The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.Rand Paul stalls quick Senate OK of $40 bil Ukraine package
By ALAN FRAM WASHINGTON©2022 GPlusMedia Inc.
39 Comments
commanteer
He'll catch a lot of flack for this, but Paul is right. Ukraine was the most corrupt country in Europe before the war, and you can be sure that those corrupt officials see the war as a way to cash in big time. By all means, support the Ukrainians - but sending billions of dollars to an unaccountable recipient is just reckless. If course, we know the senators want to keep their own arms manufacturers and other lobbyists happy, but people deserve to know where the money is going.
The crooks in the US congress have a history of using crises to push through outrageous and corrupt bills - they take advantage of the public's emotions. After all, it's not their money. Yet.
lincolnman
Rand Paul proving once again that he is Putin's Puppet - siding with the Butcher in Moscow...
He's just another example of the Republican Party's embrace of authoritarianism and rejection of democracy....
Putin and Trump are the defacto leaders of this new GOP....Reagan wouldn't recognize it now...
bass4funk
Good.
Mr. Noidall
Thank you Rand Paul. The U.S citizens have already had 14 billion of their dollars squandered over Ukraine. U.S. citizens are also paying over 4 bucks a gallon to drive hours away from home to spend over a 100 bucks on baby formula—all in support of Ukraine. Thanks Paul for saying, wait up a minute.
Chucky138
40 billions, how many homeless or health care could it help in the US?.
takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com
Nope, that'd be Russia. Also, one of the reasons Ukraine hasn't been accepted into NATO and the EU is due to corruption issues. Integrating with the Europe and the United States would mean Ukraine would have assistance in rooting out corruption, something Russia obviously doesn't want.
Yes, what a great guy. Let's hold up aid to Ukraine or healthcare for 9/11 responders if my spurious, last minute demands aren't met.
Blacklabel
How casually it went from 33billion to 40 billion.
With nonsense like this:
bass4funk
https://www.cato.org/commentary/whitewashing-ukraines-corruption
Ukraine has long been one of the more corrupt countries in the international system. In its annual report published in January 2022, Transparency International ranked Ukraine 123rd of the 180 countries it examined, with a score of 32 on a one to 100 point scale. By comparison, notoriously corrupt Russia ranked just modestly lower, 139th, with a score of 29.
Ukraine’s track record of protecting democracy and civil liberties is not much better than its performance on corruption. In Freedom House’s 2022 report, Ukraine is listed in the “partly free” category, with a score of 61 out of a possible 100.
Without a doubt!
UChosePoorly
Blacklabel - How is that nonsense? Better services for refugees including helping them to integrate and learn English is a pretty good use of funds, in my opinion. I will continue to press my elected representatives to help support Ukraine and Ukrainians (not that they need it, my reps are pretty pro-Ukraine/anti-Russia)
UChosePoorly
If you think that Rand Paul would spend that kind of money on the homeless or health care, then I would submit that you may not know Rand Paul.
Blacklabel
Meanwhile our own military is 20 billion short on high priorities and we don’t even have enough baby formula for our own children with 8.3% inflation and record gas prices.
but let’s fund NATO countries militaries too? Dems have also hidden some US domestic spending in there too, of course.
Blacklabel
It does not cost 900 million dollars to teach English to a couple thousand people.
It’s a slush fund ripe for money laundering. Things like this are why we monks the term “10% for the Big Guy”.
takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com
This is a red herring. Even if the US didn't send a dime to Ukraine people like Rand Paul wouldn't support helping with formula, or record high gas prices
Blacklabel
sure they would. America First.
UChosePoorly
Blacklabel - make sure you are letting your elected reps know your priorities. Democracy doesn't work if we don't.
UChosePoorly
Blacklabel - I do believe that the US will be taking in a lot more than a "couple thousand people", at least I hope we do. I will look into it.
UChosePoorly
Ok, the numbers I am seeing is that the US eventually hopes to take in 100,000 Ukrainians.
Blacklabel
So that’s the number just created to justify the 900 million, right?
Same as people who say I bought this exercise bike cause I’m gonna use it 1000 times so it’s only 100 yen per use! Then it becomes a clothes hanger after a month.
do we get that money back if 100,00 do not come? What company is getting the contact? The Burisma School of English
this is a slush fund ripe for corruption.
bass4funk
That is a bunch of BS. Rand Paul was the senior poster child that always railed against frivolous spending and unnecessary wars like his father before him as both are conservative libertarians. His record has always shown that as well an American first anti-Washington establishment member of congress.
https://www.paul.senate.gov/news/dr-rand-paul-introduces-school-act-empower-parents-increase-education-options-and-flexibility
https://ne-np.facebook.com/foxandfriends/videos/sen-rand-paul-on-need-for-us-energy-independence/935715197312356/
UChosePoorly
Blacklabel - good thing for you all of this will be auditable and knowable.
I am happy to share the below with you. Thank you for doing what it takes to be an even better citizen and participant in our democracy!
https://www.foia.gov/
https://foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/request
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_InformationAct(United_States)
takeda.shingen.1991@gmail.com
There's not evidence to back this up. Please, Republicans tried to take away healthcare from Americans and are trying to tax the poor. Republicans have 0 policies aimed at helping the poor/working class. "America first" is a meaningless campaign slogan, considering how we rank in healthcare and education.
Given the size of the federal budget, $40 billion is hardly breaking the bank, and if I had to choose, I'd much rather provide support to Ukraine, than build a dumb wall, or increase the US military budget.
Bungle
A lot of people here do not seem to understand geopolitics, least of all Rand Paul. If you think the Ukranians are using American / NATO largesse to live the high life, I suggest a reality check.
bass4funk
Yes, there is, especially if you follow Rand Paul anyone knows this.
No, the Republicans believe in helping 22 million Americans that don’t have access to proper or no healthcare, not to take care of every American from cradle to grave burdening the taxpayer than they already are. There is no way the US can afford to care for 320 million people. We can’t get inflation under control under inflation up by 8.3% and we continue to print more money, money we don’t have and we are devaluing and this WH just doesn’t care. I am not sure if you have noticed, but we don’t even have baby formula and how is that possible in a first world nation? Of course it is this administration‘s fault, ask any parent with a child and they will tell you that.
Not to the majority of Americans.
Liberals say that because they have no clue about the value of the dollar and the abysmal state the nation is in. This is why people want Democrats out because they continue to spend on entitlements and let everything else fall by the wayside, case in point the border. Liberals think it’s nothing. If the UK were connected to the rest of Europe there is no way that country would allow millions to stream in, no way!
and if I had to choose, I'd much rather provide support to Ukraine,
Ok, so damn with our own nation, we can scrape up the money and write checks for money we don’t have for a nation that gives us zero benefits, but for our own nation we have nothing. Seriously, November can’t come soon enough.
Yeah, every home had a wall, lock and doors, but the US shouldn’t, yeah, makes logical sense.
Yes, we don’t need a strong military, continue to encourage Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. No wonder the love Democrat Leadership.
Rodney
@bass. Did you copy paste my previous post? Usually most posters don’t do research and just moan, I hate China, I blame Russia. 123rd is pretty high.
Rand Paul should demand every single bullet and missile and money for government officials salaries is thoroughly independently audited.
(we still haven’t found the missing $8.6 billion in Iraq Reconstruction Funds.)
Blacklabel
the US is using 40 billion dollars that liberals were screaming could be used to "cure world hunger!"
and its not like Uklraine isnt getting paid by a dozens of other countries too.
Oh the things we could use this money for in America.
that 2 billion dollar wall looking super cheap right now. could have prevented 2 million illegals from entering and their associated costs. Immigrants have baby formula, by the way.
Rodney
well they seem to get to go the front of the line for asylum seekers in EU, UK, USA and Japan, including free flights, housing, social benefits and as mentioned $900,000,000 of free English lessons in USA alone. Ever tried to get a work visa in any of the countries if you are from Africa?
Blacklabel
oh yeah sure thing.
"Reasons Access May Be Denied Under the FOIA”
Spolier Alert: there are 9 of them that cover every single thing someone would want to know.
This money is gone, will never be accounted for and at least some will likely end up in Biden donor (or even his brother or son's) hands.
you know this.
UChosePoorly
Well, you seem to be doubtful, but I can help to reassure. Just because they can't deny a request doesn't mean they will. Also, you probably won't even need to request the info. It will be publicly available and auditable.
UChosePoorly
can* deny
UChosePoorly
Since you seem interested in how this money is being spent and accounted for, I am happy to help provide what insight I can.
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/10/1097883083/how-the-u-s-aid-to-ukraine-is-taking-shape
I don't usually recommend consulting an anonymous internet forum for research, but I will help to the extent possible.
Blacklabel
its not even clear now what is being funded NOW, much less any expectation of an accounting of what will be spent. its 54 billion dollars now.
Just saw this too
SO thats not even to Ukraine. Plus I hear there is some money to the CDC and other things, very hard to find what all the line items are.
Can Americans who are experiencing food shortages have some of this money? No, right?
UChosePoorly
There are other programs for Domestic use, this aid is specifically for International use.
UChosePoorly
Here is an accounting for the aid up to Mid-March:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/16/fact-sheet-on-u-s-security-assistance-for-ukraine/
Blacklabel
deflection shields activated. No one is talking about right wing extremists (who?) nor Obama.
Please do focus on why we sending 54 billion dollars to Ukraine when American taxpayers dont have what they need?
UChosePoorly
Blacklabel - if that $900M for Refugee Assistance including English instruction is not used for its intended purpose, then you can bet Rand Paul or someone similar will call it out. We will find out about it.
Blacklabel
Why not just not give it in the first place?
why do we have to wait until it is misused/stolen when the only thing that can be done by then is to complain about what happened?
Blacklabel
no one is talking about the 2020 election here- except you.
so how bout some insights on 54 billion total now?
UChosePoorly
because the point is to help the Ukrainian refugees
SuperLib
There's nothing being said here that can't be said about any government program.
It will be dropped in a few days.