world

U.S. Supreme Court says it is adopting code of ethics, but it has no means of enforcement

13 Comments
By MARK SHERMAN

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


13 Comments
Login to comment

STUPIDITY AND AMATEURISM

°

If this is not law bidding, this is not ethic by deontology. Deonthology is a work guideline that can suffer to be forgotten depending on the case. Ethic at Supreme Court level are part of the constitution and are law biding up to constitution level. Ethic is part of the science law of making laws. This is as flexible as math.

Under Biden, this court became a joke. With Trump sewing, we knew the justice was democrat and political. But now, they are no even professional of justice and laws universal systems & tools. Pitiful.

°

M

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

The policy, agreed to by all nine justices, does not appear to impose any significant new requirements and leaves compliance entirely to each justice.

So, a distinction without a difference.

Clarence and Samuel can continue to be wined and dined and financially advantaged by a group of showdown right wing billionaires with no oversight or enforcement.

Calling this a fig leaf is an insult to fig leafs.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

This Supreme band-aid needs to be ripped off and invasive surgery performed. Too bad America's political establishment hasn't the nerve to cut out the tumor of corruption and cauterize.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

The SCOTUS and ethics.............LOL!!!.....This is a joke, yes?

5 ( +5 / -0 )

well at least Sotomayor can keep annoying people to buy her books.

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-sotomayor-book-sales-ethics-colleges-b2cb93493f927f995829762cb8338c02

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Yeah because a book tour is totally the same thing as an unrepaid loan of 267k or literally millions in free travel.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

For her book tour to Mississippi for example, Sotomayor requested no upgrades to her commercial flight or hotel (the local Marriot) and turned down the WHOPPING $250 stipend.

She was not provided with lunch or dinner.

Her cut of the sales of the 1,500!books purchased? $2,250 over 2 days of talking to kids in summer in Mississippi.

So yeah, that’s TOTALLY the same thing as loans not repaid, houses purchased and private air travel around the world.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/07/sotomayor-book-festival-mississippi-ethics/

2 ( +2 / -0 )

In total She made over 3 million dollars on book sales.

can you name a book she wrote without searching?

nope.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Millions in travel?

where did they go that cost MillionS?

sorry I don’t have more on the leftists but you only have 3 left on the court to look into while we have 6. lol

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

In total She made over 3 million dollars on book sales.

And declared it. Unlike your bois who did not and traveled on billionaire money without letting anyone know.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Millions in travel? 

*where did they go that cost Million*S? 

sorry I don’t have more on the leftists but you only have 3 left on the court to look into while we have 6. lol

Over 30 years undeclared private planes to all parts of the globe. Where didn’t they go? Asia, their private retreats, private yachts, Propublica which will undoubtedly win one of this Pulitzers that your kind so desperately crave has conservatively estimated the cost of one trip at 500k.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

sorry I don’t have more on the leftists but you only have 3 left on the court to look into while we have 6. lol

This is the ultimate @Im getting my ass handed to me with facts!” White flag.

Try knowing the details next time.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

MNov. 14  07:35 am JST

STUPIDITY AND AMATEURISM

°

If this is not law bidding, this is not ethic by deontology. Deonthology is a work guideline that can suffer to be forgotten depending on the case. Ethic at Supreme Court level are part of the constitution and are law biding up to constitution level. Ethic is part of the science law of making laws. This is as flexible as math.

Lesse, the woman-harassing Clarence Thomas who has treasonous links, the blubbering Kavanaugh, the stooge for TreasonTrashtrump. Ethics but they're not binding.

Yeah yeah yeah. With chumps like these what good is a code of ethics, esp. since they ain't gonna enforce them or are bound by it in the first place?

Damn, what an insult this is. An utter joke.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites