world

Trump slams former White House chief of staff Kelly for defending key impeachment witness

22 Comments
By AAMER MADHANI

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.


22 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

lashed out against former White House chief of staff John Kelly for being disloyal 

Do never play with a stable genius’ ego.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Actually he didn’t, he leaked it to the so called whistleblower instead.

He went and told his boss what he just heard.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

@balcklabeActually he didn’t, he leaked it to the so called whistleblower instead.

Have you through sources at the Internet Research Agency uncovered yet another plot?

2 ( +2 / -0 )

We need more men like Vindman and fewer like Trump. Purple Heart vs loser scammer.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Gen John Kelly, career Marine, Gold Star family member, man of honor...is criticized by a draft-dodging coward, a wimp, and a pervert...

Don't sweat in General - your career and your service speak for themselves...

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Oh thats not what you were saying about him when he was actually Chief of Staff though. forgot already all the horrible things liberals said about this man?

Gen John Kelly, career Marine, Gold Star family member, man of honor

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Trump is playing the left like a fiddle. LOL

Just look at the above statements for proof.

”gold star family member”?

Only politicians and MIC globalists use this phrase. Everyone else is not afraid to say the truth, that a family member has died in combat.

invalid CSRF

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

Let me refresh your memory, I believe the terms were lying racist?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/20/frederica-wilson-strikes-back-john-kelly-lying-rac/

John Kelly Confirms He Was Lying All Along: The White House Is in Chaos

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/kelly-exit-interview-773739/

He is just trying to get a book deal like everyone else now. He is jealous of that sweet, sweet money Bolton is gonna get. You guys love him again, when its convenient. Just like Bolton and all the others.

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Uh, bass, all he did was point out what we already knew which was that Vindman told his superior as he was trained to do and testified to the House because he was served with a subpoena. I don't see how bringing up his despicable behavior in another case, something you cheered at the time, is relevant in any way except point out that you cheer despicable behavior. Doesn't make Vindman any less right for what he did.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

You conveniently left out that vindman also told someone else. Who he and Schiff both know who it is but the American people do not

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Gen John Kelly, career Marine, Gold Star family member, man of honor

Oh thats not what you were saying about him when he was actually Chief of Staff though. forgot already all the horrible things liberals said about this man?

And what were Trump and Trumpers saying about him when he was hired; "only the best", "a military hero", "strong leader"... So what happened to those?

He is just trying to get a book deal like everyone else now. He is jealous of that sweet, sweet money Bolton is gonna get. You guys love him again, when its convenient. Just like Bolton and all the others.

And if on cue - he goes from hero to shady money grubber...thanks for the example.

Only politicians and MIC globalists use this phrase. Everyone else is not afraid to say the truth, that a family member has died in combat.

Why don't you go take your I hate the US military shtick somewhere else - these are families that gave the ultimate sacrifice of a family member in service to their country. The definition from the US Army is below;

https://www.army.mil/goldstar/

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Scolded by Barr and now Kelly. Trump having a bad hair day.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

You conveniently left out that vindman also told someone else. Who he and Schiff both know who it is but the American people do not

Then how do you know he told someone else?

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Because he testified that he told someone else. Then Schiff jumped in and ordered him not to answer to protect the whistleblower.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

You conveniently left out that vindman also told someone else.

Prove it.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

The other day it was Lt. Col. Vindman, a decorated war hero. Today Trump's attacking former USMC General John Kelly. And yet the Always Trumpers prefer to put their blind trust and obedience in Trump. It's hard to imagine what a conversation between 3 or more Always Trumpers must sound like.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

prove what? Vindman said he discussed the call with two people, George Kent and someone else in the intelligence community. When asked the name of the other person, schiff jumped in.

Mr. Schiff said: "We need to protect the whistleblower. ... If the witness has a good faith belief that this may reveal the identity of the whistleblower, that is not the purpose that we are here for and I want to advise the witness accordingly."

who authorized Vindman to leak outside his chain of command?

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/four-witnesses-testify-impeachment-tuesday/card/1574180697

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Vindman said he told two people, both of whom had clearance and a need to know. You have zero evidence one of them was the whistleblower. If I'm wrong, tell me why he isn't either under investigation or indictment right this second.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

He isnt under investigation or indictment because Schiff saved him from having to answer the question he was asked. 

That makes absolutely no sense. The GOP-controlled Senate can investigate whatever they want.

And Schiff objected not to the question but after a series of questions that became an obvious attempt to out the whistleblower, and he called them on it. Vindman also testified that he did not know the identity of the whistleblower.

His chain of command is ONE person, he told TWO.

He told TWO people who had clearance and a need to know basis. That's why you have nothing.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

That makes absolutely no sense.

You’re really expecting people that have huge issues with accuracy to make sense?

> The GOP-controlled Senate can investigate whatever they want.

Yes, it can. How will Black try to spin this one?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Yes, it can. How will Black try to spin this one?

He's waiting to get the Kremlin's version.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Trump should let Kelly ramble on, the man is a loser.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites