world

Taiwan tensions raise fears of U.S.-China conflict in Asia

46 Comments
By DAVID RISING

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2022 GPlusMedia Inc.


46 Comments
Login to comment

Taiwan has every reason to be worried. The XiJiping government is drumming up nationalist fervor for an invasion of Taiwan (partly to unify the population and distract from its own problems), and the current globalist regime in the US can not be depended on to defend the island. Very dangerous times.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Today, the US needs China more than China needs the US

There is no shortage of countries that would dearly love to replace China in that supply chain. If you scratch the surface and do some reading you will discover many US companies are finding suppliers and subcontractors in places like Mexico and Brazil. Big global corporations used to say "China plus one", meaning they kept part of their production outside of China, just in case. Now companies are finding suppliers elsewhere. It won't happen overnight but the trend is clear.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

The PLA also are applying pressure on Xi. This says to me that the Generals lack the attitude for a invasion. Biden pressure on Xi alone could not change Xi attitude. To me to get Xi to turn over so quick it must be the PLA lack of backing Xi invading Taiwan plan.

In late summer or early autumn 2017 a faction of the PLA tried to depose Xi. Three of the PLAs top generals went to prison for life. A fourth "committed suicide" while in home detention prior to his trial. It was very soon after this that Xi leaned on the Central Committee to end term limits for the General Secretary of the CCP and President of the PRC, along with eliminating the maximum age for members of the Central Committee so Xi could keep his aging courtier of political supporters in power. The PLA is riven by factions and there is a great resentment that officers in the logistics and support functions advance faster than those in the combat arms, leading to situations where Generals that have served less time but on the support side often outrank longer serving officers in the combat arms.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The US does not care about Taiwan, Uyghurs, "democracy"..

They do, don’t know where you get that myth from, this is why so many Taiwanese have relocated to the US as well as trying to send aid and arms as well as trade with the island nation

That is not going to happen, to no one and much less to China and the US a war would be convenient, China would stop its advance and the US would go bankrupt,

As well as China, both economies are intertwined, the bigger difference is, the US holds more patents and is more innovative, whereas the Chinese are in constant violation of intellectual property theft worldwide.

China is not desperate, he has until 2049 for reunification to celebrate the centennial of the revolution..

And the US and international community will be right there waiting and watching.

By the way, never, ever trust US..

The US is not perfect, but when it comes to freedom and democracy, China is the absolute last country on planet Earth that people would ever trust.

That's right, the whole truth, although I think it will be in a peaceful way and in more years, the unification is unstoppable ..

I seriously doubt it, unless China really wants to go to war with the international community and I doubt it wants that.

It is the chaos and fear that the US wants to make the world believe for its benefit.

Not the US, it’s China that thinks it can bully and annex anyone and any country it wants.

That's right, US exceptionalism no longer exists, the world is not theirs.

Oh, it exists, if it didn’t, millions would be moving to China to seek a better life.

>

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

I have to say that one of the mistakes of the Obama administration (in my opinion) was to allow the PRC to build up sand banks on rocks in the S. China Sea and establish facts of the ground international law be damned.

Short of starting a war, what do you think the US should have done? It's all well and good to say "stop them" but how does a nation do that short of using military force and risking a war with China? A lot of the weapons coming on line now started development ten or twelve years ago if that tells you anything. I can also tell you there was a lot of fear that referring to China as an enemy back then would have been shouted down by corporate, cough cough gag "leaders", who's firms were heavily invested in China. It was just something you could not say in public fearing exposing your leadership to vocal criticism..

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

1) Given the weak and ineffectual Trump admin response to the Hong Kong takeover,

And Biden is doing what? crickets.....

Thanks for agreeing with me - Trump did nothing when the CCP took-over HK - except give them more money to keep getting his clothing line made there...

Xi and CCP may be over-confident, and think they can get away with an invasion of Taiwan with minimum consequences....

If they decide to invade Taiwan it will be with the next 3 years without a doubt.

""Without a doubt"? Sure, just like "Trump will win in a landslide"....and "Georgia won't turn Blue"...

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I hate violence but I hate bullies even more.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Xi was force to come out and change his aggressive talk in his last speech on Taiwan, Changing his talk from "any means" to "peaceful means". This was a couple of day after a phone call with Biden. This alone was not what has change police so quickly. The PLA also are applying pressure on Xi. This says to me that the Generals lack the attitude for a invasion. Biden pressure on Xi alone could not change Xi attitude. To me to get Xi to turn over so quick it must be the PLA lack of backing Xi invading Taiwan plan.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

I know an old guy who used to say that the world needs a good war every 20 years to thin out the population.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

a small skirmish would do the world of good and push China back. Words aren't working

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Just because China says they have something it doesn't mean it works. If you see that I have what appears to be a gun and it could very well be one but the question remains is it real and does it work. Recently China displayed all the new aircraft they have etc... Everything they had was based on a design that was made in the US. Copy copy copy!! I know what it takes to design test and manufactured advanced weapon need I not say more. The question is when you get into a dog fight and pulling g-loads will the aircraft withstand those. A scared person display what they appear to have, a confident man does not show his cards he only puts them down when he needs to!!! China is a pitbull with no teeth. The CCP in china will take out Xi before any bombs are dropped.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Western private equity firms who bought out corporations threw their countrymen out of work and wantonly disregarded the security of their countries to move manufacturing to China to make more money that went to shareholders.

Today, the US needs China more than China needs the US. Don't believe me? Look at the impact of supply chain problems now and imagine what it would/will be like when China intentionally reduces exports.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Zichi,you would be the first one hit in Japan, China do.not have the capacity to invade the US,unless with cheap Chinese goods

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

@P.Smith

Cite?

https://www.businessinsider.com/not-clear-us-others-would-help-taiwan-if-china-attacked-2021-5

Fears of a Chinese attack on Taiwan are growing, and Taiwan isn't sure who would help if it happened

Japan has recently been more vocal about Taiwan, but Tokyo has made no official statements about how it would respond to an invasion. Japan has a pacifist constitution, and Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga has said that his recent expression of support in a joint statement with President Joe Biden "does not presuppose military involvement at all."

A major factor is whether the PLA attacks bases in Japan. "I think in that case you'd see very close cooperation between the US and Japan to respond militarily and perhaps even to try and support Taiwan," Cooper said.

But it's not clear that Japan and the US have a plan for such a scenario or have even discussed one.

"That, I think, is in fact why the alliance has to talk about this now," Cooper said. "We can't just assume that we know what either Washington or Tokyo would do in a crisis."

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

In the modern world, the only way a small democracy can resist the attentions of a fascist dictatorship is by having a nuclear armed response. If Israel was provided with nuclear capability so should Taiwan.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

The island bases China has made mean nothing. Too far away and sitting ducks to cruise missile attack. Any Chinese attack will happen from the mainland.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

1) Given the weak and ineffectual Trump admin response to the Hong Kong takeover,

And Biden is doing what? crickets.....

Xi and CCP may be over-confident, and think they can get away with an invasion of Taiwan with minimum consequences....

If they decide to invade Taiwan it will be with the next 3 years without a doubt.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

America will not be able to have a major war against China.

Who knows. nothing should be ruled out, but if China wants to strike at Taiwan, now would be the time or at least within this admin timeframe.

The blow to the American economy would be enormous and the loss of vital imports.

As bad as it is already in American, I doubt a loss of a few trillion here or there will make a significant difference.

China is not in a strong enough position to invade Taiwan. Maybe by 2025

Many thought the same about Russia going into Crimea and how did that work out?

When China does invade America won't able to do anything about it.

Well, that probably will not happen unless we get another term of this admin. which I doubt.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

My wife had a quick and clever idea, moving the Okinawa stationed forces to Taiwan. Okinawans happy, Taiwan happy, China a bit more tamed and Japan still has support from the other U.S. bases and an enforced JSDF. Immediately applauded her for that theoretical strategy…

0 ( +3 / -3 )

I'd like to see Xi's face if the US and a few other countries officially recognized Taiwan as an independent country. He'd freak out. And that's what I think a majority of us would love to see. And arming Taiwan with nukes would be a good step, too. Another 'Cuban Missile Crisis' would be good for the world right now. Escalate. Stick it down his throat.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Taiwan is the world biggest supplier of important chips. Once it goes down, the whole world economy goes down with it. Whether the world like it or not, they can't distance themselves from this conflict thinking it's just a US-China problem.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

WWIII coming soon.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

The US agreement to treat Taiwan as part of One China, regardless of what they actually think, was contingent on a peaceful settlement of the “Taiwan Question.” If the settlement becomes non-peaceful, then the US will feel obligated to recognize Taiwan as a separate country again, and then we will have a mess that won’t be beneficial to anybody. Things are currently unbalanced due to Chinese aggression and US inattention to it. The agreement needs constant attention, with give and take, for it to work beneficially. It will be difficult to put things back into balance, but all this acting out is in aid of that. Nobody can predict what will happen at this point.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

and the cost of enslaving Taiwan 

Don’t be silly. No one is going to enslave the Taiwanese. They’re the same Han people with the same language plus dialects. It’s like saying the Japanese are going to enslave Osakans or the Americans are going to enslave Oklahomans.

-3 ( +3 / -6 )

The CCP in China would definitely invade Taiwan, in two likely situations;

1) Given the weak and ineffectual Trump admin response to the Hong Kong takeover, Xi and CCP may be over-confident, and think they can get away with an invasion of Taiwan with minimum consequences....

2) Nationalism is always the "get out of jail card" the CCP uses whenever there is a major problem the government can't solve - economic instability caused by bad loans, an energy crisis, or similar failure...

Dangerous times...

3 ( +6 / -3 )

China is not going to invade Taiwan, a ludicrous scenario.

China is banking that the rest of the world believes that as well.

The Pacific Ocean is no longer an American Lake. Patrolling the Asian coast with USA carrier groups is arrogant and dangerous.

I disagree,

Yanqui Go Home!

That is exactly what China and North Korea want.

1 ( +5 / -4 )

China is not going to invade Taiwan, a ludicrous scenario.

The Pacific Ocean is no longer an American Lake. Patrolling the Asian coast with USA carrier groups is arrogant and dangerous. The British, how possibly is is their presence in the Pacific justified - that's rhetorical - to answer, it is not.

Yanqui Go Home!

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

I have to say that one of the mistakes of the Obama administration (in my opinion) was to allow the PRC to build up sand banks on rocks in the S. China Sea and establish facts of the ground international law be damned. 

I think it is critical to ramp up the ability to support and reinforce Taiwan's ability to remain self-governing and democratic in the face of Fascism with Chinese Characteristics.

For once I do agree with you.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Japan is helping to preserve peace in Asia by refusing the US the right to launch military interventions out of Okinawa, ensuring that US cannot intervene effectively and let PLA take Taiwan in about a week.

Had Japan granted the US the permission to operate out of Okinawa, then Taiwan has a slim chance of repelling PLA invasion, but then Tokyo faces the threat of Chinese ballistic missile strikes if Japan agreed.

-7 ( +2 / -9 )

In light of Biden and Co. wrapping things up in the sandbox, they need a new 'enemy' to justify defense spending.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

Countries can be as inextricably and economically linked as you like but that has never prevented a power hungry autocratic from launching a war of conquest. Precisely the same arguments were put forward regarding Europe before the First World War, that didn't stop the Kaiser from sacrificing the lives of millions and destroying his country and economy.

Autocrats living in their own little bubble, out of contact with their own people and lacking empathy like Pooh Bear and the Kaiser can become a very real threat that economics have no real leverage on. Add in paranoia at being toppled and a nice military victory to distract the masses and whip up nationalist fervour which they can ride becomes overwhelmingly attractive.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

No need to tag team it, cobber.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

No country should send any athlete to China.

100% agree.

Any nation that sends athletes; any athlete who attends, tacitly supports mass genocide.

2 ( +8 / -6 )

A war between China and the US would be the worst scenario.

And especially because North Korea will jump in, and what that means everyone knows.

The world has to stand together against the aggressor China.

A peaceful sign, that the world don't ignore China's behaviour would be, that each country boycott the Olympic winter games.

No country should send any athlete to China.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

Never, ever trust China. They desperately want Taiwan - FACT. And have shown through their extreme warlike behaviour theyll do anything to take it.

The West, AUKUS and QUAD will be there and ready if the Communists start anything. Ready for peace - Prepared for war.

3 ( +9 / -6 )

Right now the best strategy is to bolster Taiwan’s defenses with modern and effective weapons. While maintaining with absolute certainty that Xi's militaristic expansionist ambitions to annex the island - much like Mao did to Tibet - are totally unacceptable to the global community. The cost for eating a porcupine Taiwan must be too high militarily, and the cost of enslaving Taiwan must be nothing short of total rejection by the international community, regardless of economic cost.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

There will be no war. Raising fears to sell more arms is what it is.

A senior cybersecurity official at the Pentagon has quit saying because he thought it was impossible for the US to compete with China on AI. "We have no competing fighting chance against China in fifteen to twenty years. Right now, it's already a done deal; it is already over in my opinion," he said.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/10/12/pentagon-official-says-he-resigned-because-us-cybersecurity-no-match-china.html

China is going to keep pushing AI putting the pedal to the metal. The US will keep wasting money on it military budget while China invests in 6G. There's lot of fear-mongering and other forms of propaganda to try and convince countries to militarize and purchase more arms

-2 ( +8 / -10 )

I agree with all the very intelligent comments so far, and I’d just add that another potential danger is Xi deciding to invade Taiwan as a distraction from internal domestic problems, should his current self-destructive economic course lead to widespread dissatisfaction with the CCP within China.

3 ( +10 / -7 )

Experts agree a direct conflict is unlikely at the moment

A conflict is not going to happen until after the Winter Olympics if at all. China hosting the Olympics and fighting a war at the same time is not reality.

9 ( +12 / -3 )

It's not going to be up to the military," he said. “It's going to be up to the politicians.

It is the politicians that start wars for their own ego's. People die by the thousands because a few people want to exert their will over a people not currently under their control.

This will not be a religious war, thank goodness. But it will be a war that was not necessary. It can only be started by China invading a land not its own, to rule people not under it's influence. Jinping Xi has delusions of grandeur and that is generally the reason one nation invades a peaceful neighbor.

If China is unable to reach its goal's without violently taking freedom away from others, it has no business at the top and will spend little time there if it reaches it.

China may not like other nations, their democracy and personal freedoms, but it has no right to make or force others to bend to it's will. It will only make more enemies for itself as it does internally when it represses an new section of its own citizens.

Time for China to back off and concentrate on internal matters rather than conquest of territory and other people.

4 ( +10 / -6 )

I have to say that one of the mistakes of the Obama administration (in my opinion) was to allow the PRC to build up sand banks on rocks in the S. China Sea and establish facts of the ground international law be damned.

I think it is critical to ramp up the ability to support and reinforce Taiwan's ability to remain self-governing and democratic in the face of Fascism with Chinese Characteristics.

13 ( +18 / -5 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites