UK top court rejects Scottish independence vote plans

Scotland needs a Braveheart. Scottish hate English (stereotype but quite accurate), and they are sick of being ordered around by Oxford/Eto toffs. The Britexit was the final nail.

Scottish do not hate English. Not accurate. Scottish have their own Parliament and are not ordered around by Oxford/Eto toffs.

Rodney

Today 12:36 pm JST

Scotland needs a Braveheart.

Hrm. You do know how well William Wallace got on in his fight against English oppression, don't you.

If it's going to be equitable the citizens of the other constituent nations should also have a say on whether Scotland leaves or stays, because there will be repercussions for all of them.

I don't follow your thinking. Sure, there will be consequences - I'm not sure whether they will class as repercussions. But does everyone at your work get a say in whether you can quit or not? And should all EU countries have had a say on whether the UK left?

@Rodney: Scotland willingly entered the union with England in 1707 and prospered mightily from it until the 1970s. There was no part of the British Empire without its Scots merchants, bankers, engineers, lawyers and administrators. Thomas Glover comes to mind in Japan. He came over from Shanghai where he was working for Jardine Matheson and played a major role in the Meiji Restoration. The British Empire was a joint venture and the Scottish staggering success would not have been possible outside the union with England. Likewise, England could not have profited as much without the input and dynamism of Scotland. It's a bit rich for some (a minority of) Scots to claim that they were unwilling partners and even colonised! In fact, it's a lie, pure and simple.

albaleo, you had one, if memory serves, 8 short years ago. We had to wait 41 years between referendums on EEC/EU membership, and we've never had a referendum in England on whether we want out of the union with Scotland.

We had to wait 41 years between referendums on EEC/EU membership

Is that not because the people didn't vote for a party that wanted such a referendum in that period? 8 short years ago we were promised all sorts if we remained in the UK, including being sure of remaining in the EU.

The Supreme Court's Scottish president, Robert Reed, said the power to call a referendum was "reserved" to the UK parliament under Scotland's devolution settlement.

Therefore "the Scottish parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence", Reed said.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, is one of the UK most astute politicians.

Baffling, Sturgeon went ahead with such a costly manoeuvre when reviewed the SNP were so unanimously rejected.

???

patience is a virtue.

Scotland's place is within the UK, who else is there to Challenge the English and put them back on track ?

Scottish have their own Parliament and are not ordered around by Oxford/Eto toffs.

But a bunch of Tory toffs won't allow us to hold an independence referendum. Not exactly an equitable "union". Perhaps the UK should change its name to the English Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

albaleo

Today 04:08 pm JST

But a bunch of Tory toffs won't allow us to hold an independence referendum.

Neither would a Labour government.

Not exactly an equitable "union.

If it's going to be equitable the citizens of the other constituent nations should also have a say on whether Scotland leaves or stays, because there will be repercussions for all of them.

albaleoToday  12:18 am JST

"If it's going to be equitable the citizens of the other constituent nations should also have a say on whether Scotland leaves or stays, because there will be repercussions for all of them."

I don't follow your thinking. Sure, there will be consequences - I'm not sure whether they will class as repercussions.

I don't see much difference in the meaning of those words.

But does everyone at your work get a say in whether you can quit or not?

That's a false equivalency. If you quit a job they get someone else to take your place.

And should all EU countries have had a say on whether the UK left?

It's not really the same kind of situation. They're all still considered to be separate sovereign nations and there are EU rules in place for when and if one country chooses to leave, Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. By setting those rules they have had a say already.

TokyoOldMan

Today 05:53 am JST

Scotland's place is within the UK, who else is there to Challenge the English and put them back on track ?

Then Scotland needs to stop voting SNP in general elections, especially if Scots don't like being ruled over by old Etonian -Oxbridge Tory toffs. It only increases the Tories' chances of staying in government or Labour only being able to form a minority government. All well and good if Labour and the Lib Dems can work something out, but if they need support from the SNP the price will be another independence referendum. Personally I don't think the SNP have done a good enough job of running Scotland to deserve that.

Scotland needs a Braveheart. Scottish hate English (stereotype but quite accurate), and they are sick of being ordered around by Oxford/Eto toffs. The Britexit was the final nail.