Japan Today
world

Trump assails judge who blocked deportations as case heads to appeal

12 Comments
By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
Video promotion

Niseko Green Season 2025


12 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

“And even if reviewable, the President’s action is lawful and based upon a long history of using war authorities against organizations connected to foreign states and national security judgments, which are not subject to judicial second guessing,” they wrote.

One problem. The US isn’t at war with Venezuela.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Whenever Trump starts to "assail" someone, you know that someone is doing something good.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Whenever Trump starts to "assail" someone, you know that someone is doing something good.

You can also make the same argument when he p***** someone off, he’s doing something right.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

"If the President can designate any group as enemy aliens under the Act, and that designation is unreviewable, then there is no limit on who can be sent to a Salvadoran prison, or any limit on how long they will remain there,”

Exactly.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

"If the President can designate any group as enemy aliens under the Act, and that designation is unreviewable, then there is no limit on who can be sent to a Salvadoran prison, or any limit on how long they will remain there,” they wrote.

Exactly what the voters voted for. Send those there who attack honest vehicles dealerships, the products and their owners. Send gang members. This will teach them all a decent lesson.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

JJE

"If the President can designate any group as enemy aliens under the Act, and that designation is unreviewable, then there is no limit on who can be sent to a Salvadoran prison, or any limit on how long they will remain there,” they wrote.

Exactly what the voters voted for.

Nope. Nobody voted for fascism. But some of us warned against it.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

This is what happens when a convicted felon thinks he has more power than a federally appointed judge.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Nothing but a clear assault on our democratic foundations and the Constitution.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Exactly what the voters voted for.

Even if some voters “wanted” this, it’s still illegal. The Executive has no special rights to suspend due process.

America is not Putin’s Russia, however much you may wish it were.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

and the judges cannot override the executive,

Yes they can. You must not have paid attention in civics class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution

they won using mail-in voting, and last year, Republicans did the same and won

... Why are you talking like mail-in voting is some sort of dark and obscure political tactic?

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Yes they can. You must not have paid attention in civics class.

They can't.

https://youtu.be/rszjBMuyuR0?si=mbvnxIQdsZNDUtGn

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

They can't.

But they can though. Whatever your fox news boyfriends' opinions on the subject. People who say they can't don't really know the Constitution or understand how government works.

Let me repost the explanation for you in case you missed it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites