The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Queen agrees to let Harry, Meghan move part time to Canada
By DANICA KIRKA, JILL LAWLESS and FRANK AUGSTEIN SANDRINGHAM, England©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.
67 Comments
Chip Star
What a relief? Aren’t Harry and Meghan adult citizens of free countries? Why would they need an old woman’s permission to do anything?
CrazyJoe
Hey folks, give this young family a break. Just wish them well. They have paid their dues via unrelenting abuse from British press. Now hope they have some peace.
Alfie Noakes
They don't. They told the Queen they were leaving as a fait accompli. It's strange that the article fails to mention the three-year hate campaign against Megan Markle by the right-wing media and the internet tiki torch mob; that's the real reason they've quit.
Ah_so
They don't. Although they do want the security guards, the titles and the UK residences which are kind of in her power (apart from the title - he's still a prince whatever).
Aly Rustom
exactly!
Wallace Fred
The racist undertones in the media were to blame. But as the case of another island nation we're all too familiar with, the victim will be blamed.
Chip Star
If they didn’t need the old woman’s permission, why was there a meeting and why is the media reporting that the queen agreed?
Chip Star
Countries with royal or imperial families are quaint. Sorcerers and dragons aren’t really either, by the way.
JJ Jetplane
Because Harry is part of the royal family regardless of what he thinks or feels, he needs the monarch's permission to withdraw from royal duties. The monarch, the heir, and the spare are the only ones that are never allowed to withdraw from such duties. For other members, it can be done only with permission of the monarch. Regardless, of what he may think or feel, he is considered a royal no matter where he goes and because of this he cannot just withdraw from his duties.
Wallace Fred
Jezuz, sounds like they're still stuck in the plague era. I guess the abolition of this archaic system is long overdue.
itsonlyrocknroll
The site below is the very definition of a differentiate to harness product placement and establish a presence in the market to harness, attract and retain a customer baseline. Branding.
https://sussexroyal.com/
OK, remove the Royal, the Titles, namely “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex”, and what is left, Harry and Meghan. It might as well be Bill and Ben the flower pot men.
The “cashing in” factor on both Harry and Meghan “HRH” status, whilst the hard working tax payer, rich and poor will ultimately have to foot the bill for their security, the £2.4 million plus, refurbishment of Frogmore cottage, Harry and Meghan UK base. Whilst attending pubic engagements, product placement will be come the order of the day.......
It is this po-faced arrogance, that will prompt present and future Government to take preventative legislative step to bring this farce to an end.
This whole sorry Royal soap opera is about to turn political.
arrestpaul
Mr. and Mrs. Markel were moving to Canada. That was a done deal. The Queen agreed to not stop them.
theFu
Suits wasn't all that popular. I'd never heard of Meghan before the wedding announcement. I'm guessing that she doesn't understand the meaning of "duty."
The Queen is wise. Best to get her away so she doesn't spoil the rest of the family like an overripe banana. The royals were looking awfully pale these days. The trick is to have an independent tally of royal working days and private days so the expenses are split in a far way.
Sh1mon M4sada
Genius, the attentiion is off Prince Andrew, and the clan enters a new chapter where earning your own living is shared with public duties.
What's there to complain about, unless you're Murdoch press.
Amir Marzouk
TheFu
Are you saying the second highest rating show its first 2 seasons only behind Game of Thrones wasn't that popular?
Jimizo
So they are keeping the taxpayer funded goodies then?
theFu
Amir Marzouk, Is that on some hidden rating list? It certainly wasn't popular here.
NCIS, Sunday Night Football and Big Bang Theory were at the top in 2012-13. Suits wasn't in the top 25 that year. The top ranked CATV show that year was The Walking Dead.
Not that this matters. I'll stick with most people in the world never heard of her before the wedding announcement.
Maria
What's your point? Nobody had heard of Ms Catherine Middleton before she started dating Prince William, and Lady Diana Spencer was a teenage child-carer.
So what does do you think that proves?
JeffLee
Seriously? I've had the Daily Mail and others on my news feed over the past three years, and I don't remember any such "campaign." There was the occasional criticism over specific things like using a private jet while preaching environmentalism or ordering the media not to photograph her at the Wimbledon tournament. But overall, the coverage was neutral to positive.
Around the time of the marriage, most of the coverage was positively gushing, contradicting the left's laughable and embarrassing assertions she would be rejected by the royal family on racial grounds.
Jimizo
Who cares? I found out she was a minor celeb when she started dating the more famous celeb Harry.
Anyway, they are more than capable of earning enough cash to support their needs and luxuries and so they should give up the freebies and earn their own way.
Toasted Heretic
The establishment didn't care for Dodi Al Fayed, either. I'm no monarchist, but I wish the papers and pundits would leave the kids alone.
Priti Patel and other right wingers are pretending it's not racism. Patel would know, given her insensitive and bigoted comments about Ireland.
Maria
Jefflee wrote:
Here's some of that neutral to positive coverage. For Princess Kate, that is.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share&fbclid=IwAR2zLibjCOXO50Xot9na4re5HssjEXD-HinOZKL37MV-DC0NsUK70FUgW98
Rizdown
Meghan will tire of Harry quickly.
I give their marriage 5 more years at most.
They will blame the media for their divorce when it happens.
bass4funk
I hope the Queen cuts off all their financial ties, allow Harry to keep his inheritance, but other than that, cut the cord.
GW
These 2 both have their own histories, aren't young, Hollywood & Royal couple, what could possibly go wrong.....
Seems like Megan is really throwing her weight around by wanting to live in Cda as well, she supposedly knew you would think she was marrying into the Royal family & now once a kid is born she is pushing to get them out......wish them good luck they ARE going to need it bigtime!!!
Jimizo
Why? He can earn his own money.
I thought you conservatives were all for people supporting themselves and not sponging off others. Lazy, good-for-nothing, arrogant inheritance brats are a real problem and send out a bad message to others.
Toasted Heretic
That's not really cutting the cord, though, is it?
His inheritance will keep them both comfy and secure, far beyond the rest of us mortals could ever hope for.
People who get inheritance know little of the hardships of real life.
bass4funk
Yes, so keep it and anything else, cut all financial ties. What a home wrecker this woman, no wonder no one likes her, disgusting. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
Having said that, be free and live your own life.
Toasted Heretic
It's still not cutting any cords. It's money he inherited. Like most elite.
Harry chose his wife over his gran. That's hardly home wrecking. Remind me, how many divorces has the current PotUS had & how many affairs?
Ah, but that's it. MM and Harry don't like Trump & there was no wedding invite. This is a source of ire for the American far right.
bass4funk
You can get it in one lump sum.
Not him, her. But she doesn’t have a good history as a person, but yes, if Harry is happy, good on him, but her reputation as a decent woman is once again, crushed.
Tangerine2000
The problem with those that say the "right-wing" media have made a racist and sexist hate campaign against Meghan, is that when you ask people who claim such to provide any evidence, they can't.
Fortunately, people are wising up to the tactic of those who cry "racism" when valid criticism is being made.
Joe Blow
Princes Harry and Andrew can both go off into exile in Canada. The Firm doesn't likely want them around.
Toasted Heretic
The problem is that the right wingers who support the campaign with every fibre of their being, tend to ignore when evidence is provided. They pretend it's not happening.
Toasted Heretic
Always the woman's fault. Especially if she be strong, black and or progressive.
You be very hushed about your own home wrecker in chief. Very telling.
Tangerine2000
Then please provide evidence of the British media behaving in a racist or sexist way towards Meghan.
WilliB
ToastHeretic:
What the heck does anything here have to to do with "right wing" or with "racism"? People have different opinions about the royal soap opera, I do not see what is right or left about either. And "race"? Aren´t they all caucasians? Is "racism" some some of of obligatory phrase that some people have to pepper every single comment with? I don´t get this.
Toasted Heretic
It's not just the media.
But anyway, again? Ok.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/11/post-racial-britain-harry-meghan-tabloids
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-01/royal-reporters-lift-lid-on-abuse-levelled-at-meghan-markle/9496132
https://news.sky.com/story/trolling-of-meghan-how-duchess-is-abused-over-race-and-pregnancy-11696606
https://www.her.ie/news/police-investigating-racist-hate-crime-towards-meghan-markle-prince-harry-390649
Mr. Noidall
Yes yes that's it!
Toasted Heretic
Leo Varadakar, Kevin Sharkey, Samantha Mumba, Liz Bonnin and Phil Lynott and many more would disagree (if Philo was still with us).
The point is, Patel is pretending that the abuse is not racist, when it clearly is. And she's made racist comments about Ireland, without a clue about its history.
But most right wingers are not well versed in anything outside their own narrow confines.
Tangerine2000
Toasted, you've just posted links to articles by the media reporting about the abuse Meghan has received from individuals on Twitter and the like.
You are trying to make out that the media itself has been racist and sexist. Please show us where.
Don't make claims that the system is against her when in reality it is just a handful of private individuals on social media.
Toasted Heretic
It's not just a handful of private individuals. Piers Morgan and his pal Trump have both made disparaging comments towards her. These are public figures with a huge and unfortunately, influential platform where they can demonize anyone they don't like, without consequences.
And whilst no fan of the royals, I cannot recall such vitriol directed at Kate Middleton. Even the BBC were clumsy in reporting.
When news of his relationship with Meghan Markle became public, he criticised “racial overtones” in reporting. Last week, it emerged he had complained to the BBC for broadcasting and publishing online an image from a neo-Nazi social media site that called him a “race traitor” and depicted the royal with a gun pointed at his head. Although the BBC internally and the broadcasting watchdog Ofcom rejected the complaint, ruling that the use of the image in a report about the activities of the group was in the public interest, the BBC did apologise for not warning the duke in advance.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/oct/01/meghan-sues-mail-on-sunday-for-publishing-letter-to-her-father
Tangerine2000
So we've gone from "The media are racist and sexist towards Meghan" to "Two famous people have made disparaging comments about her". "Disparaging" isn't racist.
I suggest you stop looking for racism in everything.
Hung Nguyen
I am surprised that this kind of news still attracts the attention of Japan Today.
Andrew Crisp
Because they are part of the royal family, they draw millions of dollars in wages from the royal purse to perform certain duties, the taxpayer's just spent millions upgrading their residences in London, the taxpayers already pay hundreds of thousands for their security which will now cost a lot more, now that this is apparently going ahead the big question is how much taxpayer money is going to prop up "their independent lifestyle" .
bass4funk
In this situation, mostly it is, but Harry gets some share of the blame as well.
Liberals, stop with the race baiting, no one cares about it. Diana went through a very rough time and she was White, maybe she suffered from White racism as well.
PTownsend
Neonationalsocialists: stop ignoring racial prejudice.
bass4funk
What? Is that even a word? I’m sorry, but Meghan has mostly herself to blame, her problems didn’t start just recently, she’s been having problems for years and now Canada May get to take on her problems, I weep for that country.
WilliB
Toasted Heretic:
I don´t know these people, and I don´t know why they are relevant.
Who is Patel? I was asking you about your race obsession, while all of the people in the photos look pretty white to me. OK, I found out in the meantime that one of them has a black parent, but so what? It seems you are obsessed about race. Maybe you should ease up on that'?
bass4funk
We all know that, that’s not the point, the point is how this woman behaves, but once she uttered progressive, red flashing lights should have been a warning sign what this woman is. She left Hollywood, but it didn’t leave her and she brought it back to England. What a joke.
Chip Star
Yeah! Progress is bad, I say using my mobile phone connected to the internet. We should fear progressives because they think we should evolve as our societies move forward. Scary stuff!
Look, you’ve been backed into yet another corner. ROFL!
Chip Star
Other people being racist towards Meghan is her fault?
Her being half black is a “problem she’s been having for years”?
Sweet posts
Ah_so
Examples galore below if you want to see how they have been treated differently in parts of the British press.
Another interesting correlation is that people who have a bit of a thing against Meghan are also more likely to vote for Brexit and be sceptical of climate change. Fancy that!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.insider.com/meghan-markle-criticized-kate-middleton-praised-double-standards-racism-2019-11
Kate: "Royal sources said yesterday that the Queen understood and endorsed William and Kate’s decision not to spend Christmas Day with her. One said: ‘Her Majesty understands that it is a dilemma that many young couples face and acknowledges how close Catherine’s relationship is with her family." Daily Mail: Dec. 16, 2016
Kate: "It was reported that new Duchess of Cambridge requested her favorite scented candles and toiletries from luxury fragrance brand Jo Malone be delivered to scent the Abbey. A selection of candles, handwashes and lotions was requested, specifically in citrus spring scents including Orange Blossom, Grapefruit and the ever-popular Lime, Basil & Mandarin." Daily Mail: May 4, 2011
bass4funk
Uhhh, that’s not what I meant by “Progressivism.”
No, you just jumped the gun again, relax.
No, but her mouth and attitude of selfish and personal egotistical entitlement is though.
Hmmm.....
Keep trying...
If Princess Angela of Liechtenstein can do it, Meghan can as well, but her selfishness will prevent her, stop with the race excuse, I know it’s a shield for a deflated argument, but no one cares, but liberals will monotonously and tirelessly try to belabor that empty point.
Jimizo
I just want these celebs/scroungers off the tax bill. That is an issue worth commenting on.
Black/white/male/female/progressive/conservative - they should all sod off.
Ah_so
Still haven't seen any evidence of this. But the language you use to describe her throughout your posts are mostly found in the thesaurus as synonyms for "uppity".
bass4funk
I am so tired with liberals trying to invoke race into every debate they for some reason can’t seem make a serious cohesive argument, it just always devolves into race, race, race. I find people like Bieber or Madonna or the Kardashians equally as uppity if it makes you feel better.
Sneezy
What do you mean?
Sneezy
bass4funk:
Also bass4funk:
Ah_so
I think that they are rather different cases. The ones you quote have made every effort to out themselves in the public eye and revel in fame and publicity. Markle hasn't but has been relentlessly picked on in a way that is inexplicable in Britain if she were not American or from an ethnic minority.
bass4funk
She was a TV actress and before that, she already had a bad reputation that was public.
A lot of it she brought on herself.
What? Or better yet, maybe if she wasn’t difficult.
lostrune2
That went better than expected. Like a regular grandma trying to keep her family from breaking apart, the Queen used the word "family" so many times in the press release
My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan’s desire to create a new life as a young family. Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working Members of the Royal Family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family. Harry and Meghan have made clear that they do not want to be reliant on public funds in their new lives.*
It has therefore been agreed that there will be a period of transition in which the Sussexes will spend time in Canada and the UK.These are complex matters for my family to resolve, and there is some more work to be done, but I have asked for final decisions to be reached in the coming days.”*So the Queen wants the details done in days and not weeks. And if in the end, they depend less on grandma's money and strike out on their own like adults who move out of the house, that may save money
Who wouldn't want that - who would want to depend on grandma's money forever
Chip Star
Lost: Thanks for that. Agree with your analysis.