world

Trump, Ryan pledge to work together

49 Comments
By ERICA WERNER

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

49 Comments
Login to comment

“We talked about what it takes to unify, where our differences were and how we can bridge these gaps going forward,” Ryan said,

Ahhh, that ain't quite there yet, now is it. It was, in the words of soon to be unemployed Reince Priebus, " It was a very positive step toward party unity."

I give it one more day. If nothing else comes out of this, then my hope has come true, and the Republican party will flop towards November disunited,

2 ( +6 / -4 )

Sound both of them had good meeting. And I am glad there was no Trump bashers are here yet.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

WASHINGTON — Straining to mend their party after months of chaos, Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan declared themselves “totally committed” to working together after a fence-mending personal meeting on Thursday. Ryan praised Trump as “very warm and genuine,”

Totally committed? The following shows what Paul Ryan says he's “totally committed” to.

"Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump's butler has called for President Obama to be killed, according to a post on his Facebook page on Wednesday."

"Anthony Senecal, who worked as Trump's butler for 17 years at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and is currently the in-house historian there, frequently expresses his hatred for Mr. Obama in social media posts."

"To all my friends on FB, just a short note to you on our pus headed 'president' !!!! This character who I refer to as zero (0) should have been taken out by our military and shot as an enemy agent in his first term !!!!" the post, which was first reported by Mother Jones, reads. "...Instead he still remains in office doing every thing he can to get the America we all know and love !!!!! Now comes Donald J Trump to put an end to the corruption in government !!!!""

source: Donald Trump Butler Posts Obama Death Threats On Facebook - May 12, 2016, 5:56 PM

This is a stunning example of who, and what, Donald J. Trump employs

What is Speaker Ryan so sure he wants to work so hard to make Trump's entourage the first family race tinged bigotry. They say an organization follows the lead of the CEO. Trump as CEO USA? Trump's examples of bizarre employees, undisciplined over aggressive, paints another picture of the Real Trump, game show host.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

Trump is on the way to becoming POTUS!

Great!

-7 ( +7 / -14 )

Better kurisupisu, Hillary is not!

-5 ( +5 / -10 )

Trump is on his way to getting bogged down in the Trump University fraud trial. And as kcjapan's example shows, Trump surrounds himself with old school racists (started working at Mar a Lago in 1959). Seriously, how is calling for Obama's execution for treason not beyond the pale in your world? Since you won't call it out, there seems to be tacit agreement on the part of the average rightwing birther.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

"Trump surrounds himself with old school racists . . . there seems to be tacit agreement on the part of the average rightwing birther." - comments

This is the heart of support Trump has scare herded.

The shocking thing is just how willing the RNC, GOP, GOP-Tea are to follow Donald J. Trump.

None, not one, of Trump's lunatic tactics bothers anyone in the Republican Party.

Trump is letting them the opportunity of blatant cover for any activity.

Their shield is Trump's paranoid secrecy.

That's not a qualification for the Oval Office, unless you're the GOP/Tea.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Trump's got that old school bigotry. He's like the uncle at the dinner table who has a few drinks and gets a few laughs via shock value. Fun guy to hang out with, but you certainly don't put him a position with such power and responsibility.

5 ( +8 / -3 )

The speciation is Trump will be GOP and Hillary will be Dem on Nov nat'l election. Not Sanders. I think both of them will reveal their VP candidate next week.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I give it one more day. If nothing else comes out of this, then my hope has come true, and the Republican party will flop towards November disunited,

It's too funny how the left will never accept even in this situation that Trump and Ryan are coming towards the middle, Dems start to get nervous and blow things once again out of context. The NeoDems care only about one thing, divide and civil unrest.

Trump's got that old school bigotry. He's like the uncle at the dinner table who has a few drinks and gets a few laughs via shock value. Fun guy to hang out with, but you certainly don't put him a position with such power and responsibility.

But at the end of the day, he's the family member that proves to have more street knowledge and experience than, the younger know it all vegan family members that manage to botch things up, again and again.

-10 ( +2 / -12 )

That's not a qualification for the Oval Office, unless you're the GOP/Tea.

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States." US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

You can judge Trump unfit to be President for any number of valid reasons but those reasons are merely a matter of opinion. You can find Trump to be just what the country needs and think that he would be just dandy as President, but then again that would just be another opinion.

All kinds of people have all kinds of opinions about Trump, and that is their collective inalienable right. People hate him, people love him but in regards to qualifications for office; Trump is a natural born American citizen, he is 69 years old and he has lived in the United States for at least 14 years.

He's qualified.

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

He's qualified.

Those are not qualifications, they are requirements. He passes the minimum requirements. Whether or not one is qualified is based on different criteria - one's suitability, knowledge, and skills.

4 ( +10 / -6 )

"We will have policy disputes. There is no two ways about that. The question is, can we unify on the common core principles that make our party? ... I’m very encouraged that the answer to that question is yes.”

So in other words, either Trump is going to cave to the GOP or the leadership of the GOP is going to cave to Trump. Because there is no in-between.

Either a Trump is going to leave the tax rate for the wealthiest Americans at the current 30% level in order to avoid gutting the treasury and plunging the country into historic levels of public debt, or the GOP is going to back his stated plan to drop it to 25% . . . And gut the treasury.

Either Trump is going to adopt "traditional conservative principles" and go back on his contention that transgendered citizens have civil rights, or the GOP is going to go back on its contention that transgendered citizens don't deserve legal protections from bigotry and ignorance.

Either Trump is going to apologize to the 164 million females across America he continues to insult with his staunch refusal to apologize for a long series of comments that are misogyny defined, or the GOP is going to implicitly back Trump's contention that women are best seen and not heard.

Either Trump is going to walk back his promise to the 10.9 million voters he enticed with his, ahem, "straight talk," to block Muslims from entering the country or build a wall along the border between the US and Mexico or the GOP is going to say, "Yeah, for the sake of party unity and winning man the fall, we'll back ethnic and religious discrimination."

Aside from these major, social-fabric-changing cornerstones of Trump's vision of America, precisely what common core principles are left to unite around that are of any substance? None.

Which leaves us with compromise across the board, one way or another. And in all cases, it's the electorate that stands -- or lies down, I suppose -- to get screwed.

It's still absolutely astonishing that Trump supporters could still be so gullibly stupid as to buy into the horse manure promises he's peddled simply to trick them into propelling him to Cleveland. None of these promises are ever going to happen if he's elected president, just as Sanders’ promise to make college free and raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour is never going to happen. The midterms elections will make certain of that.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Trump is following GOP rules. It is obvious that many GOP elders are supporting him. For VP, I prefer Gingrich to Romney. But My guess is whoever Hillary choose, she will live again in WH.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

So it appears upper level Repubs are willing to make a deal with the devil...........will make for an interesting fall, hopefully not scary though

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Get used to hearing PRESIDENT TRUMP for the next 8 years! Hillary's graetest challenge is how to avoid prison...

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

Hillary's graetest challenge is how to avoid prison...

Yeah, they're definitely going to put her away with all the crimes they found in the 32 Benghazi investigations they've done.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

one's suitability, knowledge, and skills

According to whom? Each one of those assets is subject to debate. Different people see things differently.

The basic minimum requirements are the ultimate qualification. And the message is clear, anybody who meets those requirements, mounts a successful bid and achieves the goal of office can be the President of the United States.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Trump will do anything and say anything to win. He doesn't care about issues. He cares about winning. Now that he's got the nomination, he'll convince the Republican establishment he's one of them. He's already going after Republican donor money to fund his campaign. Oh, and Trump supporters, his self-funding the campaign was just another of his lies.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Either a Trump is going to leave the tax rate for the wealthiest Americans at the current 30% level in order to avoid gutting the treasury and plunging the country into historic levels of public debt, or the GOP is going to back his stated plan to drop it to 25% . . . And gut the treasury.

We are already for almost 8 years spending or should I say what the government is taking from us about 80 cents on every dollar. At the current debt rate of $19 Trillion that makes Obama THE absolute king of spending. We are spending more than we are taking in and the majority of that is on...of course, government entitlements primarily. We are printing money, too much, the treasury is already on life support.

Either Trump is going to adopt "traditional conservative principles" and go back on his contention that transgendered citizens have civil rights, or the GOP is going to go back on its contention that transgendered citizens don't deserve legal protections from bigotry and ignorance.

The sad thing about that statement is, liberals are really peddling this nonsense!

Either Trump is going to apologize to the 164 million females across America he continues to insult with his staunch refusal to apologize for a long series of comments that are misogyny defined, or the GOP is going to implicitly back Trump's contention that women are best seen and not heard.

This fictitious war on Women has got to stop. Do I think Trump needs to watch his mouth when it comes to women, absolutely, however, that doesn't mean he has to walk on egg shells in order to tow the liberal PC line.

Either Trump is going to walk back his promise to the 10.9 million voters he enticed with his, ahem, "straight talk," to block Muslims from entering the country or build a wall along the border between the US and Mexico or the GOP is going to say, "Yeah, for the sake of party unity and winning man the fall, we'll back ethnic and religious discrimination."

I think he should lock it down, double down on it and perhaps clarify his points that he has always been referring to radical Jihadists which we should scrutinize more, without a doubt and definitely work on building the wall, at least load the border with as many agents as possible or station the National Guard to help the border patrol, but now is not the time for Trump to run around and apologize for something that makes sense to most Americans. If the Left want to spin it as a race issue, then so be it, that's the only thing they can do, because everything else so far has failed.

Aside from these major, social-fabric-changing cornerstones of Trump's vision of America, precisely what common core principles are left to unite around that are of any substance? None.

Oh, please, both parties do this, but especially now that the left is seeing that there is a possibility that they can lose the WH, they will go through any lengths or measures to do what is necessary to keep the WH. Desperate, but NOT serious!

It's still absolutely astonishing that Trump supporters could still be so gullibly stupid as to buy into the horse manure promises he's peddled simply to trick them into propelling him to Cleveland. None of these promises are ever going to happen if he's elected president, just as Sanders’ promise to make college free and raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour is never going to happen. The midterms elections will make certain of that.

You have a point there, but if any liberal thinks that Clinton is going to keep ANY of her promises and as much as she has flipped flopped on many of them really shows that politicians will say and do whatever it takes to reach the top!

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Donald is coming. We are about to get the President the US deserves. Reality TV has already corrupted many aspects of social intercourse, now its corrosive influence is reaching into the public domain and the seats of power.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

The basic minimum requirements are the ultimate qualification.

This has to be the most asinine thing I've read in quite some time.

Meeting height, wieght, age, and vision requirements does not make one qualified to fly an F-16.

Meeting age, stamina, and physical size requirements does not make one qualified to play linebacker in the NFL.

Meeting minimum grade requirements to get into medical school does not make one qualified to do brain surgery.

And simply being born in the U.S. and wanting really badly to play at being the president sure as hell does not make one automatically qualified for the job.

"The ultimate qualification..." I feel dumber now just having to read such an inane proposition. For god's sake, no wonder the electorate can't get a decent candidate. Some of them can't even understand the difference between "requirement" and "qualification." Requirements and qualifications are not even remotely the same thing. Open up a dictionary, for crying out loud.

.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

"he ( Ryan ) may well end up endorsing the GOP candidate for president."

Ha ha ha ha ha

This is too funny, of course Ryan is going to endorse Trump, what other choice does he have, endorse Hillary, since the Democrats are going to screw up and nominate her? lol

Looks like pressure from Sarah Palin worked, lol

0 ( +2 / -2 )

GOP claims with Ryan Trump negotiation, it now have Full House to defeat Hillary. But Hillary already has four Aces. She does not need to negotiate with anyone.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Jail time for Hillary,,,,LOVE the Trump

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

@Douglas: Why don't you sue her? Haven't you ever heard words Bail and Bond ? She hasn't been sued yet. You can sue her in criminal court with evidences you have.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

"Sen. Lindsey Graham, who has called Trump a “nut job” and a “loser as a person,”

Graham is one of the three Republican senators who refuse to get with the program, lol

Break out the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter, because Hillary is toast! Er, I mean, don't worry about those polls showing Hillary virtually tied with Trump, assuming she's actually the nominee on election day, she's guaranteed to win the Electoral College vote, right?

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Is that a sieg heil that bewigged, orange old man is giving in the pic? Pretty appropriate.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Dem has two candidates. Did Sanders join Dem party now? Calf based Dem elected officials are in favor of Hillary. They are the one who will choose Hillary. Sanders will go complain at D Convention but he is not Dem member. He will be lucky he get inside...

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Trump is Lucy. Ryan is Charlie Brown. Lucy promises on her mother's grave, cross her heart and hope to die that she won't jerk the football away at the last second like she always does, leaving Charlie Brown flat on his keister again. Watch Charlie Brown trust Lucy. See Lucy jerk the ball away. Stupid Charlie Brown.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Yeah, they're definitely going to put her away with all the crimes they found in the 32 Benghazi investigations they've done.

Even Trump admitted the hearings had been a disaster for the Republicans.

There is still no doubt in my mind that U.S. air and ground personnel could have been on scene to help defend the CIA Annex if only Hillary Clinton had acted. She did not. Instead, with the help of her sycophantic inner circle they settled on the anti-Muslim movie trailer as the scapegoat cause for the attack and within the hour began communicating this lie. Why were the heavily redacted emails confirming this only released last Christmas and new witnesses still coming forward if the Secretary of State hadn't been caught red-handed in an obvious lie ? The fact that it was ignored almost entirely by leftwing media doesn't negate the fact that she is a despicable politician of the worst kind and she has American blood on her hands.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Trump is Lucy. Ryan is Charlie Brown.

. . . . .Obama is Franklin. Acts like Linus and smells like Pigpen.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

they can continue to work together to continue destroying the GOP.....

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Well, its not quite yet a day later, and all is quiet on the Ryan-Trump Front.

Yesterday, Ryan showed he is willing to allow Trump to be the standard bearer, BUT fell way short of endorsing Trump, though that seems an inevitability at this point. "The Speaker's carefully-crafted position is going to be that he and Trump certainly agree on some things, and that the Democrats sure are bad, aren't they? It's not an embrace of the billionaire, more like holding him at arm's length. A lot of pundits are using the term "détente," and that seems a pretty good way to characterize it."

-- The Votemaster

The right-wing noise machine is peddling party unity achieving and good tidings and all that. The usual suspects have flooded the right wing aggregate news sites, like Real Clear, fomenting HRC is worse than Trump, so lets all joint the Trump Wagon.

Sheldon Adlelson, a major Republican donor, has joined the merry men. The Koch brothers have not, and will not it seems.

In short, the party is going to pretend all is fine. Its not. As long as Trump has some kind of chance, brave faces will be kept. In the final month, if Trump is still getting clobbered, then the knives will come out.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

There is still no doubt in my mind that U.S. air and ground personnel could have been on scene to help defend the CIA Annex if only Hillary Clinton had acted.

Interesting how the 85 investigations they have done - a bunch of them bipartisan - didn't come to the same conclusion as you. Pretty impressive that you know more than the people who actually investigated it.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Meeting height, wieght, age, and vision requirements does not make one qualified to fly an F-16.

Meeting age, stamina, and physical size requirements does not make one qualified to play linebacker in the NFL.

Meeting minimum grade requirements to get into medical school does not make one qualified to do brain surgery.

The United States Air Force has specific and detailed requirements in place that must be met in order to pilot an F-16.

The National Football League has its own set of qualifying criteria to be met in order for someone to be considered for a linebacker position.

The medical profession has volumes of technical and ethical requirements that are necessary to meet in order to get a licence to do brain surgery.

The US Constitution has three requirements for running for President, natural born citizenship, proper age and residency. That's it. No where does it state or even imply what personal and/or professional qualities a prospective candidate must have in order to run. If a person meets the basic minimum requirements they are qualified to seek office and if they are qualified to serve as President will be determined by the subjective opinion of the American electorate.

I feel dumber now just having to read such an inane proposition.

Don't feel bad. Go spend some time with some Bernie followers and you'll see that "dumb" is the new smart.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

There is still no doubt in my mind that U.S. air and ground personnel could have been on scene to help defend the CIA Annex if only Hillary Clinton had acted.

Yeah, where did you come up with this? It's not about the ground crew member posting something on his Facebook, is it?

"A senior Pentagon official criticized the House Republican-led investigation into the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya, saying the panel has made a "crescendo" of costly, duplicative and unnecessary requests, including some based on claims made on Facebook or talk radio."

"Hedger complained in the three-page letter that the committee asked the Pentagon to track down four pilots who did not deploy to Benghazi on the night of the attacks, as well an unnamed mechanic at an air base in Europe who claimed on Facebook that planes could have been sent to Benghazi to respond."

The mechanic's claim is "easily dismissed" by statements from a number of high-level officials already interviewed by the Benghazi panel, Hedger said. Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other military officials have repeatedly told Congress there was not enough time to get planes from Europe to Libya to respond to the attacks, and the military lacked accurate intelligence about what was happening

"The panel also requested an interview with a person identified only as "John from Iowa," who told a talk radio show he operated a camera for a remotely piloted aircraft and saw a video feed related to Benghazi on the night of the attacks, Hedger said."

The request to interview the four pilots was later withdrawn. Hedger called the proposed interview with the mechanic unnecessary and said officials were unable to locate John from Iowa, despite expending "significant resources to locate anyone who might match the description."

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/04/30/senior-pentagon-official-criticizes-house-benghazi-probe.html

Your tax dollars at work.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

News of noon is Trump. Is short on money and will begin donation campaign and GOP want Trump help party financially. Trump will.reveal tax report after audited. He looks he is not much rich? Is that why he wants to increase rich people's tax?

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

News on the Trump-Ryan Front:

It is confirmed: Ryan has called news outlets to confirm that he has endorsed Trump. Ryan said he's realized the voters have spoken, that the Donald is a true conservative, that he looks forward to working with the Donald, and that they are now besties. When questioned about his problem with female voters, Ryan laughed off the worries, noting how the Donald has never had any trouble with the ladies, 'cause he is so manly and attractive.

Then it turned out it was actually Trump pretending to be Ryan. When called on it, Trump reportedly defended himself:

"That was like, two minutes ago. Let's not wonder about what may have or may not have happened back then. Lets move on the what's happening now."

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Yeah, where did you come up with this? It's not about the ground crew member posting something on his Facebook, is it?

No. And it isn't like the Obama Administration and State Dept hid the relevant communications for 3 or 4 years for no reason either....One of the new Benghazi emails released last December from then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash to State Department leadership immediately offering “forces that could move to Benghazi” during the terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. In an email sent to top Department of State officials, at 7:19 p.m. ET, only hours after the attack had begun, Bash says, “we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak.”This makes readily apparent that the military was prepared to launch immediate assistance that could have made a difference, at least at the CIA Annex.

As per usual, investigators only obtained this document after going to federal court.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Great, then you've uncovered something big. From the article I posted:

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other military officials have repeatedly told Congress there was not enough time to get planes from Europe to Libya to respond to the attacks,

That's a pretty big conspiracy, is it not? Looks like it goes all the way up to Panetta.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I believe that during the same testimony Panetta made it clear that he had immediately ordered the DOD to respond and notified Clinton that military assets were "spinning" or putting everything together so they that they would be ready to move when the order comes. The order never came. And with the CIA Annex under fire 6 hours after the diplomatic compound excuses like no kind of advance warning or a problem of distance and time simply don't hold water. The Islamic radicals did not call us with a schedule of how long they intended to press the attack nor how they planned to carry out the attack. Even though the U.S. Government knew early on that Ambassador Stevens was missing, no contingency plan for finding him or rescuing him was put in place. The bottom line is that Hillary wanted to handle it all by herself, but not with the intent of sending help. Her only interest was managing the political fallout.re

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I believe that during the same testimony...

You can believe what you want, but the fact is that the people who actually investigated Hillary and Benghazi found no wrongdoing. And remember, they are the ones who had access to all the facts and interviewed all the relevant people. Have you?

0 ( +3 / -3 )

The bottom line is that Hillary wanted to handle it all by herself, but not with the intent of sending help. Her only interest was managing the political fallout.

Lizz, I don't know how to put this other than to say, the investigation is over and a Republican-initiated, Republican-led, Republican-concluded U.S. House of Representatives investigation of the Benghazi attack found no wrongdoing on the part of the Obama administration, the CIA, or the State Department in their handling of the attack. Zero. Nothing. Zilch.

Read for yourself if you don't believe me:

http://intelligence.house.gov/investigative-report-terrorist-attacks-us-facilities-benghazi-libya-september-11-12-2012

What you are essentially arguing is that you somehow have better access to the facts, are a better judge of the facts, and more trustworthy than the very GOP establishment you insist needs to use Benghazi to bring about Clinton's political demise.

More to the point, you're calling the investigators incompetent, stupid, corrupt, or a combination of all three.

Who is more believable in this little disagreement? The investigative committee? Or you?

My money's on the GOP in this case.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

What you are essentially arguing is that you somehow have better access to the facts,

I am actually given that Benghazi related documents are still literally being forcibly released by the State Dept, the latest on April 15, 2016. The courts are as frustrated at this stonewalling and cover-up of the facts as we all should be.

http://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-journal-hillarys-spin-on-benghazi/EB06B6AD-5C19-488F-8FE5-1333AE04534F.html

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

@Lizz - There is a big difference between an opinion and facts. The poster that you took issue with cited facts--a real report from the Republican-led committee on the Benghazi farce. You cited an opinion piece that did not refute the official report.

It's time to let this one go already.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

It's time to let this one go already.

Hah! If 122 Benghazi investigations hasn't convinced the right to give it up yet, nothing will.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The poster that you took issue with cited facts--a real report from the Republican-led committee on the Benghazi farce.

Make your own interpretation, use your own brain, but the facts that no one is disputing: while discussing the uncovered email showing Hillary Clinton had told the Egyptian prime minister that “we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film,” prior to telling the families to their face days later it was a YouTube video that caused the terror attack, Clinton said she did not lie to them but instead was caught up in “the fog of war.” (operating out of her own house).

Ignores 500 Emails from Ambassador Stevens requesting Security. Is informed of Benghazi Attack. Calls Chelsea and says "Hi Honey, it was a Terrorist Attack." Puts on Pantsuit. Stands on Ambassador's coffin and Blames a Youtube Video. Tells Congress "What Difference, at this point, does it make?" Cackles.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Make your own interpretation, use your own brain, but the facts that no one is disputing:

I suggest that you take your own advice.

The facts from the reports from the Republican-led committee cite no wrongdoing whatsoever. If you have an issue with that, then why not take it up with the Republican committee?

BTW--Youtube is hardly a credible source. Ditto for Fox News and other right-wing conspiracy theory sites.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites