The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2016 AFPSaudi Arabia lobbies U.S. over 9/11 law
RIYADH©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2016 AFP
10 Comments
Login to comment
Zodiac
Of course Kerry agreed I wonder how many bills they slipped in his pockets while he was saying that I mean they could never state fund terrorism ever again if they could be sue'd by victims I mean they economy is already dropping.
Outrider
More Obama selling out.
Strangerland
Somehow you have equated to an action by the Saudi's as Obama selling out.
I'm not too sure if you're too dumb to realize that Obama would have to be the one performing the action to sell out, or if you just don't care and are willing to blame literally anything and everything on Obama.
Asakaze
And where is the mighty choir of indignation and outrage about blatant attempt to influence the US law system? Everything here is clear-cut, but where are the crowds of resented activists and posters? Ah, too busy decrying the non-existent Russian hacking, I see.
Strangerland
There is plenty of it - people have (rightly) been complaining about SA for years. But there is a difference between influencing through lobbying of politicians, and hacking someone through illegal means.
The only way you could know it's non-existent is if you were the hacker. Were you?
Strangerland
You call it mass hysteria going on about the Russian hacking, while simultaneously getting hysteric over this Saudi thing.
Seems legit.
I've never claimed that there was hacking. I'm open to all possibilities. You on the other hand have clearly stated that the hacking was non-existent.
That link doesn't work. But I can just as easily provide a link to a site that says that the Russians did it.
Again, the only way you can know for sure it's non-existent is if you were the hacker.
Asakaze
One sarcastic post you call "hysteric"? Wow, then how you call the whole Hillarist zoo? lol
Of course. Ever heard about "Innocent untill proven guilty" thing? Now the whole hacking story smells like "Saddam has nukes!!!!!" tragedy-comedy show of 2003.
The only way you can know for sure it's Russian hacking if you caught them red-handed. Nothing even close so far.
Strangerland
Just following your lead with the hyperbole. Seems you dish it. Better than you take it.
Sure, it's why I'm open to either possibility. But you've determined innocence without even bothering to investigate.
You're right, which is why I'm not claiming it was Russian hacking.
Oh, are you CIA or FBI with inside information? I hadn't realized.
Asakaze
I'm not interested in exercise in empty semantics, no time for it. So, only two things:
You fail to understand one basic thing: first comes proof, only then comes the verdict. Without proof everybody is innocent.
And here is one very thorough artcle. If you do not believe Russians then you should believe a British diplomat. I hope the link works.
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/12/former-british-ambassador-says-russia-election-hack-conspiracy-theory-kafkaesque.html
Enjoy the read.
lostrune2
The US would be sued next