The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2019.U.S. officials seek to tone down Trump rhetoric on Iran
By Patricia Zengerle WASHINGTON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
43 Comments
Login to comment
SuperLib
How long until Bolton is fired?
nostromo
He wont be. Bolton wants his war and he will do all he can to get it
CrazyJoe
There is no possibility of having an easily winnable war against Iran. Look at the Iraq War and Afghanistan War for examples of a similar quagmire that would result from a shooting war against Iran.
nostromo
That is what common logic would dictate yet Bolton isn't interested in that. As he has stated "my field is policy, not war" so he has no interest in the abstractions of was or its results. He does policy and his policy requires a war with Iran. This is the mentality the world is dealing with
lincolnman
Or, the few adults left in the administration try to get the Great Orange Fifth Grader to keep his mouth shut, as he doesn't have the faintest idea what he's talking about...
As one of the adults who left already has said, "he's a danger to the republic"...
CrazyJoe
One of the most bizarre things about this Boltonesque tragedy in the making is that underlying all the US threats is a notion that Iran has no legitimate interests in the region in which it is located. Yet Iran is a big country in a very dangerous part of the world. Seven countries border Iran, and three of them are very unstable. Several ongoing military conflicts are nearby. Counting the Americans, nuclear forces face them on all four sides. Saudi radicalized Sunnis attack Shia in every adjacent and nearby country.
And from two continents away Bolton pontificates about how the Iranians should not do what no other country on earth does: look out for itself in its region.
bass4funk
Love Bolton, always respected the man, but I fail to see what’s the problem, rockets aren’t flying, No one was killed and you would think thousands were killed this week by the sheer lunatic behavior from all the liberals. If the president doesn’t do anything then liberals will say, how can he just sit there and do nothing, how can he just sit there and give no response, and when he does take action and threatens them verbally, then they complain he’s a warmonger, he’s going to get us all killed, so what do you liberals want? I don’t even think they know what they want. ROFL!
NorwegianboyEE
Why does the US have so much against Iran while selling weapons and sucking up to Saudi Arabia, one of the most vile countries in the world? SA is a dictatorship, spreader of Wahabism, military aggressor, one of the worst violators of human rights in the world. Yet hawks in Washington push for war against a peaceful democratic country that has breached no contract, followed the rules. while ignoring all the bad SA does to gain access to that sweet sweet oil trade.
lincolnman
What liberals (and Americans) want? They want the person who made this statement in 2018 to remember it and not do another flip-flop...
"Was it the Civil War? Nah. The failure to stop Sept. 11? Nope. How about Pearl Harbor? Not even close."
“The worst single mistake ever made in the history of our country: going into the Middle East, by President Bush,”
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/407398-trump-slams-bush-for-worst-single-mistake-in-us-history
Chip Star
Why would anyone love or respect the main architect of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
bass4funk
Some might agree, some might disagree, but one thing is for sure, No one misses the butcher of Baghdad.
lincolnman
That's a direct quote from your President - why is he now flip-flopping and following the architect of the Iraq war John Bolton into another one with Iran?
bass4funk
Ok, that’s his opinion, unlike liberals, we are independent of thought. I was happy that Saddam was dealt with.
Nothing happened and we don’t know what Bolton, Trump, Pompeo or the Pentagon knows about Iranian threats that they feel needs a strong military visual response.
lincolnman
Got it - you disagree with Trump and think he's wrong - looks like some sun is starting to shine through...
Flip-flop. Explain why he is re-creating what he called the single biggest mistake in our history?
bass4funk
I agreed with Bush and I agree with Trump.
Thank you.
He didn’t no bombs were fallen and don’t get all worked up, it’s not healthy.
bass4funk
Yes.
Yes
lincolnman
Even though one started the Iraq War and the other said it was the single biggest mistake in our history - don't think agreeing with both is an option...
The Iraq war was not healthy for over 4000 of our troops who I faithfully served with...committing military force is not something to take lightly or joke about.
bass4funk
Of course I have empathy for the people we lost. But that was the job they signed up for and for better or worse the commander in chief felt justified in his decision.
An adult making a decision is different than an innocent and helpless child that can’t make its own decision at 9 months.
bass4funk
That’s your opinion.
I agree.
SuperLib
Bolton just seems to ratchet up the pressure without any real end goal or exit strategy in mind. It's just tension for tension's sake. He can't invade Iran or North Korea, he can't just hand them papers dictating terms, so he just seems to harass everyone and....that's it.
I don't think Trump will continue to see much use for him, especially if he keeps backing Trump into a corner and limiting his options.
bass4funk
Good! They should be kept under intense pressure, keep them in line and on edge, not knowing what and how they would be demolished if they tried something funny.
Bolton or Pompeo or more importantly the Pentagon never made an accusation like that remotely close.
Yes, he can.
We shall see.
rlperez@hotmail.com.au
Easy solution; Trump is mentally unstable and a security threat to the American people and the globe and Congress needs to remove him from office and the American people need to pressure Congress to ensure their survival.
lincolnman
Trump is a criminal, Trump isn't a criminal - I guess you agree with both...
bass4funk
We are all guilty of one thing or another.
I think it’s terrible, but I don’t know these people, so my empathy is limited.
lincolnman
Trump has Russian investments, Trump doesn't have Russian investments - I guess that's another one you believe too...
SuperLib
Tough talk appeals to the Trump base (unless Putin is involved), but there have to be accomplishments tied to it. Results. That's what Bolton is lacking.
They don't have to. Everyone knows Trump can't invade Iran or North Korea. That's why everyone is wondering what Bolton is up to. He has no endgame.
My guess is that Bolton will be replaced. And when that happens you will change your tune and say it's great Trump fired him so your opinion will match Trump's.
bass4funk
I don’t unlike the obsessed liberals, I won’t speculate on what the man has or doesn’t have and I don’t care, but if you really care, then look around D.C. and look at all the building going all around, there is No way anyone could convince me foreign money isn’t flowing through the Nations Capitol. A lot and I mean a lot of politicians have money from various countries throughout the Capitol. Gee, what a shocker!
Really? Hmmmm....I disagree.
Well, if that’s the case, don’t worry, if Trump doesn’t give the order, then Bolton can’t do anything, relax and have a Stout.
Not really, I’ve always been a fan of Bolton, I doubt he’ll be fired, but you never know.
SuperLib
Which makes all of Bolton’s rhetoric empty. No results on Iran, none on North Korea. I’m happy that harsh words are enough to satisfy you personally but others want to see results.
Bolton is a relic who still believes the US can operate under the threat of force, but we can’t here and everyone knows it. He’s just raising the tensions and accomplishing nothing except for raised tensions, and the word on the street is that Trump is starting to realize he doesn’t have many options anymore and is trying to clamp down on Bolton.
bass4funk
The distorts Iran deal is for the most part dead and Kim couldn’t get any sanction relief, that’s something right there.
Like the no collusion deal? You should be satisfied then. I prefer more rhetoric and less war, but optics wise to show a force of intimidation, most definitely.
Which it can, relics are good, we need more of them.
Which is something in itself and is exactly the point.
Stop reading and watching all the liberal networks. Trump didn’t do anything yet.
SuperLib
The Iran deal was working and successfully took Iranian nukes off the table. Trump killed the deal, releasing Iran from their obligations.
Iran is now going to wait Trump out and wait for the next President and put the deal back together again. Some are saying this increase in pressure is Trump’s last hope at getting anything out of Iran. If he leaves the White House without a new deal then all he did was destroy a working deal and replaced it with nothing.
Bolton hasn’t gotten Trump any closer to getting any concessions out of Iran, he did the opposite by freeing them from the obligations of the nuke deal.
Wolfpack
And you believed the Ayatollahs? The same Ayatollahs that supplied terrorists with bomb materials that have killed an estimated 500 US servicemen in Iraq? Boy - you are as gullible as the Messiah Obama himself.
bass4funk
Not for the Israelis and the Saudis, which they would know about and I trust them over any political or business investor hack.
As if they would have abided by them, you bought that line.
Well, the Israelis and the Saudis will have the ultimate last say, Trump or No Trump.
There was nothing to begin with. Can’t have something when there was nothing.
With the armada that’s building, Iran may be stupid, but they’re not suicidal....or are they?
SuperLib
Trust? OK. That's great. But the countries who signed the agreement all agree that Iran is in compliance, unless you think Russia, China, and Europe would all agree to lie about it, which wouldn't make any sense.
Israel and SA will accept nothing less than regime change so to them any deal that doesn't include that isn't a good deal. And while you might want US foreign policy to exist for the benefit of those two countries at our own expense, I disagree.
This doesn't make any sense. There was a nuclear deal put in place, and Iran was complying. Trump came in and cancelled the deal without a replacement ready. It's been 2.5 years and he has made zero progress on a new deal. Essentially, his only action was to release Iran from their obligations. Tough talk and moving ships isn't getting us any closer to a better deal, which is the result we are expecting of Trump.
You're free to start another thread for whatever it is you're saying here, but there's really no need to paste in what I said since your response doesn't align with it in any way.
SuperLib
Trump could have kept the deal in place and used it as leverage if he wanted to extract more concessions out of Iran. The threat would have been to pull out of the deal.
But instead Trump just wasted that and now we're back at square 1 with Trump going at it alone and a wedge between us and our allies. And he's giving the hardliners in Iran more credibility by the day as they tell their people how Trump reversed the US agreement and can't be trusted with a new one.
It's just all so screwed up. Why destroy something that was working when you didn't already have an alternative? Have Tweets and troop movements brought Iran to the table ready to agree to new concessions? What's the result of all of this?
bass4funk
Yeah, we’ve heard that before and then this...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/10/france.iraq
I agree and don’t blame them if I were in their shoes and lived in either of thousands countries.
I think it makes perfect sense
The whole neighborhood will race to go nuclear. This deal most likely will accelerate nuclear proliferation. Because if regional powers feel threatened by the possibility of Iran getting a weapon and the penalty for producing nuclear weapons decreases, then why wouldn’t they?
**Tehran gets to keep its vast nuclear infrastructure and its missile program.** And the promises from Iran only confirm the obvious: that the regime definitely has nuclear-weapons ambitions. After all, why have a massive ballistic-missile program and secret military nuclear facilities if the plan isn’t to build nuclear weapons?
Sanctions relief will make the region far less safe. The sanctions relief and the renewed ability to sell more oil on the open market could wind up bringing $300-400 billion into the Iranian economy, bolstering the Iranian government. Essentially, this means the deal will pay for undermining U.S. policy and interests throughout the region.
The deal is temporary, by design. Even the White House doesn’t claim it will permanently keep Iran from getting a bomb. So, what’s the point?
https://www.myheritage.org/news/4-reasons-why-the-iran-deal-may-be-the-worst-diplomatic-decision-in-history/
I understand. I feel the opposite.
bass4funk
I think him tearing up that disastrous deal was the best for everyone, including Israel, SA and ultimately the US.
As if our allies have our best interest at heart, come on...lol
They have been saying to you is can’t be trusted since 1979, nothing new.
It actually wasn’t working and since Israel and the Saudis live in that region, they have the absolute to demand safety and security. They don’t trust Iran and they should make the call.
lincolnman
John Bolton, or "Dick Cheney Jr" leads Donnie by the nose just like Cheney led Bush and America becomes involved in another major middle east war...
And to top it off, Donne once described the Iraq war as the biggest mistake in our history - and he repeats the mistake again....
Republicans - they can't contain themselves when it comes to war in the middle east...
And how will they explain this one to all the grieving mothers, wives, husbands and children?
SuperLib
Great. Now Iran has no restrictions on what they can do since there is no alternative in place. I don't know why you support that, but I can't stop you from supporting it.
You want Israel and SA to dictate terms to the US, Europe, China, and Russia? Yeah. Pass. You've failed to explain why these countries should go against their own best interests all for the benefit of Israel and SA. If you want US troops to die in Iran for the benefit of Israel then I nominate you to lead the charge.