies of water and ethnic cleansing.
Did you hear Trump say that he was stopping weapons going to Ukraine and therefore giving Putin absolutely no reason to join peace talks?
Blacklabel
The word play is all over the place.
no I don’t believe he CAN suspend Biden’s shipments. Ones that already happened that you now claim Trump did.
ClippetyClop
Then prove it! If you can't, then your claim can be dismissed.
You can't even be bothered to so why should I do it for you?
Do you want me to tell you what people actually said, rather than what you think they meant?