Trump abandons effort to put citizenship question on census


U.S. President Donald Trump abandoned his controversial bid to inject a citizenship question into next year's census Thursday, instead directing federal agencies to try to compile the information using existing databases.

He insisted he was "not backing down," declaring in a Rose Garden announcement that the goal was simple and reasonable: "a clear breakdown of the number of citizens and non-citizens that make up the United States population."

But the decision was clearly a reversal, after the Supreme Court blocked his effort by disputing his administration's rationale for demanding that census respondents declare whether or not they were citizens. Trump had said last week that he was "very seriously" considering an executive order to try to force the question. But the government has already begun the lengthy and expensive process of printing the census questionnaire without it, and such a move would surely have drawn an immediate legal challenge.

Instead, Trump said Thursday that he would be signing an executive order directing every federal department and agency to provide the Commerce Department with all records pertaining to the number of citizens and noncitizens in the country.

Trump's efforts to add the question on the decennial census had drawn fury and backlash from critics who complained that it was political, meant to discourage participation, not only by people living in the country illegally but also by citizens who fear that participating would expose noncitizen family members to repercussions.

Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project, and the lawyer who argued the Supreme Court case, celebrated Thursday's announcement by the president, saying: "Trump's attempt to weaponize the census ends not with a bang but a whimper."

Trump said his order would apply to every agency, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. The Census Bureau already has access to Social Security, food stamp and federal prison records, all of which contain citizenship information.

Trump, citing Census Bureau projections, predicted that using previously available records, the administration could determine the citizenship of 90 percent of the population "or more."

"Ultimately this will allow us to have a more complete count of citizens than through asking the single question alone," he contended.

But it is still unclear what Trump intends to do with the citizenship information. Federal law prohibits the use of census information to identify individuals, though that restriction has been breached in the past.

At one point, Trump suggested it could help states that "may want to draw state and local legislative districts based upon the voter-eligible population." That would mark a change from how districts are drawn currently, based on the entire population, and could increase Republican political power.

Civil rights groups said the president's efforts had already sown fear and discord in vulnerable communities, making the task of an accurate count even harder.

"The damage has already been done," said Lizette Escobedo of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund.

The Census Bureau had stressed repeatedly that it could produce better citizenship data without adding the question.

In fact, the bureau had recommended combining information from the annual American Community Survey with records held by other federal agencies that already include citizenship records.

"This would result in higher quality data produced at lower cost," deputy Census Bureau Director Ron Jarmin had written in a December 2017 email to a Justice Department official.

But Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees the Census Bureau, ultimately rejected that approach and ordered the citizenship question be added to the census.

The American Community Survey, which polls 3.5 million U.S. households every year, already includes questions about respondents' citizenship.

"It's a retreat back to what he should have done from the beginning," said Kenneth Prewitt, a former Census Bureau director.

Trump's administration had faced numerous roadblocks to adding the question, beginning with the ruling by the Supreme Court temporarily barring its inclusionon the grounds that the government's justification was insufficient. Two federal judges also rejected the Justice Department's plan to replace the legal team fighting for inclusion.

But Trump insisted his administration was pushing forward anyway, publicly contradicting government lawyers and his commerce secretary, who had previously conceded the case was closed, as well as the Census Bureau, which had started the process of printing the 2020 questionnaire without the controversial query after the Supreme Court decision.

As he has many times before, Trump exploded the situation with a tweet, calling reports that the fight was over "FAKE!"

A week of speculation about the administration's plans and renewed court battles ensued as Trump threw out ideas, including suggesting last week that officials might be able to add an addendum to the questionnaire with the question after it was printed. And he toyed with the idea of halting the constitutionally mandated survey entirely while the court battle played out.

Attorney General William Barr, however, said that the government had no interest in delaying the count and that, while he was confident the census question would have eventually survived legal review, the process would have taken too long to work its way through the courts.

Trump had offered multiple explanations for why he believed the question was necessary to include in the once-a-decade population count that determines the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives for the next 10 years and the distribution of some $675 billion in federal spending.

"You need it for Congress, for districting. You need it for appropriations. Where are the funds going? How many people are there? Are they citizens? Are they not citizens? You need it for many reasons," he told reporters last week, despite the fact that congressional districts are based on total population, regardless of residents' national origin or immigration status.

If immigrants are undercounted, Democrats fear that would pull money and political power away from Democratic-led cities where immigrants tend to cluster, and shift it to whiter, rural areas where Republicans do well.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday accused Trump of pushing the question "to intimidate minorities, particularly Latinos, from answering the census so that it undercounts those communities and Republicans can redraw congressional districts to their advantage."

He later called Trump's move a "retreat" that "was long overdue and is a significant victory for democracy and fair representation."

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

He would have done better if he hadn’t lied to the Supreme Court.

But, whatever. His choice.

10 ( +10 / -0 )

The Constitution is crystal clear that the census's sole and only purpose, is to count the number of people in our borders. Not citizens. People! People should not have to be asked, or answer any citizenship question on the census. 

I can remember when Republicans used to be against answering any Census question other than "how many people live here", b/c it was "none of Da Gubmint's business". My how times change.... yet Right Wing hypocrisy never does.

10 ( +10 / -0 )

He insisted he was "not backing down,

I have accepted defeat, but I have not lost!

Another win for Trump, he must be tired of winning by now.

13 ( +13 / -0 )

the Supreme Court blocked his effort

The separation and balance of powers are critical to preventing the executive from becoming an autocrat. Which Trump and his followers seem to want.

9 ( +9 / -0 )

Welcome back "Caveman!"

Donnie raises the white flag again - so much "winning".....

Caves on the census question...

Loses the appeal on the census question in court...

His Labor Secretary will soon be out for cutting a sweetheart deal for a child molester...

He says the British had airfields in the US in 1776...

It rained on his 4th of July parade...

E Jean Carroll said he raped her....

Poor Donnie - losing is such sweet sorrow....

And with Muller testifying next week, get ready for more tantrums and meltdowns...

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Donny done before did.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

America is being overrun by billionaires. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people...

10 ( +10 / -0 )

"Down, down, deeper and do(w)nald!"

He is making up stuff, he wants to look so great, so "tremendously beautiful" ....

..... and in the end: nothing gained, nothing achieved.

Well, except for his admirers, he is still "DeDon".

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Da comrade.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

the Supreme Court blocked his effort by disputing his administration's rationale for demanding that census respondents declare whether or not they were citizens. 

We need more conservative justices on the Supreme Court. We're going to get them.

The majority of Americans want the question on the census 53% to 32%. The Supreme Court is out of line with the people here.

Any country has the right to know if the people in it are citizens or not.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

@Serrano   I thought that the US Constitution was the very basis of US laws - not what the majority wants at the moment.  Of course they do have the right to propose a constitutional amendment.

And while the US government does indeed have the right to know the basis of why a person is in the US - that is NOT the role of the census.  (But I suspect that you already knew this...)

4 ( +4 / -0 )

I can remember when Republicans used to be against answering any Census question other than "how many people live here", b/c it was "none of Da Gubmint's business".

Real Conservatives still feel this way.

Trump is majoring in the minor things. Wish he'd stop. Some things aren't worth his time or bad publicity.

It would be different if he were actually smart and good at everything, but he isn't. If he were even average intelligence, he'd realize this stuff. Saw that some website guessed his IQ to be 140-ish. Doubtful.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites