Trump rules out debate with Sanders

I say Trump is afraid of Bernie and is a chicken!

Good. Trump has nothing to gain from this debate, and everything to lose. If he shuts down Bernie, Hillary wins. If Bernie shuts down Trump, Hillary wins.

Such debate, if a network operate, debaters get paid millions of fee. Trump was a TV 'personality. So he knows debating Sanders is just waste of his barking tome. Hillary has been declining Sanders offer to debate Sanders. This is just because she does not want voters fond out old man do not know economic and diplomacy.

But today, Sanders said Clinton is arrogance so people are guessing he really needs money.

It gives Trump a chance to once again portray Bernie as a "loser" that the system is rigged against, which is also a bit confusing because he has called on Sanders to run as an independent, but if there was a debate for charity they would definitely have to agree to focus on Hillary instead of rabidly criticizing each other.

A day after saying he would welcome a debate with Sanders, Trump called the idea “inappropriate” because as the Republican presumptive nominee he should only face the Democrats’ final choice.

Only another example that Trump doesn't really mean what he says. If he was truly confident of his presidential skills, he wouldn't coward away from his original statement.

He's waiting to debate someone whose hands are not larger than his. Who expected Trump to actually have any backbone? He knows Bernie would mop the floor with him.

Donald Ducks!

With all the anti-corruption Bernie supporters jumping on the Trump steam-roller maybe it made no sense. Hillary is unpopular and an easy target and Bernie will not stand-up to the corrupt Democrat system. = A lost chance for Bernie to change the corrupt Democrat super-delegate party for the better. Democrat party is losing support and the corruption is turning many young voters away.

Well he backed out in a hurry. Maybe he just wanted more media attention and was never really planning to debate. Looks like he's just waiting our time.

Trump has nothing to gain from this debate, and everything to lose.

@comanteer

I completely agree. And lose he would. I'm sure behind the scenes Trumps handlers talked some sense into him.

If I were Trump I also would have backpedaled. If a debate were to take place, Trump would come out looking like an amateur — pants down and exposed.

Trump's ammunition would be little more than his signature playground insults, against Bernie's well-reasoned issue-by-issue focus. The debate would have been a comedy hour circus act, but I would have tuned in.

I say Trump is afraid of Bernie and is a chicken!

Afraid? He completely demolished 17 of the strongest GOP politicians with the deepest of pockets that threw EVERYTHING at him. Fear of Bernie like saying an Elephant is afraid of an ant. Seriously, what can Trump gain debating a 74 year old socialist? The only thing Bernie would talk about is: Socialism, that's the ONLY topic Bernie knows, Sanders is pathetic.

I can't believe anyone expected a different outcome. A non-starter from the beginning.

Like I said yesterday, you people living in Japan missed it. This debate happened ALREADY.

Here you are; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Poi5x0E2CM

Its worth every minute of your time.

Trump wants to have shouting debates with Clinton. If 10 channels give $ 10 million each to both of them,, profitable. Those two are front runners. And each station earns with commercial incomes. Not with Sanders. Just show business.

Almost, Trevor - Trump is a walking example of Schrödinger's cat - in Wonderland. He may turn out to mean his utterances, or he may dismiss them as never having happened; nevertheless (and this is the Wonderland point), you still won't know even when you open the box because there exists neither time nor consistency in his world, and once you think you know, you don't.

In the end, there would not have been much to sustain a debate. These two candidates are pro taxing the ultra wealthy (those a few pay grades above Trump). They would end up hugging it out as they craft a joint tax increase. Socialism shmoesalism.

Trump is a walking example of Schrödinger's cat - in Wonderland. He may turn out to mean his utterances, or he may dismiss them as never having happened

Good example.

None of us know what Trump actually thinks. All we know is all his flip-flops on pretty much everything.

Bernie's platform is all about income redistribution, not creating, not instilling self-reliance, but more government and $$ exhausting draining entitlements. We don't need another socialist to ruin the country.

Trump has nothing to gain from this debate, and everything to lose.

And he agreed to it on the spot with a high level of confidence. Then, I guess, the thinking part came a while after....

when there were more candidates,, first Rubio created lies. Then Cruz expanded Rubio's lies. Then Trump has differentlies on others. They gradually disappeared.

But media loved Trump talks. I don't think he was lieing. He tells whatever he want to tell and he amend his erred story when he got caught. His tLks about Japan and Asa are from his ignorance.

But media pay.

And he agreed to it on the spot with a high level of confidence. Then, I guess, the thinking part came a while after....

Maybe he didn't want to seem like he's beating up on the old guy. Let's remember, liberals will call you racist, sexist, gender phobia, ageism etc. anything to label you under the sun if you are shown to be mean or vindictive.

Bernie's platform is all about income redistribution,

@bass

Bernie's platform is about undoing income redistribution of wealth flowing from the middle class to the 1%, as a result of the Reaganomics/Bush trickle down schemes of corporate welfare, Wall Street bailouts, and low wages for hard working citizens. And guess what, the money doesn't trickle down.

The U.S. has seen its greatest redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the rich since the era of the Robber Barons. That didn't come to an end until trust-busting Teddy Roosevelt (who was a Republican back when they were the good guys) came along with his Square Deal campaign to fix the rigged economy. Teddy Roosevelt and FDR who authored the New Deal would be seen as left of Sanders in today's world.

Maybe he didn't want to seem like he's beating up on the old guy.

Ah, probably another thing he didn't realize at the time the question was asked.

Bernie's platform is about undoing income redistribution of wealth flowing from the middle class to the 1%, as a result of the Reaganomics/Bush trickle down schemes of corporate welfare, Wall Street bailouts, and low wages for hard working citizens. And guess what, the money doesn't trickle down.

Sanders model of income redistribution would never work, in fact, it would add to the already astronomical debt we have under Obama. Second, that kind of massive entitlement apparatus would never be approved by congress. You lower taxes, encourage growth in the private sector, people spend more money, pay more taxes and that flows back into the economy, but the way things are, people are unwilling to put ANY money into the market.

The U.S. has seen its greatest redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the rich since the era of the Robber Barons.

And Obama has completely pretty much killed off the middle class with his war on coal, gas and oil, he's pissed off a lot of people and pushed the vast majority of them into Trumps's arms.

That didn't come to an end until trust-busting Teddy Roosevelt (who was a Republican back when they were the good guys) came along with his Square Deal campaign to fix the rigged economy. Teddy Roosevelt and FDR who authored the New Deal would be seen as left of Sanders in today's world.

What? When were the Dems good guys before Johnson or before Wilson? Come on now....

Maybe the label "Scaredy Trump" will stick now.

Sanders model of income redistribution would never work, in fact, it would add to the already astronomical debt we have under Obama.

The difference is that Obama inherited the credit card bills for two wars that the previous president didn't pay for, and he also inherited a deficit that was significantly higher than the one he'll be leaving for his successor. That puts Bernie in a much better position.

"Afraid? He completely demolished 17 of the strongest GOP politicians"

Not a difficult job. Many of these people either belong in zoos or shrieking and shouting nutcase churches. These 'debates' included knob gags, puerile nicknames and jibes about hand size and sweating. They were a disgrace.

Sanders doesn't do this. He actually debates. I know you prefer Trump's raucous idiocy but it isn't what adults call a debate.,

Trump just got BERNED! Fried CHICKEN anyone?

I would too, be afraid to expose my political ignorance at a debate.

Trump appears to have only 5 buttons in the back, press one and enjoy either an "America great again", "build da wall", "Mexican...rapist","Let's Japan have nuclear bomb" or "Get Him The Hell Out Of Here".

"Everyone's after income redistribution."

Including Trump. He's talking about hitting the high earners harder for tax. When a Democrat says this the rightists start reaching for the shotgun above the fireplace and yelling about Bolsheviks and Peter and Paul.

wipeout: Or excessively high executive pay rises?

Or running companies into the ground and pocketing tens of millions of dollars as they're being shown the door. Bernie is the only candidate questioning that.

The Republican nominee should only debate the democratic front runner. That is the smart thing to do. It has nothing to do which one is best at debating.Trump will most definitely debate "crooked Hillary" and hands down will expose her for what she really is.

Don the Con, yellow as his hair.

Afraid? He completely demolished 17 of the strongest GOP politicians He will have to take on Hillary. It was just a yelling contest with the other GOP candidates.

and hands down will expose her for what she really is. There is nothing to the email story. The last several Secretaries did the same acts. This was just politicized now. This has been a problem with the system and not the Secretaries (the last five). She is as clean as a whistle. No legal problem. Now on the other hand Trump is being sued for his scam University.

Not a difficult job.

Then he should do fine, demolishing Hillary, that's news that inspires confidence!

Many of these people either belong in zoos or shrieking and shouting nutcase churches. These 'debates' included knob gags, puerile nicknames and jibes about hand size and sweating. They were a disgrace.

It was a spectacle for sure. By the way, ever see the videos from Hillary rallies on TV where people are falling asleep? Maybe a debate with Trump will help keep her fan base awake.

Sanders doesn't do this. He actually debates.

Rattling on about income redistribution is NOT a debate, it's a mild, but earnest threat.

I know you prefer Trump's raucous idiocy but it isn't what adults call a debate.,

Naw, I prefer a person that's unapologetic and believes in working or creating jobs, not trying to punish success. Our Sainted anointed one has already done that.

She is as clean as a whistle.

Because you say so?

No legal problem. Now on the other hand Trump is being sued for his scam University

Sorry, but I'll follow and listen to the FBI and wait for their results. I would never listen to anyone especially about this case JT members included.

Because you say so? No, because she has no legal problems. The FBI looked into it? So? Any indictments? On the other hand Trump is being sued for his phony fraudulent university. It's in the court books.....scheduled to begin on November 28, 2016... I think I will listen to that. That's a fact.

listen to the FBI and wait for their results You will be doing this until you die.

prefer a person that's unapologetic Yes, unapologetic about displacing American Indians again cruelly from the wall (take your pick a shovel or ladder).

earnest threat Not compared to the threat the Conservatives by targeting government officials and PP clinics with guns.

Smart move on Trump's part. Everything to lose and nothing to gain by participating in such a debate.

There is nothing to the email story.

Tell that to the Office of Inspector General, US Department of State, Office of Evaluations and Special Projects. I'm sure that they would be glad to hear that their findings amount to nothing.

 This was just politicized now.

By whom? The head of the State Department is the Secretary of State who is appointed by the President. This is Obama's State Department. Are you saying that Obama is trying to get Hillary?

The last several Secretaries did the same acts. 

No that's not true. Only two of the former Secretaries of State used private email for official business, Colin Powell and Hillary Clinton. Albright and Rice did not use personal email accounts for State Department business and the current Secretary, Kerry, only uses a State Department account for State Business. Hillary was the only one among the group that set up her own private server. When Hillary's own deputy chief of operations informed her that her emails to State Department workers were not getting through because they were not getting pass the spam filters; and suggested she get a Department account or release her email address so it could be recognized, she responded with:  “Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.” Really doesn't sound like clean as a whistle, sounds more like something to hide.

By whom? People like you and the Republicans. Of course Republicans say Clinton should do hard time in solitary confinement in a Supermax prison- and you agree that Clinton should be charged with a major felony, right?

No that's not true. Yes, true and it shows this was a systemic problem. It's like blaming 9/11 all on GWB. Worst case it just shows that IT policy needs changing. What you say just points out subtle differences of the same bad policy shared among these several Secretaries.

Clinton does not have any legal problems, but it looks like Trump does with his fraudulent university and that trial is on the books.

Because you say so? No, because she has no legal problems. The FBI looked into it? So? Any indictments?

Not yet, either way, we don't know, neither you or I.

On the other hand Trump is being sued for his phony fraudulent university. It's in the court books.....scheduled to begin on November 28, 2016... I think I will listen to that. That's a fact.

And it's also a fact we don't know the outcome of that, but it's safe to say, if Hillary won't be indicted for far worse crimes, then probably Trump won't either.

listen to the FBI and wait for their results You will be doing this until you die.

Coumey said, he's in NO rush, he's going to take his time and scrutinize every detail in order to find the truth.

earnest threat Not compared to the threat the Conservatives by targeting government officials and PP clinics with guns.

Or Democrats using the IRS to target conservatives.

And it's also a fact we don't know the outcome of It sounds like you are more on Clinton's side then. OK. Glad to see you are supporting her.

Or Democrats using the IRS to target conservatives. Who went to prison for that? The Bundies targeted government officials with guns and they all are under indictment. These are some really bad conservatives.

if Hillary won't be indicted for far worse crimes, then probably Trump won't either. Neither committed a crime. Trump is being sued. But it's a crime the way Trump wants to displace all those American Indians with his wall.

"Many of these people either belong in zoos or shrieking and shouting nutcase churches. These 'debates' included knob gags, puerile nicknames and jibes about hand size and sweating. They were a disgrace."

"It was a spectacle for sure. By the way, ever see the videos from Hillary rallies on TV where people are falling asleep? Maybe a debate with Trump will help keep her fan base awake."

It was a spectacle. It showed the world just how childish and idiotic the GOP is. It used to be cross-eyed lunatics denying evolution but then it sunk to the level of talking about Trump's knob. I've seen more maturity and intelligence at a fart-lighting competition.

I haven't seen the footage of people falling asleep at a Hillary rally. Could you post a link? While you are at it, could you finally post a link to the non-partisan historians who view the last president as a roaring success? I honestly can't find them.

Clinton does not have any legal problems, but it looks like Trump does with his fraudulent university and that trial is on the books.

Clinton is more than willing to cooperate, right ? If only there weren't so many conflicting and confusing ongoing cases the FBI and federal courts could coordinate their timetables to minimize the political fallout of testifying during primary season.

Feds fight to prevent Clinton deposition in email case

The Obama administration is trying to prevent former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from being deposed in an ongoing open records case connected to her use of a private email server.

Late Thursday evening, the Justice Department filed a court motion opposing the Clinton deposition request from conservative legal watchdog Judicial Watch, claiming that the organization was trying to dramatically expand the scope of the lawsuit.

Judicial Watch is “seeking instead to transform these proceedings into a wide-ranging inquiry into matters beyond the scope of the court’s order and unrelated to the FOIA request at issue in this case,” government lawyers wrote in their filing, referring to the Freedom of Information Act. The lawyers wrote that the request to interview Clinton “is wholly inappropriate” before depositions are finished in a separate case also concerning the email server.

http://www.thehill.com/policy/national-security/281565-feds-fight-to-prevent-clinton-deposition-in-email-case

Why waste his time debating an old, broken-down socialist who never held a job until he was 40 AND never had a job where he wasn't paid by the taxpayers! Sanders--whose father, Eliasz Gitman changed his last name to Sanders when he emigrated to the US from Poland--almost blew a gasket when he was interview last night and was asked about how great the socialist economy was going in Venezuela. BTW, assuming she loses the election, FBI Director Comey will not present evidence for an indictment of Hillary until after Jan 20, 2017 to ensure Obama cannot pardon her...

and you agree that Clinton should be charged with a major felony, right?

Not at all. She didn't break any laws, but she did intentionally violate State Department policy. Apparently the State Department takes their policies somewhat seriously and it is Obama's State Department that is criticizing Hillary's actions.

It was during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State that one of her ambassadors in Africa authorized his staff to use private email for official business. The State Department (of which Hillary was the head) immediately notified this diplomat that the use of private email was in violation of Department policy and told him to get in line. He didn't and the State Department initiated disciplinary proceedings. He quit before they could fire him.

Hillary was aware of the department's email policy. She was at the helm when her department took disciplinary action against one of its own diplomats for doing the exact same thing that she did. Well...not exactly the same thing. The diplomat in question didn't set up a private server to intentionally circumvent department policies.

Hillary didn't break any laws, that is true. But for some people her actions give the impression that she considers herself above the law, and that gives pause for consideration.

she considers herself above the law AND Hillary didn't break any laws AND if Hillary won't be indicted for far worse crimes

Come on! Some of you Clinton haters say she should do hard time and some say she should not. At least have some consistency among you guys. I'm not even sure how to respond now. For me it was a system problem and not a Clinton problem. If there was a Republican in the WH their Secretary of State might have been in the same situation like the previous ones before. It's her job to be a political leader and not an IT manager. Did she break the law? Does she deserve the slammer with no parole? Yes? No? Is this still the FBI's business since she didn't break any laws OR Coumey said, he's in NO rush, he's going to take his time and scrutinize every detail in order to find the truth.

She almost certainly did break laws related to mishandling classified information, Freedom of Information Act and Federal Records Act at a minimum. Even the IG report notes specifically that the “policies,” she violated “were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.”

Sanders need money. his campaign fund is down to $5 million now. His target Hillary has been refusing to debate with him. Only he know how to darn is fond debater to earn from media. It is not like when he was young and he had his wife feeding him. He targeted Trump as media has been giving Trump debating fees. Income h be redistributed. He want to debate with Trump. Trump does not want. His next target Hillary politely declined. She should cooperate with his income redistribution. So desperate Sanders calls Clinton Arrogant, He needs to pay his supporter whom rushed Nevada Convention and made death threat against Nevada Democratic Chair lady

She almost certainly did break laws related to mishandling classified information, Freedom of Information Act and Federal Records Act at a minimum. Even the IG report notes specifically that the “policies,” she violated “were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.”

After your last fiasco of quoting comments Obama never said, any quotes you make should be summarily dismissed without supporting evidence. You've shown you are willing to write quotes that don't exist.

The offer stands at $20 Million (minimum) for charity. -that is a legit, bona fide offer. Are Bernie and Trump willing to take that $20M check and donate it to charity. Bernie vs Trump Las Vegas. Could make it a double-header and hit Atlantic City, NJ.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/27/bob-arum-offers-20-million-for-trump-sanders-debat/

Read it yourself. Hillary once asked rhetorically, “What Difference Does it Make?” It makes a world of difference. If you cannot trust Hillary to do the right thing on small matters like personal email, you cannot trust her on the big things.

At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department issues before leaving government service," says an audit by the State Department Inspector General, obtained by NBC News.

"Because she did not do so, she did not comply with the [State] Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/clinton-broke-federal-rules-email-server-audit-finds-n580131

Badsey get real New Jersey City bankrupted Trump's business. Also, casnos, we don't use check. Write something you are familiar such as bank..

Read it yourself.

You need to provide links if you want us to do so.

It seems this time your quote was accurate, unlike last time.

She almost certainly did break laws You break the law or you don't break the law.

And it's also a fact we don't know the outcome of It sounds like you are more on Clinton's side then.

So either way, we don't know the outcome and as long as the FBI takes their time, I'm fine with that.

Or Democrats using the IRS to target conservatives. Who went to prison for that?

When you get rid of the evidence, it's pretty hard to prosecute someone, but since Clinton is a lawyer, well.....

if Hillary won't be indicted for far worse crimes, then probably Trump won't either. Neither committed a crime. Trump is being sued. But it's a crime the way Trump wants to displace all those American Indians with his wall.

If that means, he needs to break a few eggs to make an omelet, do it.

It was a spectacle. It showed the world just how childish and idiotic the GOP is.

One thing about the GOP in all honesty, lies, dishonesty and deception is something they're not good at, not at all compared to the Democrats, there's your reason.

It used to be cross-eyed lunatics denying evolution but then it sunk to the level of talking about Trump's knob. I've seen more maturity and intelligence at a fart-lighting competition.

Only Washington Democrats and progressive liberals would know about those things.

I haven't seen the footage of people falling asleep at a Hillary rally. Could you post a link? While you are at it, could you finally post a link to the non-partisan historians who view the last president as a roaring success? I honestly can't find them.

Gladly, As soon as you post a link of Native Americans in masses on the reservations disapproving of Trump's wall and of them worrying about being displaced.

News Trump campaign stuffs has infighting that Trump has to attend and heas to select his VP candidate sooner. Chris Christie is pushing. He. was NJ giver or. Once upon a time all casinos in Nnew Jersey bankrupted. Trump's Casino, too.

If that means, he needs to break a few eggs to make an omelet, do it. This is agreeing with Trump's cruelty. Andrew Jackson II.

Everyone knows Trump and his fictional wall is bad for the Indians and even if it were built(it won't be) - take a pick, a shovel or a ladder. My Indian friend chief said none of them want Trump since he will be as bad as a president as Andrew Jackson to the American Indians. They think that Americans who believe Trump's wall idea are not so smart. And he said they can simply get a ladder to jump over it or get a shovel to dig). Lots and lots of tunnels and they can be dug way past where the snipers are positioned- as you said there will be snipers there 24/7 picking off illegals.

I have a friend who works for the FBI and this contact said Hillary is in the clear. She did a couple of things that attracted her attention but she is in the clear and no crime. But Trump is being sued for his phony university. My friend said that there was also no evidence tampering with the IRS issue. That was a non-issue. Reported, looked at, nothing.

@nishikat: every newschannelsrates that what she was doing was the same way all other Sec of St had been doing.

Her IT aide who said she was violating was in jail and after he did press interview, he disappeared. Then supposed to be secret written database in this guy's computer disappeared ,,,report said. I think she couldn't be an expert in handling computer or data files. She did not major Computer Science when she was young.

Everyone knows Trump and his fictional wall is bad for the Indians and even if it were built(it won't be) - take a pick, a shovel or a ladder.

You saying the wall won't be built is like saying, without a doubt the next president will be Obama once again.

Lots and lots of tunnels and they can be dug way past where the snipers are positioned- as you said there will be snipers there 24/7 picking off illegals.

So how would they know where the snipers are hidden, wouldn't that defeat the purpose of the sniper since stealth, secrecy and camouflage are vital attributes to being a successful sniper? Since they're trained marksman it's safe to say, they'll have the advantage when their night vision gear to spot any potential illegal border crossers. Some relief at least. The best thing is, once the wall is built and we have an orderly system in place, coming into the US legally, then by all means, we should welcome anyone that abides by our laws and values.

@toshiko

Hillary is in deep hot water, that's for sure, as far as what evidence the FBI has, none of us know, the final stage of their investigation is to interview her and usually they don't do that unless they ave serious evidence against you, but as I said, No one knows in the public Comey is keeping it close to his chest and as to when the interview will take place, No one knows.

One thing there is no debate about?

The San Diego Federal Judge will rule "Trump University's" fraudulent business model, the subject of theft totaling forty million from Americans Citizens, will go forward.

Trump has been deposed and the evidence is overwhelmingly against Trump showing him a liar, fraud and thief.

Bernie would have destroyed Trump in a debate.

The other thing there is no debate about?

Court records in hundreds of cases against Trump show a pathological liar who does not try to shade meanings but simply lies to whatever effect he wishes to create.

No wonder the GOP-tea loves Trump, he represents the pathological liar in every Republican. (See: Forged Iraq Documents Drive Bush Cheney War Profiteers)

So is the worst thing about this report the fact that she broke the law, broke policies in her own agency intended to comply with the law or the fact that virtually everything Clinton has said about her secretive email system has proved to be a lie ? I go with the latter. And most Americans believe it or not are going to be less than shocked. In a Quinnipiac poll last August, the word most mentioned by respondents in association with Hillary Clinton was “liar.” The runners up were “dishonest” and “untrustworthy” — offered by a combined 394 people. The next most common term, “experience,” was offered by 82.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/poll-liar-frequently-word-hillary-clinton/story?id=33361629

Trump refuseddd debate, since Sanders do not get paid well, Trump saved Sanders need to go to borrow money to pay for charity.

Trump has been deposed and the evidence is overwhelmingly against Trump showing him a liar, fraud and thief.

There are a lot of variables in a lawsuit to get a conviction, it's not so cut and dry. If they can prove Trump intentionally and knowingly tried to defraud people of money, then he's in big trouble and that is going to be difficult to prove and because of that, he might walk.

Bernie would have destroyed Trump in a debate.

If the topic is socialism, then without a doubt! For over 40 years, that's Bernie's passion and bread and butter and No one can debate that topic like him.

Court records in hundreds of cases against Trump show a pathological liar who does not try to shade meanings but simply lies to whatever effect he wishes to create.

So now Trump and Hillary have something in common.

No wonder the GOP-tea loves Trump, he represents the pathological liar in every Republican. (See: Forged Iraq Documents Drive Bush Cheney War Profiteers)

If the GOP were good at lying, Romney would have won in 2012 But the Democrats are the absolute masters of lies and deceptions, hands down.

There are a lot of variables in a lawsuit to get a conviction, it's not so cut and dry.

Hehe, after reading you going on about how Hillary is a criminal for years now, the double standard in this comment is rich.

Anyone thinking Hillary is NOT a criminal even at the atom level is like saying Mickey Mouse is really a dog. When you have the DOJ itself under investigation, then you know corruption is alive and ripe. Doesn't get worse than that and makes Trump look better day by day.

Anyone thinking Hillary is NOT a criminal even at the atom level is like saying Mickey Mouse is really a dog.

Anyone thinking Trump is NOT a criminal even at the atomic level is like saying Donald is really a mouse.

It's funny to see you try to wiggle your way out of your hypocrisy.

"Gladly, As soon as you post a link of Native Americans in masses on the reservations disapproving of Trump's wall and of them worrying about being displaced."

What in the name of 'bias' ROFLs are you Benghaziing about now? I never mentioned displacing people once.

I take it these links don't exist. I thought so.

I take it these links don't exist.

They don't. No non-partisan historians view Bush Jr. as a success. We all know Bass was just trying to pretend that someone agreed with him when he made that claim. Reality does not support what he said though.

Hillary is in deep hot water, that's for sure, I just said my friend at the FBI says no charges are coming. In fact the FBI are annoyed at this political witch hunt and it was like Terri Schiavo all over again. No charges. But Trump's lawsuit is in the books.

So how would they know where the snipers are hidden Chapo's people have been digging tunnels for years. They know. It's what Mexico does. (These tunnels will often come up on a friendly's house- it's not just baron land) So as you say Trump will have 6,000 snipers and 6,000 spotters (total about 12,000 in the border sniper team) to pick off any illegal person (including mom's and their kids running away from danger). This according to Trump will save on the US's deficit so they don't freeload on government benefits. This according to Trump will make the US great again. The Indians will be displaced again but this will create a better life for the white people so they can feel exceptional again and bring back white privilege we were all supposed to be born with according to Sarah Palin.

What in the name of 'bias' ROFLs are you Benghaziing about now?

Apparently, you are not willing to deal with the situation that is at hand and that applies to both unpopular candidates.

I never mentioned displacing people once.

I wasn't talking about you. Heads up, dude.

No one is saying Trump is or isn't a criminal, unlike liberals that think they were bestowed mythical magical powers by some miraculous DNA spark, No one can make a judgment whether the man is guilty or not or will serve anytime, that needs to be established, Hillary on the other hand is being investigated by the FBI, pardon me, but usually when the FBI conducts an investigation it means, there are some serious allegations backing the investigation up and I know that's a tough pill for liberals to swallow, after all, Bernie is not going to be the nominee and all their eggs are in one small basket. What the outcome will be of the pending FBI investigation is anyone's guess, but since now we seem to have a corrupt DOJ on top of it, the sky is the limit as they say.

This according to Trump will save on the US's deficit so they don't freeload on government benefits. This according to Trump will make the US great again.

BINGO! You got it right, finally.

"I wasn't talking about you. Heads up, dude."

Your comment came straight after you quoted me asking for the links.

Bass, do us all a favour - be honest. It's wrong to just make stuff up.

BINGO! You got it right, finally. That's right. As you said. Those American snipers killing those illegals. Dealing with a dead body is cheaper than dealing with a freeloading one that will be a parasite on the US medical system for decades to come. But question for you: If Trump is going to put NAVY SEAL snipers on the border why the wall then? With all their equipment it makes the wall obsolete. Just put up signs in Spanish DANGER: SEAL TEAM SIX snipers in position. Mexican trespassers will be shot. Stay out of our country you dirty freeloaders. Is the wall still necessary?

Trump considers the American Indians as subhuman so he has no problem moving them (again) as long as the white man stays privileged.

Also, did you hear that Trump will order his nuclear submarines to patrol the Rio Grande when he becomes president? That's good news, isn't it?

Librttarans have candidates now to replace Clinton or Hillary I prefer Trump and Clinton to Libertarian. Sanders need to explain foreign policies and other IS related issues than firing Dem party. Chairman.

Trump considers the American Indians as subhuman so he has no problem moving them (again) as long as the white man stays privileged.

Only liberals use the constant argument about race, it's the only card they to stay somewhat relevant in the bigger picture of politics. Lol

Only liberals use the constant argument about race Trump says all Mexicans are criminals and rapists. He started it. But, he will increase the spending in public healthcare after he raises taxes since he supports Obamacare's mandate.

"Donald Trump jokes about how difficult he says it is for him to listen to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's voice"

I can't believe he's joking about that, Hillary's shrill voice is indeed difficult to listen to, it's like fingernails on a chalkboard.

@nishikat: Ask your FBI friend if State dept's computer is 1970's old computer like other US Gov't. A few days ago JT article had an article they still using floppy.