The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.Syria reports Israeli missile attack near Damascus
DAMASCUS, Syria©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
6 Comments
Login to comment
kurisupisu
Why is Israel attacking Syria?
Their actions make little sense and are harming innocent people.
The Israelis wonder why they are despised in the Middle East...
starpunk
If the stupid and illegal 2003 - 2011 Iraq War didn't occur, there would be no ISIL threat and things wouldn't be the mess in the region that it is. Saddam Hussein was a rotten dictator but he kept a lid on such crazy activity. Take him out of the equation and the cork came off the bottle. The genie escaped. The Syrian Civil War has confounded the problem.
America is now involved in the military-industrial complex that Ike Eisenhower warned about in 1960.
venze
The Middle East is in focus again.
Just days after US bombing over Syria, Israel follows up with attacks near the vicinity of Damascus. Why? Where is the legitimacy?
nandakandamanda
Some people here need to follow the news to build up a background to what is happening there, a proxy war.
No mention of the Russian bombing of IS targets in eastern Syria. Their 'legitimacy' comes from Assad and Iran paramilitaries.
The 'legitimacy' of Israel and the US attacks on Iranian-link targets is buried deep within the article, starting from line 5.
Goodlucktoyou
Israel has the right to commit human rights abuses and war crimes anywhere in the world they choose because over 1.6m Jews died in the Haulicaust over 70 years ago.
WilliB
kurisupisu
Because the Alevite Assad government is supported by Iran, and Israel sadly still sees Iran as its biggest enemy and prefers Wahabi Sunni radicals to the secular Assad government in Damascus.
It makes complety sense and is consistent from the Israeli perspective, much as I would disagree with it.