The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.GOP pushes Barrett toward court as Democrats call it sham
By LISA MASCARO, MARK SHERMAN and MARY CLARE JALONICK WASHINGTON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
22 Comments
PTownsend
The Republican Party has long been the party serving the needs of the country's wealthiest. Barrett is their ideal justice.
She'll help ensure the needs of the wealthiest, especially those running big corporations are met.
Look for her to support further undermining of the rights of individuals while protecting and strengthening those of corporations.
Look for further reductions in environmental, worker and consumer protections.
She's Trump and the 'elites' ideal justice, especially those in the Federalist Society and other far right groups pushing for a return to the 1950s, a person with little if any regard for the general population.
bob
God willing...
Strangerland
Fast forward 10 years, and America is the christian equivalent of the Saudi government.
bob
Judeo-Christian values made the west the most successful, free, and powerful nations the earth has ever seen.
The Saudis? Not so much...
Strangerland
No, getting away from said values over the past 50 years has created the most successful, free, and powerful nations the earth has ever seen.
bob
wrong. A cancer is growing in the west. The likes of blm/antifa are the symptoms.
ACB will be instrumental in curing the patient.
PTownsend
Not surprising the global alt right are once again pushing a Russian system of national socialism backed by Russian Orthodox as the state religion as their preferred model of governance. 'They leave the 'west' behind' in their quest to be 'back in the USSR'.
plasticmonkey
Let’s stop calling her ACB. Stop appropriating the legacy of RBG, a true champion of justice for all, especially for those less privileged in social status.
Barrett is a champion for the Republican Party and its loudest, richest backers.
Beyond gender and motherhood, the two have nothing in common.
Strangerland
Wrong. A cancer is growing in the west. The likes of Trump, right-wing militias, and qanon are the symptoms.
plasticmonkey
Cornyn is forgetting that the majority of the American people are not Republican, evangelical Christian, anti-abortion, anti-gun control, or billionaires. And the majority of Americans believe that the SC nomination should happen after the election.
Bob Fosse
And some good ole timey prayin’
I thought you were against kneeling.
Yrral
What if she became a liberal,would not be the first time
Yrral
Bob,Jesus never met a White man, if he did, he would not associate with him, Jesus only associated with Jews
bass4funk
Not as wealthy as the Democrats or the richest elites that vote Democrat especially in the tech industry.
No, she’s a constitutionalist snd she’ll interpret the law as written and that’s what a SC should do, not legislate from the bench.
Look at the giant corporations and donors trying to thwart her nomination.
If the Dems controlled the WH and Senate they and all the high tech corporations as well as Hollywood and Soros would without a doubt put a liberal activist Justice on the bench. Period.
u_s__reamer
Let’s stop calling her ACB.
I beg to differ:
AOC is used both by her supporters and by her detractors. ACB, like ABC, is a kind of synecdoche and we can understand it as a brand, whether good or bad. RBG is used by her admirers as a term of endearment and respect, but not her traducers.
In ACB I see little to admire, especially as she accepted this judicial appointment from a most unsavory character, a life-long scofflaw of the lowest morals and, as a fellow-traveler, fully on board with the Republican rush to judgment, she has shown a readiness to serve as a "handmaid" to a right-wing agenda on the USSC. This sorry story is surely to be continued...
bass4funk
The Haters will think that, understandable.
Yeah, if the roles were reversed and a conservative would say the same thing liberals would say, tough.
bass4funk
As well as the Democrat party.
The big difference is and one of the few redeeming qualities the GOP has is the rule of law, the constitution and democracy the Dems could care less. I dislike both parties, but when it comes to stability of the nation, I vote red.
pointofview
She's very intelligent and knows the law. Quit griping.
Attilathehungry
Farmboy, you are right. The GOP beclowned itself in how it dealt with the Garland nomination. They should have just been honest and said, "we can block it because we have the power, so his nomination is toast".
At the same time, the Democrats were demanding that Garland get a hearing because the it was still Obama's term and the election hadn't happened.
Now the positions are, ironically, reversed. So we just have to go with the law. The GOP can do it because they own the Senate and White House. It's really that simple. It's been done often in the past. By contrast, when the Senate and White House are different parties, nominees rarely (if ever) go through.