world

U.S. Pacific Fleet chief joins surveillance of South China Sea

15 Comments
By JIM GOMEZ

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.

15 Comments
Login to comment

What happens if Chinese warships, nuclear submarines, etc, join surveillance of the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, etc, near US coasts ?

The US won't care.

This just happened off the coasts of Alaska and California, but people didn't even hear about it since it's no big deal from the side of the US:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3152026/US-fighter-jets-scrambled-intercept-Russian-bombers-Alaska-California-Independence-Day.html

As long as it's done over international waters and airspace, the U.S. will keep an eye alongside but won't whine about it. They know it's allowed over international waters and airspace.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

God Bless the United States of America!

3 ( +3 / -0 )

What happens if Chinese warships, nuclear submarines, etc, join surveillance of the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, etc, near US coasts ?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Because these planes were so effective in finding MH370, they are a sure bet to protect any nation from enemy submarines.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

I can imagine the response. China's nuclear ballistic and attack submarines, destroyers and others patroling a thousand miles or less from US coasts especially in South America, putting all points in US within range of China's nuclear missiles (SLBM), land-attack cruise missiles (LACM), and so on. What a great contribution to world peace by both sides !

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Freedom of navigation is paramount for the economic well-being of all parties concerned. The Government of China must except this overriding principal.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Good. It's time China learned it can't just take or make new territory.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Ting ZhaoJul. 20, 2015 - 11:14AM JST No sure if Scott Swift inspected the other islands occupied by Vietnam and Philippines.

No need. Unlike China, neither Vietnam nor the Philippines are claiming the entire South China Sea.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

No sure if Scott Swift inspected the other islands occupied by Vietnam and Philippines.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

I hope the mission went out with fighter CAP since it was a high asset value aircraft. Fighters probably couldn't be "seen"...

0 ( +1 / -1 )

The Chinese Embassy in Manila had no immediate reaction to the Pacific Fleet commander taking part in the surveillance flight.

Then you don't own it.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

The PLAN's declared goal is to replace the USN as the dominant strategic power in East Asia. The problem with that is that nobody else in Asia likes that idea. And by extension, nobody else on this planet.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

South China Sea is international airspace regardless of what the Chinese government says.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

This is a well-reasoned and proportionate response to China's provocations: Public and high profile, without being militarily provocative.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

The U.S., Swift stressed, doesn’t take sides in the territorial rifts

...just high profile escalations

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites